Sony Pictures Releasing International

Masters of the Universe (2026): Travis Knight Strikes Magic with His Latest Movie Based on Toys

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Masters of the Universe” is directed by Travis Knight (Kubo and the Two Strings, Bumblebee) and stars Nicholas Galitzine (The Sheep Detectives, Purple Hearts), Camila Mendes (Do Revenge, Riverdale), Alison Brie (The Disaster Artist, Together), James Purefoy (The Following, Pennyworth), Morena Baccarin (Greenland, Deadpool), Jóhannes Haukur Jóhannesson (Vikings: Valhalla, The Innocents), Kristen Wiig (Bridesmaids, Sausage Party), Jared Leto (Blade Runner 2049, Suicide Squad), and Idris Elba (Sonic the Hedgehog 2, Pacific Rim). This film is based on the Mattel franchise of the same name and follows Adam who is sent from his home planet of Eternia to Earth at a young age. When he grows up, he is tasked with returning a magical sword back to his home planet, which he must save from the evil Skeletor.

I am a “Masters of the Universe” novice. Partially because I would have no clue where to start. Well, sort of, as I started my relationship with the franchise weeks ago when I checked out Amazon MGM Studios’ “Masters of the Universe” in theaters. Yes, I knew certain characters from the franchise, and sometimes I would talk in Skeletor’s cartoony voice because I thought it sounded cool. But I was born in 1999. I was not watching He-Man when I was a child, I was watching “SpongeBob.”

Despite my lack of knowledge of “Masters of the Universe,” I was mildly impressed with some of the film’s marketing. Note that I said mildly. It looked a little more serious than I imagined the property to be, but I was open to seeing what the crew cooked up behind the scenes. I am glad to say I thought the crew delivered something delicious.

This film feels like a Saturday morning cartoon brought to the big screen. Or, perhaps a more meta version of a Saturday morning cartoon. There are one or two nods to how absurd some of the concepts of the property happen to be. The film is basically this year’s “Thor: Ragnarok.” I do not know if this is going to have the lasting appeal that “Thor: Ragnarok” would for some people, but nevertheless.

Interesting enough, “Masters of the Universe” tends to take a lot of notes from the Marvel playbook. It presents the origin story of Adam, who we later come to know as He-Man. In fact, much like Thor, a particular incident brings him down to earth. Though whereas Thor was brought down as a consequence for his foolishness, Adam was brought down so he could be safe. If anything, his arrival, and therefore extended time, on earth is similar to that of the title character of the “Sonic the Hedgehog” movies.

Nicholas Galitzine continues his hot streak of enjoyable films this year between this and another Amazon MGM project, “The Sheep Detectives.” Galitzine plays Adam, who despite being on earth for several years, has not fully embraced the planet. His connection to his planet’s lore is not exactly helping him in his work life, dating life, social life. It makes him look like a bit of a dork. He spends time looking for a sword, which also does not help. Galitzine serves as a convincing lead and brings a dose of fun to the final product.

Given how little “Masters of the Universe” has grossed so far against its $170-200 million budget, this movie continues the Jared Leto curse. I said this before, I will say it again. Jared Leto is a great actor, and I will stand by that notion until the day I die. Sure, he did not play my favorite Joker, but he commits 110% with just about every role he is given, even as the lead in “Morbius,” a movie so bad that Spider-Man could not swing in time to save it. If you had no idea that Jared Leto was in this film, then there is a chance that you could end up watching it from start to finish failing to realize Leto is in front of you by the end of it. Leto plays Skeletor, and as a result, we never end up seeing his face. Leto is given some of the film’s finest material. There is a moment early on where he is delivering a vicious monologue, and once he raises his fist, he just stands there in awkward silence trying to emphasize that he is done, which prompts Evil-Lyn (Alison Brie) to softly affirm her understanding. I laughed quite a bit.

Speaking of Evil-Lyn, I thought Alison Brie was well cast as the character. This film is essentially a Saturday morning cartoon brought to life, and if you have ever seen Brie in real life, you might notice how large her pupils are. I mean that as a compliment. She is adorable. That said, the large pupils really work in Brie’s favor for this role, as she is not given a ton of lines to work with, but her character does spend a lot of time churning up wacky facial expressions. I thought Brie could have been given a tad more to do, but from a non-verbal perspective, I thought she did a great job with the character.

Daniel Pemberton composed the score for the film, which delights me to no end as he is quickly becoming one of my favorite composers between the “Spider-Verse” films and more recently, “Project Hail Mary.” Nearly every track feels larger than life. The real highlight of the music though is Brian May. Yes, the one from Queen, who dropped in some satisfying guitar solos.

This film is directed by Travis Knight, and overall, I thought he did a decent job at presenting a fun story with a balanced pace, despite a longer runtime. The film is 2 hours and 20 minutes long, but never once does it feel long. It is never boring.

This film is not doing so hot financially. About a month into its release, it has yet to make its budget back. Not a lot of people are checking it out in the theatre. But when it comes to those who did check it out, a majority of the reactions seem to be positive. Granted, overall, they seem to lean into mixed territory, but more people seem to like this movie compared to those who do not. This should not be surprising as Travis Knight seems to have a knack for bringing toy staples to the big screen. In 2018, Knight directed the “Transformers” spinoff “Bumblebee.” I personally think “Masters of the Universe” is a bit of a step down from “Bumblebee.” I think there is a little more humanity and wonder in “Bumblebee.” “Masters of the Universe” most certainly has those two elements, but not quite to the same degree. Even so, Knight does a great job at bringing Eternia to life and bringing things down to Earth precisely when he means to.

Also, if you check this movie out, be sure to stay for the credits. There’s bonus material as soon as the credits roll, in the middle, and at the end. You’re welcome.

In the end, “Masters of the Universe” is not the best movie I have seen this year. But if you are looking for something that could put a smile on your face that delivers on humor and action, this movie gets the job done. One note of caution for families… Even though is based on toys, part of me questions exactly how family-friendly this movie is. Granted, it is PG-13. So, not every child is likely going to be able to watch it right away. That rating is not unusual as the Michael Bay “Transformers” movies were also based on toys for example. Those were all PG-13. I watched those movies as a kid and turned out fine. But there is a running gag about “fisting” that makes me wonder if someone of a younger age could end up watching this movie and say something in public that maybe they should not be saying. Just something to keep in mind. Granted, I laughed myself silly whenever that gag played out. Does this movie make me want to explore more of the “Masters of the Universe” lore? I am not entirely sure. Perhaps if a sequel comes out, I will be there. I had fun with this movie. But if I am bored one day, I definitely have a greater chance of diving down a rabbit hole than I did before. The movie has a solid cast with some big names, a talented director, and despite feeling a bit paint by numbers at times, I found myself quite entertained. I am going to give “Masters of the Universe” a 7/10.

“Masters of the Universe” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! As a reminder, be sure to check out my latest episode of Movie Requests, featuring comedian and television host Chris Hardwick! He requested I should watch “Real Genius,” starring Val Kilmer. To hear my thoughts on the movie, click the video above and check it out! Also, if you want to see new episodes in the fastest way possible, do yourself and I a favor by subscribing to my YouTube channel!

My next review is going to be for “Another World.” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “The Breadwinner,” “Disclosure Day,” “Toy Story 5,” “Supergirl,” and “Jackass: Best and Last.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Masters of the Universe?” What did you think about it? Or, since we are on the topics of Travis Knight and movies based on toys, has anyone here seen “Bumblebee?” What are your thoughts on it? And if you have not seen it, please leave this post and go watch it. You will thank me once it is over. Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Mercy (2026): Exactly What You Will Beg for by the End of This Near Futuristic Slog

Posted on by Jack Drees

© 2025 – Amazon MGM Studios

“Mercy” is directed by Timur Bekmambetov (Profile, Wanted) and stars Chris Pratt (Guardians of the Galxy, Jurassic World), Rebecca Ferguson (Reminiscence, Dune), Kali Reis (True Detective: Night Country, Catch the Fair One), Annabelle Wallis (Annabelle, Peaky Blinders), Chris Sullivan (Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, This is Us), and Kylie Rogers (The Whispers, Home Before Dark). This film is set in the near future and follows LAPD Detective Chris Raven, who is put on trial for his wife’s murder. Tied to a chair with no escape, Raven has 90 minutes to prove to an A.I. judge that he is innocent. If he cannot prove himself in time, Raven will face execution.

January… It’s cold. It’s uneventful. And the newly released movies sometimes have you begging for mercy. Interestingly enough, one of the films that released last month just so happens to be called “Mercy.” I saw the trailer one time in IMAX, and I wanted my two minutes back. I am sad to say that, because it stars people I like, including Rebecca Ferguson as an A.I. judge. Leading the charge is Chris Pratt, an actor I also like, depending on what he does. He can be charismatic, but not every role of his has the personality of Star Lord.

That said, this film, from the trailer, looked incredibly lazy. Most of it is set in one location, where we see Chris Pratt’s character strapped to a chair, trying to convince an A.I. judge that he is innocent. The whole idea feels like a slightly more ambitious variant of Prime Video’s “War of the Worlds,” which mostly features Ice Cube staring at a screen. I have also heard some comparisons to “Minority Report,” but this did not look like Spielberg to me…

I ended up seeing “Mercy” in a Dolby Cinema at my local AMC. For those who have never gone to a Dolby Cinema, I believe it is the most immersive non-IMAX way to watch a movie, and you should absolutely check it out.  But I would strongly recommend not wasting money on Mercy regardless of the format. This even applies for a standard matinee or bargain Tuesday price. If there is a movie that is worse than “Mercy” that comes out this year, then I might as well organize a funeral for the concept of imagination.

“Mercy” is unimaginative. Not necessarily because it takes elements from superior films like “Minority Report” and “Searching,” though that notion does play a factor. But as I watched “Mercy,” I felt the same way about it that I felt about “Smurfs” last year, which is that this probably should have gone to streaming. The very idea of this movie sounds exactly like something that was intended for Prime Video, after all it is from Amazon. But I guess someone, somewhere, had just enough faith in the project to put it in cinemas. Then again, it is January, where the collective faith in cinema is about as tiny as the chance of playing through Cuphead for the first time and not dying once.

Another reason why this film felt like straight to streaming slop was because of the dialogue. While the dialogue may not be the worst I have ever heard, there would be a line almost every other minute that seems to be designed for people watching movies and using another device at the same time. You ever watched a movie where a character says something out loud that they probably would more likely be saying in their head? “Mercy” has a couple of those moments.

Also like “Smurfs,” if there happened to be any reason why “Mercy” was put in theaters in the first place, it is probably because of the actors. Not everyone in this film is super well-known, but Chris Pratt has starred in several billion dollar movies. Rebecca Ferguson has made a name for herself in the “Mission: Impossible” and “Dune” franchises. Putting these two box office stars in the same project seems like a winning combo. Then unfortunately, the movie happened.

I am not going to pretend that Chris Pratt is the best actor working today, but every once in a while he can be charming, like in “The LEGO Movie” or “Guardians of the Galaxy.” That said, as this movie started, I was actually surprised by how much Pratt’s character, Chris Raven, captivated me with his performance. His character did not want to be in his current situation and Pratt did an excellent job at capturing that. Sadly, the best moments of his performance are towards the beginning of the film, but I would not say that is entirely his fault. The more I think about it, one could argue the middle of the film, where we dive deeper into the character’s alcoholic tendencies, also makes for some meaty material, but still. This is not Pratt’s best work. Yet I would not say that this movie was capable of delivering his best work. His work here is perhaps as good as the script allows, considering how most of his performance is just sitting in a chair. It is not as physical or action-packed as some of his other movies.

Courtesy of Amazon MGM Studios – © 2025 Amazon Content Services LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Starring alongside Chris Pratt is Rebecca Ferguson as an A.I. judge named Maddox. This may be controversial, but I do believe actors are capable of giving performances where it does not sound like they are trying. Ferguson in this case, believe it or not, does sound like she is trying her best with her given character. That said, as I watched this character, it felt like someone, or arguably something, that any actor could play. I am not saying that an A.I. should play this character. But based on what I could only assume is the direction of her performance, Ferguson often comes off as flat. Perhaps that is the point. Robots naturally do not sound as lively or expressive as people. In fact, this movie establishes the judge’s inability to feel or emote. If my review for “Bugonia” suggests anything, I can understand the film’s intent while also finding myself incapable of appreciating it. That said, this film lacks personality, kind of like Ferguson’s character. It is not to say the film did not make me feel anything. After all, it did make me sleepy. So, there’s that.

There are some movies that sound engaging on paper or in a pitch meeting. The more I think about the behind the scenes stories of “Mercy,” the more I imagine this film sounding incredible as a pitch, especially in this modern era. There is a common belief that most audiences want fast-paced content that can be told in as little time as possible. Personally, I do not care what the runtime of a movie is as long as every essential bit of the story can be effectively told in said runtime. “Mercy” is a film that likely delivers a solid first impression when being explained in a meeting or over dinner at a restaurant. Yet the movie itself, for whatever reason, comes off as lazy and uninspired. To further my point, this is a film that is honestly at its best when it begins. We see Raven extremely afraid of his current situation and what’s to come, but with each new point that is introduced, the film becomes increasingly convoluted and dull. It was difficult for me to care about the people connected to Raven in his life. By the time the film gets to the climax, I could not feel the stakes or emotions no matter how hard the movie tries give me those things. I do feel one thing though, and that is regret. Specifically, the regret that I wasted my time on this so-called movie, and I literally could have been doing anything else at 4 o’clock on a Saturday afternoon.

In the end, do not waste your time with “Mercy.” This is a movie that is about as engaging and riveting as court itself. Not very. It disappoints me that this film is so bad, because again, this movie reminded me of “Searching,” which is part of the screenlife style of filmmaking. I like that movie. This film’s director, Timur Bekmambetov, happened to produce that movie. In fact, that is not his sole screenlife credit, as he directed “Profile,” which I reviewed years back and gave a positive score. If you were to ask me what happened in “Mercy” a couple years from now, who knows, I might struggle a bit. However, if you were to ask me how the movie made me feel, I would say “bored,” “tired,” and “frustrated.” “Mercy” is one of the worst movies I have seen in some time, and I am going to give it a 2/10.

“Mercy” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now!

Thanks for reading this review! Next week is the 8th Annual Jack Awards! It is the latest edition of Scene Before’s yearly celebration of cinema, where this time, we pay tribute to the movies of 2025. There will be awards, comedy bits, and more! Stay tuned! And if you want to play a role in this year’s show, CLICK THIS LINK TO VOTE FOR BEST PICTURE! The list is mostly based on my top 10 BEST movies of 2025. Your favorite movie cannot win if you do not vote! If you want to see this and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Mercy?” What did you think about it? Or, what is the worst movie you watched in recent memory? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Materialists (2025): Love and Money Blend Together in This Middle of the Road Romance

Posted on by Jack Drees

Courtesy of A24 – © A24

“Materialists” is directed by Celine Song, the director behind one of 2023’s best films, “Past Lives.” This film stars Dakota Johnson (Fifty Shades of Grey, Madame Web), Chris Evans (Captain America: The First Avenger, Lightyear), and Pedro Pascal (The Last of Us, The Mandalorian). This film is about a matchmaker from New York City who finds herself in a personal conflict between her ex and a new love interest.

One movie I am mad at myself for skipping while it was in theaters was “Past Lives.” I did not review the film, but I was able to catch it by the end of 2023. I adored it so much that it ended up among my best movies of the year. The chemistry between the three leads was impeccable. Each role was perfectly cast and I was hooked from scene one. I thought the film was cute and heartfelt. Naturally, when I first saw the trailer for “Materialists,” I did not get excited by the film because big Hollywood stars like Chris Evans or Pedro Pascal would be in it. Although I do like those two actors. But what sold me was finding out that this was Celine Song’s next film following “Past Lives.”

I missed “Past Lives” in the theater but ended up loving it. Unfortunately, I had the opposite experience watching “Materialists.” Honestly, I was rather disappointed watching Song’s latest outing on the big screen.

What makes this effort somewhat sad is the fact that not only did the film’s director carry some weight, but as someone who lives in the U.S., and not South Korea, the actors have a ton more star power than Song’s previous project. You have Dakota Johnson, whose resume is hit and miss, but nevertheless prolific. Then there’s Pedro Pascal, who has had a large hand in the geek culture spheres in recent years between “Game of Thrones,” “The Mandalorian,” and “The Last of Us.” Also, there’s Chris Evans… Captain America himself! Need I say more? It would be one thing to see a disappointing Celine Song movie, but to have these well known actors in the mix makes it worse.

And honestly, I wish I could say that all the actors do a good job in this film despite the… (sigh) material. But I thought Dakota Johnson, while not horrible in this film, is sometimes stiff. Every other line out of her character, Lucy, feels flat. Watching Dakota Johnson in this film is like playing roulette. Every time there is a line out of her, I had no clue if it was going to be delivered decently or poorly. The gap separating the quality of her lines feels significant. Dakota Johnson can give good performances. Just go watch “Daddio.” But not only is Johnson sub-par in this film, I got the impression at times she was playing the same character she’s played in other films like “Madame Web” or “The High Note.” Despite the range of her line delivery in this film, I am starting to think Johnson herself has limited range as a performer.

That said, I thought the film’s two main male leads were okay in their roles. Pascal is a well built, rich, successful man. Or, as he is sometimes referred to throughout the film, a unicorn. I thought Pascal was perfectly cast. I never met Pedro Pascal myself, but from what I imagine, he must be a charming, handsome person.

Chris Evans on the other hand is a little less perfect of a human being. He self-admittedly has anger issues, he struggles with maintaining a steady career path as well as his financial stability. But despite his problems he seems like a decent guy. I liked Evans’ performance. He felt down to earth and inviting. Not preppy, not over the top. Just a genuine guy.

“Materialists” is a fairly grounded narrative. But unfortunately the script is where its tonal inconsistencies lie. Much of the film’s dialogue is quite good. Parts of it made me think about life. But there are quite a few cheesy lines that do not feel like they belong in a movie like this. I am not denying that people have said something cheesy at some point in their life. But the rate in which it happens in this film does not feel authentic.

There is a message in “Materialists” that makes for a good story. While a lot of people date and eventually marry for love, there are some people who want more out of a relationship. They want the partner to be attractive, have money, have a nice place and so on. As the film progressed, and this should be no surprise given the title, the film successfully presented itself as an allegory about how certain people find others’ possessions more attractive than the person they are dating. I will not go into spoilers, but there is a line towards the end of the film that could almost double as the film’s slogan. The film suggests that some people are simply attracted to success. Yes, someone could be the nicest person on earth. But for some people, they would be turned off if they found out the person they were dating happened to be poor.

Given this film’s message, I found it interesting how Lucy was written. Lucy works with a dating agency. Customers, some of whom are clearly desperate for a relationship, give this company good money to find a partner. The film asks questions as to whether love can be bought or if it is simply something you have to find yourself. The film shows the potential dangers of trying to follow a perhaps unachievable dream but also reveals how one can find life unappealing if they were to give their dreams up and settle.

The film does not shy away from highlighting appealing and thought-provoking topics. I just wish that the package that contains such topics was a little more appetizing. I wish it had better dialogue. I wish I liked some of the acting better. And I wish it were a little more tonally consistent. The film is shot well, has good music, and contains a couple decent scenes, but for me, I wanted more. I guess I am a bit of a materialist myself.

In the end, I do not think the “Materialists” and I are that great of a match. There are plenty of other fish in the sea, thankfully. Maybe the film will find its audience somewhere else. Honestly, I found this film disappointing. It is decently framed, the production design is nice, and some of the acting is okay. But there are plenty of elements that bog the film down between the tonal inconsistencies, Dakota Johnson’s sometimes stiff performance, and the cheesy dialogue. I still think Celine Song has a promising future as a filmmaker. I just hope her next project is much better than this one. I am going to give “Materialists” a 5/10.

“Materialists” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! Pretty soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on Pixar’s latest film, “Elio.” Stay tuned! Also, you can look forward to reading my reviews of “Jurassic World: Rebirth,” “M3GAN 2.0,” and “F1: The Movie.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Materialists?” What did you think about it? Or, have you seen Celine Song’s directorial debut, “Past Lives?” If you did, tell me your thoughts on that! Leave your comments down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Bring Her Back (2025): Another Clever, Scary Outing from the Philippou Brothers

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Bring Her Back” is directed by Danny and Michael Philippou, the directing duo behind “Talk to Me.” This film stars Billy Barratt (Kraven the Hunter, Responsible Child), Sora Wong, Jonah Wren Phillips (Human Error, How to Make Gravy), and Sally Hawkins (The Shape of Water, Paddington). This film centers around Andy and Piper, a brother and sister who are placed under the care of an eccentric woman and find themselves part of a terrifying ritual.

I ended up going to see “Bring Her Back” mainly because of the films that were out in one particular weekend, it piqued my curiosity the most. Note my choice of words. I never said I was looking forward to this film. But I cannot say I was dreading it either. If anything, I was going to see “Bring Her Back” because of my past experience. If I saw any trailers for “Bring Her Back,” they likely flew over my head. That said, I saw “Talk to Me” one time a couple years back. I thought it was a respectable effort by filmmaking brothers Michael and Danny Philippou. While the film had its fans, I cannot say I thought it was perfect. Though I liked it enough to give it a thumbs up. There is a saying that you are only as good as your last project. The Philippou brothers’ last project got me in the door. So, how is their latest outing?

Out-freaking-standing, and I cannot emphasize my enthusiasm enough.

“Bring Her Back” is easily one of the best films of the year. It is a movie that is not quite committed to one genre. I have called it a horror film, and knowing what “Talk to Me” turned out to be, I was kind of expecting “Bring Her Back” to be in the same boat as that movie. While the film is creepy, I will say that one could easily put “Bring Her Back” in the category of psychological thriller. One can simply say it is a drama. Regardless of whatever genre you call it, it handles all of its mini-genres with excellence.

What makes “Bring Her Back” so great is my attachment to the core characters. We come to find out that they all have something in common. Specifically, they are all grieving over someone they lost. While it is traditional for people to grieve over someone’s death, these deaths are unlikely scenarios. For the two younger characters, Andy and Cathy, we see early on in the film that they lose their dad. Shortly after, they meet a new foster parent (Sally Hawkins), whose young daughter died after drowning in a pool. The movie made me feel bad for all three of these people, even if something seems off about one of them.

When these three people first met, it did not take long for me to develop a pit in my stomach. I knew we were in for a ride with Sally Hawkins from the moment I saw her. First off, like some of her previous projects, Hawkins does not phone it in whatsoever when it comes to her performance. She has so much range packed into one character. At one moment she is kind of a creep, then lovable, then flamboyant. Whatever she happens to be as Laura, Hawkins nails it. That said, even when she is those last two adjectives, there is a sense of creepiness to her that remains consistent.

There are some things Hawkins does throughout the runtime that not only made me hate her, but made me want to straight up punch her in the face. She is everything you can want in a solid antagonist. While I will give praise to Hawkins for her performance, I will not deny that her character is sometimes straight up unlikable despite her occasionally having a chill or “cool mom” vibe. And me loathing her is a good thing. All it got me to do is get behind the kids through their journey as it plays out. As wacky as this movie gets at times, I was able to buy into Laura’s motivation. I could see where she was coming from even if I ultimately thought she was a psychotic lunatic.

I would not call this a complaint, but this is more or less something I noticed through my experience of watching the film. Keep in mind, I found “Bring Her Back” to be quite scary. But I cannot say that there are many jaw-dropping individual scares in the film. If anything, I found the film to maintain a consistent eeriness. Going back to how this film balances itself between multiple genres, this is another example to support that case. The scariest part of this film is not any particular scene, but it is the everlasting sense that Laura is going to do something bonkers. And she ends up doing some bonkers things.

Structurally, “Bring Her Back” does not miss a beat. It has a great hook that gets you to care about the two younger kids. You have all the adventures these kids encounter alongside their new foster parent, and as the film gets to the climax, it means business. Again, Sally Hawkins is a fantastic performer. But by the end of the movie I would not have minded seeing her character splatter into bits. There is never a boring moment in this film. The story is captivating. The characters are well written, everything ends on a solid note, and the entire film has a pretty good soundtrack. There are some tunes that slide their way into the film that are perfectly placed.

Sally Hawkins is not the only standout amongst the cast, though she is by far the biggest name. That said, I must give credit to all the younger cast members as well. Billy Barratt does a solid job in the film as Andy. I thought he was on the money when it came to channeling his character’s apprehension in a variety of situations. Jonah Wren Phillips is not given as much to do as Oliver compared to some of the other characters, but what he ends up doing stands out. There is one particular scene in the film that involves him chewing an unusual object that will linger in my mind beyond the end of the year. And lastly, Sora Wong as Piper is adorable. This is Sora Wong’s first role and I am very pleased by how it turned out. I think she is going to have a great career ahead of her. I can totally tell how masterful the Philippou Brothers are as directors based on the efforts of the talent. Each actor feels perfectly in sync with the others around them and not a single performance feels off.

In the end, “Bring Her Back” is top tier filmmaking. I cannot believe we have been blessed with cinema as compelling as this. When I walked out of “Talk to Me,” I did so having had a good time with it. Flash forward a couple years later to “Bring Her Back,” I am genuinely onboard for whatever the Philippous can produce. I keep bringing up Sally Hawkins as a selling point, partially because she is a recognizable name. But everyone else in this film does a great job too. I have to give the entire cast credit for their work. If you like good storytelling, look no further, because I am going to give “Bring Her Back” an 8/10.

“Bring Her Back” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for the brand new comedy “Friendship.” I have been looking forward to seeing and talking about this movie. And I finally get to discuss it in the coming days. Stay tuned! Also look forward to my reviews for “Ballerina,” “The Phoenician Scheme,” and “The Life of Chuck.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Bring Her Back?” What did you think about it? Or, which film did you like better? “Talk to Me” or “Bring Her Back?” Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!