Spa Weekend (2026): A Fierce Contender for the Worst Film of 2026 *SPOILERS*

“Spa Weekend” is directed by Jon Lucas and Scott Moore (Bad Moms, 21 & Over) and stars Leslie Mann (Blockers, Welcome to Marwen), Isla Fisher (Keeping Up with the Joneses, Now You See Me), Michelle Buteau (Babes, Clerks III), Anna Faris (Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, Mom), and Adam Demos (Sex/Life, UnREAL). This film is about four women who reconnect for, you guessed it, a spa weekend.

While there is no Oscar for “most accurate movie title,” this one would certainly win it should it ever become a thing.

Also, in case the title of the post is not clear, this review contains spoilers. The movie has been out for a number of weeks as of this publication, so chances are that some of you reading this early have already seen it. Regardless, this is still a new release, and if you were looking forward to watching “Spa Weekend,” maybe wait to read this review until after you have seen the movie.

…Or don’t wait. If anything, this review should serve as a warning as to why you should skip this film altogether.

I want to share a true story that happened during my screening of “Spa Weekend.” I was in a tiny auditorium watching the movie. How tiny? It holds 28 people. You would think this was a private cinema in someone’s home. I went with three other people, and since my ticket was purchased last minute, I sat in the row behind them, where I stayed until the film’s conclusion. As the film was ending, I came down to the row where the other three people were sitting, and tripped down the stairs while falling into their row. Thankfully, I am okay. I had a minor sensation in my ankle, but it was not twisted or broken. Had it been twisted or broken, I would still debate whether that experience was worse than having to sit through “Spa Weekend” from start to finish.

I did not realize going into “Spa Weekend” that I have had quite a bit of experience with Jon Lucas and Scott Moore as creatives. These two are responsible for several comedies containing some of the hottest stars including “Bad Moms,” “Jexi,” “The Change-Up,” and “The Hangover.” Lucas and Moore directed the first two of these four movies in addition to writing them. The duo happened to write the last two movies as well, but they were directed by different people. To me, their resume, overall, is fairly mixed. While they have done more than these four, these are the projects of theirs that I have seen.

Well, unless you count part of “Four Christmases,” which is, by all accounts, a holiday movie that exists.

The only one of this duo’s films that I can genuinely say is worth watching is “The Hangover.” It is one of my favorite comedies ever. “Bad Moms” and “The Change-Up” are mixed at best, and “Jexi” nearly crosses the “so bad it is good” territory, but it is not quite on that level. It is just bad. Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to congratulate these two for making a movie that makes “Jexi” look like “There’s Something About Mary.”

As mentioned, “Spa Weekend” is from the minds behind “Bad Moms,” and I am almost convinced that “Spa Weekend” is secretly part of the “Bad Moms” cinematic universe. I did not stay for the entire credits, but I would not be surprised if this movie ended with a title card that reads “Mila Kunis will return in ‘Spa Weekend: Doomsday.'”

At times “Spa Weekend” has a script that feels like it was meant to be a “Bad Moms” movie that did not quite end up working out, so they changed some of the names, cast members, and situations in which the characters find themselves. Granted, that does seem unfair as not all of the main characters are moms. See? It’s not “Bad Moms!” It’s “Bad Moms and Friends!”

You have Jane (Mann), a single mom who struggles to balance work and taking care of the kids. As a result, she does not have any time for herself or reliable resources to babysit. There is the workaholic, Sophie (Faris). She does not have any children, but she has a boss that sometimes acts like a child. Then you have another single mom, Coco (Butaeu), who in addition to dealing with her separation, comes off as a pessimist to other people around her. Her ex is, calmly, recommending she should see a therapist, and she is not bagging what he is raking. All three of these women are fed up and decide to go on a spa weekend to celebrate Jane’s birthday. It is at this point that they all agree not to invite Mel (Fisher), a wealthy, overexaggerated nutcase who also happens to be the friend of the group that the other three talk about behind their back.

And if you think that after the three souls plan this extravagant weekend that Mel is not going to show up, then look up in the sky! See that red cloud? The one shaped like an X? That’s for you!

Mel is a lot of things. A handful. A loudmouth. An ignoramus. But a fleshed out character is not one of them, as is the case with several others in the film. I will say, the film gets one thing right, and that is playing up the fact that Mel is definitely the annoying friend. And I know that because watching Fisher commit to unleashing the most over the top performance imaginable was like hearing nails on a chalkboard infused with rainbow dust. Fisher does not give the only overexaggerated performance in this film, but compared to everyone else, she is a cartoon.

It is actually kind of interesting watching Fisher play this annoying fourth wheel because that is what she is to the other women. I say this because when I think of the year’s most immersive films, I will inevitably think of something like “Project Hail Mary” or “The Odyssey,” but “Spa Weekend” turned out to pack in more immersion than I originally anticipated. I truly felt like I was at a hotel with some horny, loud chick whose mouth I would have liked to have duct taped just so I could relax. Just in the way that Mel ruined the spa weekend for the other three women, she also ruined the hour and a half I had to spend watching her on the big screen.

I am not going into “Spa Weekend” expecting to be changed as a person, but at least give me something that is funny. This movie could not even give me that. In fact, the funniest part of the film for me is one character who I would have liked to see more of, and that is Jane’s brother, who very much gives off “funcle” vibes. He is showing the kids “Pulp Fiction” and refuses to clean up dog poop that’s left inside the house. He does not give two squirts of urine about his laziness. In fact, he seems to embrace it. He only had a couple lines early on in the film, but they made me cackle. I would like to see a movie about this genius and shove the spa weekenders aside for a little bit. But only after about a minute of getting to see this “funcle,” the movie showcases about 80 to 90 minutes of gags that have most certainly been done before, and absolutely positively done ten times better.

The movie tries its best to fulfill the arcs of each of the characters, and in some ways, it is not awful. While I was not entertained with the journeys that this film takes its single moms, Jane and Coco, I do think their stories wind up being wrapped in a competent bow of sorts. As for the two women without children, I wish I had kinder things to say.

Sophie spends a portion of the film dealing with her less than stellar boss. He complains if even the tiniest thing does not go his way. Some of his complaints have to do with “second homes,” as well. As a premise, this sounds like a case where I can root for Sophie. At the beginning, that was the case. This boss was a spoiled brat.

But… As this arc progresses, we see Sophie do something that, quite frankly, is just as, if not twice as despicable, as some of the things her boss did to her.

I hate doing this in reviews, but I have to spoil something that happens in the movie. This may affect your experience should you watch this film down the line. You’ve been warned.

About two-thirds or so into the runtime, Sophie, who is now fired from her job, gets a call from her boss. He is calling because he forgot his password to get into his alternate home. Okay, sounds snobby, but still. Sophie takes this information, and declines to provide assistance all the while calling him a prick. Okay, she does not work for this person anymore. She is not being paid. She is not on the clock. Fine. That is technically true. But what is ALSO true, is that her boss was being attacked by dogs. As far as I am aware, these were not his dogs. It is not clear if they are someone’s pets, police dogs, or if they live in the wild. Nevertheless, he is being attacked by dogs. I do not care how much you hate your boss, or former boss for that matter. If they are in a situation where they are being attacked, my first instinct is not to tell them to screw off. For all I know, this boss could have died, and Sophie played a role in his murder! She is evil! As far as this film is concerned, Sophie is secretly the villain. She is a monster!

Some of you reading this have probably seen this movie. Then again, judging by the fact that this movie was outgrossed domestically on its opening weekend by a rerelease of “The Fast and the Furious,” a 25-year old film, I am not so sure. But for those who have seen this movie, you might say that I should stop taking this film so seriously and turn off my brain. Let me make something clear. I can enjoy dumb fun as long as that is exactly what it is. Dumb fun. This movie was just dumb. And it made me feel dumber for having watched it. Many of the characters, main and supporting, act like complete buffoons. On top of that, some of the main characters who the movie tells me I am supposed to like, I cannot even tolerate because they wind up doing questionable things. Every other so-called attempt at comedy in this film had me rolling my eyes, shaking my arms in question, or staring in dead silence. I thought “The Breadwinner” might have been the worst comedy of the year. But it has some competition.

In the end, “Spa Weekend” is an absolute travesty of a film that is about as lazy as a suburban dad on a Sunday in the fall. I had low expectations for “Spa Weekend,” and in some ways, they were met. I want to like every movie I go into. I was hoping “Spa Weekend” could have been the pleasant surprise of the year. But it wound up being the definition of an insufferable waste of time. Jon Lucas and Scott Moore are by no means untalented. Again, I love “The Hangover” and think it is a masterful film. But when it comes to making movies, not only do I think their batting average is not the best, but this film tanks it. “Spa Weekend” might be my least favorite film from them. I am having a tough time coming up with something I genuinely enjoyed in “Spa Weekend,” other than the “funcle” who shows up for a minute. It is not enough. I am going to give “Spa Weekend” a 1/10.

“Spa Weekend” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! If you have not done so already, be sure to check out the latest episode of Scene Before’s Movie Requests, it is an original series where I ask celebrities what movies they think I should watch, and I report my thoughts on those movies! The latest episode features actress Melissa Barrera, who requested I should watch “Roma.” To find out my thoughts, click the video above! If you enjoy the video, leave a like, subscribe to my YouTube channel, and hit the notification bell that way future videos will come into your feed as fast as possible!

My next review is going to be for “Coyote vs. Acme.” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Idiots” and “Don’t Move.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Spa Weekend?” What did you think about it? Or, what is the worst movie you have seen so far this year? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Why Is A Bad Moms Christmas Happening?

mv5bmtuwnta4mdmxnl5bml5banbnxkftztgwmje4njq0mzi-_v1_sy1000_cr006741000_al_

Hey everyone, Jack Drees here! If you have been looking at the movies that have come out during the year of 2016, you may have come across one titled “Bad Moms.” I actually saw that in the theater, enjoyed it for what it was, but considering the audience that was there, I clearly wasn’t the target demographic, the amount of times I laughed were much fewer than the majority of attendees, and I clearly don’t laugh at swear words as much as other people. Maybe I’ve watched too many movies with foul language to know what I’m getting into. I’m not saying that other people are stupid for liking this film, we all have our personal tastes. Although then again I’m kinda pissed it made more than “Kubo and the Two Strings.” Sure it’s an animation so I imagine some people might not like the idea, but MY GOSH that was a masterpiece. At least we have “Sausage Party.” Right? Anyway, “Bad Moms” was relatively successful when it came out. It never hit the #1 spot on any of its weekends in theaters, although to be fair it was competing against movies like “Jason Bourne,” “Star Trek: Beyond,” and “Suicide Squad.” So at some point, a sequel goes into production. What’s the difference this time around? Well, it’s a Christmas movie.

For those who want to know the cast of the upcoming “Bad Moms” sequel, the movie will star Mila Kunis (Family Guy, Black Swan), Kristen Bell (The Good Place, Frozen), Kathryn Hahn (I Love Dick, Tomorrowland), Cheryl Hines (Curb Your Enthusiasm, Son of Zorn), Christine Baranski (The Good Wife, The Big Bang Theory), and Susan Sarandon (James and the Giant Peach, Thelma & Louise). The movie is basically a follow-up revolving around the characters played by Mila Kunis, Kristen Bell, and Kathryn Hahn as they try to rebel against the expectations laid upon them concerning Christmas.

Now, on paper, I wasn’t thrilled that this was happening. Sure, I enjoyed the first movie, but it’s not even that great. Plus, the more I think about it, I may have just been in a particular mood that day and I was trying to put my mind in another person’s shoes. I’m not a mother, nor am I a girl. I’m a teenage boy, there’s not many people I PERSONALLY can relate to when watching this movie. Then again this is why they make different movies for different people. This is why they make “Sharknado” and its sequels for stupid people. I’m not saying only stupid people enjoy “Sharknado” but keep in mind their movies are OBJECTIVELY DUMB. So what did I do to verify my interest or lack of interest in this movie? I watched the trailer. I didn’t laugh once, but then again, I go to the movies and see funny trailers which nobody laughs at. Although consider this, usually when there’s a trailer for a comedy, all the funny parts are shown in the trailer.

Let’s also consider the fact that this is a Christmas movie. What was the first movie? It was it’s own thing! There was no particular holiday on the rise, it was just a simple movie. Sure, Christmas might be a less than pleasant holiday for a number of mothers, but at the same time, I don’t see a Christmas theme fitting in the “Bad Moms” universe. If “Bad Moms” had a sequel that focused less on the Christmas theme, maybe someone has a birthday, maybe a number of children have birthdays coming up, something like that, a situation such as that might work out. In fact, you don’t even have to eliminate Christmas entirely, maybe you can make it subtle and not have all of this holiday theme strip club s*it. Besides, there are movies which happen to be sequels that take place during Christmas time that I enjoy despite the previous movies having no relation to that holiday. Just look at “Iron Man 3!” By the way, that movie was released in May, so that’s saying something.

Now there is another movie that’s actually coming out the week after this one comes out, which is “Daddy’s Home 2.” That movie is also going to have a Christmas theme, and a similar layout in terms of plot. “A Bad Moms Christmas” is going to have the mothers of the main characters coming for Christmas and “Daddy’s Home 2” is going to have the fathers of the main characters coming for Christmas. I saw both the original “Daddy’s Home” and “Bad Moms” movies, but if you had to ask me which was better as a movie, I’d say it would be “Bad Moms.” I’d honestly rather watch “Daddy’s Home” the more I think about it, but I found more things wrong with it and part of the illogical humor got into my head that it made me nearly frustrated. Plus I also found something that bothered me with the whole cones thing in the movie. I feel like “Daddy’s Home 2’s” Christmas theme is a little more appropriate for the film partially considering the last one came out in December and mainly considering that part of the last one took place on Christmas Day.

Another thing I had in the back of my mind is the wonder of repetition we’ll be seeing in this sequel. This may be judging a book by its cover, just like how watching a trailer might be judging a book by its cover, but just check out the posters. The poster for the original movie said “Party like a mother.” That slogan is also on the Blu-ray and DVD for the film. On the poster for this new movie, the slogan is “Celebrate the holidays like a mother.” Comedies and sequels can get some slack for repetition in full-length movies, but I don’t usually recall seeing repetition like this on many posters!

If you ask me, if I were making executive decisions, I’d say “A Bad Moms Christmas” sounds more like a straight to TV or straight to DVD film as opposed to a theatrical film. The first movie may have been fit for theaters, but this just feels out of place. I feel like the fact that it’s a sequel to a previous successful movie and the people starring in it are at least two reasons why this is getting a theatrical release. Moms will go see it, girls who want to see men without clothes on will go see it, heck, part of me even thinks teenage boys might even want to see this. Just think about it, Mila Kunis is the star of the movie!

On a little sidenote, a hint of dialogue was uttered in the trailer that caught my attention. Mila Kunis’s character is communicating with her mother, played by Cheryl Hines, and Mila Kunis tells Cheryl Hines that she just wanted to enjoy Christmas this year. Cheryl Hines replies saying “You are a mom. Moms don’t enjoy Christmas they give joy.” I understand what she meant there, but let me just have you know that I try to pay back my mother on Christmas Day. I understand it’s hard for mothers to cope with this holiday. This involves spending tons of money, buying gifts, preparing food, decorating, wrapping, possibly meeting in-laws that they may consider crazy, etc. I do try to help whenever I can, and you know what I gave to my mother last Christmas? I gave her a Roku! I try to put tons of thought in what to give to people, sometimes it’s hard. This is why I make lists for what I want. Some people I imagine don’t do that. I help in any way I can. Cooking’s a bit of stretch for me, I’m not the greatest at cooking, but I try to help buy gifts, wrap them, those sorts of things. So yeah, moms give joy for Christmas, but it doesn’t mean they can’t get it in return. Just thought I’d say that.

“A Bad Moms Christmas” comes out November 1, which is two days before “Thor: Ragnarok.” I personally don’t think that’s the best business decision possible, but let’s see how it plays out. I don’t know how much of the world will go see “A Bad Moms Christmas” when it comes out, but then again I’m talking about the same world containing millions that decided to skip out on seeing “Blade Runner 2049.” By the way, f*ck you, that movie was amazing, it should have made more money! I’m willing to bet this could break soon, but as of right now, “THE EMOJI MOVIE” HAS MADE MORE MONEY OVERALL THAN THIS PIECE OF WORK! Thanks for reading this post, tomorrow I will have my review for “Thor: The Dark World,” so look forward to that! Stay tuned for more posts and I’ll ask you a question. Are you going to see “A Bad Moms Christmas?” What are your thoughts on the original? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!