Comedy

Poor Things (2023): Emma Stone Delivers a Career-Best Performance in This Wildly Entertaining Mish Mash of Genres

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Poor Things” is directed by Yorgos Lanthimos (The Favourite, The Lobster) and stars Emma Stone (The Favourite, The Amazing Spider-Man), Mark Ruffalo (Spotlight, The Avengers), Willem Dafoe (Spider-Man, The Lighthouse), Ramy Youssef (Ramy, Mr. Robot), Christopher Abbott (Sanctuary, Girls), and Jerrod Carmichael (The Carmichael Show, Lucas Bros Moving Co.). This film is based on a book by Alasdair Gray and it is about Bella Baxter, a woman whose body just so happens to be revived as a result of a scientific experiment conducted by the eccentric Dr. Godwin Baxter.

I cannot explain this film’s concept justice. It is not that I do not know what it is about. But even before going to see it, I knew certain things about it that would have made for awkward conversation or have ruined the somewhat vague nature of the film’s marketing. On the surface, the film seems to give enough away. Basically, a woman who happens to be brought to life through science experiences her definition of what it means to live. I think that is a great way to describe this movie without being too detailed, or in some cases, overly graphic. The concept is interesting to say the least. But as far as I am concerned, it was being helmed by someone who I did not completely trust.

One of my least favorite films of 2018 was “The Favourite.” Of that year’s slate of Academy Award Best Picture nominees, that movie was by far the one I considered to be the worst. That film was directed by Yorgos Lanthimos. Other than the fact that I found the film to be a uniquely boring waste of time, it gave me a bad impression of the director to the point where I neglected visiting some of his earlier films. I have heard decent things about “The Lobster” and “The Killing of a Sacred Deer.” But I refused to watch those because I was so turned off by “The Favourite.” As I have said previously on Scene Before, first impressions matter. But I watched the trailer for “Poor Things” and found myself hypnotized, but also with a sense of hesitancy in the back of my mind. But I thought “Poor Things” was worth checking out because much like “The Favourite” five years ago, “Poor Things” has been receiving tons of positive word of mouth. Plus, if Emma Stone continues to trust Lanthimos, maybe I should too.

So, how was the movie? I am very pleased to say that this is a banger of a film. It is not in my top 10 of the year, but it is excellent. I am immensely pleased and surprised by how this film turned out. It is wacky, it is weird, it is a feast for the eyes and ears. Yorgos Lanthimos undoubtedly has a unique style to his filmmaking. But in some ways, this kind of reminded me of a Wes Anderson film. Its color palette is particularly striking, the production design is a perfect blend between reality and fantasy, and the dialogue is almost like an enhancement on everyday life. I might not come across people talking the way these characters do sometimes, but I assure you it makes complete sense within the context of the movie and its universe.

One of the reasons why this film failed to reach the mark of being in my top 10 films of the year is because it starts kind of rough. It takes a bit for the movie to get going, despite inklings of intrigue. There are a couple of moments that I found to be an eyesore. In a movie full of eye candy, there are moments where I found something in the frame quite disgusting to the point where I could not help but wince or look away. It is a bit of a balancing act, really.

Part of the movie is in black and white, and then there is a portion of it that is in color. There were some mixed bags when it came to the black and white scenes. Once we get to the color scenes, that is when the movie unleashes its best material. It is creative, insane, and even with its strange tendencies, everything makes sense. I found every single thing in this film convincing. That said, there are times where the pacing is a tad uneven. It is not a huge dealbreaker, but it is noticeable.

The ensemble of the film is honestly a contender for the best of 2023. To me, it is up there with “Barbie,” “Oppenheimer,” “Killers of the Flower Moon,” and “The Holdovers” in terms of being a fine mix between star power, acting ability, and instant charm from everyone involved. Mark Ruffalo has a number of shining scenes that could potentially warrant some extended talk this awards season. Willem Dafoe, per usual, gives everything his all here. During the latter half of the film, I was heavily entranced by Kathryn Hunter as Swiney. The entire cast in this movie is great, but the star of the show, literally and figuratively, is none other than Emma Stone.

Talk about a marvelous triumph of a performance! Emma Stone nails Bella Baxter throughout this entire film. I looked back at Emma Stone’s IMDb and was reminded of some of her career highlights. Of course as a comic book movie enthusiast, I know she played Gwen Stacy in “The Amazing Spider-Man” and its sequel. She did a good job in those films despite them not being up to snuff. She also did one of the better coming of age films of the 2010s, “Easy A,” where she was funny and charming. I liked her in the “Zombieland” movies. Of course she was great in “La La Land.” I even liked her in “The Favourite” despite my negative thoughts on the movie. Given time to marinate, I have to say Stone’s performance in “Poor Things” trumps all of her past work that I have seen. I honestly cannot think of a performance of hers I liked more. “La La Land” comes close, but Stone’s performance in “Poor Things” is comparatively transformative, it is otherworldly. It something that I could have never imagined seeing in my entire life, especially from someone like her. I am not saying Stone is not a talented actress. There is a reason why she has an Oscar on her mantle. But this is a performance that takes what I know about Emma Stone as a person, as an actress, as someone who has seen her in certain movies, and completely subverts my expectations. As I watch this movie, I of course know it is Emma Stone in front of the camera. Her face has become rather recognizable over the years. In fact, even though I have not seen the movie, Stone may come off as less recognizable in Disney’s “Cruella” based on what I have witnessed through images and marketing. But as I watch this movie, despite the low difficulty of realizing the talent in front of the camera happens to be Stone physically, it is a bit harder to conclude that it is her mentally.

Part of what makes her performance so riveting and exciting is how her character easily blends in to the world around her. The script is written in such a way that I would not call it fantasy, but it certainly is not a part of our reality either. The film, kind of like “Everything Everywhere All at Once” meshes so many genres and ideas together to the point where it practically forms a genre of its own. Bella Baxter is one of the most unique characters I have seen all year, and she comes from an equally one of a kind piece of art. And that is what this movie is. Art. I was transfixed by this in the same way some may be transfixed by the Mona Lisa. Again, this is not to say “Poor Things” is one of the year’s best movies, but it is certainly one of the boldest and brightest.

While Bella Baxter might not be my favorite character in a movie I have seen this year, I need some time to think on that front. Baxter is nevertheless in contention to be, idealistically, the most fascinating protagonist created for the screen this year. She has a sympathetic personality, but she also has the mind of a young child and a teenager all wrapped into one person. With those last two ideas, we see a bit of a transition between them, but they are still interlinked somehow as the movie goes. The film is an entertaining study on what happens if you put someone as eccentric as Bella Baxter into our society, or some variant of it. What would she do? How would she behave? This is basically a fish out of water story. And while the fish out of water idea has been done time and time again, I imagine stories like this one happen to factor into why the idea continues to be unleashed in several projects. It is a tried and true method of storytelling that may be familiar, but if you could your own spin on it, it may be worth seeking out. And speaking of things that are worth seeking out, if you have time on your hands and you have not seen “Poor Things” yet, make an effort to see it at some point. Not only is it a great movie, it is one of the most welcome, monumental surprises of 2023. I know a lot of people were looking forward to this film. I was not one of them. If anything, I almost rolled my eyes knowing it exists. But with one AMC A-List punch later, I can say this is one of the better movies of the year.

In the end, “Poor Things” is a great turnaround for Yorgos Lanthimos. This movie took me from resisting his past work to making me want to see more of it. Emma Stone is better than she has ever been. If she is not nominated for an Oscar this season my jaw will be on the floor. I do not know of any actress I could see beating her this year. This is a once in a lifetime performance as far as she is concerned. The film is very funny. There are a lot of stellar lines from various characters. Bella Baxter’s mannerisms and quirks are wonderfully distinguished and brilliantly written throughout the picture. The movie does a good job at splicing all sorts of ideas at the wall and having most of them stick. The pathos was off and on. I do not think I am going to remember “Poor Things” through much of an emotional connection, but again, the comedy worked quite a bit so that makes up for it. The sets are detailed and colorful. I could not take my eyes off of some pieces. And if it were not for some occasional roughness in the first act, this film would probably make my top 10 of the year. You never know though, I could change my mind. I just saw the film. That said, as far as I am concerned, I am glad I saw it. If Lanthimos and Stone reunite in the future, I cannot wait to see what these two do next. I am going to give “Poor Things” an 8/10.

“Poor Things” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now!

Thanks for reading this review! If you enjoyed this review, why not check out some of my other ones? Just recently I did reviews for “Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom,” “Migration,” and “Wonka.” Check those out when you have a chance! Also, I will soon be reviewing the new romcom “Anyone But You.” That will be up later this week. Also coming soon, I will be announcing my top 10 best and worst movies of 2023. If you want to see this and more from Scene Before follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Poor Things?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite Yorgos Lanthimos movie? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Wonka (2023): A Sweet But Tired Prequel Whose Strength Comes from Old Tricks

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Wonka” is directed by Paul King (Paddington, Space Force) and stars Timothée Chalamet (Dune, Call Me by Your Name), Calah Lane (This Is Us, Kidding), Keegan-Michael Key (Toy Story 4, Keanu), Paterson Joseph (Timeless, Peep Show), Matt Lucas (Come Fly with Me, Little Britain), Matthew Baynton (Ghosts, The Split), Sally Hawkins (Godzilla, The Shape of Water), Rowan Atkinson (Johnny English, The Lion King), Jim Carter (The Good Liar, Downton Abbey), Olivia Colman (The Favourite, The Mitchells vs. the Machines), and Hugh Grant (Four Weddings and a Funeral, Bridget Joneses Diary). This film is about a young Willy Wonka who tries to open a chocolate shop in the hopes of making his dreams a successful reality. He must also deal with the greed of a chocolate cartel that looms over him.

I absolutely adore “Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory.” When I was seven years old, I would watch that film almost every other night. I was equally as fascinated by some of Roald Dahl’s books, “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” included. And if you all must know, I did watch the Tim Burton “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” and while many of you will probably spew pitchforks at me, I do not just like the film, I kind of love it. It is simmered with the dark vibes of Wonka himself in every scene. Danny Elfman’s score is a banger. I really liked Freddie Highmore as Charlie. Johnny Depp as Willy Wonka leaves a little to be desired though, that’s the one big downside. Both films, especially the latter, make me want to stuff my face in chocolate. That’s how good those films are.

Thus far, we have had a couple of “Wonka” features that I tended to enjoy, so when I heard they were doing this new one with Timothée Chalamet, I was onboard. He is one of the best young talents working today. He has range. He has a natural look to him. So I was curious to see what he can do in a film like this. The great news is that Chalamet slays in his performance. As far as the Wonka character goes, he is significantly better than Johnny Depp. He is no Gene Wilder, but one thing to note about these two roles is that they are basically interconnected. This is set long before the events of the original “Chocolate Factory” story and the film does a decent job at making these two interpretations interlink. They don’t feel like the exact same character, but when it comes to a bridge in the gap between these two, it is filled exquisitely. Chalamet’s take on Willy Wonka matches his younger age, upbeat personality, and the dreams that clog his mind. Both Wonkas emit a sense of wonder and joy in their mannerisms, but as I watch Chalamet’s take and think about him, he seems to have more of a heart and significantly more patience than Wilder’s. Credit is due to Paul King as well for his stellar direction, as it felt not only distinctive, but effective enough to allow Chalamet to bring one of the year’s better performances.

Unfortunately, the film is not all pure imagination. In fact, the best parts of the movie to me, are mostly those in reference to nostalgia or things that came before in say “Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory.” Pretty much everything that is new feels like a far cry.

Much like “Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory,” “Wonka” is a musical. And there are callbacks to songs from the 1971 classic. The highlight of the film for me is the new take on the Oompa Loompa songs. They have new lyrics, new visuals, the whole nine yards. I thought those were well done, and it also helps that Hugh Grant sells the Oompa Loompa character to a tee.

The Hugh Grant Oompa Loompa might be my favorite character in the movie partially because of how Grant voices him. There is a certain snark factor to this character that I immediately welcomed. He also allowed for one of the better gags in the film during the second half. It is in the trailer, but having seen it in the film, it worked for me.

But with that Oompa Loompa bit aside, most of the musical numbers in this movie are some of the most forgettable and bland I have seen in ages. These are some of the most uninteresting musical numbers I have come across since 2021’s “Dear Evan Hansen.” As a movie, I liked “Wonka” better, but as a musical, this movie fails. Sure, there are rhymy timey lyrics, a lot of excuses for spectacles, all that jazz. That is what I come to expect in many musicals. But it is not a matter of it being in the movie, it is how it is done in the movie. I just wish the musical bits could have been done a little better.

The best way to describe “Wonka” to someone who has not seen the movie is that it is basically a Saturday morning cartoon come to life. Given the family friendly nature of the film and the musical aspect, that should not come as a surprise. In fact, Roald Dahl’s work, which this film is inspired by, has a very animated feel to it. Unfortunately though, if I were seven years old, I do not think I would be as transfixed by “Wonka” as I would hope to be. Maybe it would be one of those movies like “Attack of the Clones” that I like as a kid but grow up to realize it is not as good as I thought it was. To be honest, it is quite bland, it is a little boring at times. In fact, much like “Dear Evan Hansen,” I feel like the movie forces itself to be a musical at moments where it is better off staying closer to reality.

Sticking with the cartoony vibes, the antagonists of the film, specifically the chocolate cartel, feel rather mustache twirly. The movie does a terrible job at making these three look intimidating. The movie asks me to see them as bad people. And yes, objectively they are, but it is a matter of execution. There is almost no word I could use to describe this cartel other than unamusing. If anything, going back to the idea of “Wonka” basically being a live action cartoon, I theorize this film would be a lot better if they just went for the cartoon route and just animated it from start to finish. Heck, the musical scenes would pop more. The characters would come off as more appealing. In fact, many of the supporting characters like Bleacher (Tom Davis) and Mrs. Scrubbit (Olivia Colman) feel like they would lend themselves better to that style. If I had my way, I almost would want to see a 2D style animated movie set in this universe. I could imagine enormous potential with that concept. Unfortunately though, I don’t know how it would do at the box office, it would probably be a lot harder to market. But if word of mouth is good, maybe it would be worthwhile.

But if I have to be honest, the dialogue is unmemorable, the humor is metza metza, and the only performances in the movie I am going to fondly remember just so happen to be Timothee Chalamet as Willy Wonka and Calah Lane’s charming portrayal of Noodle. Both of those actors are the highlights of the film. They don’t always have the best chemistry, but going back to the dialogue, I am sure if I liked the dialogue better, maybe their chemistry would have worked better. Both actors seem to have done their best with the material handed to them. And as far as I am concerned, I have done my best on getting through this movie to call it one of the most average watches of the year.

In the end, “Wonka” was quite disappointing. The “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” property was a big part of my childhood. Unfortunately this latest addition to it is nowhere near as magical or scrumdiddlyumptious. When I watched the 1971 and 2005 Roald Dahl book adaptations, it made me want to eat chocolate afterwards. I was a kid in a candy store. This latest prequel made me feel like an old man getting ready for my latest shouting event directed at a cloud. Paul King likely put his heart and soul into this project, but it unfortunately resulted in something that was poorly paced, uneven, and barely watchable. There are better movies to watch at the cinema this holiday season, or you can just stay at home and watch the other films this property has delivered over the years. I would recommend those over this one. I am going to give “Wonka” a 5/10.

Also, we have had two adaptations of “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory,” some other random takes on the property over the years, this prequel, and yet I have not seen a single “Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator” movie. Life is funny, isn’t it? Then again, having read both the “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” books, the original appears more cinematic as it progresses, but that’s probably just the way I see it for now.

“Wonka” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for Illumination’s “Migration.” Also coming soon, I will have reviews for “Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom” and “Poor Things.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Wonka?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite “Willy Wonka” or “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” movie? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Dream Scenario (2023): Unlike Dreams, This Film Will Be Hard to Forget

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Dream Scenario” is directed by Kristoffer Borgli (DRIB, Sick of Myself) and stars Nicolas Cage (The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent, Raising Arizona), Julianne Nicholson (August: Osage County, Masters of Sex), Michael Cera (Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, Superbad), Tim Meadows (The Goldbergs, Saturday Night Live), Dylan Gelula (Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt, Shameless), and Dylan Baker (Spider-Man 2, Kings). This film is about a professor at a Massachusetts college who for some reason starts showing up in all sorts of people’s dreams. Now this ordinary man must deal with extraordinary fame as the dreams, in addition to his life, take a nightmarish turn.

Who here likes Nicolas Cage? *raises hand*

Actually, better question, who doesn’t like Nicolas Cage? Okay, of course, he has done way too many projects for every single one to be an acclaimed masterpiece, but he has quite a prolific resume, he is a good actor, and he commits in every just about every role that is given to him. Nicolas Cage is one of those actors who will show up in any project and automatically turn it into gold. But I am going to be honest, when it comes to the concept of “Dream Scenario,” that alone is a golden idea. Basically, it is one guy showing up in people’s dreams and becoming a celebrity as a result. It is an idea that could potentially lend itself to decent comedy and tons of engaging consequences. But of course, if you put Nicolas Cage in the lead role, you are going from a golden nugget to a platinum gem. Literally. This might be because of meme culture and such, but when it comes to people’s faces, Nicolas Cage is one of those that I cannot get out of my head for some reason. Between those big eyes, expressive mouth, and crazy hair, it is impossible for that image to leave my noggin. In the case of “Dream Scenario,” Nicolas Cage’s character has a bit of a different look to him, but there is a vibe here that I have also managed to achieve from Cage’s other roles.

Of course, knowing what I just said, Nicolas Cage and the concept have clearly had me knocking on this movie’s door. But how was the execution? For the most part it was quite good, until it begins to falter by the film’s conclusion.

Per usual, Nicolas Cage is bringing his A-game here as the character of Paul Matthews. He has a natural and admirable presence throughout the film that made him come off as a standup gentleman. When it comes to the fame that is brought upon him in the movie, it turns out to be something he clearly never asked for. Fame can be fine and dandy, but it is clearly not for everyone. The movie dives into the downsides of being famous and the consequences that are more likely to ensue to those who achieve fame.

There are a good amount of characters in this movie, and there happen to be more than I expected at the forefront. But one of my favorite characters in the film just so happens to be Molly (right), played excellently by Dylan Gelula. I doubt she is going to be considered for an Oscar this awards season, but when it comes to the demands of her role, she basically checks every box and gets extra credit. Her character also adds a bit to the overall insanity of this film’s premise. She explains her part in the whole dream scenario, what Paul is doing in those dreams. To be honest, when she mentioned what that thing is, I honestly found it to be a bit predictable. I thought based on where the movie was going, I did not find the idea all that shocking, but it does necessarily mean it was stupid. It made sense and what the movie does with it is a highlight.

If anything, I will add that not only would I mind seeing Dylan Gelula in more stuff down the road, but I also would not mind seeing a movie where she and Nicolas Cage happen to be co-leads. Maybe a buddy cop movie or a father-daughter road trip adventure. Both actors do a really good job and unleash tremendous chemistry.

The film kind of goes back and forth between genres. Specifically horror and comedy. But never once does either genre overpower or jeopardize the other. They feel perfectly balanced. But when it comes to the horror aspects, I cannot say I was overly scared by “Dream Scenario.” Although I highly doubt that is what the film was going for. I think it was going more for hypnotizing chills than heart-stopping terror. But when it comes to comedy, I was surprised with how far the movie went. I wasn’t surprised it was funny. I was expecting that from the getgo. I was shocked with how funny it turned out to be. Now I don’t remember every joke in the movie, and when it comes to comedies this year, I think “Bottoms” and “Joy Ride” are better films overall. But there is one joke in this movie that had me laughing so hard to the point where I probably embarrassed my family members with whom I saw this movie. There is one particular joke in the middle of the film. I am not going to share too many details other than to note it was a fart joke. I find fart jokes to be a bit hit or miss, because they sometimes feel like copout jokes when there is nothing else that comes to mind. But here, it could not have been timed any better than it was. I was laughing so hard I almost died. That joke alone makes the movie worth seeing.

My biggest problem with “Dream Scenario” would have to be the climax. Because at this point, the movie almost decides to change course with its tone, vibe, and ideas, and deliver something different than what we have already seen. “Dream Scenario” very much feels like two different movies in one. There is a fairly enjoyable feature we see from the start, then there is some tacked on, rushed short film by the end. You can say the transition between these ideas makes logical sense, but you can also say they don’t belong in the same movie. Maybe the idea could be used in a sequel or spinoff to this film, but the climax takes a short amount of time to establish something we have not seen in the movie and quite honestly, barely even felt like we were building up to. If you had to ask me if “Dream Scenario” is a thumbs up or thumbs down, I would easily give it a thumbs up. But the climax made the film lose a point in my book. At the end of the day, I choose to look at the positives. The idea of the film is clever, and its cast from the lead to everyone else, turn things up to an 11. The movie is sometimes pretty funny. In fact, it probably delivered one of the biggest laughs I had watching any movie from this year. There is some fairly decent social commentary on cancel culture, fame, and how one bump in the road can jeopardize your life.

In the end, “Dream Scenario” is not the best film about dreams. Let me just remind everyone that “Inception” is a thing, but it is quite a good time and you would be doing yourself a favor if you watch it. “Dream Scenario” comes from A24, which is a rather polarizing distributor. A lot of their films are bangers, but there are also a notable few that are less than stellar. This is one of the better ones. And similar to even their bad or less notable films, I will be thinking about parts of this one for some time. I was pleasantly surprised that a movie diving deep into cancel culture and the consequences of fame may have had the best fart joke I have witnessed in a long time. Everyone is really good in this movie. The screenplay is fun, crazy, and wild. But if it were not for the third act, I probably would have liked this movie a little more. The positives heavily outweigh the negatives on this one, so I would have to give “Dream Scenario” a 7/10.

“Dream Scenario” is now playing in select theaters. It is also available to buy on VOD.

Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for Bradley Cooper’s “Maestro!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will have reviews for “Wonka,” “Migration,” and “Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Dream Scenario?” What did you think about it? Or, what is the wildest dream you remember having? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

The Holdovers (2023): A Hearty, Homey, Comforting Throwback to the 1970s

Posted on by Jack Drees

“The Holdovers” is directed by Alexander Payne (Sideways, The Descendants) and stars Paul Giamatti (Sideways, Billions), Da’Vine Joy Randolph (The Last O.G., High Fidelity), and Dominic Sessa in a film set in the 1970s where a cranky history teacher and a troubled student are forced to remain on a school campus together during the holidays.

I have been looking forward to “The Holdovers” for a very long time. Granted, I have some bias in this notion because I live not too far from where it was shot. In fact, one of the filming locations is about five minutes away from my house. More on that later. But of course, that sort of attachment should not be an indicator of whether the film is good or bad, but it is one of the reasons why I got in the door. But there are many other reasons why I got in the door as well. The film itself looked fairly wholesome and relatable. I have never attended a prep school, but I think many people regardless of where they have received education may have had a troubling connection with a teacher. And the same goes for teachers, I imagine just about every teacher had some trouble dealing with students for one reason or another, even if it is for a reason beyond their control. But even with the troubling dynamic, this just looked like a fascinating slice of life picture that would come out at a perfect time.

And that is exactly what it is.

I have said this phrase in the past, and I have heard other people say it too, but it needs to be said here. “The Holdovers” is the movie we need right now. I feel like ever since COVID-19 began I have always been finding myself in a need to go to a “happy place,” and I imagine a lot of other people reading this feel the same way. Ever since the virus began to spread, few movies have took me there like this one did. In fact, going back to the COVID-19 aspect, it sort of took me back to 2020 when the disease first got traction in the United States. This film coincidentally is set, mostly, in a singular location where our leads are basically in quarantine. Nobody’s sick, nobody’s spreading any infections, there’s not much on that front to worry about. But a good portion of the movie, specifically the first half, is set at this one prep school. When we get to the second half of the movie where our characters start venturing out, there is a feeling of joy and excitement in the air. It reminded me of when June 2020 rolled around and restaurants near me started opening up for outdoor dining. There was a sudden liberation in my veins when that opportunity arose.

But that does not mean the first half is uncomfortable. Although one of the lower points of the movie just so happens to be the relationships between the students. That said, it is not like the students have a ton of screen time. They ultimately serve their purpose. But when it comes to our three leads, we spend a ton of time with all them to the point where each one is adequately established. It also helps that I like all of them and when it comes to our core duo, specifically Paul Hunham and Angus Tully in a divided teacher/student relationship, their time dominating the screen makes for some incredible moments together. The movie brilliantly displays their strengths and weaknesses and uses them to make each one all the more likable. All the characters have phenomenal chemistry together, and I cannot imagine another soul in their shoes.

Sticking with the idea of isolation, this helped me appreciate the Angus Tully character. Because as someone who had to deal with the outside world closing off at the age of 20, I felt like any semblance of my life getting started was out of reach. As this movie progressed, I was watching this character deal with his personal issues and I could not help but feel bad for him partially because he was stuck somewhere he clearly did not want to be for an extended period of time. I understand that feeling because I lived through it. And much like me staying home in 2020, Tully stayed where he needed to stay for a reason, but I understood how agonizing it can get the longer you’re there.

I have not reviewed many Christmas or holiday movies on Scene Before, partially because I have not had much time to visit classics, and I feel like there is a shortage of them nowadays. Or at least a shortage of Christmas flicks that tend to stand out. Although I somehow managed to tackle a couple Christmas movies last year between “Violent Night” and “The Mean One.” “The Holdovers” is probably one of the best Christmas movies I have watched in the past number of years. And it is not exactly preachy to the point where everything is Christmas central. It is one those movies that takes place at Christmas but it can probably be an appropriate watch at any other point of the year. All due respect because the movie is entertaining, but I cannot remember the last time I wanted to watch “Elf” in the spring. It’s just not that kind of movie for me. “The Holdovers” is perfect for any time of year, and when it comes to 2023’s calendar, it is a standout of all the films I have seen this year.

One of the reasons why “The Holdovers” is as I describe in the title of this review, hearty and homey, is because of the progression we see with Paul Hunham. I am not going to spoil much for you, but the teacher does not emit the most pleasing vibe when it comes to dealing with his students. Part of that comes into play regarding the relationship between him and the main student in the film, Angus Tully. You have these two people who do not really see eye to eye on everything, but the more they are forced to deal with each other, the more they tend to find themselves having good times with each other. Both individuals, in their own ways, make the best of a bad situation. But they do so realizing maybe they could share a bond if they opened their eyes. Of course, when it comes to Hunham, it also helps that an actor with the caliber of Paul Giamatti just so happens to be portraying him, and it brings forth one of the best performances of the year. The character reminds me of, and I know this analogy may not be the most prominent because not a lot of people saw this movie, Alice from the 2020 movie “Summerland.” By the way, watch “Summerland.” It’s fantastic. But I use this as a comparison because both films have a main character who appears all tough and mean, but when she is placed together with someone younger with her for a period of time, we see more and more that she kind of has a heart.

The film does a great job at showcasing the flaws of these characters and having them come into play throughout the runtime. And when it comes to Hunham as a character, we see his flaws from the beginning, how they are adjusted to some degree, but his positives and negatives as an individual make him one of the most compelling characters of the year.

On a little sidenote, much like the George Clooney-directed “The Tender Bar,” which came out at the tail end of 2021, this film features my local candlepin bowling alley, Wakefield Bowladrome in a couple minutes of screentime. And unlike “The Tender Bar,” which is set in New York, it actually makes sense that it is in here because the film is set in Massachusetts, where candlepin bowling just so happens to exist. I think what they’ve done with the place is rather impressive and adds to the throwback feel of the movie itself. Though if I have one nitpick, there are occasional moments where I hear pins falling down, but the sound effects match the sound the pins would make in tenpin. But of course, this is why I put the “moron” in Movie Reviewing Moron.

In the end, “The Holdovers” is an utter delight of a film. Its main trio make the story worthwhile. The film is a sensational throwback to the 1970s that is as charming as it is inviting. The film is rated R, so I would not recommend watching it with younger viewers, but if you are with loved ones this holiday season, this could be a good watch. The characters are spectacular. The locations are beautiful. The set design is very well done. And I think Paul Giamatti could be in the running for an Oscar nomination. Also, one more thing, there is a particular scene in the film that includes “The Newlywed Game” where I was in a trance until the moment it was over. I have not watched that show a ton, but I have often watched clips of it on YouTube, and it is legendary. Bob Eubanks is a treasure. I am going to give “The Holdovers” an 8/10.

“The Holdovers” is now playing in theaters everywhere. It is also available to buy on VOD.

Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for the brand new historical epic, “Napoleon.” Also coming soon, I will have my thoughts on “Godzilla Minus One,” “Ferrari,” “The Boy and the Heron,” and “Dream Scenario.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “The Holdovers?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite Christmas movie? Yes, “Die Hard” counts. Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Next Goal Wins (2023): Taika Waititi Misses the Goal

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Next Goal Wins” is directed by Taika Waititi (Thor: Ragnarok, Jojo Rabbit) who also appears in the film as the character “American Samoa Priest.” The film also stars Michael Fassbender (Steve Jobs, X-Men: First Class), Oscar Kightley (Sione’s Wedding, Hunt for the Wilderpeople), Kaimana, David Fane (Sione’s Wedding, Love Birds), Rachel House (Moana, Soul), Beulah Koale (Hawaii-Five-0, Dual), Will Arnett (The LEGO Movie, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles), and Elisabeth Moss (The Invisible Man, Mad Men). Based on the 2014 documentary of the same name, this film is about what happens when an arrogant coach and one of the world’s worst soccer teams come together with the hopes of making the latter do something they are not necessarily known for doing. Scoring goals and winning.

Taika Waititi is one of those Hollywood personalities that I can respect, but I think he also has his moments of taking said personality too far. I think he has a knack for humor at times, even if I think his “Thor” movies are inferior to Kenneth Branagh’s 2011 MCU installment. In recent years, I thought “Jojo Rabbit” has proven he is both a great storyteller and just about as good of an actor. His portrayal of Adolf Hitler in that film was one of the best of the year. In 2021, one of my favorite films of the year, “Free Guy,” starred Waititi as Antwan, the greedy executive who serves as the film’s antagonist. No disrespect to Ryan Reynolds, there is an argument to make that Waititi stole every scene he was in. He had this swagger to him that I was not expecting out of a character of this nature. I cannot imagine anyone else playing the character. That’s how good Waititi was in the film.

His latest film prior to this one, “Thor: Love and Thunder” got a thumbs up from me, but perhaps just barely. I think the film did an alright job mixing comedy and drama together, but the comedy sometimes becomes too silly to the point where it almost tarnishes the more dramatic elements. I was also not a fan of when Waititi publicly and perhaps mockingly called out his distaste for how the VFX turned out. I am all for recognizing your own faults, but when you are trying to sell a movie, I don’t think mocking a great span of the people who made it is the best move. It would be like if I were a delivering a Domino’s pizza, handing it off to the customers, and leaving them off by saying I worked for Papa John’s and I think the people over there usually put more care into their pies. That’s why I went into “Next Goal Wins” with lukewarm expectations. How did the movie turn out? Well, I’ve seen worse this year. But the way I saw this movie is the way most of my country sees soccer. A snoozefest that makes me wish I were watching something else.

I appreciate the concept of “Next Goal Wins” because it is not just an underdog story, it is one that celebrates failure in a such in an embracing manner. It reminds me a bit of “The Disaster Artist,” one of my favorite A24 movies that goes into the making of “The Room.” Similarly, there was another sports film I saw last year called “The Phantom of the Open,” where an unlikely man participates in professional golf, much to the dismay of those involved with the sport. “Next Goal Wins” recognizes the lowest points of both its protagonist coach and the team he has to reluctantly oversee. Unfortunately, when the reluctant coach is put together with the below par group of athletes, the on-screen chemistry is iffy at best. There are certain matches between the coach and the team. Not to mention, there happen to be certain relationships throughout the film that are well developed, but the movie spends most of its time devoted to one tired comedy gag after another. The film may call itself a comedy, but it is subjective as anything deemed artistic. I failed to find it funny. Sure, maybe I had a couple laughs here and there during the film. But I would not be able to tell you what it that got me to laugh. Overall, I found a good portion of the film forgettable and that is not a word I was expecting to use out of a picture like this. If you know me in real life, perhaps one of my weaknesses, though I personally call it a strength, is my resistance to take some things seriously. Everything is a joke to me. That is almost the mentality that Waititi takes to heart throughout “Next Goal Wins,” and it only hurts the final product. Between “Thor: Love and Thunder” and now “Next Goal Wins,” Taika Waititi is practically overdoing his comedic efforts to the point where they feel in your face, and therefore unfunny.

This film is not going to win any Oscars. Does it look competent? Perhaps. Is the acting okay? Sure. Does the story make sense? Yes. But the movie is bombarded with negatives to the point where those stand out a lot more than the positives. It does get better as it goes along, because I started off this movie not liking anyone. I thought the coach was not a great center of the story as it started. I found the characters on team uninteresting. It was not an easy task latching onto this film’s ensemble. Michael Fassbender does an okay, albeit far from awards-worthy job with the material given to him, but it is not enough. If I had to guess, it ultimately comes down to direction, because almost every choice in the film comes off either as some semblance of a joke. “Next Goal Wins” is basically what happens when a joke is taken too far. Although in this case, the joke is never offensive, it just lingers much longer than it should to the point where it leaves a bad aftertaste.

I will give credit where it is due because despite the somewhat predictable structure of the film, there are some unexpected and unique creative choices brought to fruition in the film whether it is through writing, editing, or narration. I cannot say I was a fan of all these choices, but despite finding the movie dull, these choices kept some banality out of the final product. And that is kind of what this movie is in multiple ways. A series of halfway marks. I found the story boring, but great in concept. I found the characters to have personalities, but they just didn’t leap off the screen for me. I found the movie to be heartfelt, but it is sullied by bad humor.

But I must add, one of those creative choices becomes a driving force in the climax, and it honestly took whatever fun I was having in the movie, if any, and lessened it to such an unbelievable degree. It resulted in a conclusion that was not as satisfying as it could have been. When it comes to this vision, Taika Waititi is like a class clown, but in this case as I watch him, I am the teacher telling him to stop joking around and focus on his studies. “Next Goal Wins” is far from this year’s worst picture, but it is easily one of the most forgettable.

In the end, “Next Goal Wins,” much like the American Samoa national football team, fails to score any goals. It is not a travesty that will go down in history as one of the most awful pieces of crap Hollywood has ever produced, but I do not know if I will be thinking about this movie in about five years from now. I have not seen all of Taika Waititi’s work, but I think after watching this film, I cannot say I am looking forward to whatever feature film he does next as much as I previously expected. Hopefully he turns things around. I am going to give “Next Goal Wins” a 4/10.

Come to think of it, “Next Goal Wins” might not even the worst sports movie I have seen this year, because “80 for Brady” exists. So congratulations, Taika Waititi! Tom Brady and four elderly women just saved your butt! And yes, if you read that review, you’ll notice the score for “80 for Brady” is higher than what this film got. I wonder if I was too generous on that review. But at the end of the day, they’re just numbers. What can I say?

“Next Goal Wins” is now playing in theaters. Granted, none of them are near me at this point. But if you live in a certain market, it could be playing near you. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for the brand new Alexander Payne-directed film, “The Holdovers!” I have been looking forward to this movie for quite some time, and having seen it, I cannot wait to share my thoughts with you all. Also coming soon, I will have my thoughts on “Napoleon,” “Godzilla Minus One,” “Ferrari,” “The Boy and the Heron,” and “Dream Scenario.” If you want to see this and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Next Goal Wins?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite Taika Waititi movie? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Wish (2023): The Stars Align in Disney’s Latest Animation

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Wish” is directed by Chris Buck (Frozen, Frozen II) and Fawn Veerasunthorn and stars Ariana DeBose (West Side Story, The Prom), Chris Pine (Star Trek, Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves), Alan Tudyk (Wreck-It Ralph, Rogue One: A Star Wars Story), Angelique Cabral (Life in Pieces, Enlisted), Victor Garber (The Orville, Alias), Natasha Rothwell (Sonic the Hedgehog, The White Lotus), Jennifer Kumiyaya (The Sessions, Awkward), Harvey Guillén (Blue Beetle, Puss in Boots: The Last Wish), Evan Peters (X-Men: Days of Future Past, Kick-Ass), Ramy Youssef (Mr. Robot, Ramy), and Jon Rudnitsky (Catch-22, Saturday Night Live). This film is about a young girl named Asha who wishes upon a star only to have said wish unleash complete and utter chaos on her homeland.

My history with Disney is not as prolific as some others. Of course, as they have bought various properties over the years like “Star Wars” and Marvel, I became more inclined with the company as they produced more things I’d be predisposed to enjoying. But I was born in 1999, and as a kid, I was not as into Disney’s projects as some other people. I am male, and therefore was not inclined to embracing princess leads or royal stories. Television-wise, I was more of a Nickelodeon kid than a Disney kid if you had to ask which of the cable channels I’d be more likely to torture my parents with. And even as I aged, most of the movies in my growing collection would come from other studios for certain periods of time. I did watch “Power Rangers,” which for a time aired on Disney-owned channels and was owned by them. But when it comes to the more historic Disney properties, I never bothered with them as a kid. I still haven’t bothered with a lot of them now. I still have not watched “Aladdin,” as much as I try to. I still have not seen “The Little Mermaid.” I have not watched “Dumbo.” Despite Studio Chizu’s “Belle” being my favorite film of the decade so far, I still have not gone back to watch Disney’s “Beauty and the Beast.” Maybe I had these titles on in the background somewhere as a kid and just don’t remember it, but I can never say I watched any of these films and had the urgency to call it a core memory. They were just never my thing. I watched game shows as a kid. When I was young, I did not want to fly like “Peter Pan,” I wanted to buy vowels on “Wheel of Fortune.”

But Disney is now a hundred years old, and their newest animated title, “Wish,” comes with an ooze of specialty attached. It is practically a celebration of a century of Disney as a brand. Now, this is its own story that introduces new characters, new places, new ideas, even if it does take inspiration from other stories. Though as I watched this movie, one thing I will say, as someone who knew the significance of sorts regarding it, is that the movie is an appropriate title to release to commemorate such an occasion. The movie is about wishes and sort of represents an idea that Disney has represented for decades. Taking wishes and dreams and making them come to life. If I were in a pitch meeting for a movie celebrating such an occasion, this would be a foundation I would emphasize. But the movie has to be as good as its backbone, and thankfully, I had a good time with it.

“Wish” is not the best not best Disney movie of all time, but if you ask me, I like it better than their previous couple of animated outings. As much as “Encanto” dominated a certain sphere of pop culture in recent years, I have had no urges to go back to it after one viewing. As for “Strange World,” I would say that film did not even deserve one viewing. It was easily one of the biggest bores and wastes of time I had in that year of moviegoing. “Wish” is a film that works because of its characters, specifically its relationship between the protagonist and antagonist.

Asha wants to be the apprentice for King Magnifico, the most revered of her land’s people as he is able to grant wishes. I thought the way this movie starts off the relationship between these two, as they conduct an interview, unleashes some phenomenal chemistry between them. Ariana DeBose and Chris Pine work well together. But when their relationship goes awry, we continue to see a divide in their personalities and thoughts, which in the case of Chris Pine’s character, Magnifico, brings forth one of my favorite antagonists of the year. The reason why I love Magnifico as an antagonist is the same reason why as much as I rooted for the Avengers in “Infinity War” and “Endgame,” I understood, and sometimes agreed, with where Thanos was coming from in those movies. Magnifico, as mentioned, grants wishes. It’s his thing. But Magnifico refuses to grant every single wish that is given to him, including one given by Asha’s grandfather that I probably would have granted if I were in that kind of position. The reason he gives for not granting it, specifically its elusiveness, is not one I necessarily would side with, but that’s his choice. But the reality is, even though this, in addition to a sudden revelation, understandably enrages Asha, I am on Magnifico’s side when it comes to wish granting. What if someone wished for world domination? What if someone wished for the extinction of bees? What if someone wished for the resurrection of Adolf Hitler? These are outright dangerous or terrible things that most sane people who have a knowledge of how things are supposed to work would tend to avoid desiring. But at the same time, from Asha’s point of view, her grandfather’s wish, while Magnifico may see it one way, she sees it another way that can only be described as positive. I understand where she is coming from. But this also results in a mixed message of the film. Sure, you should be able to follow your dreams, but you better make sure that dream is a good one. It is a bit of a coin toss of a message when broken down.

“Wish,” like many Disney titles over the years, is a musical, and I have to say some of the songs in this film are quite good. Not all of them stand out, but I cannot name one that I outright thought couldn’t even achieve mediocrity. Whether it was the song itself or the visuals that accompanied it, everything had a place in the film. My favorite of the film is the one that was often used in the advertising, specifically “This Wish.” And I should not be surprised that I am giving this much praise to the song, because it is sung by Ariana DeBose, who has a musical background, including an Oscar-winning (and Jack Award-winning) role in Steven Spielberg’s “West Side Story.” Her singing power is marvelous and instantly emits classic Disney vibes. It is perfect. Speaking of incredible songs, my runner-up for this category would have to be the villain song, “This Is the Thanks I Get?!.” Not only does it encapsulate a particular spiral into madness Magnifico experiences, but Pine’s range in his voice throughout the song is a standout. This is not Pine’s first time singing in a Disney movie, as he previously did so in 2014’s “Into the Woods.” I have not seen “Into the Woods,” but I was delightfully surprised here at Pine’s singing abilities. He’s not the best I’ve heard, but he is much better than I could have imagined him being. But then again, having seen him in other roles, I often get the sense that Pine easily oozes charisma. So maybe I shouldn’t be surprised.

If I have to note one thing in the movie that is kind of hit or miss, it is the humor. Now, maybe if I were a kid it would land with me better, but there are jokes in this film that are probably going to hit more with younger viewers. That said, it is less insulting than some other jokes I have seen in some animated movies in recent years so it gets points there. There’s not much, if anything, that made me roll my eyes. Some jokes just stuck the landing better than others. Although my favorite exchange in the movie comes about thirty, forty minutes in where Asha explains the cause behind everything that is going on. She says “I wished upon a star.” In response, her friend, Gabo, asks, “What are you five?” Between the brief pause, the context of the scene, and the line delivery, this could not have been more perfect. I loved this moment. Speaking of voices, most of the cast of this film does a good job, but Alan Tudyk is a standout as Valentino the goat. I think his voice, no matter the role, is a thing of beauty. Here, he tends to use the same voice he uses as Clayface in Max’s “Harley Quinn” series, which if you have not watched, you absolutely should. Despite the similarity, the voice is appropriate for the character and adds a comedic edge for his lines. His lines are not laugh out loud funny, but they do deliver a chuckle here and there. I am not going to go into detail, but I have seen better, more satisfying climaxes out of Disney movies. Though if you recall certain details about this movie’s lesson I mentioned earlier, that is a partial reason why I find this climax to be inferior.

Sticking with the idea of Disney 100, this film’s animation style very much reflects the company’s history. It is a bit of a mish mash of what they have done over the years. The character designs reflect various eras of the company, and so do the minute little details surrounding the image. I do think there is an unfortunate shortage of 2D animated movies. If I had my way, we would more 2D animated movies, and fewer Disney live-action remakes. When it comes to this hybrid style, there are glimmers of beauty, but there is an obvious gimmicky feel to it. DreamWorks’s “Puss in Boots: The Last Wish,” which is much more 3D-esque than this movie on the surface, manages to pack a more palatable outlook when it tries to implement 2D tricks. It feels much more seamless. While there are a lot of good-looking shots in “Wish,” in fact there is one about 20 to 30 minutes in that is one of my favorite shots I have witnessed in any movie this year, the movie makes me think that the animation style should not be given any more attempts in the near future. But if I have to say one thing, between this, “The Mitchells vs. the Machines,” “Puss in Boots 2,” and the recent “Spider-Verse” movies, I am noticing more studios taking cracks at unique animation styles in recent years. I will give credit where it is due. I often say that having good animation is a requirement nowadays considering how much we have evolved over the years, but I am glad that when it comes to style, even if it emits inferior results, that we are seeing more unique projects being made.

In the end, “Wish” is not the brightest star of this year’s animated slate. But it comes packed with plenty of glowing qualities. “Wish” has the significance of doubling as a 100 year celebration of Disney, and I think it is a lovely tribute to the company, but it pales compared to a ton of their newer animated fare like “Wreck-it Ralph” and “Zootopia.” I am admittedly probably on an island of a lonely opinions because when I look back at Pixar’s release this year, “Elemental,” I think Disney proper’s “Wish” is the better of the two films. But if you look at Rotten Tomatoes, the scores for both critics and audiences are higher for “Elemental.” It goes to show the subjectivity of art. I think visually, the film works. Sound-wise, it packs a punch. The music puts its best foot forward. But what makes me want to go back to this movie despite its technical beauty is its two leads, because both of them are compelling. Earlier in this review, I said I never once had any urges to go back and watch “Encanto” a second time. I cannot say the same about “Wish.” I might even buy it on 4K Blu-ray if I had the chance. I am going to give “Wish” a 7/10.

“Wish” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for Taika Waititi’s latest directorial effort, “Next Goal Wins.” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will have my thoughts on “The Holdovers,” “Napoleon,” “Godzilla Minus One,” and “Ferrari!” If you want to see this and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Wish?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite Disney animation? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

The Persian Version (2023): Two Generations of Stories Come Together in a Uniquely Structured Dramedy

Posted on by Jack Drees

“The Persian Version” is directed by Maryam Keshavarz (Viper Club, Circumstance) and stars Layla Mohammadi (Special Ops: Lioness, The Sex Lives of College Girls), Niousha Noor (Kaleidoscope, Here and Now), Bijan Daneshmand (Infidel, The Night Manager), Bella Warda, and Tom Byrne (The Crown, Road Dance). This film is about a young Iranian-American woman who is at odds with her family, most notably her mother. The two have their key differences. But when a secret is revealed, the young woman realizes that she and her mother may have more in common than then they once thought.

“The Persian Version” is a film that I am not surprised a lot of people are keeping out of the conversation. It is not playing in too many places, and it came out the same weekend as “Five Nights at Freddy’s.” By the way, I have no plans to watch that film for those who ask. But I was very intrigued by “The Persian Version.” I was sold with the marketing. The movie looked, bright, cheery, vibrant, and seemed to make the most of whatever budget it had. It did not look terribly expensive, but it looked polished for a film of its caliber. Turns out, that is just half the battle, because little did I realize what I would be in for.

“The Persian Version” is a quirky, fun, good old fashioned time that occasionally inserts moments of seriousness every once in a while. Is this a good thing? Sort of. There are multiple storylines at hand, all of which deliver some sense of engagement to varying degrees. Like a lot of other movies, there are parts of “The Persian Version” that are better than others. But in the case of “The Persian Version,” even when the movie transitions in an uneven, and nearly cluttered manner, I still find myself invested in much of what is going on.

I found the storytelling and the way it was executed to be particularly creative. It is non-linear, there is an occasional song and dance aspect. There are notable tonal shifts. There is a balance between comedy and drama. But when it comes to those last two things, it is kind of like a see-saw. It has its highs and lows. I found the comedy in particular to be funny, charming, and for the most part, it works. I found the drama to bring the film to a more down to earth feel that gives a sense of perspective for the characters at hand. This does not result in the best movie of the year. Far from it. But it does result in a film I do not regret seeing and one I think that if it is playing near you, would not make for a bad choice. It comes with plenty to enjoy even with its quirks, whether they work or not.

This film starts out in a lighthearted manner. But it sort of does a back and forth transition between genres where at one moment, it is serious. It is dramatic. Then eventually, it reverts back to being something of a comedy. If you have seen my last review, “Freelance,” you would know that meshing genres does not lead to the best results. But in this movie’s favor, it manages to utilize comedy in a way that is humorous. And it also blends in drama to the point where it manages to compel me. But it does not mean the film is without its imperfections. If anything, I think as fascinating as the events within these genre blends are, there is a noticeable sense of inconsistency between them. Because while comedy and drama can work when combined together, the shift from one genre to another feels nearly seismic at times. It does not really allow much room to breathe and the movie almost spends too much time focusing on one genre to the point where it almost has no identity. It is kind of a mish mash, and too extreme of one at that.

The best way I can describe “The Persian Version” is that it is two movies in one package. Both movies are really good, but they almost do not fit together. The story presents itself in two tonal opposites. In comic book movie speak, it’s like combining “Deadpool” with “V for Vendetta.” Both movies work perfectly on their own, and maybe if you put both together, they could lead to an interesting result. But combining both projects only lessens their value in a case like this.

Although given time to marinate, the movie presents two different tones that ultimately fit their respective narratives by the end. And the more I ponder, it gives me a good idea as to how this film’s main duo tends to see the world. In the back of Leila’s mind, she will do anything to embrace the fun and spontaneity of life. She will do anything to have a good time. She will do anything to keep herself happy. Meanwhile we see another story with her mother as the center where I am getting the sense that having fun may not be the top priority, and fun would only get in the way of what she thinks is important. But it is also shepherded by what these two have on their plate at their respective times of their lives.

The other thing I really appreciated about the movie is that it kind of gave me perspective as someone who is of similar age to Leila, who serves as the film’s protagonist. It reminded me that nobody is perfect. I often think about my parents growing up and realize that maybe they have made choices in life that they either regret or maybe their parents did not always agree with, but maybe they stood by them regardless of the outcome. That is not to suggest those choices are a bad thing, because in the end, they ultimately make us who we are. What matters is how we conduct our lives moving forward for ourselves, in addition to the people around us. In the end, even if our choices end up being mistakes, life finds a way to make us happy.

To top off all of what I just said, “The Persian Version” has a marvelous ensemble that is led beautifully by a mother-daughter duo played by Niousha Noor and Layla Mohammadi respectively. Both individuals are perfectly cast and play off each other very well. The family itself offers plenty of moments to enjoy. I thought Leila’s grandmother, Mamanjoon, was a highlight of the film. She also had my favorite line of the film that comes into play a couple times. It got a good laugh out of me. When it comes to slice of life-style films, “The Persian Version” gets plenty of things right, but it is not without its flaws. But would I watch it again? Perhaps so. It is by far one of the most unique movies of the year and if you are looking for something beyond the traditions of filmmaking, this is a decent option.

In the end, “The Persian Version” showcases the beauty of life, all the while highlighting problems that its core woman characters have to face at certain times of their lives. No matter how big or small. The movie is kind of like life itself. It has its fun moments. It has its downer moments. But by the end, everything tends to come full circle. I think this is a creative, one of a kind feature that despite not getting a lot of attention at the box office for the past number of weeks, certainly had mine. I am going to give “The Persian Version” a 7/10.

“The Persian Version” is now playing in select theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! If you enjoyed this review, good news! I have more coming! My next review is going to be for “Priscilla!” I got the chance to watch this film at the beginning of the month. It has been on my mind for quite a bit. I cannot wait to talk about it. Also coming soon, I have reviews coming for “The Tunnel to Summer, the Exit of Goodbyes” and “The Marvels.” Stay tuned! If you want to see this and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “The Persian Version?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite mother-daughter relationship in film? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Dicks: The Musical (2023): A24’s First Musical Delivers the Goods

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Dicks: The Musical” is directed by Larry Charles (Bruno, Curb Your Enthusiasm) and stars Megan Mullally (Will & Grace, Bob’s Burgers), Megan Thee Stallion (She-Hulk: Attorney at Law, Legendary), Bowen Yang (Saturday Night Live, Awkwafina is Nora from Queens), Nathan Lane (The Lion King, Stuart Little), Aaron Jackson (The Chris Gethard Show: Public Access, National Lampoon Radio Hour), and Josh Sharp (Jared & Ivanka, Search Party). This film is based on an off-Broadway musical titled “F*cking Identical Twins” and is about two business rivals who come to realization that they are long lost twin brothers. In an attempt to bring their divorced parents back together, they decide to swap places and disguise themselves as the other.

I have been curious about “Dicks: The Musical” ever since I first watched the trailer in August. I am not the biggest musical guy, but I have long been an A24 guy. They are not always consistent in quality, but that is a part of the young distributor’s charm. They always distribute content that has an identity of its own and would tend to carry certain notable qualities about it. Even when I end up hating a film of theirs like “Zola” or “The Whale,” there is still a specialty to those pictures. They always feel distinguished, individualistic, and polished no matter the budget.

In the case of “Dicks: The Musical,” the budget is $12 million. Not the most expensive movie, but it is one that uses its money wisely. Because every frame is packed with joyous splendor. From start to finish, I had a ball of a time with “Dicks: The Musical.” What sells the movie hardest is its marvelous cast who just so happen to play each role to the best of their ability, all to the point where I cannot imagine anybody else in their shoes. This is a film that refuses to take itself seriously. On it’s surface, this movie is like “The Parent Trap,” but different. In terms of recent movies, “Dicks: The Musical” kind of reminded me of “Bottoms,” because it is set in a universe that packs in various similarities to our own, but it is also one that feels like an enhancement of everyday life. Granted, it is a musical, which is not the most everyday feeling genre, so it only makes sense. And thankfully, as a musical, this movie works perfectly. All the songs are properly placed, well choreographed, well sung, and make sense within the context of the story. I am not going to pretend I am going to buy the soundtrack for this film, but the music accompanies everything else the film has to offer nicely.

That said, again, the film is budgeted at $12 million. When compared to recent musicals like “La La Land,” “Tick, Tick…BOOM!,” and Steven Spielberg’s “West Side Story” adaptation, it is significantly cheap. Despite my comments for the choreography and the songs, the budget does show at times when you consider everything put on screen. There may be occasional extravagance here and there, but that comes with infinite camp. Within all the pizzazz, there is a continued slight sense of humility.

The lead twins are played by Aaron Jackson and Josh Sharp. I have not known these names by any chance, but this movie could put them on the map. At least for me. Because it took me a bit to find out that not only is this movie based on something else… That something else just so happens to be a play in which they created and starred. Both of these men are stacked with talent and make for a perfect pair. I buy them as rivals, and I also buy them as brothers. I know this is probably a weird comparison to make, but they kind of remind me of the Smosh duo. Anthony Padilla and Ian Hecox. Their chemistry is always on point and they both consistently deliver high energy in addition to humor.

My favorite characters of the film have to be the twins’ parents. They have the best lines, the best quirks, the best backstories, and on top of that, their costumes and looks match the feel of the film. They look just as kooky as the vibe of this picture. They look like they fit the style and match the attire of a higher-up at Willy Wonka’s chocolate factory. The parents outfits pop just as much as their voices. Both talking and singing for that matter. I did not expect to be as invested in this film’s plot as I turned out to be. When a particular bombshell is revealed about Evelyn (Mullally) early on in the film, I was very curious as to where things would go from here. I was kind of expecting the big obstacle of the movie to be that these two people don’t really feel anything for each other the way they once did. While that idea is noticeable throughout the script, there is more to their disconnect than meets the eye. And some of it, particularly regarding Evelyn’s bombshell, is wonderfully ridiculous.

My biggest surprise of the film would have to be Megan Thee Stallion. I thought she was really good here. I don’t listen to her music, though I have heard her sing before on “Saturday Night Live,” I thought she stood out. And while “Dicks: The Musical” is not her first acting gig, she is not the first person I would think of casting in a film if I were to make one. I did see her guest appearance in “She-Hulk: Attorney at Law” as herself, but even with her limited role, I thought she was a tad stiff. To my pleasant surprise, she is a lot better here. I do not know what her future is as an actor, though I do see she has an upcoming film with Adam Sandler and the Safdie Brothers in the works. That said, I thought she was a fine choice to play the character of Gloria. She is dynamic, has tons of personality, and of course, because it is a musical, she has a chance to unleash a proper singing voice.

I do not know when would be the next time I would plan on sitting down and watching “Dicks: The Musical.” I have seen much better entries to this genre that have more replay value. Heck, going back to Steven Spielberg’s “West Side Story,” I ended up seeing it twice in theaters and I also rewatched it on 4K Blu-ray. If I had any other gripes with the film, it would be that the comedy, while funny, never reaches a level where I am rolling on the floor. It is worthy of chuckles, but maybe not death-inducing laughter. Even so, I found the movie to be funny. I found it to be joy-filled. I found it to have a ton of character. It has the vivid nature of a Wes Anderson movie with the ridiculousness of, apologies if this is too recent, but I think it is a fine example, “Bottoms.” It is energetic, fast, and delivers a happy go lucky, stupid good time.

In the end, “Dicks: The Musical” gets my recommendation if you are looking for something quick and fun to watch. And I do mean it, the movie is quick. Not only is it tightly paced, but the runtime is 86 minutes. If you want to watch something neat without having to kill a ton of time, “Dicks: The Musical” is a nice choice. I have seen better comedies. I have seen better musicals. But even so, “Dicks: The Musical” handles both genres respectably. This is A24’s first musical, and I doubt it is their last. And if it is not their last, I doubt this is their best. But if you make the choice to check it out, you are not doing yourself any disservice. It is a good movie, give it a watch sometime. I am going to give “Dicks: The Musical” a 7/10.

“Dicks: The Musical” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! If you enjoyed this review, good news! There are plenty more where that came from! If you missed out on my Ridley Scottober event, you are in luck! Because if you click any of the following links, you can check out my reviews for “Body of Lies,” “Gladiator,” “All the Money in the World,” and “Blade Runner!” Check them out! My next review is going to be for Martin Scorsese’s latest piece of cinema, “Killers of the Flower Moon!” Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Freelance,” “The Persian Version,” “Priscilla,” and “The Tunnel to Summer, the Exit of Goodbyes!” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Dicks: The Musical?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite A24 film? At the risk of sounding too mainstream, I gotta go with “Everything Everywhere All at Once.” Let me know down your picks down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Dumb Money (2023): A True Story Rich in Humor and Stars

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Dumb Money” is directed by Craig Gillespie (I, Tonya, Cruella) and stars Paul Dano (The Batman, The Fabelmans), Pete Davidson (The King of Staten Island, Big Time Adolescence), Vincent D’Onofrio (Daredevil, Full Metal Jacket), America Ferrera (Barbie, How to Train Your Dragon), Nick Offerman (Parks and Recreation, The Founder), Anthony Ramos (In the Heights, Transformers: Rise of the Beasts), Sebastian Stan (Captain America: The First Avenger, I, Tonya), Shailene Woodley (Divergent, Big Little Lies), and Seth Rogen (Neighbors, Sausage Party). This film is inspired by Ben Mezrich’s “The Antisocial Network,” a book based on true events. The story of “Dumb Money” captures ordinary people subverting the expectations of Wall Street and turning GameStop into the hottest company on the stock market.

I never got involved in the stock market in any capacity throughout my life. It is just something I have never gotten around to. But even as someone who has never gotten involved, there were times in 2021 where I could not scroll through social media without seeing something related to GameStop, or heck, even AMC Theatres. Both companies were the talks of the town at the time because a ton of people kept buying their stock, and on the surface, it felt like an ongoing joke, but for some people, it was more than that. This is a fascinating story. Therefore, I was surprised, but also delighted, that people were making a movie of this caliber on it as soon as they were. On the surface, the cast is fantastic. Many of them either had recent roles that were highlights of their respective works or have maintained careers that have kept my attention for a long time.

When I think of the GameStop stock story, part of me wants to laugh about it. I mean, come on! It is a physical media company that is as much the butt of the joke as it is synonymous with its own industry. If you live in an area where used game stores are a rarity, chances are you will, even with recent closures, have a GameStop or two within close distance. I am a GameStop customer and shop there multiple times a year. I don’t think all their business practices are great, but they usually provide a decent experience if you are looking for something in particular. In fact, I almost ended up working for GameStop in my teens. Having seen this film, I realize that as much as it highlights the people who are investing in GameStop, it is not afraid to joke about some of the things the company has done. Additionally, “Dumb Money” seems to satirize retail environments in general. I previously worked in retail. Not at GameStop, but still. And this kind of took me back in a way. One of my favorite segments of the movie is this bond between a GameStop employee and their boss. Each scene between them got a laugh out of me. This movie highlights, as I previously knew, the fact that GameStop remained open during the pandemic as an essential business. Sure, it sold certain technologies that people often used during the pandemic, but it is far from the most essential of businesses.

My favorite dig this movie does towards the large gaming chain is when they reference the idea of employees doing a TikTok dance challenge as part of a company contest. This is true by the way. The moment I heard that joke, I was in shock, and then in amazement. Because I nearly forgot that happened. Or more specifically, that it almost did. For those who don’t know, GameStop proposed a challenge to its employees to dance to a song on TikTok in the hopes of achieving extra hours on Black Friday week. This is the thing I love about “Dumb Money,” it is a film that balances humor and respect towards its subject matter. But at the end of the day, it is also a film that tells marvelous tales of underdogs.

There are several underdogs in this movie, and their stories are all compelling. In fact, one of those underdogs is a GameStop employee played by Anthony Ramos. If I did not suggest it already, I enjoyed his presence in the film and his character was well written. Meanwhile you have a couple college students trying to strike it rich. Both of whom are wonderfully played by Myha’la Herrold and Talia Ryder. On another side of the spectrum is a struggling nurse named Jenny, played by America Ferrera, whose presence oozed of charisma every moment she was on screen. But at the center of it all is Keith Gill, who spends his off time from his job on the Internet talking about stocks and Wall Street. The working man and family background of this character made him a compelling protagonist, in addition to Paul Dano’s acting method.

I like all the characters in “Dumb Money,” and I must say the antagonists of the film, specifically those more connected with Wall Street such as Seth Rogen’s Gabe Plotkin, are also fun to watch. At times, this movie basically spitballs who to root for, which is not a hard thing for me to do considering the personality traits and backbones of the antagonists. But there is one scene that perhaps over-embellishes the necessity to root against Gabe. This movie is set during the early-ish days of the COVID-19 pandemic. And one of the earliest things we learn about Gabe is that he and his family now own a new place in Florida so they could party hard during the pandemic. I was, and still am to a degree, one of those people who takes the recent events of the pandemic seriously. I am not perfect, but I still keep everything about it in the back my mind. I remember when the pandemic first started, my family and I had to balance our finances because of the way the economy flipped on its head. And I was primarily concerned about getting my grandparents sick. Meanwhile, this guy is more concerned about being able to party like an animal. The difference here is obvious.

“Dumb Money” is one of those stories that highlights the divide between classes. You have Wall Street up at the top and people like Keith Gill, who is not poor, but making chump change in comparison. It shows how even people at the top feel like they might not have enough despite their enormous success. Meanwhile, this GameStop story, whether it will be remembered more as a triumph for people outside Wall Street or as a silly meme that caught a lot of people’s attention, shows that there may be room for regular people when it comes to striking it big on the stock market. This is a story set in recent times that often delivers humor highlighting said times. I am wondering how well this movie is going to age as a comedy because some of its humor is COVID-driven, but there are plenty of other jokes emitting a more timeless feel to balance it out. “Dumb Money” is very funny, entertaining, and brings out a heck of a story. Before this movie, I looked at the GameStop stock trend as a silly fad, but this movie presents it as something more. And that’s probably the best thing about it. It added depth to this subject for me that I was not expecting. A job well done is in order to everyone involved with this movie.

In the end, “Dumb Money” is rich in excellence. It is not my favorite movie of the year, but when it comes to comedy, this movie has a ton of laughs, and as a drama, it is way more compelling than it needs to be. It presents all these individual stories from different walks of life and makes one big, masterful connection out of all of them. “Dumb Money” is neither short on stars or chuckles. Go check it out if you get a chance. I am going to give “Dumb Money” a 7/10.

“Dumb Money” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! Stay tuned because I have reviews coming for “It Lives Inside,” “Dicks: The Musical,” and “Killers of the Flower Moon!” But in addition to those reviews, I have my last review of the Ridley Scottober series dropping this week. If you want to read my reviews in the series so far, you can check out my thoughts on “Body of Lies,” “Gladiator,” and “All the Money in the World.” As for this last review coming up, I must claim it is a big one. I am talking about “Blade Runner!” Make sure you check out these reviews, past and future, when you get a chance! And you can do so by following Scene Before either with an email or a WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Dumb Money?” What did you think about it? Or, do you shop at GameStop? If not, what is your gaming store of choice? Do you even play video games? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Bottoms (2023): A Rambunctious, Raunchy Comedy That is Too Cool for School

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Bottoms” is written and directed by Emma Seligman (Shiva Baby, Void) and stars her co-writer, Rachel Sennott (Bodies Bodies Bodies, Call Your Mother). Joining her in this cast are actors including Ayo Edebiri (Big Mouth, Up Next), Ruby Cruz (Mare of Easttown, Willow), Havana Rose Liu (No Exit, Mayday), Kaia Gerber (American Horror Stories, Babylon), Nicholas Galitzine (Cinderella, Chambers), Miles Fowler (Women of the Movement, The Resident), Dagmara Domińczyk (Succession, We Own This City), and Marshawn Lynch (80 for Brady, Westworld). This film is about two queer girls who start a fight club in their high school that they say is meant to empower women. Only thing, the duo started the club to potentially get lucky with cheerleaders.

The concept of this movie won me over as soon as I heard it. From the very beginning, “Bottoms” sounded like a bombastic, ridiculous good time. Little did I know what I was in for, because I went in expecting this film to be a fine mix of violent and naughty scenes, but this movie overdelivered on its premise because it does not feel like something that fits in our world. It feels like someplace much goofier, perhaps a little more fun than our world. If anything, “Bottoms” plays like a live-action episode of “Family Guy.” That is if “Family Guy” centered around two teenage girls. It is horny, fast, and over the top. Not once was I bored, and I was overwhelmed with the sense of immersion this movie gave me from scene one. I often think about some of my favorite movies like “Blade Runner” and “2001: A Space Odyssey” and when it comes to those films in particular, they emit a certain atmosphere from start to finish. I am not saying “Bottoms” is on the same level those two films, but the atmosphere of this film does a really good job at taking me from my world to the one inside the screen. “Bottoms” is not my favorite movie of the year. In fact, when it comes to this year in comedy, I still give a slight edge to “Joy Ride,” which deserved to do much better at the box office.

Having seen “Bottoms” in live-action, the movie works perfectly the way it is. But I think an argument can be made to justify setting this universe in an animated form. There are a lot of moments that feel cartoony, but yet they never take me out of the movie. Because the vibe is clearly established from the beginning. It goes for such a quick, almost blink you’ll miss it pace from scene one, and it never stops. The best live-action comparison that comes to mind is “Scott Pilgrim vs. the World.” Because the film’s dynamic stylization feels like a graphic novel come to life. Once the film kicks into gear, it is full of incredibly kinetic energy. “Bottoms” does not have the colorful stylization “Scott Pilgrim” has, but when it comes to dialogue, displayed mannerisms, and personality, this film reaches for the end zone. Plus there are moments of the movie that do not feel they would happen in our lives, but work super well for that world. One of the storylines of “Bottoms” involves the two leads getting into hot water over ruining an egotistical high school football player’s chances of being able to play. How so? By tapping his kneecaps with a car while his girlfriend sits in the backseat. The reaction on said football player’s part is equal to if I were ever so slightly gored by a bull. It completely jumps the shark, but I cannot help but embrace it. And while there are hints of realism in this scenario, the school takes this issue to a level that feels more important than, I do not know, making sure students barely pay attention in advanced algebra.

Say what you want about “high school drama.” This film does a good job at taking situations that may seem silly and miniscule, and making them come off as if they have significantly higher stakes. And as everything is going down, I am rooting for the two leads. Both of them are likable and are well played by their respective performers. Rachel Sennott and Ayo Edebiri are a perfect combo. Speaking of perfect combos, Havana Rose Liu and Kaia Gerber do a fantastic job as the cheerleaders who just so happen to be heavily desired by the two leads. I am as straight as they come, that said I can see why these two leads were attracted to these particular cheerleaders.

But when it comes to the high school in “Bottoms,” this place is in contention to be the single greatest on-screen school in cinematic history. Not because of their ability to educate. Actually kind of the opposite. It goes to show how little the movie takes itself seriously. Because not only are the students and staff, primarily those who we see on screen most of the time, charming as heck. But one of the reasons why “Bottoms” works so well as a comedy is because when it comes to establishing its high school, it is often riddled with things would often get a traditional high school either investigated or shut down. One of the best gags of the movie are the moments when the loudspeaker is being used, and it brings out moments where the principal asks the two leads to come see him, all the while referring to them as “gay and untalented.”

I mentioned this movie is horny. And I am not just talking about the teens. Of course they are horny. They are teenagers. What do you expect? But this movie has a teacher, MARVELOUSLY portrayed by Marshawn Lynch, a freaking football player, having a casual conversation with the leads all the while exposing a dirty magazine. The school football team all look like Ken dolls come to life. Speaking of horny, the school football team happens to be marketing themselves throughout the movie, encouraging supporters to “get horny” for them.

When I watch certain movies, I will sometimes say that there are things that do not add up or make sense within everything the film is trying to showcase on screen. In the case of “Bottoms,” the high level of absurdity of the film is played in its favor. The vibe of the film is clearly established from the beginning. It is almost like a drug. The film knows what it is. It refuses to take itself seriously, and it is all the better for it.

But just because “Bottoms” manages to be constantly naughty, does not mean it stays away from feeling sweet. I am not going to go into much detail as to what the sweet moments are, but there are one or two moments in the movie that allow me to breathe in a story that is presented at such a breakneck pace, and they provided a fine mix of innocence and grace. They were very well executed.

Comedy, like many other aspects of art, happens to be a completely subjective matter. When it comes to the comedy of “Bottoms,” I was laughing consistently. Between this film, “No Hard Feelings,” and “Joy Ride,” I am really glad we are starting to witness a comeback of great raunchy comedy in cinema. If we can get more films like these that are just as good, I will continue to check them out.

In the end, “Bottoms” is one of my top movies of the summer. Again, when it comes to pure laughter and humor, I think “Joy Ride” is slightly better. But “Bottoms” is a close second regarding comedy this year. I do not think we had a year in cinema this decent for comedy since 2018. Ever since COVID-19 started, I feel like pure, straight-up comedies have been missing from the movie market, which is kind of sad because after the start of a pandemic where everything is depressing and seemingly world-ending, you would want a good laugh every once in a while. These movies have all done that with excellence, with “Bottoms” being the latest example. The writing is on point, the casting is perfect, including Marshawn Lynch to my delightful surprise, and it is a rare film where I accept its unserious, goofy tendencies. Not once do they feel distracting. This is a movie that I would not mind watching again if given the chance, and I imagine it aging better with each viewing. I am going to give “Bottoms” an 8/10.

“Bottoms” is now playing in theaters. It is also available to buy on VOD.

Thanks for reading this review! My next reviews are going to be for “A Haunting in Venice,” “The Creator,” and “Dumb Money.” Stay tuned! If you want to see this and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Bottoms?” As silly of a question as that sounds, I am being serious. Did you watch the movie “Bottoms?” What did you think about it? Or, what is a movie you admire that refuses to take itself seriously? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!