Review

Ready or Not 2: Here I Come (2026): The Sequel to My Favorite Film of 2019 is Finally Here… Was it Worth the Wait?

Posted on by Jack Drees

© 2026 SEARCHLIGHT PICTURES

“Ready or Not 2: Here I Come” is directed by Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett, the same directing duo behind the original “Ready or Not” released in 2019. This film stars Samara Weaving (Bill & Ted Face the Music, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri), Kathryn Newton (Blockers, Freaky), Sarah Michelle Gellar (All My Children, Buffy the Vampire Slayer), Shawn Hatosy (Animal Kingdom, Southland), David Cronenberg (The Fly, Scanners), and Elijah Wood (The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, Grand Piano). This sequel once again follows Grace (Weaving), who just survived a nightmarish game of hide and seek against the Le Domas family. Now, she must face off against several elite families that make up the Council to play the same game with a twist.

“Ready or Not 2: Here I Come” is a movie I did not have on my bingo card. I say this as someone who loves the first film to death. “Ready or Not” remains my favorite film of 2019. Prior to watching this sequel, I took the opportunity to rewatch the original. It holds up tremendously. The ending is chef’s kiss. The simple utterance of “In-laws” is a top five final line in the history of cinema. It is up there with “Nobody’s perfect” from “Some Like it Hot.” I am not the most knowledgeable horror nut, but “Ready or Not” is an easy favorite of mine within the entire genre.

As much as I was looking forward to this movie, it had a lot to live up to. The original had a simple but fun concept. It contained a plethora of funny lines. It had a fantastic cast carried by Samara Weaving. If you know how the first movie went down, you would know that it would be impossible to bring most of that cast back. But to my delight, Weaving, once again, is leading this film and cooking up a killer performance with fire. She is one of the film’s many positives. Also, I know the term scream queen gets thrown around a lot amongst horror circles. To take that concept literally, Weaving’s screams are some of the most unique I have ever heard. It is to the point where I cannot imagine another soul playing her character.

Even you, Margot Robbie! I know you and Samara look so much alike, but I highly doubt your screams sound alike!

With this film being a sequel, it tends to follow the “bigger is better” cliche. Although if you are aware of my thoughts on various sequels over the years, you would know that I do not think they always live up to that phrase. “Ready or Not” is a beautifully simple movie that takes a childhood game as pure as hide and seek and turns it into an absolute nightmare. “Ready or Not 2: Here I Come,” puts its main character, Grace, in a situation where she has to play hide and seek against a ton of rich family members. Again. The before, during, and after, are a little different from the original. Although another similarity is that if these family members do not kill Grace by dawn, they die. The film does a fairly decent job at laying out some of the complications that make this experience different, and it also raises the stakes for the main character by bringing her sister Faith (Newton) into the mix and holding her captive. It also puts the elite family members in a situation where they have to do more than simply kill Grace. While doing so, they are competing for the Council’s “High Seat” now that the person who used to be associated with that position has died.

Bringing Faith into the picture does come as a bit of a surprise, as we learn a little bit about Grace’s backstory in the original movie, but not once does she mention she has a sister. Nevertheless, the sequel does a good job at making me believe these two are sisters. For starters, they look quite a bit alike between their blonde hair, big eyes, and expressive personalities. Also, knowing what we know about Grace from the original, I buy the fact that the two siblings had a bit of a falling out. It enhances that scene from the 2019 film where Grace talks about her family life, or lack thereof.

I enjoyed both “Ready or Not” and its sequel, but if you were to ask me which of these two movies I prefer, I would easily pick the original. The main reason is because Grace seems to go on a more personal journey. Sure, her sister is in the sequel, but as we get to the inciting incident of the first movie, it makes her rethink everything about her partner, her love life, her in-laws, whether she wants to be married… The first film was more interesting because it involved people she once trusted trying to kill her. The second film is an extension of that killer family, but without her partner, Grace is simply trying to defend herself against a group that held her captive.

So, the film may not be as memorable as the original, but to me, this could almost be the “Gladiator II” of the “Ready or Not” franchise. Is the story as exciting? Probably not, though it did keep my interest. But the action and humor more than make up for the film’s less intriguing plot. Every kill is terrifically done and the antagonistic family members come off with as much personality as those in the 2019 predecessor. The changes they made for how the game works were fun to see play out. It was also nifty to see Elijah Wood play a bad guy. Wood is not the first person I would associate with the term villain, but this film did make me reconsider. I was quite pleased with his quiet yet commanding performance. He reminded me of Grand Moff Tarkin in the original “Star Wars.” He does not have a big mouth, but every word that seems to come out of it sounds like it matters.

This sequel came out a little more than six and a half years following the original’s release date. As an avid fan of the original, I knew I was going to be in the cinema as soon as possible to see it. But even as a fan, I questioned if a sequel was the most sound idea. Judging by the fact that I liked the second movie, I could say it was. But even as someone who likes it, I recognize that the original is out of this film’s league. That said, I did dig the finale of the film. Much like the original, there were one or two out of left out of field moments that stuck the landing. I walked out of this film having a fun time. It added some exciting new material to the lore, maintained a good pace, and ended up having some genuine laugh out loud moments.

In the end, I really liked this film. It offers a lot of familiar aspects from the original. Sometimes expanding upon them. I prefer the first film’s simplicity and cast a bit more, but this new cast is by no means bad. They are actually quite fun to watch. That said, this film is directed by Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett, the same duo behind the original, and it shows. The duo helm each scene with perfect timing, balance scares and humor fantastically, and refuse to compromise on blood and gore. Kathryn Newton, who previously worked with these two in the excellent horror-comedy “Abigail,” is a lovely addition to the cast, and so is Elijah Wood. This film came out the same weekend as “Project Hail Mary,” which is doing very well at the box office. If that film is sold out, then “Ready or Not 2: Here I Come” is not a bad option to have as a backup as long as you are okay with violence and intense sequences. I am going to give “Ready or Not 2: Here I Come” a 7/10.

“Ready or Not 2: Here I Come” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! As a reminder, Scene Before is now officially 10 years old, and I am doing a brand new video series by the name of Movie Requests in honor of the occasion. Feel to check out my latest episode featuring “Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back” actor Jason Mewes, who requested I should talk about “House Party.” If you want to see more episodes, leave a like on YouTube and subscribe to my channel so you can stay up to date!

I am also happy to remind everyone that the next guest in the Movie Requests series is going to be “Avatar” actor Joel David Moore. You can catch that episode Sunday, April 19th. I have yet to watch his movie of choice, but I look forward to checking it out and talking about it!

My next review is going to for “They Will Kill You.” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “You’re Dating a Narcissist!,” “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie,” “The Drama,” and “Exit 8.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Ready or Not 2: Here I Come?” What did you think about it? Or, which of the two “Ready or Not” movies do you prefer? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Project Hail Mary (2026): A Spectacular, Awe-Inspiring Adaptation of Andy Weir’s Hit Novel

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Project Hail Mary” is directed by Phil Lord and Christopher Miller (Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, The LEGO Movie) and stars Ryan Gosling (La La Land, Blade Runner 2049), Sandra Hüller (Anatomy of a Fall, Zone of Interest), James Ortiz (Cryptid, The Woodsman), and Lionel Boyce (Loiter Squad, The Bear). This film is based on a novel by Andy Weir, who also wrote the book “The Martian,” which has since been adapted into a hit movie starring Matt Damon. “Project Hail Mary” follows a middle school teacher-turned-astronaut by the name of Ryland Grace who is put on a mission to stop a mysterious substance from destroying the earth’s sun.

I am not that much of a reader. Although there have been rare occasions where a movie would come out and I would read the book sometime before seeing it. I did this years ago for “The Martian,” by Andy Weir, which has become one of my favorite reads. The movie, while not as good as the book, is utterly amazing. Much like the book, I found the movie to be extremely funny and endlessly engaging. As someone who found myself to be a fan of Andy Weir’s writing style, I thought I would give the “Project Hail Mary” book a shot. I barely finished it before I saw the movie, but I really liked the book. It maintains the humor that Weir mastered in “The Martian,” while delivering something more complicated and adventurous. I think “The Martian” is the superior read, but both books are winners.

The hype train was real going into “Project Hail Mary.” Not just because it was based on a well received book… Not only because I happen to concur with those who say the book is great… Not just because I am a sci-fi junkie… Not just because it stars Ryan Gosling… Not just because it is directed by Phil Lord and Christopher Miller… But the trailers and the footage leading up to the movie, for the most part, looked incredible. The effects were pure eye candy. The sets looked great. The camerawork looked awe-inspiring. The film was even shot in true IMAX… Granted, it is technically digital. But still.

Maybe I am overexaggerating my excitement a bit. If there is any movie this year I would have been looking forward to more than any other, it would be “The Odyssey,” but “Project Hail Mary” was up there based on everything that I have seen, heard, and read prior to checking it out, including the overwhelmingly positive reviews.

Ladies and gentlemen, believe the hype. Actually… No. The hype might actually be too small.

“Project Hail Mary” is the best movie I have watched in years.

It has not been since “Godzilla Minus One” that I walked out of a movie buzzing so excessively.

As previously mentioned, I have read the book. I thoroughly enjoyed the book. I thought the way Weir told the story was unique. I think I prefer the movie. If you told me that Steven Spielberg directed this film, I would believe you. I said this some time ago with “Arco,” but I meant that more as a statement on the film’s style rather than its quality. This not only reminds me of some of Spielberg’s past movies, but it is just as watchable as some of his greatest hits. My dad, who for the record did not read the book, saw the movie with me. He had a great time. He said the movie reminded him of “Close Encounters of the Third Kind.” To me, “Project Hail Mary” feels like “E.T.” for a new generation. Only this time around, not as much of the story is set on earth.

Honestly, there are a number of filmmakers whose work I could compare this to, and I mean that as a positive. This film reminds me of some of my favorite projects said filmmakers have done. In addition to this film delivering Spielberg vibes, it comes off as what would happen if a Christopher Nolan epic had a baby with a James Gunn adventure. It has the scope and ambition of one of Nolan’s blockbusters and the humor and fun of Gunn.

This movie is a pure bundle of joy. I should not be surprised, as this movie is done by Phil Lord and Christopher Miller, who have produced some of my favorite films of the past decade like “The Mitchells vs. the Machines” and the “Spider-Verse” movies.

They have also done “The LEGO Movie,” which is so much better than it should be. If I ever have a conservations with people discussing my personal favorite films of all time, I am proud to say “The LEGO Movie” and “Project Hail Mary” will both likely be part of said conversations.

No, seriously, who is Ryan Gosling’s agent? Because his resume, especially over the past ten years, is filled with banger after banger after banger, with this film being the latest example. “La La Land” is extravagant and otherworldly. “Blade Runner 2049” was amazing despite not doing so hot at the box office. “First Man” was moving. “Barbie” was not just a good movie, but Gosling practically stole the show. When I think of the best actors working today without an Oscar, Gosling is somewhere close to the best of the best. After seeing “Project Hail Mary,” I am convinced that not only is Gosling capable of being nominated, but also of winning an Oscar next year. Granted, it is only spring. The Oscars are practically a year from now. But I have a feeling that Gosling’s performance can sit well with people through the coming months as he is given lots to do and handles all of it with excellence.

It also helps that he plays such a likable character. There is a line in this film where Ryan Gosling’s character, Ryland Grace, says he puts the “not” in astronaut. As corny as that may sound, that line solidifies his entire journey. I do not want to spoil everything that happens in this movie, but the narrative constantly unfolds bits and pieces of the character as it goes along through its clever non-linear format. Much of the film is set in space, but there are portions that take place on earth, and those portions are surprisingly engaging. Grace is a middle school teacher, which only adds to his likability. Remember “Interstellar?” Arguably the biggest drive Cooper has in that film that allows him to try to save earth are his children. Grace does not have any kids, but his middle school class, while temporary, almost comes off as a set of children he never had.

In a multitude of other possible movies, Grace would be the star of the show. But one character constantly steals the spotlight, and that is Rocky. Much of the film features these two in close quarters as they learn about each other, their worlds, their backstories on how they found each other, to the point where they end up working together not only to save earth, but Rocky’s own planet.

Remember the Grogu craze when “The Mandalorian” came out? It felt like for months that Grogu fever, and by extension, merchandise, was everywhere. Heck, I own a pair of Grogu socks that are worn out, but I cannot get rid of them. They’re comfortable, and I like the design. There is a fine line that a film rides with a “merchandisable” character, which I would say Rocky just so happens to be. For me, to get me to buy a character’s merchandise, I would prefer to realize I like said character before wasting my money. Thankfully for this film, Rocky is a riot. Having read the book, I had no clue how they were going to portray him in the movie, but I was actually surprised with how much I loved his first moments on screen. He is adorable, but also rather smart. Rocky is a winning combination. James Ortiz does an excellent job on the voice. Given how Rocky is an alien, the communication styles vary significantly between him and Grace, but I enjoyed getting to see how the movie showcases both characters as they learn how to communicate back and forth.

Rocky also has the best line in the movie, and without giving any context to the situation, all I will say is that it involves a guy named Mark. You will know it when you hear it.

I said before that this film reminded me a lot of “E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial” and I could sum up the basic reasons… Both films heavily feature bonds between a human and an alien. Both have inspiring musical scores. Both have characters who want to do what they can to get home. But the real reason why I find this to be “E.T.” for the next generation is that the film is an incredibly emotional experience. I did not cry during “Project Hail Mary,” but I would not be surprised to be sitting during this film again and seeing other people wiping tears off their faces. This film has everything that reminds me of why I love the movies. Well-realized characters with their own quirks… A great story that enlightens the soul… Stunning visuals and audio that excite on every level.

Some could argue that I am rather predisposed to liking “Project Hail Mary.” Not only did I read the book and like it, but if you know me well, you would know that sci-fi is my preferred genre. It does not mean every science fiction tale is great. I have seen a few “Star Wars” movies I would rather forget. In fact, having read the book, I recognize that not everything from the source material is going to find its way into the film. It is too long, and I think the general audiences can only take so much technical and scientific jargon. Are there things from the book that I am disappointed are not in the movie? Yes. There is a pinch of backstory involving Stratt towards the book’s end that moved me. But these are two separate things. I am not going to let the dismissal of that material affect my verdict of the film, because as a general movie, regardless of what it was based on, this was one of the most unbelievable experiences I have ever had.

“Project Hail Mary” presents a universal problem, as a mysterious creature is causing the sun to die. On the surface, one would think this film is about saving the world. And in a way, it is. But as soon as Rocky is brought into the picture, the film basically gets to the point where both he and Grace think bigger. The journey these two go on together as friends is truly something. I could honestly watch a weekly sitcom starring these two. But the film, as fun and joyous as it is, is simultaneously sad. You have this protagonist who minute by minute is trying to remember every little thing about himself. He finds out he is alone. He is tasked with mankind’s most important mission, and his only escape appears to be Rocky. And you might think he has people back on earth to save. Sure, he has the people he knows from his school. But he has no lover, no pets. Nobody. All he has is himself, the children he will likely only see for portions of his life, and Rocky. But the film manages to balance the sadness with more optimistic moments, hilarious lines, and a satisfying ending. This is the kind of movie that I can see a lot of people going to multiple times, bringing new people with each go. Heck, I am already thinking about who I would bring for a second viewing. If you are still reading this and have not seen this movie, please stop what you are doing and go check it out. Do not pirate the film. Go to a theater. See it on a big screen. Do it as soon as you possibly can.

In the end, I cannot stop thinking about “Project Hail Mary.” I read the book before checking out this movie, but I have to say I enjoyed the movie more than I did the book. There are certain scenes in this film that honestly play out ten times better as visuals rather than text. I have a pretty active imagination, but even I have to say some of these scenes were better than how I interpreted them. Ryan Gosling gives the performance of a lifetime. James Ortiz is fantastically cast as the voice of Rocky. Sandra Hüller does a great job as Stratt. Overall, the cast brings their A-game. The musical score is riveting. The cinematography is easy on the eyes. Phil Lord and Christopher Miller deliver a spectacle for the ages. Everything in the story from the beginning to end had me hooked. It is a longer film at two hours and thirty-six minutes, but it is never boring! Please go see this movie. It will make you laugh. It may even make you cry. Amazon does not have a long history as a film distribution company, but this is easily my favorite film they have put out thus far. If you are reading this review around its publication, do not wait for Prime, if there is a prime time to go see “Project Hail Mary,” it is now. I am going to give “Project Hail Mary” a 10/10.

“Project Hail Mary” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! I want to remind everyone that in honor of Scene Before’s 10th anniversary, I started a new series called Movie Requests and if you would like, you can now check out my latest episode, where “Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back” star Jason Mewes requests I talk about “House Party.” And if you want to see future episodes, please consider subscribing to my YouTube channel that way you can see them as soon as they drop!

My next review is going to be for “Ready or Not 2: Here I Come!” Also, coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “They Will Kill You,” “You’re Dating a Narcissist!,” “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie,” and “The Drama.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Project Hail Mary?” What did you think about it? Or, did you read the “Project Hail Mary” book? What did you think about that? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Hoppers (2026): A Dam Good Animation

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Hoppers” is directed by Daniel Chong (We Bare Bears, We Baby Bears) and stars Piper Curda (A.N.T. Farm, Teen Beach 2), Bobby Moynihan (Saturday Night Live, The Secret Life of Pets), Jon Hamm (Mad Men, Keeping Up with the Joneses), Kathy Najimy (King of the Hill, WALL-E), and Dave Franco (Together, The Disaster Artist). This film is about a young girl named Mabel who uses a new technology to allow her consciousness to hop into a robotic beaver. Despite discouragement from those working on the tech, Mabel uses her newfound beaverhood as an opportunity to save a glade from being replaced by a freeway.

You ever hear the saying “Just another Tuesday?” Well, that phrase applies to Pixar. Specifically, when it comes to describing their ability to pump out one solid movie after another. Not every one is perfect, but the studio has unleashed a ton of hits over the years, including a couple all-timers like “The Incredibles” or “Inside Out.”

Watching a new Pixar movie always feels like an event, because while they are not the only group dedicated to making animations, I always see Pixar as the gold standard. It has come to the point where I find inferior Pixar projects to be better than most movies. Do I think “Elio” is a masterpiece? No. But did I enjoy it and take something from it? Absolutely. Even with “Elemental” turning out to be lackluster, I continue to find myself onboard Pixar’s train for whatever they have in store.

As much as I look forward to seeing what Pixar brings to the table with franchise extensions including “Toy Story 5” and “Incredibles 3,” I am often more engaged when I find out about one of their original projects, including “Hoppers.” That said, while the movie did look fun and hilarious based on what I saw in the marketing, I will admit that the movie did turn me off slightly even while watching the trailers, as they admit how much their concept sounds like “Avatar.” Although in fairness, if you break down “Avatar,” it has ripped off quite a few other films like “Pocahontas” and “Dances with Wolves.”

Despite the film’s self-admitted ripping off of sorts, there is plenty in it to enjoy. In fact, I think it is just about as enjoyable as the first “Avatar.” Much like how I think “Avatar” is not James Cameron’s best work, I would have to say the same is true for “Hoppers.” Nevertheless, both movies are worth watching. These two stories just so happen to play around with similar ideas beyond just having someone take on the form of another living thing. They both highlight how humanity tends to mistreat other creatures, intentionally or not. “Hoppers” also taps into the idea that humans often fail to realize that they are not the center of the universe. As humans we are taught to appreciate nature, but in the past couple hundred years we have become so reliant on convenience and industrialization to the point that we forget to care for other animals.

I saw this film with a couple friends, and one of those friends said this film is Pixar’s closest cousin to “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.” I would partially agree with them as, like that film when put next to others in its franchise, is not exactly the best one. But also, like “Temple of Doom,” there are some surprisingly dark moments. There is a particular death that comes in this film. Wow. Characters die in a movie. What a spoiler. But without specifying, there is one death involving a clap that caught me by total surprise. You will know it when you see it. If you saw the trailer, you would know that a good chunk of the movie is dedicated to other creatures trying to “squish” humans for everything they have done. That said, the trailers make this film look totally lighthearted. It was a bit darker than I anticipated. There are some segments involving the animals’ aspirations that lead to some eerie visuals or concepts. I do not want to spoil much, but the end of the movie has some “facial expressions” if you will, that I cannot stop thinking about.

Speaking of things I cannot stop thinking about, I like the film’s protagonist, Mabel. She comes off as smart, though a bit rebellious. Yet she is not necessarily pushy. The movie does a great job at creating someone whose passion for nature is as strong as her desire to preserve it. While this film is not as emotionally charging, there are some sentimental moments between Mabel and her Grandma Tanaka that felt reminiscent of watching earlier moments of “Up.” Much like that Pixar classic, “Hoppers” works so well because not only is Mabel doing what she’s doing for herself, she is thinking of the people in her life each step of the way. She is an individual who clearly wants something to go her way, but oftentimes cares enough about others during her journey to see said thing play out.

Story-wise, this film reminds me of a lot of other movies, including some of Pixar’s own like “Up,” “Ratatoullie,” or “A Bug’s Life.” This film is not exactly the same as all of these, but it borrows a lot of elements from their stories like large insect casts, the “humans are dangerous” cliche, or the general appreciation of nature. “Hoppers” is far from Pixar’s best film. To me, it is mid-tier Pixar, which is still better than a lot of movies. I would probably put it in the same boat as “Onward” or “Inside Out 2.” Yet “Hoppers” borrows a lot of traits from some of Pixar’s most memorable stories and creates a fun remix out of them.

In some ways, I think you would be forgiven if “Hoppers” also reminded you of a recent DreamWorks film, specifically “The Wild Robot.” For one thing, both films, on a technicality, primarily feature “robots” as their main characters. These “robots” if you will, are their respective universe’s fish out of water. Both Roz and Mabel have to adapt to the ways of the wild. They take on completely different adventures and carry completely different motivations, but on the surface, both films would seem like distinct cousins if watched back to back. This is especially true when you consider both films suggest that humans the reason why the world is changing for the worse.

Overall, “Hoppers” is a hoot. It is quite funny, wonderfully ridiculous, and like a lot of other Pixar fare, beautifully animated. The studio has only gotten better at making their films look as crisp as can be through the years and “Hoppers” is just the latest example.

In the end, I recommend “Hoppers.” This is not going to end up being my favorite film of the year, but it is one that I think is fun for all ages. It does get a bit dark, but it is not the first film of its kind to do so. The mostly star-studded voice cast brings their A-game. The story is a lot of fun, but also important. For the younger viewers, the film offers positive lessons about environmental preservation and not messing with nature. The film is fast-paced, never boring, and an overall good time. I am going to give “Hoppers” a 7/10.

“Hoppers” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! If you like this review, I have more coming including for “Project Hail Mary,” “Ready or Not 2: Here I Come,” “They Will Kill You,” “You’re Dating a Narcissist!,” and “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie.”

Also, if you have not done so already, please check out my latest episode of Movie Requests featuring special guest Jason Mewes, who asked me to review “House Party.” If you enjoy the episode, leave a like on YouTube, and subscribe to my channel so you can stay tuned for more episodes as they drop!

If you want to see more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Hoppers?” What did you think about it? Or, if you could experience life as another living creature? What would it be and why? For me, I would pick a mayfly. Their lives are short, but they sound interesting, as they only tend to live one or two days as soon as they become adults. Let me know which creature you’d want to be down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

The Bride! (2026): Buckley and Bale Do Their Best with This Unexciting Cinematic Enigma

Posted on by Jack Drees

Photo by Courtesy of Warner Bros. Pictures – © Warner Bros. Pictures

“The Bride!” is written and directed by Maggie Gyllenhaal (The Dark Knight, White House Down) and stars Jessie Buckley (Hamnet, Women Talking), Christian Bale (Batman Begins, Thor: Love and Thunder), Peter Saarsgard (Shattered Glass, The Batman), Annette Bening (American Beauty, Nyad), Jake Gyllenhaal (Stronger, Spider-Man: Far from Home), and Penélope Cruz (Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides). This film is set in 1930s Chicago, at which point Frankenstein’s monster, or Frank, asks Dr. Euphronius to create a companion. Once the companion is brought to life, the film follows both creatures as they go on a wild journey together in which they become romantically involved.

“The Bride!” was on my radar ever since I saw the trailer back in October in the best possible way… On a giant IMAX screen. Any movie that is shot in the coveted 1.43:1 format, even if it is digital, has my attention. Of course, having looked at the many shots the trailer had to offer, the film definitely would dazzle in scope widescreen if I were to see it that way too. The film had a dirty, rugged, sometimes sexy feel to it that felt unlike anything I would not recall witnessing before. Sure, in terms of vibe, this film did remind me a bit of “Joker” and its severely insulting sequel, especially considering some of the crew members on those films also work on this one. Some of the names attached to this film include cinematographer Lawrence Sher and composer Hildur Guðnadóttir. But “The Bride!” appeared to have its slight differences from “Joker.” “The Bride!” seemed to lean more towards the horror route rather than a pure drama route, though “Joker” did manage to insert an eerie moment or two.

Speaking of the “Joker” movies, if you are aware of how I scored them, you would know I did so on opposite sides of the spectrum. The first was pretty positive, while the second was highly negative. “The Bride!” falls somewhere between these two projects. Frankly, this movie is kind of a hot mess. If I had to compare “The Bride!” to any other film experience in my life, the “Joker” movies are an easy target because they do have similar tones and concepts. The movie takes familiar characters and puts an odd spin on them. As much as I do not mind odd movies, this experience felt too odd at times. It was odd to the point where I did not really feel any emotion in certain scenes. Overall, Maggie Gyllenhaal puts something together that is pleasing to the eye, but at times, it strikes a vibe that feels like “Dollar Tree Tim Burton.” That is almost unfair to say because this movie was by no means cheap. Variety reports the budget is a hefty $90 million. While the film looks nice, it does not really feel nice. It reminded me of “Jupiter Ascending,” which is one of the most beautiful looking pieces of crap that someone has the audacity to call a film. One moment after another, the movie sounded like it was trying to welcome me into its environment, but as a viewer, I was consistently hesitating on the film’s invitations.

The film is not all bad. It has a decent cast, and its two leads do a fantastic job despite the average at best material given to them.

Jessie Buckley is on a roll lately. Right alongside Timothee Chalemet in “Marty Supreme,” I think she gave the best performance captured on film in 2025 through her lead outing in “Hamnet.” While her lead role in “The Bride” is not as compelling, Buckley nevertheless manages to bring a performance that makes me think I am getting a five-star meal despite slumming it in the middle of a Buffalo Wild Wings. Buckley is diabolical as the titular character. I almost cannot imagine anyone else in her shoes.

Alongside her is Christian Bale as Frankenstein’s monster. Technically his character is credited as Frankenstein, even though he is not the scientist… Anyway… The timing of this film is interesting, as it was made around the same time as Guillermo del Toro’s “Frankenstein,” which I thought was pretty good. Much like Jacob Elordi, who played the Creature in that movie, Bale is excellent here. Is he as strong as Elordi? Perhaps not. But I also feel that part of it is more the fault of the material given to Bale rather than his performance. Much like Buckley, Bale makes the most of what is given to him. This is not to say everything about his presence is bad. In fact, I really liked getting to see the two leads when they’re close as a couple. It brought out both of their wild sides and showed they have chemistry. That said, Bale’s performance did feel rather familiar. It almost reminded me of his portrayal of Gorr the God Butcher from “Thor: Love and Thunder.” It is a character who is mildly scary, odd-looking, but complicated beneath their wretched surface.

Technically speaking, this film is rather impressive. The cinematography is beautiful. The makeup work is stunning. The production design is off the charts. I bought into every location and set. When it comes to immersion, “The Bride!” really tries. Though I cannot say it always succeeds.

The color palette feels weirdly mute. Note my use of the word “weirdly.” I was convinced by the marketing that this film was going to be big and exciting. While it was definitely the former, I cannot say the same for the latter. The film looked oddly dry for something that simultaneously was trying to deliver something of utter extravagance. It is an enigma.

I am sure many people are familiar with the phrase “do not judge a book by its cover.” Bear with me as I go against this philosophy for a moment. If you look closely at the title for “The Bride!”, you would notice that it has an exclamation mark. “The Bride!” is not the first project to contain such a thing. You would notice this if you ever get a good look at the game show “Jeopardy!”, or the animated series “American Dad!”, or the movie “Airplane!”. In terms of punctuation, an exclamation mark is meant to signify an extreme. “Jeopardy!” is extremely fast-paced. “American Dad!” is extremely action-packed. “Airplane!” is extremely funny. Meanwhile, I find it difficult to come up with an extreme for “The Bride,” that is unless I were to resort to negatives. I could say the movie is extremely bland. I could say it is extremely wasted. On paper, “The Bride!” sounds like a project that should be a big ball of energy. But at times I am watching it and find myself surprised that I barely happen to be awake.

Chances are I am not going to remember much about “The Bride” by the end of the year. Part of it is because other than the visuals and the unique way of telling the story, there was nothing to write home about. Sure, the two leads are great, but never once did I feel captivated by anything the story had to offer. If I were presented the story in a pitch meeting, I think it would sell. If I saw the full picture, like what we got in this film, that is a different scenario. If anything, “The Bride!” does feel like a film that comes from a singular mind. I would have never have been able to come up with the vision that Maggie Gyllenhaal had intended. While I have one or two gripes about Warner Bros. Discovery since their merger three years ago, I will credit them for hiring filmmakers with unique visions, with Gyllenhaal being the latest example. I would love to see what other projects she has in mind, and sincerely hope they are better than what this one had to offer.

In the end, “The Bride!” is by no means the worst movie ever. In fact, part of me is glad I saw it because it has some great acting and setpieces. But from one moment to the next, I thought there was something missing. There was barely a sense of a wow factor. It is really sad I did not like this more. I was genuinely looking forward to “The Bride!”. I do not think Gyllenhaal should give up on her work behind the camera. I can see her knocking another project out of the park, but she struck out on this one. I am going to give “The Bride!” a 4/10.

“The Bride!” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for “Hoppers.” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Project Hail Mary” and “Ready or Not 2: Here I Come.”

Also, feel free to check out the new promo for the second episode of Movie Requests! The next guest on my list is actor Jason Mewes, who requested a movie he has watched in the past with his collaborator Kevin Smith. Make your guesses! The movie will be revealed this Saturday, March 28th! If you want to see me review whatever movie Jason Mewes asked me to talk about, subscribe to my YouTube channel and hit the notification bell that way you know exactly when the video drops! If you want to see more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “The Bride!”? What did you think about it? Or, what is the most disappointing movie you have seen recently? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

EPiC: Elvis Presley in Concert (2025): Baz Luhrmann’s Big, Loud, and Ambitious Showcase of the King of Rock and Roll

Posted on by Jack Drees

“EPiC: Elvis Presley in Conert” is directed by Baz Luhrmann and is a documentary about the titular musician, following portions of his life through pre-existing footage, a good chunk of which had not yet been witnessed by the public.

Back in 2022, I reviewed the “Elvis” biopic. I waited a bit after its premiere to check it out. Not because it was off my radar. I just had other people in my life who also had interest in checking it out so I figured I’d wait so I could watch it with them. Safe to say, it was not worth the wait. While there are worse movies I saw in 2022 like “Morbius,” I do not know if there is a movie that left me with a headache like the one “Elvis” did. And it is not that I do not like Elvis’ music. After seeing the film, I think I can come to the conclusion that Baz Luhrmann’s filmmaking style is not my tempo. I have vivid memories of watching “Romeo + Juliet” in middle school, and immediately getting the sense that the movie stole my soul. Since watching “Elvis,” I have since checked out Luhrmann’s “Moulin Rouge!,” which felt like a case of style over substance.

So far, Luhrmann’s filmography has left me all but impressed, which is why I was somewhat nervous going into “Elvis Presley in Concert.” That said, this is a documentary and not a fictional narrative. Perhaps this could allow me to see a different side of Baz Luhrmann. Much like Luhrmann’s past films, “Elvis Presley in Concert” comes with a distinct, clear style. Although unlike “Elvis,” I occasionally found myself having a good time with this film.

“Elvis Presley in Concert” gives you what you came for and more. I say “more” both as a positive and a negative. The movie is part documentary, part dive into Elvis’s career, and part concert showcase. Not all of it is perfect, but let’s start with the good.

If you came for a concert film, this absolutely delivers. If you are a die-hard Elvis fan, this is automatically going to leave you impressed. This is probably the closest one can get to experiencing Elvis in concert today. I had the privilege of watching “Elvis Presley in Concert” on a true IMAX screen via its 4K laser projection system. While the film is not quite “full IMAX,” it comes very close at times. In fact, at my screening, I noticed the way the film was formatted and essentially all of the framing was off center. All the scenes that were in scope widescreen had a taller black bar on the top than the bottom. There are scenes that are a bit taller-looking that essentially have no black bar on the bottom of the screen, but a black bar on the top. It is an odd choice, but I had the sense Luhrmann wanted to make the audience believe certain people in the film were standing on my auditorium’s ground. You see a lot of movies nowadays that advertise themselves as “Filmed for IMAX.” While the footage that makes up “Elvis Presley in Concert” was filmed long before IMAX was associated with Hollywood fare, this is a film that feels like it was designed for IMAX first. This may as well sound like a negative… I feel that watching this film in IMAX almost ruins every other possible way I could see it.

That said, while the formatting of this film is perhaps best experienced in an IMAX theater, the sound mix is probably going to translate well across various formats, whether you are watching it in the cinema or at home. From the very beginning, this film is booming. The first couple of minutes unleash a sense of electricity beyond comprehension. Certain performance sequences like those for “Burning Love” or “Suspicious Minds” gave me the sense that I was part of the audience in Vegas, some of whom happened to be women screaming their lungs out. I could really tell some of the audience enjoyed the film too, because during my screening, some people were clapping to a performance here or there. Granted, this movie did not garner the same attention that the “Taylor Swift: The Eras Tour” documentary did a couple years back. There were no screaming youngsters in my audience, which, frankly, despite being in my 20s, I am okay with. I do not mind loud movies, but my sensitive ears can only take so much.

Another monumental technical achievement this film boasts is its clean editing. This is some of the craziest film editing I have seen in recent memory. Not only does the edit blend tons of archival clips together beautifully, along with one engaging soundbite after another, but all of the pre-existing material makes for a fascinating story about Elvis himself, all the while saving room for the concert experience that many people likely came to see. It is amazing how much this film was able to tell in just a short amount of time. That said, much like Luhrmann’s “Elvis” biopic, the film is almost too fast. The film tells a lot of information in a short amount of time. In fact, I was somewhat surprised to find out that the film was only an hour and 36 minutes. As the movie ended, I asked myself, “That’s it?” But apparently it was. This movie’s supersonic pace, which sometimes works, made it somewhat difficult to digest every little detail. Maybe upon a second watch I will appreciate certain parts more, but there are a handful of bits highlighting Elvis’s career and personal life that had me less entertained compared to other scenes.

The pacing issues were especially noticeable towards the beginning, which does not start off bad. In fact, the first moment of the movie features Presley walking onstage and introducing himself to the crowd. What follows is a lot less concert material than I anticipated and a lot more backstory material. I get that this film is a documentary, but given how the film has “concert” in the title, I found it to take a bit of an odd turn early on in the runtime. It’s around the first twenty minutes or so, and perhaps another point or two, that the movie spends so much time being one thing that it nearly forgets to be something else.

Do not get me wrong, I was entertained. I like the movie as a whole, but at times, it feels like it has ADHD. It is too fast and almost unfocused. Technically speaking, it is astounding at times. But I am not sure if this film is going to have much replay value for me down the line, even in the cinema again despite how immersed I happened to be.

In the end, “EPiC: Elvis Presley in Concert” is undoubtedly a good time, even with its flaws, which do not take much away from an overall entertaining hour and a half. I wonder how well this film is going to play with people who are not Elvis fans. Granted, I am not a hardcore Elvis fanatic myself, though I do like some of his songs. I think even if you are not an Elvis fan, there is something to be said about how well put together this movie is. The concert scenes are a lot of fun. The footage feels seamless at times. The pacing is a bit iffy, but forgivable. That said, I think if you are an Elvis Presley lover, this will be your jam. If you are an Elvis Presley casual, I think there is something to appreciate here. I liked this film more than the “Elvis” biopic, so if anything, I consider that win, especially considering both projects were helmed by the same filmmaker. I am going to give “EPiC: Elvis Presley in Concert” a 7/10.

“EPiC: Elvis Presley in Concert” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.

Photo by 20th Century Studios/20TH CENTURY STUDIOS – © 2025 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved.

Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for “Send Help.” I know I am a bit late to the party on this film. I was going to go see it during an early access screening, but I ended up skipping it as I felt somewhat sick beforehand. Cut to the weekend the film came out… I was in New York. Then things did not end there as I could not make time within the next couple of weeks. Blog projects got in the way, weather got in the way, other movies got in the way, but no longer! Stay tuned for that review, which will be dropping soon! Also, coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “The Bride!” and “Hoppers.”

And I will once again remind everyone, if you have not checked it out yet, please watch the first ever episode of “Movie Requests,” it is a brand new review series where I talk about movies requested by some familiar faces. I just talked about “The Idiots,” which was requested by Bryce Dallas Howard. You can watch the video above to hear my thoughts on the film. Also, if you enjoy the video, please leave a like and subscribe to my YouTube channel!

If you want to see more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “EPiC: Elvis Presley in Concert?” What did you think about it? Or, since the topic is relevant, have you seen the “Elvis” biopic? Am I a monumental moron for disliking it? Leave your thoughts down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

GOAT (2026): A Traditional Sports Animation That Dribbles at a TikTok Pace

Posted on by Jack Drees

© 2025 – Sony Pictures

“GOAT” is directed by Tyree Dillihay (Bob’s Burgers, Good Times) and Adam Rosette (Harvey Girls Forever!, The Mr. Peabody and Sherman Show) and stars Caleb McLaughlin (Stranger Things, The Book of Clarence), Gabrielle Union (Think Like a Man, Bring it On), Aaron Pierre (Mufasa: The Lion King, Krypton), Nicola Coughlin (Derry Girls, Bridgerton), David Harbour (Stranger Things, Black Widow), Nick Kroll (Big Mouth, Sausage Party), Jenifer Lewis (Think Like a Man, Black-ish), Patton Oswalt (King of Queens, Young Adult), Jelly Roll, Jennifer Hudson (The Jennifer Hudson Show, Dreamgirls), Sherry Cola (Joy Ride, Shortcomings), Eduardo Franco (Stranger Things, Booksmith), Andrew Santino (The Disaster Artist, Mixology), Bobby Lee (Inside Job, Kickin’ It Old School), and Stephen Curry (Holey Moley, Mr. Throwback). This film is about a goat named Will Harris who gets the unique opportunity to follow his dreams and play roarball with much bigger, stronger, and faster animals.

When I think of the gold standard of animation, my mind tends to dart towards Pixar. As for Sony Pictures Animation’s place in this medium, I am kind of iffy about them. As much as the “Spider-Verse” movies are masterpieces, they also come from the studio that is responsible for “The Emoji Movie,” one of the most unforgivable abominations made by man. The quality is not the most consistent from one project to the next.

I was not exactly sure what to expect with “GOAT.” I had some idea, but not quite a full picture. The film certainly looked like it took some inspiration from “Spider-Verse’s” fast-paced animation style while also finding a way to bring its own personality to the table. That said, from what I saw through the marketing, this film looked cliche in more ways than one. Having seen the movie, I can definitely say it is cliche. Depending on how many movies you have seen, some of this film’s structure is going to feel quite familiar to you. A protagonist wants to be the best at something despite what the odds suggest and what other people have to say. I have said on this blog that cliches are fine as long as a project can effectively utilize them. Having made that point, I wish “GOAT” was a better movie.

This is not to say the movie is the worst I have ever seen. In fact, when it comes to establishing characters like the scrawny Will Harris (McLaughlin) and his much stronger mentor figure Jett Fillmore (Union). The movie takes time to give them a splendid dynamic that plays out perfectly on and off the court. Their connection unleashes some cliches, but they are, again, cliches that are handled decently. You have the young, eager student willing to learn from a wiser figure who is supposedly becoming more washed-up with each passing minute. It is a traditional storytelling method, but it works.

“GOAT” is very much a product of the 2020s. In some ways, it does a good job at shining a light on people’s weaknesses and problems that define the decade. There is one gag in the film involving a character who is way too attached to their phone. I could see a joke like this playing well with parents in the audience. That said, at my screening, the person next to me, who happened to be an adult, was on their phone numerous times. I wonder how they took this lesson.

By the way, if this has not been made clear already, please put your phone away at the movies. That said, I understand not everyone carries a watch nowadays, so I have no problem if you want to check the time as long as you do not go any further to wreck my time. Turn the brightness down. Peek in your pocket. Don’t flash it heavily for everyone to see! You got it? Good. Let’s move on.

While the movie positively defines the 2020s in some ways, it also manages to define it in less stellar ways. One of my biggest problems with this film is the pacing. Granted, the movie is all killer, no filler. It dives into each and every point without skipping a beat. But for a movie that is about basketball, part of me wishes I could have seen more of it. Thankfully, unlike another so-called sports movie that goes by the name of “Him,” which I reviewed last year, “GOAT” actually dedicates a lot of time to its focal sport. That said, part of me wishes we could have spent a little extra time on the games. I am not saying that we need to see all 48 minutes of the film’s players running up and down the court, but by the time the film gets to the big game at the end, it feels much smaller in scale than it should be. It feels rushed. It feels like it wants to end before it starts. The film literally breezes through its first couple of quarters of the climactic game in about as much time as it would take me to swipe through a few YouTube shorts. There are some occasionally thrilling moments in these games, but they would probably be more exciting if the movie drew things out. “GOAT” tells a lot in a 100 minutes. I just wish I had the chance to digest the material a little more.

One reason why I tend to favor stories told by studios like Pixar is that unlike Sony, their films feel a lot less commercialized. Sure, “Toy Story” uses a lot of real life toys, “Cars” uses real life vehicles, and “Wall-E” has ties to “Hello, Dolly” and Apple. Yet those projects feel like stories rather than extended advertisements. Even in some of Sony’s better animated productions, I always notice they find a way to sneak in a commercial for one of their products. When it comes to product placement, “GOAT” is utterly shameless. The movie spends quite a bit of time showing off the PS5, creates its own 2K sports games based on roarball, makes the card game Uno a core concept of the plot, and even spends quite a bit of time featuring Doordash.

Just because this movie feels commercialized, does not mean it lacks creativity. Instead of basketball, the movie features the sport of roarball. Like basketball, it features players going up and down a court trying to put a ball through a hoop. The two sports have their differences. We do not see humans playing roarball and rather tons of different animals taking up the sport. The universe within “GOAT” seems to have a similar layout to “Zootopia” as there are no humans.

But above all, I find the roarball courts to be more interesting than anything else the sport has to offer. If you ever go to an NBA game, you would notice that each arena has its own individual quirks and home teams, but each court follows a similar structure to the next. The courts that we see through this film’s professional league sort of play like a video game. There are moments where characters have to make their way through rising surfaces, ice, fire, and so on. Honestly, if Nintendo wants to make a “Mario Basketball” game sometime soon, I think this movie would be a solid piece of inspiration.

In the end, “GOAT” is not the greatest flick. It has glimmers of goodness. Although those glimmers are rather thin. The voice cast is pretty talented and bring a lot to the table. Despite clearly being similar to basketball, the concept of roarball has sparks of creativity. While there are a couple decent moments, most of the scenes in this film feel so rushed to the point where I cannot fully appreciate the characters within them. Also, the product placement feels kind of over the top, especially considering this film is animated. As someone who is in his 20s, I sometimes think about what would happen if I had kids and I took them this movie. I think they would have a fun time with it, and for all I know it could age somewhat decently for them, but I do not know if it is going to age like a fine wine. Time will tell. As for this 26 year old loser, I think “GOAT” is a one and done for me. I am going to give “GOAT a 5/10.

“GOAT” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now!

Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for “EPiC: Elvis Presley in Concert!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Send Help” and “The Bride!”. Also, this is my first film review I have published since Scene Before officially turned 10 years old. I want to thank everyone who has wasted their time reading my above average material over the past ten years.

If you want to see a video-based film review I have done, check out the first episode of Movie Requests, where I discuss Lars von Trier’s film “The Idiots,” as requested by actress Bryce Dallas Howard. It is available now on my YouTube channel, and you should absolutely positively subscribe!

If you want to see more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “GOAT?” What did you think about it? Or, what an animated sports film you enjoy? Sticking with the topic of basketball, you should totally check out my review for “The First Slam Dunk.” It is a great movie, give it a watch. Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Solo Mio (2026): Kevin James Misses the Bride

Posted on by Jack Drees

Hey you! Yes! You! Do you like movie reviews? You should! Because you are reading one right now! And TOMORROW, you can check out another! As Scene Before begins its brand new series, “Movie Requests!” You can check out the promo for the first episode now, featuring Bryce Dallas Howard requesting a film she says is “extraordinary!”

And if you want to see the video as soon as it drops, please subscribe to my YouTube channel! Otherwise, if you are following Scene Before either with an email or WordPress account, you can see the video shortly after it is uploaded! Now, on with the review!

“Solo Mio” is directed by Charles and Daniel Kinnane, and this is their latest collaboration with this film’s star, Kevin James, after the three worked together on the straight to Netflix film “Home Team.” Alongside James, the film has a cast including Nicole Grimaudo (Medicina generale, Loose Cannons), Alyson Hannigan (Penn & Teller: Fool Us, American Pie), Jonathan Roumie (Jesus Revolution, The Chosen), Julee Cerda (The Mighty Ducks: Game Changers, Homeland), Julie Ann Emery (Absolute Dominon, Preacher), and Kim Coates (Van Helsing, Sons of Anarchy). This film follows a man named Matt Taylor, whose wedding is upended when his bride never walks down the aisle. Not only does this put an end to his marriage before it starts, but also prompts him to continue with the couple’s honeymoon activities by himself. Throughout the film, we see Taylor make the most of the situation, while meeting new faces along the way.

Life is beautiful. No. Genuinely. It is. Part of this is because of its unpredictability. As a moviegoer, I have, to quote Roy Batty from “Blade Runner,” seen things you people wouldn’t believe. Part of this harkens back to my experience with Kevin James, whose projects in recent years may not be as notable as his earlier work. Yet at the same time, his more recent efforts showcase some diversification in his resume. “Becky” was a huge surprise. Not only was the movie better than I thought it would be, but Kevin James does an excellent job in his role as the film’s antagonist. I never imagined Kevin James as a villain-type character, but that movie completely changed my mind. Also, while Kevin James may not be on the same level as Tom Cruise or Keanu Reeves, he showed some potential as an action star in last year’s “Guns Up.” Kevin James, whether he likes it or not, will always be tied to comedy. But I think he has done a good job at spicing up his resume a bit recently.

Compared to “Becky” and “Guns Up,” “Solo Mio” feels a bit more like a return to form for Kevin James. That is to a certain degree. While the film is definitely lighthearted, it does not quite have the same DNA as a typical Happy Madison project. Frankly, that works in the film’s favor. It comes close at times, but I guarantee you that this movie would have been a different animal if the crew found an excuse to put Adam Sandler in it. “Solo Mio” is a romcom, and James is no stranger to films where he seeks love, like “Paul Blart: Mall Cop.” Another example is “Hitch,” which features him playing a character who lacks the “game” in the dating game. In this film, we see James’ character, Matt Taylor, deal with his emotions and make the most of his time in Rome when the love of his life ditches him at their wedding. James also had a hand behind the scenes as one of the film’s writers and producers.

But the most beautiful story behind the scenes is not James’, but rather the family that came together to make this movie happen.

Following my screening of this movie, I did some research on the Internet about it to see what minor details would come up. Next thing I knew, I found myself on a Reddit page where one of the film’s writers, John Kinnane, was talking about how this was his first film. That would be a cool bragging right by itself, but it gets better. Turns out said writer is one of seven brothers, and the rest of those siblings collaborated on the film’s production. John Kinnane co-wrote the film alongside his brother Pat. Charles and Daniel Kinnane directed the movie. Pete Kinnane handled editing. And as for producing, Wil and Brendan Kinnane took care of that alongside their brother-in-law, Jeff Azize.

…Which is why it breaks my heart to say that this movie is okay at best.

It is difficult to find something in “Solo Mio” that outright made my blood boil, but I can pinpoint to some things in the film that did annoy me at one moment or another. Some of the supporting characters are a bit exaggerated compared to James as the lead. There is sometimes a sense of tonal inconsistency when they are on camera together. Speaking of characters, the film debatably has too many of them. I could not tell you everyone’s name on the cast. I was not fully intrigued by each character’s role in the story. By the end of the film, things become rather convoluted and random subplots feel as if they are being thrown in at the last minute.

Once again, this film was put together by seven brothers. I wonder how collaborative their process must have been. Part of me worries, given the result of this movie, that it could have been overly collaborative. Maybe John and Pat Kinnane had their own ideas of how the movie should go, but perhaps the other brothers, who, for the record, were not credited with writing the script, had their own ideas that ultimately overstuffed the runtime. While I appreciate the film’s fast pace, part of me wonders if we could have settled things down a tad and padded out the runtime to give some more depth to everything going on. Granted, I was not involved in the making of the movie. So, this may as well remain a baseless assumption. But my experience of watching “Solo Mio” reminded me of “Fackham Hall,” which I also found okay at best. That film was written by four people, two of whom happen to be brothers. Sure, like “Fackham Hall,” some things work in “Solo Mio,” but at a certain point more than halfway through, the film overcomplicates itself and almost becomes something it probably should never have been in the first place.

The film has its attempts at humor, but if I had to average everything out, the film lands somewhere around the middle in terms of landing all its jokes.

Yet for all the film’s faults, the film has one aspect that is worth the price admission. There is a celebrity who happens to play themself that made the movie for me. The appearance, which if you ask me, is way too long to be considered a cameo, does require some suspension of disbelief. But if you can live with that, you are in for a treat.

I had one big question regarding “Solo Mio” going into it. How preachy would this film turn out to be? I asked this to myself because I did some research prior to my screening and found out the film was being distributed by Angel Studios, which is a company that tends to have an association with Christian or faith-based projects. Having seen this film, most of it comes off as if it lacks a religious identity, though there is one scene at a dinner table that does have an ongoing gag about prayer. The film does not appear to accuse or shame anyone of having a different viewpoint. That said, when it comes to the romantic connections in this film, there appears to be more of a focus on love rather than lust. If you are looking for something that lacks the filth of “Wuthering Heights” at this time of year, then “Solo Mio” may be for you.

I should also note that the film is G-rated, so this film may be okay for the younger crowds too. That said, I do not think every kid is gonna round the block for a ticket to see this. In fact, at my screening, which was about three-quarters full, I may have been the only person in the auditorium under 30.

In the end, I cannot quite say “Solo Mio” is in fact… for me-oh. There are things to like about this film. Kevin James gives an okay lead performance. Some of jokes are funny. There is a certain arc involving Ed Sheeran I thought was well realized. The unnamed celebrity appearance is a highlight. The movie has a compelling hook, I just wish the rest of it were as smooth as what it was at the start. It feels weird to say as someone living in the 2020s, where just about everything is at my fingertips, but I thought “Solo Mio” might have been too short. I congratulate the family who came together to make the film of their dreams, and I am rooting for them to hopefully churn out another project sometime in the future. I just hope whatever they do next is an improvement over this. The film is not bad, but definitely not perfect. I am going to give “Solo Mio” a 6/10.

By the way, this is not my first exposure to the Kinnane brothers. Years ago, they created a series of online videos called “Sound Guy,” where its titular character reacts to popular movie scenes while said scenes were being made. The series, like this movie, also starred Kevin James. The videos are often quite funny, including this one where the sound guy gets early access to the big twist in “The Empire Strikes Back.” If you ever have a chance to check the videos out, please do. They are such a riot, especially if you are a film fanatic like yours truly.

“Solo Mio” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! And as a reminder, Movie Requests begins tomorrow! And if you are following Scene Before already, you will get access to the first episode as soon as it is posted here, but the fastest way to check out the episode is to be subscribed to my YouTube channel! If you have not subscribed yet, do it now!

My next reviews in terms of new releases are going to be for “GOAT” and “EPIC: Elvis Presley in Concert.” If you are a fan of acronyms, this is a good time to be alive! And if you are a fan of movies and people who talk about them excessively, follow Scene Before either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Solo Mio?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite performance of a celebrity playing themselves? For me, as much as I do not think it is Kevin Smith’s best film, Stan Lee in “Mallrats” was beautiful to see. I love his scene. Also, Bob Barker in “Happy Gilmore” is freaking riot. Let me know your favorite celebrity appearances down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Arco (2025): Back to the Future – Reimagined for the 2020s

Posted on by Jack Drees

Before we begin this review of “Arco,” I would just like to remind everyone that “Movie Requests” begins this Saturday, February 28th! “Movie Requests” is my upcoming film review series where I ask prominent people to request films for me to talk about, and I give my thoughts on their suggestion. A new promo is out now for the first episode, featuring Bryce Dallas Howard! You can watch it by clicking the video below!

And if you want to see the new episode when it drops, please subscribe to my YouTube channel! Otherwise, if you are following Scene Before with an email or WordPress account, you can be notified shortly after the video is uploaded! Now, on with the review!

“Arco” is directed by Ugo Bienvenu and Gilles Cazaux and stars Swann Arlaud (By the Grace of God, Anatomy of a Fall), Alma Jodorowsky (Blue is the Warmest Colour, Kids in Love), Margot Ringard Oldra (Fortune de France, Along Came Love), Oscar Tresanini (La rebelle, les aventures de la jeune George Sand, Mini-Court), Vincent Macaigne (Diary of a Fleeting Affair, Cicadas), Louis Garrel (Little Women, A Faithful Man), William Lebghil (Soda, Some Like it Veiled), and Oxmo Puccino (In Your Dreams, Athena). This film is set in the future and follows a young girl who sees a boy fall from the sky, only to find out this boy has the ability to travel through time. The two do what they can to help each other, while trying to get the boy back to his own time.

Just an FYI before we get on with the rest of this review. This is a French movie. Nevertheless, I watched the movie in English. I bring this up because when I review movies, I always attempt to watch them in their original language to get the most authentic experience possible. Even so, I watched the film in English as the film did not appear to be playing anywhere near me in French. Just know that I will not have any concrete thoughts on the film’s original cast. That said, the cast of the English version of the film did a good job. I do not really have any complaints. If you watch the film in English, and chances are you will if you live in the U.S. like me, I think you will have a solid experience.

“Arco” is one of those films where I went in nearly as blind as possible. I knew about the film a couple months before its release. Having followed Natalie Portman on Instagram, I was made aware that she was in the English version. I have also been made aware about the film receiving noticeably positive reviews. Having seen the film myself, those positive reviews were justified. This is not my favorite animated film of 2025. But it is a finely crafted remix on a familiar time travel concept.

Some people believe that they do not make movies like they used to. While everyone’s definition of this phrase may vary, “Arco” feels like an answer to that philosophy for those looking for something like they got in the 1980s. “Arco” is essentially “Back to the Future” for a new generation. Not only because the plot heavily involves time travel and someone’s intentions to get back to their specific time following a mishap. But the film also captures a specific kind of wonder that movies like “Back to the Future” can easily evoke. During my earliest viewings of “Back to the Future,” which has now become one of my all time favorite films, I was always marveled by everything that went into the climax of that film between the actors’ line delivery, the sound mix, the lightning effects, and Alan Silvestri’s iconic score. If I watched “Arco” as a child, perhaps even as a teenager, it could have inspired me to pursue filmmaking or animation. It is a film that comes with a concept that not only sounds clever, but plays really well on screen. Even the method of time travel feels like a sibling of “Back to the Future.” If you have seen “Back to the Future,” you may recall Doc saying he turned a Delorean into a time machine to “do it with some style.” Much like that 1985 classic, there is a sense of style brought to the time travel in “Arco,” where we see characters utilize such a fantastical concept through rainbows. I cannot come up with many cooler ways to travel through time more magical than that.

This film is the feature-length debut from Ugo Bienvenu, and I think anyone’s efforts should be commended should they direct a feature film for the first time. Although Bienvenu’s in particular had me perplexed, because throughout the film, I was under the impression I was watching the work of a longtime veteran. The 2D animation style feels very Studio Ghibli-like with some of the film’s occasionally vivid landscapes, strong colors, and cozy locations. If you told me that this film were being directed by Hayao Miyazaki, chances are I could believe you. If this film were live-action, based on all the 1980s movies talk from before, you could have convinced me Steven Spielberg put something like this together. That said, if you want to get technical, Steven Spielberg has done an animated film before, specifically “The Adventures of Tin-Tin,” but these films do not quite feel the same. I enjoyed that movie, but still.

As a story, “Arco” is incredibly tight. Clocking in just short of an hour and a half, “Arco” delivers a simple concept met with brilliant execution. I stared at the screen in awe of the vision that was on display. Unlike some time travel stories, which are set close to the time the story comes out, this film takes place, as of this review’s publication date, entirely in the future. This allows us not only to play around with the idea of people traveling through time, but simultaneously tap into the continued evolution of technology and the earth’s climate. In the case of addressing climate change, I found “Arco” to come off as less obvious in its messaging than “The Wild Robot” and “Flow” did when those two films came out in 2024. Maybe that is just a me thing. I would not be surprised to find out that some viewers feel different when it comes to that matter. That said, the film not only does a good job at entertaining, but also serves as a reminder to take care of the planet.

Much like “Back to the Future,” “Arco” is a film that I can see playing really well with families. In fact, I think some parents may be more comfortable showing “Arco” to their children considering it has significantly less foul language. The film may be animated, which some adults may find to be a turnoff, but “Arco” often feels more Pixar or Studio Ghibli-like rather than something out of the more obnoxious Illumination. The movie is bright and colorful. Heck, any movie heavily involving rainbows should be. But there is a perfect balance that makes the film feel grounded yet imaginative. The film is likely going to entertain younger viewers while also delivering important messages. “Arco” seems to indicate that no matter what time you live in, everyone has their own problems. Nobody’s perfect.

That said, having seen a lot of movies, it is tough to argue that “Arco” is, by definition, original. If anything, the film reminds me a lot of “Colossal,” which puts a completely unique spin on the classic monster movie. In fact, that movie was even described by its own director to be “the cheapest ‘Godzilla’ movie ever.” Despite maintaining a noticeable degree of freshness, “Arco” does a good job at reminding me of some of the great movies I watched in the past that appeal to multiple age groups like “E.T.” or “Spirited Away.” It makes me want to go back and revisit those movies. Yet at the same time, I can see “Arco” having some replay value sometime in the future. It is hard to say that “Arco” is my favorite animated film of 2025, but it is one that gives me great joy the more I think about it.

In the end, “Arco” is a swell time travel flick that brings some originality to the table while also delivering vibes that are familiar from some of the most beloved films of all time. I keep comparing “Arco” to “Back to the Future,” partially because both movies involve time travel, but because they both handle such a concept in a somewhat similar fashion. Not just in terms of structure, but also quality. Is “Arco” as good as “Back to the Future?” Honestly, no. “Arco’s” technical aspects could arguably age better, but as a story, “Back to the Future” is superior. That said, if you are looking for something that delivers on entertainment and commentary, “Arco” is a solid pick. I am going to give “Arco” a 7/10.

“Arco” is now playing in select theaters, and as of this publication, is available to preorder on VOD.

Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for “Solo Mio.” Stay tuned! Also, coming soon, look forward to my thoughts on “GOAT” and “EPIC: Elvis Presley in Concert.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! And one last reminder, please subscribe to my YouTube channel to catch my latest videos, including the upcoming series “Movie Requests,” which begins this Saturday, February 28th! I want to know, did you see “Arco?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite animated film of 2025? For me, I would have to go with “Scarlet.” I thought it a was clever, fantastical concept done with excellence! Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Movie Requests – Meet the Guests!

Posted on by Jack Drees

Hey everyone, Jack Drees here! We are 10 days away until the first episode of Scene Before’s brand new video review series, Movie Requests!

For those who have not gotten the memo, the series is no longer going to be called Celebrity Movie Requests, and instead, will simply be known as “Movie Requests.” This is not going to change the lineup of the series or anything that goes into making it. I just think the name flows off the tongue better.

Movie Requests is being published in honor of 10 years of Scene Before. Last year, I asked 10 people what movies they think I should talk about, and each person came up with their unique response. You have seen these people in movies, television, perhaps even the Internet. Each one has a claim to fame as unique as their taste in film. I asked each guest if I could feature them in a 10 second video requesting their movie, and from that point, I will watch the movie, and provide my honest thoughts.

Some of you might wonder, what movies will I review in this series? That is a good question that will be answered in each video. I will leave that as a mystery. But one mystery has been revealed, and that is the list of special guests who just so happened to request said movies! Ladies and gentlemen, here is a dive into the ten guests who will be featured in Movie Requests!

Rosario Dawson

Please welcome actress Rosario Dawson! Rosario Dawson is a performer whose credits date back to the 1990s. Some of her most notable movie credits include the “Clerks” franchise, “Sin City,” “Rent,” “Unstoppable,” and “The LEGO Batman Movie.” Her work in the film “Top Five” earned her a Critics Choice nomination for Best Actress in a Comedy. Dawson has also made her presence known on streaming TV, like in Netflix’s “Daredevil.” In recent years, she has played the live-action version of Ahsoka Tano in the “Star Wars” franchise. This also includes her starring role in the series “Ahsoka,” now streaming on Disney+.

Sandi Harding

Be kind and rewind! Also, be kind enough to welcome Sandi Harding to the series! Harding is the manager of the last Blockbuster Video on the entire planet. As of this publication, the store is still standing. She was also the primary subject of the documentary “The Last Blockbuster,” which dives into her role at the store as well as her reaction to the chain’s continued decline. Harding also takes Blockbuster on the road to various events as part of The Blockbuster Experience, which allows customers to relive the days of the video store and maybe take home a movie or two.

Chris Hardwick

He’s geeky! He’s funny! He’s an all around welcoming guy! It’s none other than Chris Hardwick! His large resume ranges from being an actor to a TV host to a standup comedian. You can find Hardwick in films including Rob Zombie’s “Halloween II,” “A House of 1000 Corpses,” and “Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines.” Hardwick has also lent his voice to multiple animated productions. One of these includes Nickelodeon’s “Back at the Barnyard,” where he plays Otis the Cow, originally voiced by Kevin James in the film that inspired the show. His hosting gigs include “Singled Out,” “@Midnight,” and “Talking Dead.” Since 2016, Hardwick’s hosted NBC’s high-stakes game show “The Wall,” which premiered its sixth season back in January. As of this publication, Hardwick is preparing to shoot a standup comedy special called The Middle Ages. If you are in the Nashville area and want to laugh, you can request tickets to see the show through 1iota.com.

Bryce Dallas Howard

She’s kissed Spider-Man, fended off dinosaurs, and continued her family’s cinematic legacy. Please welcome Bryce Dallas Howard! As the eldest daughter of “Happy Days” star turned director Ron Howard, this actress has found herself garnering the attention of several big name filmmakers from M. Night Shyamalan to Sam Raimi to Matthew Vaughn. Franchise fans know her face from “Spider-Man 3” and “Jurassic World.” Some of her most recent acting credits include Apple’s “Argylle” and the Prime Video original movie “Deep Cover.” Shared alongside her fellow castmates of “The Help,” Howard has won the SAG Award for Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture during the 2012 ceremony. She would go on to be nominated for her own performance in TV’s “Black Mirror” during the 2017 edition of the SAGs. Howard has continuously developed herself as a director, having helmed several short films, a couple documentaries, as well as episodes of various “Star Wars” shows.

Jason Mewes

Bickety-bam! Jason Mewes has entered the chat! Best known as Jay in the View Askew universe, Mewes has graced the screen as the cinematic loudmouth time and time again, yet with consistent charisma and energy throughout each go. You can find Mewes as Jay in the “Clerks” trilogy, “Mallrats,” “Chasing Amy,” “Dogma,” “Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back,” and “Jay and Silent Bob Reboot.” Much like his frequent collaborator, filmmaker Kevin Smith, Mewes is born in New Jersey, and has filmed productions in his home state and beyond. Mewes and Smith have forged an excellent partnership as Jay and Silent Bob, most recently seen together in “Clerks III.” You can also find Mewes on Twitch playing games like “Call of Duty,” “Fortnite,” and “Apex Legends.”

Joel David Moore

He’s played dodgeball. He’s talked to blue people. He’s Joel David Moore! Born in Portland, Oregon, Joel David Moore studied acting in college, and later landed his first major role as Owen Dittman in “Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story.” Joel David Moore also appeared in all three “Avatar” movies as Norm Spellman, the first of which remains the highest-grossing movie of all time. The second film, “The Way of Water,” earned more than $2 billion at the global box office. “Fire and Ash,” which is now in theaters, has also joined the billion dollar club. Moore also made his presence known on television through shows like Fox’s “Bones” and ABC’s “Forever.”

Brian O’Halloran

Despite popular belief, Brian O’Halloran is in fact supposed to be here today! Much like Jason Mewes, Brian O’Halloran is a regular in Kevin Smith’s films. Best known for starring as Dante in the “Clerks” trilogy, O’Halloran’s character often captures the realities of working in retail, whether it is at a convenience store or a fast food joint. Some of O’Halloran’s other works directed by Smith include “Mallrats,” “Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back,” and “Jay and Silent Bob Reboot.” Last year, he appeared as a contestant during the third season of Fox’s game show “The Floor.”

Michael Rooker

He’s Mary Poppins, y’all! He also happens to be Yondu! In real life, you can call him Michael Rooker. Early in his career, Rooker was known as the star of “Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer,” which was made in 1986, but did not release until 1990 due to its controversial nature. From there, he would continue his prolific acting journey through films like “Mississippi Burning,” “JFK,” “Mallrats,” “The Belko Experiment,” and “The Horizon Saga.” Rooker has lent much of his career to working alongside director James Gunn through “Slither,” “Super,” “Guardians of the Galaxy,” “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2,” and “The Suicide Squad.” Rooker also had a small role in James Gunn’s latest film, “Superman.” On television, Rooker is known for his role as Merle Dixon in AMC’s “The Walking Dead.”

Katee Sackhoff

Science fiction nerds, you are in for a treat. Katee Sackhoff is frakin’ here! On television, Sackhoff is known for starring on the 2000s reboot of “Battlestar Galactica” as Captain Kara “Starbuck” Thrace. Since 2012, she has also played a notable role in the “Star Wars” franchise as Bo-Katan Kryze. Her “Star Wars” credits include “The Clone Wars,” “Rebels,” “Tales of the Empire,” and “The Mandalorian.” Some of her other television credits include “The Flash,” “24,” “Another Life,” and “Robot Chicken.” Sackhoff’s film credits include “Halloween: Resurrection,” “Riddick,” “Oculus,” and “Fight or Flight.” You can also listen to Sackhoff interview celebrities through her podcast, “The Sackhoff Show.” You can find it wherever you get your podcasts, as well as her YouTube channel.

Amy Sedaris

And finally, we have the funny and talented Amy Sedaris! While many know her through film and television, Sedaris got her start in comedy through the Second City in Chicago. Whether it is the three seasons on television, or the movie that followed, Sedaris is known for her role as Jerri Blank on “Strangers with Candy.” She wrote, produced, and starred in truTV’s “At Home with Amy Sedaris,” a zany and comedic look at entertaining, crafts, and cooking. The show was nominated for four Primetime Emmys, with Sedaris garnering two of those nominations, specifically for Outstanding Variety Sketch Series. Some of her film credits include “Elf,” “Jennifer’s Body,” “Chef,” and “Is This Thing On?”. Her “Star Wars” character, Peli Motto, has been featured in two of the franchise’s shows, including “The Mandalorian” and “The Book of Boba Fett.” Sedaris also has tons of voiceover experience through films like “Chicken Little,” “Puss in Boots,” “The Boss Baby: Family Business,” and “Smurfs…” As well as television shows like “BoJack Horseman,” “Star vs. the Forces of Evil,” “DuckTales,” and “Dicktown.”

Right now, there is no concrete episode by episode schedule for the series, though the plan is to do at least one episode every month. The schedule is subject to change, and more episode dates will be available soon.

The first episode of Movie Requests will be available on my YouTube channel and Flicknerd.com Saturday February 28th, and I am pleased to announce the first guest of the series will be Bryce Dallas Howard! What movie did she request? You’ll have to find out. Do me, and yourself a favor by subscribing to my YouTube channel and hitting the notification bell, that way you will see new episodes of Movie Requests as soon as they drop. Be sure to follow Scene Before either with an email or WordPress account to be notified on all the latest the series has to offer. Also, check out the official Facebook page!

And in case you missed out on the official trailer for Movie Requests, which I premiered earlier this month during the 8th Annual Jack Awards, click the video attached above to check it out!

Now that you know who is in the series, what movies do you think each celebrity chose? Leave your comments down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Train Dreams (2025): One of 2025’s Most Atmospheric Films

Posted on by Jack Drees

Just a note before we begin this post…

For those who missed it, I finally announced the guests that are going to be featured in my upcoming video-based film review series, Movie Requests. In honor of Scene Before’s tenth anniversary, I asked ten people if they wanted to be in a ten second or so video where they request a movie for me to review. The ten guests you see here agreed and gave me their unique suggestions.

The guests are…

  • Rosario Dawson
  • Sandi Harding
  • Chris Hardwick
  • Bryce Dallas Howard
  • Jason Mewes
  • Joel David Moore
  • Brian O’Halloran
  • Michael Rooker
  • Katee Sackhoff
  • Amy Sedaris

I want to thank each and every one of these guests for participating in this series, it means the world. I cannot to watch all of your movies. I am also pleased to announce that this series starts Saturday February 28th and will feature Bryce Dallas Howard, as well as a review of the movie she requested! The video will be shared here on Flicknerd.com, but if you would like to see it as soon as it comes out, then please subscribe to my YouTube channel! I also recently put out a trailer for the series. If you would like to check it out, click the link here and give it a watch. I hope you are looking forward to the series, and now onto your regularly scheduled programming!

© 2025 Netflix, Inc.

“Train Dreams” is directed by Clint Bentley (Jockey, Sing Sing) and stars Joel Edgerton (The Gift, The Great Gatsby), Felicity Jones (Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, The Brutalist), Nathaniel Arcand (FBI: Most Wanted, The Birds Who Fear Death), Clifton Collins Jr. (Jockey, Triple 9), John Diehl (The Shield, Miami Vice), Paul Schneider (George Washington, The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford), Kerry Condon (The Banshees of Inisherin, Night Swim), and William H. Macy (Everyone’s Hero, Fargo). Based on Denis Johnson’s novella of the same name, this film is about Robert Grainier, a logger and railroad worker. Throughout the film we get to see the journey of his life, as well as his perspective of the world as it changes around him throughout the early 20th century.

This review is coming to you about a month before the 98th Academy Awards, which, per usual, will recognize 10 Best Picture nominees. Each and every year, I try to catch all the nominees before the show. My degree of success for such a task tends to vary from one year to the next. As soon as this year’s nominations dropped, “Train Dreams” was the one Best Picture nominee I needed to see. Flash forward to a little more than a week later, I am sitting in a theater to check out the film, presented on a 35mm print. I could have checked this movie out in 2025, but “Train Dreams,” for whatever reason, was never on my radar. If I had to guess a reason, it is partially because Netflix is not that good at marketing their content, unless said content is called “Stranger Things” or “Squid Game.” While I do not recall seeing any trailers or ads for the film, “Train Dreams” is one of those movies whose word of mouth from audiences would find its way into my social media feeds, all of which seemed to be positive. Plus, when it comes to streaming services, Netflix is not usually my goto, so there is that.

That said, “Train Dreams” is quite good. There is a lot to like about this movie. First off, the cast is amazing. Everyone is well placed in their role and plays their part well. Unfortunately, I do not think anyone from “Train Dreams” is going to win an Oscar following their performance. Although everyone here deserves their flowers. Joel Edgerton and Felicity Jones in particular are standouts. Not just because they have arguably the most name recognition of everyone in the cast, but because they feel at home in their respective roles. As a couple, the two have great chemistry and I really enjoyed any scene where the two happened to be together. For the record, before seeing this movie, I did not look up a whole ton about it. If I did see the cast, I barely skimmed it. I have seen Joel Edgerton in other movies like “Red Sparrow,” and having seen him in projects like that, I felt a sense of shock based on my experience of watching “Train Dreams.” I could not believe this whole time I was watching him. One of the grandest compliments I can give an actor is to say that their performance is a transformation. I did not see Edgerton in Robert Grainier’s shoes. I just saw Robert Grainier.

Another thing I love about this movie is the general progression of the story. At times, this is not so much a movie as much as it feels like an extended journal. For whatever reason, it almost comes off like a documentary rather than a feature narrative with actors. It dives into several chapters of one’s life, with each chapter delivering something interesting in its own way. If anything, this film made me think about the beauty of life, and the magic of seeing the world change right before your eyes. Whether that change is good or bad is another conversation for another time. But this film takes me back to when I was 9, 10, 11, 12 years old and I would think about my future. I am pretty sure many kids within the last 50, 60 years have asked themselves when things like flying cars would exist. At times, seeing Grainier working in railroad construction had a vibe that basically screamed something along the lines of “the future is now,” even if this movie was set many years ago.

I have been a student of film going back to my teen years. In high school, one of the classes I had been blessed with taking for four years straight was TV production. One of the first things the teacher taught us in that class is about the rule of thirds. This is a traditional method used for framing subjects. A good example is when you see two people having a face-to-face conversation. In cases like these, you often see the main person in a shot on one side of the frame, with their head often nearing the top depending on how close the angle is. When the other person is on screen, this is also the case, but mirrored. This film manages to break that rule on a frequent basis. Several shots are set to the point where the subject is on the lower portion of the frame, allowing for images that focus more on the film’s natural beauty towards the top. Could this film have been done as well with a greater use of the more traditional rule of thirds? Perhaps. That said, I have no problem with the way this movie is shot. Every frame looks gorgeous and the way the shots are pulled off allows me to focus more on each scene’s environment. It kind of reminded me of seeing a movie shot on IMAX film like “Sinners,” which has a series of eye-popping shots that reveal more of the movie’s neat locations and sets.

In fact, the film’s aspect ratio also falls into the rulebreak territory. The film is presented in 1.5:1, which is not quite widescreen, but it is also wider than the old school 4:3. Perhaps that is why the film reminded me of a true IMAX experience, because it is formatted fairly close to the ratio for IMAX film, which is 1.43:1.

“Train Dreams” does not exactly fall within the stereotype of what I consider to be a “Netflix movie.” This is not to say that Netflix cannot churn out an artsy title like “Roma,” but “Train Dreams” feels much less manufactured and reliant on star power than say “Red Notice,” which I do not understand why it is still popular today. Though I did recognize Felicity Jones as soon as she appeared. Also, the film has narration, which one could argue may serve as an aid to second screen viewers, or to the people who use the movie as background noise. That said, if I were a Netflix executive, and I were to think about this movie as a product of its streaming service, I would say one of the main reasons people would wind up watching the movie is due to its sense of atmosphere. It is a film in every other frame, sucks you in to the point where you end up being part of its world. The film, despite being eventful and sometimes packing a punch with its sound mix, feels like it is on the quieter side. It is a film that if it were late at night, that I could see myself putting on to help me fall asleep. I am not saying this in the sense that the movie is boring, but rather that it is soothing. I never use anything like the Calm app to put me to sleep at night, but “Train Dreams” sounds like a nice alternative as a sleeping aid. Heck, it literally has “Dreams” in the title! I guess you actually can judge a book by its cover!

In the end, “Train Dreams” is a superb movie. I have very few, if any complaints about it. There may be a scene or two that did not connect with me as much as certain others. Maybe some of the supporting characters are forgettable. Perhaps I would be able to appreciate those things more during a rewatch. Then again, this movie reminded me of life itself, and I admit, there are likely people in my life who may have stood out 10, 15 years ago whose names I would not be able to tell you now. The film, just like life itself, moves fast. There is not a moment in the movie’s runtime that feels like filler. The film is beautifully shot, terrifically acted, and Clint Bentley brought a killer vision to life. Not only did he do a good job directing the film, but he did just as good of a job writing it. I should not be surprised, as this is his latest screenplay collaboration with Greg Kwedar. Prior to this film, both of them penned the brilliant and emotional “Sing Sing.” While I am not sure that “Train Dreams” is going to have as big of an impact on me as “Sing Sing” did, I think this is yet another exciting addition to both writers’ resumes. If you have Netflix, or if this is playing somewhere near you, go check out “Train Dreams.” I recommend it. I am going to give the movie an 8/10.

“Train Dreams” is now playing in theaters and is available on Netflix for all subscribers.

Thanks for reading this review! My next reviews are going to be for “Arco” and “Solo Mio.” Stay tuned! Also, I want to thank everyone who read the 8th Annual Jack Awards, and I want especially thank those who read all 11-thousand words of it. You guys have earned yourself a much deserved pat on the back. Thanks for your support and I am honored to continue one of Scene Before’s traditions! If you want to see my upcoming reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Train Dreams?” What did you think about it? Or, here is a two part question… What movie do you think will take Best Picture at the Oscars this year? And… What movie do you want to see win Best Picture at the Oscars this year? Personally, I think “One Battle After Another” will take the win. It has a great lead performance, excellent technical aspects, an amazing supporting cast, and it is in some ways a relatable concept. That said, if I had to pick a favorite amongst the nominees, I would say that “Sinners” might be the one. The film has gotten a decent amount of replay value from me since I first saw it in April. Leave your comments down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!