“Lisa Frankenstein” is directed by Zelda Williams and this is her feature-length debut. The film stars Kathryn Newton (Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, Blockers), Cole Sprouse (Five Feet Apart, Riverdale), Liza Soberano (Trese, Make It with You), Henry Eikenberry (Euphoria, The Crowded Room), Joe Chrest (Stranger Things, 21 Jump Street), and Carla Gugino (Night at the Museum, Spy Kids). This film is a coming of age story showing the love connection between a young girl and a corpse who returns from the dead.
When it comes to the February 2024 cinematic lineup, “Lisa Frankenstein” is one of those films that had my attention from the moment I heard about it. While it did not look like the next big thing, the marketing showcased plenty to savor. For starters, the idea is kind of clever. I like the concept on the surface. The vibe the film seems to be going for definitely screamed kooky, but with a pinch of romance. This film was set to release the week before Valentine’s day making it an appropriate watch for such a time.
You also have a writer like Diablo Cody behind the scenes, who has not only written films I have enjoyed in the past like “Tully” and “Juno,” but she also has horror experience with “Jennifer’s Body.” I have only seen a bit of the film, but I didn’t dislike what I saw. I think it would be unfair of me to give a score on “Jennifer’s Body” without having seen the whole thing. That said, I recognize it is not Shakespeare.
This film is also the directorial debut of Zelda Williams, a name that I knew for years thanks to the Internet. But for those who do not know who Zelda Williams is, she is Robin Williams’s daughter. Yes, that one. I am not always the biggest supporter of nepotism, and I say that knowing that the film industry is sometimes notorious for it. But I was curious to see if Williams had a knack for this kind of work. While doing research for this review, I found out Williams has a history of making music videos, so she is not new to this industry. And having seen “Lisa Frankenstein,” that makes complete sense. Everything in this film is nicely framed and looks like something from another world. The lighting throughout the film comes in quite a variety. It’s also easy on the eyes. The color grading has this weird pixelated-like gloss to it that I found rather appealing. When it comes to this film’s aesthetic, it is a job well done. At times it felt intimate. At others it felt roomy. At others it feels downright fantastical. I am not sure if this is a proper tech demo movie for say a big screen TV, but maybe it will be serviceable for a 32 inch model.
Unfortunately though, the movie is almost all looks, with little personality. The script has a couple decent lines, but the vibe delivered between said lines feels inconsistent. I understand that this is a movie that blends the reality of the 1980s with the fantasy of a man coming back to life. But it is not enough to make a decent package. If anything, this film feels more like a mish mash than a proper horror comedy at times. It doesn’t really know what it wants to be. Now I say that knowing that we have gotten a decent number of movies over the years that combine genres. “Everything Everywhere All at Once” is a proper example. But I also recognize that I would probably not have this complaint if there were anything that would make those genre increments stand out. Sure, this movie has a bit of a throwback feel to 1980s John Hughes coming of age movies like “Weird Science” or “Pretty in Pink,” but it is not as good as those. If I watch “Lisa Frankenstein” again, there is less of a chance that I would finish the film and say “That was fun, another round,” compared to me going “You know what’s a good watch right now? A John Hughes movie.”
Kathryn Newton does an excellent job playing a somewhat twisted, but also kind of innocent lead role. There are a lot of layers to unpack with this character as the movie goes along and while I am not sure what roles Newton will take following this picture, this film goes to showcase her range. She can be dark, she can be down to earth, she can be otherworldly. She can do it all. Going back to the film’s aesthetic, Newton’s hair and makeup are on point. I have no idea if “Lisa Frankenstein” is even going to be considered for any makeup awards during next year’s awards season, it is still too early to tell, but I would say in regards to 2024 cinema, “Lisa Frankenstein” is this year’s first notable contender in that category.
The rest of the cast all do a decent job with their roles. Cole Sprouse proves silence is golden with his portrayal of The Creature. Liza Soberano gives a fine showcase of her talent as Taffy. But aside from Newton’s layered protagonist, I think the character that stood out to me the most in the movie is Carla Gugino as Lisa’s stepmother, Janet.
For some young people, it is hard enough to adapt to a new parent or guardian. “Lisa Frankenstein” presents a reality for our protagonist that makes it come off as near impossible for her to adapt to her stepmother. The movie presents a rivalry between these two that is probably more riveting than it needs to be. And a lot of it is in the performances between these two. Of course, the shenanigans our protagonist gets into plays a significant role as well, but nevertheless.
Once again, this film is directed by Zelda Williams, and despite my negative comments for this film, I am not going to tell her to give up on filmmaking. I think she does a fine job with this movie in terms of bringing various sets and talent to life. Some frames from this picture still linger in my mind because of how stylish they come off. But when it comes to characterization and writing, that is where the movie needs work. It has a great concept but it just doesn’t stick the landing. But I also cannot entirely blame her, because she did not write the film. That job belongs to Diablo Cody, who I like as a writer, but this is not her best work.
In the end, “Lisa Frankenstein” has good intentions, but comes off with lackluster execution. Despite some inklings of quality, I will not deny that this movie could have been better. As a horror movie, it is not that eerie or terrifying. As a comedy, it does not have many laughs. When you take these ideas together, the movie kind of falters in both genres. There are good things about it, yes, but those good things do not justify a rewatch. Those good things barely stand out. That is if they do at all. Kathryn Newton’s great. Sure. Carlo Gugino is terrific. Sure. The design across the board almost couldn’t be better. Double sure. But I also think that if you are at the movies right now, there are better options for your choosing. “Lisa Frankenstein” is not offensively bad. But it could be better. How better? Well, judging by my score I think “Lisa Frankenstein” could be better than a 5/10.
“Lisa Frankenstein” is now playing in theaters and is available to rent or buy on VOD.
Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be a fun one. It is for the most anticipated film in the history of the world, “Madame Web!” Boy oh boy! I am sure everyone is expecting Scene Before’s first EVER 11/10 score on this one… We shall see. Speaking of film reviews, pretty soon I will be dropping my thoughts on “Drive-Away Dolls,” “Bob Marley: One Love,” and “Dune Part Two.” Stay tuned! If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Lisa Frankenstein?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite Diablo Cody script? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
“American Fiction” is directed by Cord Jefferson and this is his directorial debut. The film stars Jeffrey Wright (Asteroid City, What If…?), Tracee Ellis Ross (Black-ish, The High Note), John Ortiz (Fast & Furious, Clyde Goes Boating), Erika Alexander (The Cosby Show, Living Single), Leslie Uggams (Roots, Deadpool), Adam Brody (Shazam!, Ready or Not), Issa Rae (Barbie, Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse), and Sterling K. Brown (This Is Us, Army Wives). This film is about an author who creates a satirical book under a pen name that becomes bigger than anyone, even he, could have imagined.
As we approach the end of the 2023 film awards season, it is time to discuss a movie that may not be a frontrunner to win all the Oscars this year, but one that has had a respectable share of spotlight. I knew about a lot of movies coming out towards the year’s end, but “American Fiction” was one that kind of came out of nowhere for me. It took me a couple trailer watches, mentions from social circles, and online pundits to drill the title in my head, but the whole idea of the film was something that I could get behind. It looked funny, well-acted, and well-written. Thankfully, when it comes to my expectations, this film hits all three of those checkmarks. The humor is great. The acting is great. The screenplay is great. And what makes all of this even better is that the director of this film, Cord Jefferson, is making this picture his debut.
According to his IMDb page, Cord Jefferson has never once directed anything else before “American Fiction.” This includes other features. This includes shorts. This includes television. Up until now, Jefferson has had a hand in television producing and writing. His resume includes “Master of None,” “Watchmen,” and “The Good Place,” the latter of which I have watched and find quite hilarious. It got me through my recovery after getting my wisdom teeth removed so I feel like I owe something to the people who made that show. And now Jefferson his taking his TV talents and using them to deliver one of 2023’s funniest films.
The ensemble for “American Fiction” can do no wrong. From the commanding, but not quite in your face presence of Jeffrey Wright, to the quality charisma of Tracee Ellis Ross to the flamboyant glory of Issa Rae, the latter of whom makes me imagine that she could eventually become one of my favorite performers in the near future. I thought Rae was a standout in “Barbie.” But she is a different kind of great here. Honestly, I almost cannot see anyone else playing her character. She does a great job not only having a hypnotic presence from scene one, but when we see her read her book, she does a great job at immersing me into the scene and feeling as if I am not only getting to hear the book, but maybe also getting some speck of imagination to the point where I would be mistaken to believe the events of the book are actually playing out in front of me.
As I have grown older, one of things I continue to appreciate about movies is the very idea of how people can take something and deliver a primarily visual experience, but if you have to ask me, “American Fiction’s” greatest asset has to be its dialogue. There are several lines from this film that are contenders to be some of the year’s best. I don’t think any of them will have as monumental of an impact as “Oppenheimer‘s” final line, “I believe we did,” but when it comes to individual lines, there is one quote from the main character that is funny, not only because of its delivery, but because regardless of its context, the more I think about it, the more I feel it applies to some aspects of modern society. Specifically, “The dumber I behave, the richer I get.” In fact, some would say this line even links to how entertainment works nowadays. There seems to be a consensus that we keep making entertainment, whether it is through movies, television, or in this movie’s case, books, arguably for the lowest common denominator. In fact, that falls in line with the main protagonist’s goal as well, because the film follows his journey as an author who cares about and finds passion in what he does, even though he does not have the widest audience. But the more he panders to a demographic or lie about himself, the more successful he becomes.
As for other standouts, the film itself looks beautiful. This film is shot by Cristina Dunlap. Cinematography-wise, it is not the top dog of the year, but it is sometimes enchanting to look at. The film is packed with a variety of eye-popping exterior shots. I may be biased because I am from Massachusetts and this movie is set around various areas I have been to around the state, but I can say that when it comes to showcasing those areas on camera, I will not deny that the showcase itself is rather pleasing. But the film is not just easy on the eyes, but also the ears. Laura Karpman’s score is quite good. It fits every scene well.
While this film may not win Best Picture at the Oscars this year, that said, you never know, it could pull an upset… I will say when it comes to this year’s slate, particularly the movies that are going for the heavy-hitting awards, this film gets some things right that I would say “Barbie” also gets right. Specifically the vibes and tone, mixed together with the overall look of the film. In some sense, “American Fiction” is a down to earth story about people you could probably find in our society, but it also comes off with this slight sense of fantasy. It is hard to describe, but I appreciated it.
I also must note that when I remember this film, I will remember it well for the laughs I had. The smiles I had. But it is a pretty balanced movie in terms of emotion. When we get to know Thelonious’s family, we also get to know his mother, who we find out has Alzheimer’s. While I will affirm the film is not quite as memorable as “Everything Everywhere All at Once,” when you take the main idea of “American Fiction” and combine it with this Alzheimer’s subplot, the two films feel similar tonally. Because “Everything Everywhere All at Once” had tons of multiversal shenanigans, but you also have an intriguing subplot that is more down to earth like the turmoil between multiple family relationships. As for the subplot itself, I thought it was handled with grace and it unleashed a great performance out of Leslie Uggams (right). In terms of story and characters, what “American Fiction” provides on the surface, is intriguing. That said, there is more to it that paints a pretty picture.
In the end, “American Fiction” is unpredictable, exciting, and hilarious. When it comes to commentary, this is one of 2023’s finest works. But it also does something equally as important. Entertain. Once again, this is the first film from Cord Jefferson, and I honestly cannot wait to see what he does next. It is not just a good time, it is a great time. And I think you will have a great time should you decide to watch this film. Not the best of 2023, but it gets a lot of things right. When it comes to flaws, they do exist. I will remember some aspects of this film more than others. Some scenes feel a tad abrupt in terms of flow. But there’s nothing game-breaking. As for my score, I am going to give “American Fiction” a high 7/10, and honestly if I were to watch it a second time, it could go up.
“American Fiction” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now.
Thanks for reading this review! If you enjoyed this review, I have more where that came from! Pretty soon I am going to have reviews for “Lisa Frankenstein,” “Madame Web,” “Bob Marley: One Love,” “Drive-Away Dolls” and my most anticipated movie this year, “Dune Part Two.” Also, if you have a lot of time on your hands and you want to find what films defined the art form in 2023, check out the 6th Annual Jack Awards, possibly the biggest waste of time in your entire life. Who knows? If you want to see more great content like this, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “American Fiction?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite directorial debut? I don’t have a concrete answer, but I recently rewatched “Deadpool” over Valentine’s Day, because what other movie would I watch?! That was Tim Miller’s first feature film and it ended up being one of the funniest I have ever seen. If you have an answer of your own, say it down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
WARNING: The following post is over 14,000 words long. As of this publication, that is more words than the total episode count of “The Simpsons…” multiplied by 18. Get a bag of popcorn. Get a soda. Get in a comfy chair. Do whatever makes you happy. Take a break if you have to, and come back when you’re ready. But most importantly, enjoy the show.
Hello, and welcome to the 6th Annual Jack Awards! For those who did not experience the 1st through 5th Jack Awards, do not worry, you do not need to go back and read those to understand this one.
This is a celebration of the many movies that came out in 2023. Or as Taylor Swift calls them, those things that rearranged release dates so she can take up more screens. We have a great ceremony ahead where we will recognize all the films that yours truly saw throughout the span of 2023, including 10 films that have the distinct quality that makes them worthy of being nominated for Best Picture!
How does the show work? There will be a list of categories ranging in a multitude of aspects that go into making a movie. Categories like Best Supporting Actor, Best Original Screenplay, Best Cinematography, and so on. There will be five nominees in each category, but only one will win. The key thing about this show, is that it is determined by perhaps the most selfish voting body in the history of mankind. As it is only run by myself. I will be determining the winners for all these categories. Except for one. Because a couple weeks leading into the show, I announced the nominees and gave you all a task. I listed what I found to be the 10 best movies of 2023 leading into this ceremony. And you all got to vote on your favorite. The votes have been tallied, and the winner, which will be revealed at the end of the show, will be this year’s Best Picture!
Lastly, if it must be known, all the films presented here must have had a theatrical release. If you were looking forward to finding a film primarily made for a streaming service like Netflix and Disney+, one that went straight to TV, straight to DVD, taking home Best Production Design, don’t get your hopes up. We are here to talk about movies, not television. There is a difference. That said, I want to start off this post by congratulating everyone who made a movie in the past year. And this includes the movies I did not like. I recognize it is hard work. A lot of time has gone into these projects, and I admire your efforts. With that being said, let’s start the show!
To kick things off, we are going to be doing a monologue. It is time for Jack Drees Tells Jokes to Nobody in Order to Please Himself!
There is no audience during this ceremony, and therefore, there shall be no laughs. So, for those experiencing this ceremony today, please use your imagination and pretend you are listening to me live telling you all sorts of random crap. And I must say, 2023 was an interesting 365 days. I am not gonna sugarcoat it. Last year was rough for the film industry. Much like 2020, there felt like a deficit of movies, particularly bigger ones, but for a justifiable reason. That said, I saw plenty of wonderful movies over the past year, including some all-time greats. Industry-wise, this was a lesser year. But if you’re talking about the movies that ultimately came out, I would be lying if I did not say 2023 had some banger moments for cinema. Unless you were a Ken, killed by Sisu, annihilated by John Wick, or stomped on by Mario.
Of course, we cannot talk about 2023 cinema without addressing the strikes. On May 1st, the Writers Guild of America announced all writers within the union will strike from their work on film and television. The combined industry didn’t quit, they were just fading to black.
In July, while the writers were still on strike, the Screen Actors Guild also announced a strike of their own. There were so many picketers out there this year. What a huge, committed cast! Everyone went from trying to remember their lines, to the picket lines!
“Killers of the Flower Moon” became one of 2023’s most prestigious films. Directed by Martin Scorsese, the film is about an FBI investigation into the murders of a Native American tribe in Oklahoma. Star Leonardo DiCaprio expressed his excitement regarding the project, but said once it turns twenty-five, it’s over! He’s never talking about it again!
Best Buy announced in October that they were officially going to stop DVD sales. Honestly, Best Buy should be absolutely embarrassed. There is a Blockbuster that is still open and selling movies to this day! It’s true! It’s in Oregon! Imagine getting one-upped by the butt of going out of business jokes since the late 2000s! Best Buy, you had a chance to come out on top and you failed miserably! Just wait until this Blockbuster starts selling fridges and we’ll see who’s winning then.
Speaking of DVDs, Netflix also stopped their DVD-by-mail rental service. Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos made the huge announcement to the world with the preface, “Hey, in case you missed it! We amazingly still have DVDs!”
“Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse” is one of the year’s biggest, brightest, and most innovative animated films. The film is nominated for 5 awards tonight, including Best Animated Feature and Best Picture! The Daily Bugle calls it “The worst movie ever made.” As far as I am concerned, this only means every other outlet liked it.
National Cinema Day made a comeback this year! The initiative, which happened on Sunday, August 27, is designed to give discount tickets and deals to moviegoers for one day. So now instead of paying an arm and a leg to see a movie, we just pay a finger!
…They call it the Banshees of Inisherin special!
Yes, I know that’s a movie from 2022, not quite this past year. It’s a little irrelevant. But if that’s your comeback. I would flash a finger at you, but I can’t, because it’s chopped off!
One of my biggest surprises this year was “Godzilla Minus One.” The latest film featuring one of the world’s most famous creatures was a roaring good time! The film is nominated for six Jack Awards, including Best Picture tonight. Because nothing says Best Picture like “Big lizard has a hissy fit with tall buildings.”
Moving on from the King of the Monsters to King of Rock and Roll’s wife, let’s talk about “Priscilla!” A24’s new film, “Priscilla,” also nominated for three awards including Best Picture, is a coming-of-age story about the woman many would come to know as Priscilla Presley. I’m not going to lie, I love the movie. I really do. But I had somewhat low expectations sometime before going into it. Safe to say, I had a suspicious mind.
Last year during the Jack Awards, “Elvis” was nominated in multiple categories. This year, the title character’s spouse’s movie is being honored. Again, that movie being “Priscilla.” Fun fact about “Priscilla,” there is not a single song by Elvis Presley in it. Yeah, Elvis Presley Enterprises did not approve of the use of the artist’s music. When it came to “Priscilla’s” music, the people behind it were looking for a little less conversation from Elvis and a little more action from everybody else.
As of 2023, the Walt Disney Company is officially 100 years old. According to the RSPCA, an animal charity in the UK, mice usually live for about three years. At this point Mickey Mouse should be wrinkled and using a walker! Actually, I take that back, Mickey should be rotting and unable to move! What’s his secret?
To celebrate Disney’s 100th anniversary, the company’s animation division released “Wish”, a film about a girl named Asha who wishes upon a star only to have chaos unleash on her homeland. By the way, the film has a nomination tonight for Best Original Song. Congratulations! And to truly honor the 100th anniversary, Disney had all the customers hoping to see this in a theater wait in a two hour long line before they could get in.
Warner Brothers also turned 100 last year. So, in honor of the occasion, Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav announced the company will be making 100 tax write-offs.
Warner Brothers released four DC movies in 2023. Despite what the title may suggest, I can confirm “The Flash” is more than a second long.
The last of the Detective Comics Extended Universe films released this year was “Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom.” This film is supposed to close out the DCEU for good. So now it’s sleeping with the fishes.
“The Super Mario Bros. Movie” came out this April and it was a smash hit at the box office. By the way, its song “Peaches” is nominated tonight for Best Original Song. The movie made so much money that Mario can finally quit his dayjobs as a plumber, doctor, tennis player, golfer, and go-kart racer. He finally made it in life!
Chris Pratt voiced the title character in “The Super Mario Bros. Movie.” And to prepare for the role, he ate mushrooms, practiced his jumping, spewed fire and ice at turtles, and pulled down flags on a regular basis.
Chris Pratt also reprised his role as Star Lord in “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3.” And to prepare for that role, he painstakingly refreshed his memory on how to talk to trees.
One of the biggest movie events of the past summer was Barbenheimer. For the people who only saw “Mario” this year, Barbenheimer is the combination of the popular titles “Barbie” and “Oppenheimer,” both of which came out on July 21st. It was the summer of bombs, bombshells, and box office results so explosive; you would think Michael Bay manufactured the results himself.
“Oppenheimer” is the latest film from Christopher Nolan. I’m sure his next film, “Tenet,” will be just as exciting.
…
If you did not get what I just said, I should note, the joke hasn’t happened yet.
You know, it is crazy how a few years ago, “Tenet” was heavily marketed as the film to save cinemas. And in some ways, it brought people back. But it took films like “Godzilla vs. Kong,” “Spider-Man: No Way Home,” and “Top Gun: Maverick” to crack the code. I wish you could have understood what I just said, but Christopher Nolan is in charge of this joke, and the sound mix seems to be a bit off.
…On that note, I should mention “Oppenheimer” is nominated for Best Sound Editing and Best Sound Mixing tonight. The sound in “Oppenheimer” was so powerfully authentic. I can prove it by how many times I shouted “WHAT?!” to somebody when they talked to me after seeing the movie.
“Barbie,” under the vision of Greta Gerwig, became one of the highest-grossing films ever directed by a woman. In a surprisingly charitable move, Gerwig used the money she earned on Barbie to buy Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling a life-sized dollhouse.
“Barbie” used so much pink paint to design its sets, that the world experienced a shortage of the product while filming. 2022 must have been an atrocious time to open a Baskin Robbins location. That’s literally a huge portion of your identity! Pink, ice cream, and helping Ant-Man when he is in between jobs! That’s Baskin Robbins in a nutshell!
When it comes to Barbenheimer, “Barbie” ultimately ended up making more money than ”Oppenheimer.” In retrospect, if “Oppenheimer” had Taylor Swift in the film, maybe it would have had a chance of winning the box office. Instead, they had to settle for just the biggest MCU star.
AMC Theatres announced over the summer that they could run out of money in 2024. Thankfully though, this crisis was avoided within a few days. How so? Nicole Kidman decided to donate her life savings.
Speaking of taking away people’s money, AMC announced in January they were going to slowly implement a new seating system in all their theatres. The new program, called Sightline, was going to charge people more money for “better” seats. So instead of finding five pieces of popcorn in your seat, you might find four if you pay a little extra!
The AMC Sightline program was going to charge three different prices for seats. There’s the Preferred tier, which is dedicated to the middle of most rows. There’s the Standard tier, where you pay a little less and sit on the sides or a little closer to the screen depending on the auditorium. If you decide to partake in the Value tier and sit in the front row, the price goes down even further. And if you sneak in from the outside, you make the front row bargain hunters look like fools!
AMC ended up not going through with the Sightline program. Partially because according to AMC, there was not much of a change to the number of tickets purchased for the front row, which again, is called the Value tier. Because there is nothing more valuable than straining your neck after sitting down and watching “Oppenheimer” for three plus hours.
Before we get started with the show, I want to give you all a heads up. Literally. We are going to take a moment to thank our sponsor of tonight’s ceremony. I am sure this… partnership… is not breaking their brain whatsoever. Take a look at this ad that has been put together featuring some of tonight’s nominees.
As the host of the Jack Awards, I shall declare the awards-giving to begin!
We will be starting the show the way we always do, with Best Animated Feature.
This year, Best Animated Feature has its fair share of franchise additions to properties like “Spider-Man” and “Slam Dunk” to charming new originals like “Suzume,” “The Boy and the Heron,” and “The Tunnel to Summer, the Exit of Goodbyes.” No matter where these movies came from, or what worlds they represent. They all accomplish the same goal. Make the best movie possible. Here are the nominees for Best Animated Feature.
BEST ANIMATED FEATURE
The Boy and the Heron – Hayao Miyazaki, Toshio Suzuki
The First Slam Dunk – Takehiko Inoue, Toshiyuki Matsui
Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse – Joaquim Dos Santos, Kemp Powers, Justin K. Thompson, Avi Arad, Phil Lord, Christopher Miller, Amy Pascal, Christina Steinberg
The Tunnel to Summer, the Exit of Goodbyes – Tomohisa Taguchi, Akenosuke Kanazawa, Makiko Mameda, Keijirô Taguchi
And the award goes to…
“Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse!”
This is almost a trip down memory lane! This is the second “Spider-Man” film to win the Best Animated Feature category. The first one being 2018’s “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse!” Congratulations to Sony and everyone involved with these movies, particularly the “Spider-Verse” titles, for maintaining a healthy, lovable franchise! This film is the classic case of how you pitch a sequel. Go bigger, make it better. What may be one of the most basic marketing tactics in making a sequel actually ends up working for “Across the Spider-Verse,” because so much time and care was put into each scene. The film has a large cast, six dazzling animation styles, and a story that both stands on its own but expands lore that people have come to learn in the original film. “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse” introduced a wonderful world that provided for one of the most unique comic book movies of the year. “Across the Spider-Verse” does exactly the same thing, all the while arguably improving what already made that original film so great. Congratulations to “Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse!” And may I remind you, this film, and two others on this list, “Suzume” and “The First Slam Dunk,” are nominated for Best Picture. This film could win the ultimate award tonight.
We now move onto Best Visual Effects. This category honors the effects that takes otherworldly concepts and brings them to ours. It honors elements in film that turn fantasy into reality. The ones that turn science fiction into non-fiction. The ones that do everything and more to immerse the viewer into a world that may not exist, but nevertheless seems believable. Here are the nominees for Best Visual Effects.
BEST VISUAL EFFECTS
The Creator
Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves
Godzilla Minus One
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3
Transformers: Rise of the Beasts
And the award goes to…
“The Creator!”
Of the films listed here, “The Creator” is the only one that is not based on any preexisting property or franchise. The film did everything it could to create a world that centers around a future that not only feels closeby, but one that contains a great deal of verisimilitude. The four other nominees are more than deserving of their place here. They all have clean, crisp instances of CGI and visuals up the wazoo. I almost cannot imagine seeing these movies without the amazing, unbelievable effects work. But the thing about “The Creator” is that it was able to create something so lifelike to the point where it made the film itself feel twice as relevant as it could have been. “The Creator” is what happens when you stick to your guns, stick to your $80 million budget, and create a world that could only be described as one of the most polished of the year. And while $80 million is a lot of money in many circumstances, not only is it cheaper some of the other nominees, it is chump change compared to a lot of movies that come out today. And it many cases, it looks better! Let’s face it, if you are going to see a movie at the theater, chances are you are going to pay very similar prices for every movie on the list. But if we are strictly talking budgets, “The Creator” may be one of the biggest bangs for your buck on the 2023 roster. Congratulations to “The Creator!”
Now it is time to introduce our first Best Picture nominee. Throughout the show, we will be introducing the nominees for Best Picture by giving a description of the film, how many nominations they have, and inserting a trailer for your viewing pleasure.
Our first Best Picture nominee comes from Japan. And it brings forth one of its biggest and most popular properties to the big screen one more time. This reimagining on a classic premise unleashes a powerful punch. Between a gripping, hallowing, eerie vibe… An emotional, hypnotizing, edge of your seat story… And human characters that can only be described as some of the best that have ever been created for the genre… This entire movie is one of the most obnoxiously visceral and satisfying thrill rides of the decade. The titular character may be a familiar face, but you have never seen him like this. Nominated for 6 Jack Awards, this is “Godzilla Minus One.”
If you have experienced the Jack Awards before, you may be familiar with my formula for the sound categories. In the process of filmmaking, editing comes before mixing. In the process of citing the alphabet, E comes before M. Therefore, in the process of the Jack Awards, it only makes sense to present the Sound Editing category first, and the Sound Mixing category second. These films have done everything to provide an audio experience that brings endless doses of immersion and chills. Here are the nominees for Best Sound Editing.
BEST SOUND EDITING
Godzilla Minus One
John Wick: Chapter 4
Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One
Oppenheimer
Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse
And the Jack goes to…
“Oppenheimer!”
This is “Oppenheimer’s” first win! For the record, “Oppenheimer” is today’s frontrunner with 14 nominations. That makes the film the second most-nominated title in Jack Awards history. And trust me, audio-wise, “Oppenheimer” blows the competition out of the water. Both literally and figuratively. Yours truly saw “Oppenheimer” in IMAX three times, and each one was sweet as the last. Not only was the audio brought with Christopher Nolan’s trademarked, over the top volume, but some of it was used to enhance the emotion of the film. There are moments where the ears are just overwhelmed but in a way that can only be described as raw. One of the best instances of audio in the entire movie are sequences involving the stomping of feet. Not only is it great sound, not only is it immersive sound, but it is drilled into my memory. There is honestly a good chance that the next time I end up hearing tons of people stomping their feet, I will think of “Oppenheimer.” With context, it might be kind of sad to think that way, but that is the power of terrific sound editing. “Oppenheimer” achieves its first win of the ceremony, and in its first category too! It needs thirteen more for a clean sweep, and seven more to beat “Everything Everywhere All at Once” as the winningest film in Jack Awards history.
And now onto the second sound category, here are the nominees for Best Sound Mixing.
BEST SOUND MIXING
Godzilla Minus One
Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One
Napoleon
Oppenheimer
Suzume
And the Jack goes to…
“Oppenheimer!”
And “Oppenheimer” takes its second win! Christopher Nolan’s latest film dominates the sound categories! These are words I never thought I would say! The sound mixing in “Oppenheimer” is not just top tier, but it is a significant improvement over some of Nolan’s recent fare like “Dunkirk” and “Tenet.” I liked both movies. Very much so in fact. But the thing about those movies is that the sound and music were so obnoxious that it was hard to hear the characters speak sometimes! “Oppenheimer,” even in scenes where the talking may seem endless, you can at least decipher every word out of everyone’s mouth. And that is with Ludwig Göransson’s excellent score. That is with the endless instances of explosive, visceral bursts of audio that put me in the middle of each scene. Watching “Oppenheimer,” in many ways, felt like watching a slice of life. It is not a slice of life film per se. But in some ways, it felt like a documentary with slightly more epic scenes. I felt like I was a part of every moment. You could almost argue that my eyesight almost became black and white at times. The audio in “Oppenheimer” was so good that it ended up making the more visual aspects of the films all the more pleasing. Congratulations to “Oppenheimer” for its second win of the night! It takes home both sound awards!
Our second Best Picture nominee is James Gunn’s third, and likely final, installment to an iconic Marvel franchise. A band of unlikely heroes return one more time to take on the High Evolutionary, played with pure captivation by Chukwudi Iwuji. The film lets us get to know more about the backstory and origins of one of the franchise’s notable faces, Rocket. It shows us how he lived, how he bonded with old friends, and how he became the ferocious raccoon we have all come to know. The film features a killer soundtrack, bombastic action, and stunning visual effects. It is a feast for the eyes and ears, all the while delivering one heck of an adventure. Nominated for 2 Jack Awards, this is “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3.”
It is time for the first acting award of the ceremony. Best Supporting Actor. They say there is no I in the word team. You gotta have some help from those around you. For Leonardo DiCaprio in “Killers of the Flower Moon,” some of the help came from Robert De Niro. For Cillian Murphy in “Oppenheimer,” much of that movie, including his performance, wouldn’t have been as iconic if it were not for the talent on display from Robert Downey Jr.. These nominations belong to five men who broke their legs in support of their craft and their individual films. And ladies and gentlemen… Do you hear that? That… is the sound of competition!!! It is our first “Barbenheimer” matchup! The double feature event of the summer makes its way to the Jacks! So let’s get to it! Maybe “Barbie” will win an award. Maybe “Oppenheimer” will win an award! We will see! Here the nominees for Best Supporting Actor.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Ryan Gosling – Barbie
Glenn Howerton – BlackBerry
Robert de Niro – Killers of the Flower Moon
Robert Downey Jr. – Oppenheimer
Jacob Elordi – Priscilla
And the Jack goes to…
Ryan Gosling for “Barbie!”
And this “Barbenheimer” matchup is a win for “Barbie.” Congratulations! He says he’s just Ken, but in the greater span of the “Barbie” movie, I would say Ryan Gosling so much more than that. He is one of the most integral characters on screen. He has an instant charm that can do no wrong. He has a performance that brings forth tons of range in various scenes. The beautiful thing about “Barbie” is how it imagines what could happen if the toys we know came to life, perhaps came to our world. And the way it goes about it sometimes delivers spectacular results. This is especially true with Ryan Gosling’s Ken. Not only is he funny. Not only is he charismatic. He dances! Sings! Flexes! As the song says, he’s great at doing stuff! And I would have to say that stuff is acting his butt off as one of the year’s most iconic and memorable characters. Many people were surprised by “Barbie” in 2023. Even though I knew to expect something unique and happened to maintain high expectations for the movie, even I was delightfully shocked by how intense and hardcore Gosling’s performance is. Congratulations to Ryan Gosling! And this is another fine, sweet, delightful addition to his Mojo Dojo Casa House! Here is a clip of Ryan Gosling from his time in “Barbie.”
Moving onto the Best Supporting Actress category. These five women brought some assistance of their own. “The Creator” may have had John David Washington, but that movie would not be what it is if not for the endless charm of Madeliene Yuna Voyles being there by his side. Of course, “The Holdovers” has Paul Giamatti, but the movie was made even better knowing that a great actress like Da’Vine Joy Randolph could be in several scenes with him. These five women brought their best to their roles, and now they are recognized as the nominees for Best Supporting Actress.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Viola Davis – Air
Madeliene Yuna Voyles – The Creator
Minabi Hamabe – Godzilla Minus One
Da’Vine Joy Randolph – The Holdovers
Emily Blunt – Oppenheimer
And the Jack goes to…
Da’Vine Joy Randolph for “The Holdovers!”
“The Holdovers” is one of the most charming movies I have seen all year. But even with its endless comforting vibe, it does have its moments where things take a bit of a downward turn. And a large part of that is based on the presence of Da’Vine Joy Randolph as the character of Mary Lamb. Throughout the movie, we find out that she is a lunch lady who is dealing with the loss of her son. And while we may get a sense that the character may be a positive individual, there are various subtleties to help realize that there is more than meets the eye. But this is what the best performances do! They give a multitude of emotions, and this one is no exception! This multitude is best exemplified by a scene from a Christmas party where we see the character taking everything in, but also realizing how much she misses her son. It is a scene that provides a defining moment for every character in this film, including her. It helps us get to know her weaknesses, her pain, her grief. It is just a small fraction of a performance for the ages. Here is a clip of Da’Vine Joy Randolph in “The Holdovers!”
Our third Best Picture currently stands as the fourth highest-grossing Japanese film of all time. Makoto Shinkai is back with a brand-new movie and vision to captivate audiences everywhere. The movie is stunningly animated, brilliantly voiced, and gorgeously colored. It follows a young girl who discovers what it means to be a closer, or someone is supposed to close doors to prevent incoming disasters. Not only is the film easy on the eyes, but also the ears. The sound is thundering and the music is booming. It is easily one of the most immersive theatrical experiences of the year. The film also asks and brilliantly answers the question, “What if a person’s body and soul entered a three-legged chair and brought it to life?” Nominated for 4 Jack Awards, this is “Suzume.”
They say no film is perfect, and those who say that are absolutely right. For example, “The Hunger Games” does not have a ton to do with eating. There are more uses of guns than knives in the “Blade Runner” series. And last time I checked, there are not many wolves on Wall Street. No film is perfect. Even the films from this year. And there are many good ones, keep that in mind. Even those films have their imperfections. That is where this segment comes in. Because it is time to take the films of 2023, no matter how perfect or imperfect they are, and make them even better. It is time for the latest edition of Film Improvements.
This is a movie awards show, but it does not mean there is no room for the recognition of other art forms. For example, one of our nominees would not be possible if it were not for comic books. And another one would not be possible if it were not for television and manga. But all five of our next films would not be here today if it were not for the memorable pieces of music that play throughout each one. From vocally active choirs to banging and clanging percussion to the master’s touch of a fine conductor, these five films all have scores that both enhance the film as its being watched, and may also be played elsewhere once the film is over. Here are the nominees for Best Original Score.
BEST ORIGINAL SCORE
The Boy and the Heron – Joe Hisaishi
The First Slam Dunk – Satoshi Takebe
Godzilla Minus One – Naoki Satô
Oppenheimer – Ludwig Göransson
Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse – Daniel Pemberton
And the Jack goes to…
Joe Hisaishi for “The Boy and the Heron!”
To be honest, of all the categories during this show, this may be the hardest one to declare a winner. All are deserving, but I have to pick one. And the reason why I picked “The Boy and the Heron” is because the soundtrack throughout feels the most diverse. Not only do we get a good variety of tracks for the taking with all sorts of different sounds and tunes, but all of them are done well! Not only that, but it seems to match the otherworldly feel of the film from start to finish. “The Boy and the Heron” is one of those movies whose best moments are about discovery, exploring the unknown. When it comes to world-building, it is one of the year’s finest examples of that. The music in “The Boy and the Heron” not only work as great singular pieces, but they do a spectacular job at matching the visuals, the art style, the characters, every little sprinkle you could imagine. And it is all wound together beautifully with an admirable protagonist who takes on engaging obstacles. It is no wonder why this film’s director, Hayao Miyazaki, brought Joe Hisaishi onboard one more time to conduct his latest film. The two previously worked together on films like “Kiki’s Delivery Service,” “Spirited Away, and “Howl’s Moving Castle.” Hisaishi has always had a magic touch with his work and it has all led to this. One of his best creations yet. Fun fact about “The Boy and the Heron,” there was one piece of music that conductor Joe Hisaishi presented to director Hayao Miyazaki on his birthday. And Miyazaki loved it so much that he made it the main theme for the movie. I can tell you right now, it is a fine choice. There are several variants of the piece throughout the film, and this is one of them. Here is a sample of the music, particularly the main theme, simply known as “Ask Me Why,” from “The Boy and the Heron.”
Our previous category was about things that you hear. Now let’s move onto the things that you see. And what I see are five dazzling pictures that put all their glitzy, glamour-esque glory onto the screen. Specifically, its talent. And more specifically, the makeup and hairstyles on the talent. This category is dedicated the makeup artists and hairstylists who have done everything they can to make the movie’s talent pop, represent an era, or blend right into their character like a chameleon. It is time for “Barbenheimer” matchup number two! Here are the nominees for Best Makeup and Hairstyling.
BEST MAKEUP & HAIRSTYLING
Barbie – Ivana Primorac
Ferrari – Marcelle Genovese, Marco Pompei, Brian Wade, Scott Wheeler
Maestro – Kazu Hiro, Kay Georgiou, Lori McCoy-Bell
Oppenheimer – Luisa Abel
Poor Things – Nadia Stacey, Mark Coulier, Josh Weston
And the award goes to…
Ivana Primorac for “Barbie!”
That’s another win for “Barbie!” So far, it has defeated “Oppenheimer” twice, and individually, the movies are taking home two trophies! Double trouble! But I can tell you, there is no trouble in the makeup department in this film. This film is like seeing a giant toybox come to life. It is almost amazing, but almost not surprising, to think that something so heavily associated with a child’s fantasy could translate this well to the screen. Never has it been more appropriate say these characters are dolled up to the max! Out of all the movies this year, it is fair to say that “Barbie” may be the best one when it comes to hair. Margot Robbie’s character very much resembles what many people think of when it comes to the idea of a Barbie doll. One of the more memorable scenes in the entire movie is where the narrator jumps in and rejects the idea that Margot Robbie isn’t “stereotypical Barbie pretty.” Well, this win proves the narrator right! Other Barbie doll characters like those played by Issa Rae, Kate McKinnon, and Alexandra Shipp also sparkle and shine on screen with their unique styles. And as for Ryan Gosling as Ken, never has the actor looked more like a blonde boy toy. His hair is puffy, wild, and stylish. It completely works! And it is all due to some magical behind the scenes work. Congratulations to Ivana Primorac on the win!
Our fourth best picture is like a great basketball game. Fast-paced, intense, and engaging. Inspired by the “Slam Dunk” manga and television series, this film is about Ryota Miyagi. A point-guard for his high school basketball team who plays the game in honor of his late brother. The story is mainly set around a high stakes match against a rival team, and the game itself never feels low in stakes. The film is not short on non-linear storytelling and flashbacks. All of it is essential to tell a story that starts with a bang and ends with a swish. With a well-established rivalry and fantastic set of characters, this is not only a spectacular piece of animation, but it joins the ranks of the greatest sports movies ever made. Nominated for 3 Jack Awards, this is “The First Slam Dunk.”
Each and every year during the Jack Awards, we give out two Lifetime Achievement awards. This includes the Roger Deakins Award, which honors someone who has made outstanding contributions to film and cinema. Additionally, we also hand out the Stan Lee Award, which honors someone who made equally outstanding contributions, but is no longer with us. We will award that one later in the show. For now, it is time for the Roger Deakins Award.
This year’s Roger Deakins Award is given to a fantastic filmmaker. Born in 1941 in Tokyo, Japan. This mind is considered one of the greatest in the history of animation. To say he is a master of anime is an understatement. This man who would become one of the industry’s most iconic names joined Toei Animation in 1963. During his time there, he helped with notable productions such as “Doggie March” and “Gulliver’s Travels Beyond the Moon.” He worked with another notable name in the field, Isao Takahata, who he would also collaborate with after moving to another animation studio, A-Pro. Together, they co-directed “Lupin the Third Part I” released in 1973. He also worked at Zuiyō Eizō, which would later be known as Nippon Animation, and Tokyo Movie Shinsha. For the latter, he helmed his feature-length directorial debut. That film being “Lupin III: The Castle of Cagliostro.” He also directed the television series “Sherlock Hound” in the 1980s. In that same decade, he would be working on the manga “Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind,” which he would adapt as an animated film released by Toei Company. In 1985, he would go on to co-found Studio Ghibli with his collaborator, Isao Takahata. Today he is known for directing many of the studio’s iconic works. These include “Castle in the Sky,” “My Neighbor Totoro,” “Kiki’s Delivery Service,” “Howl’s Moving Castle,” and “The Wind Rises” just to name a few. His 1997 feature film, “Princess Mononoke” was for a time the highest-grossing film in Japan. His 2001 feature, “Spirited Away” received endless acclaim and just so happened to hold the top spot at the Japanese box office for 19 years. To this day, it remains the country’s second-highest grossing film. It is also the second film to win the Academy Award for Best Animated Feature, beating notable western competitors like “Ice Age” and “Lilo & Stitch.” He also has a Critics Choice Award, a Golden Globe, and several Annies. This is on top of many other wins and nominations from various platforms. His cinematic legacy lives on today. His son, Goro, directed “Tales from Earthsea,” “From Up on Poppy Hill,” and “Earwig and the Witch.” His latest feature, “The Boy and the Heron” is being recognized tonight. This was said to be his last film, but Studio Ghibli vice president Junichi Nishioka said in September 2023 that he comes to the office daily to plan his next film. Whatever that next film is, it will add to an already historic library. Ladies and gentlemen, this year’s Roger Deakins Award goes to Hayao Miyazaki.
Honorary Award recipient Hayao Miyazaki during the 2014 Governors Awards in The Ray Dolby Ballroom at Hollywood & Highland Center® in Hollywood, CA, on Saturday, November 8, 2014.
First off, shoutout to our friends at the Oscars for taking all our celebrity guests. Hope they have a good time in a couple weeks. But more importantly, the work of Hayao Miyazaki is some that will never be forgotten. His accomplishments are some of the finest amongst his peers in animation, and an enormous rival to those even in live-action. Between his many originals and even some work on previously established projects, he gives every bit his all. Miyazaki is being honored tonight for his work on “The Boy and the Heron,” which may or may not be his last film. Who knows if he’ll announce another one?… But as far as I am concerned, he has released banger after banger after banger. So, if he does come out with another project, the numbers don’t lie. Chances are it will be a banger. Congratulations to Hayao Miyazaki.
Now, the way I personally much of experienced Miyazaki’s work was through physical media. I watched most of his movies on Blu-ray. And to buy some of those Blu-rays like “My Neighbor Totoro” and “Spirited Away,” Best Buy was a good store to go to. Key word… Was. That is because Best Buy was in the news this year for a significant reason. The popular electronics chain announced that in 2024 they are going to get rid of their movie inventory. That goes for all DVDs, Blu-rays, and so on. As someone who goes to Best Buy every week to press my luck at picking up a new title, this is an issue near and dear to my heart. Obviously, I love my movies. I go to the theater all the time. Thank you, AMC A-List… But when it comes to the home experience, I love being able to hold movies and possess them. I thought I would take a moment to record a trip to a local Best Buy to see what the inventory is like in its final days. And if you are watching this several years from now, this is a reminder of what made people like me go to Best Buy week after week. Take a look.
Our fifth Best Picture is a showcase of the adventure of life. It dives into the journey of being a two-time immigrant. It shows both the inevitability of adapting another country’s trademarks, all the while having nostalgia for how you grew up. It is a tale of love, friendship, and finding your identity. Celine Song directs one of this year’s most romantic films and brings forth one of the most admirable on-screen marriages in a long time, all the while highlighting a long lost connection that maybe could have been something more. The film highlights the choices we make as people that change the course of our lives, and flirts with the idea as to whether those choices were meant to be or we could have backed out of it. But one choice is clear, the one where you go out and see this movie. Nominated for 4 Jack Awards, this is “Past Lives.”
And now we move onto a couple of design categories! Starting with Production Design, this category is dedicated to the people who put together some amazing sets and backdrops this year. From Barbieland to Los Alamos to 1920s Oklahoma, all of these designers are deserving of their place here. But only one can build themselves up to taking home the gold. Here are the nominees for Best Production Design.
BEST PRODUCTION DESIGN
Barbie – Sarah Greenwood, Katie Spencer
John Wick: Chapter 4 – Kevin Kavunaugh, Rand Abdel Nour, Mark Rosinski
Killers of the Flower Moon – Jack Fisk, Adam Willis
Oppenheimer – Ruth De Jong, Claire Kaufmann
Poor Things – James Price, Shona Heath, Zsuzsa Mihalek
And the Jack goes to…
Sarah Greenwood and Katie Spencer for “Barbie!”
“Barbie” takes another “Barbenheimer” victory! On that note, a hearty congratulations to Ruth De Jong and Claire Kaufmann on their nominations today, including the other three films here as well. This is the third win for “Barbie,” meaning it is now the winningest film tonight! Says a lot considering the film did not receive a Best Picture nomination! As I have established previously on Scene Before, movies are experiences. Movies are escapes. And few have brought as otherworldly of an experience as “Barbie” did this year. The film does a spectacular job at creating a world where you believe these characters actually happen to exist. Everything is pink, glossy, and colorful! Aesthetically, this is one of the finest-looking movies of the year. This movie creates an original story revolving around popularly known toys, and part of why that story works so well is because much of it is done in this attractive dollhouse-esque, toybox-like environment. It is hard to imagine Barbieland looking any other way after watching this film. Well done!
Moving onto costume design, this category is dedicated to five films that showcase the year’s finest outfits, fashions, and getups. The talent on screen wear these costumes well, and part of it is because the movie has designers who put them together well. From dolly designs to historical throwbacks, the films represented here have designers who allow their talent to dress to impress. Here are the nominees for Best Costume Design.
BEST COSTUME DESIGN
Barbie – Jacqueline Durran
Napoleon – Janty Yates, Dave Crossman
Oppenheimer – Ellen Mirojnick
Priscilla – Stacey Battat
Sisu – Anna Vilppunen
And the award goes to…
Jacqueline Durran for “Barbie!”
That is win number four for “Barbie!” For those keeping track, that’s four wins total, and it has won every Barbenheimer matchup we have done so far. Unbelievable! But you know what? It makes sense! Because when it comes to the costumes of “Barbie,” there is no other movie that goes as all out as this one does. I mentioned the film has a colorful, detailed, glossy production design, and the costumes honestly match the backdrops. They match the characters and their personalities. And they honestly look like something you would put on a toy if given the opportunity. When it comes to costume design, “Barbie” is the perfect example of quality and quantity. Not only are there tons of costumes to admire throughout the movie, but every outfit is polished and serves their purpose. To all the random dresses to the roller-blading gear to the cowboy getup, there is a lot to take in throughout the span of two hours! It all adds up to be completely fashionable. Congratulations!
Our sixth Best Picture is the fourth installment of a popular action franchise that has only gotten better with each installment. Its first film had humble beginnings with a Keanu Reeves comeback and a simple revenge plot. Since then, it has expanded into one absolutely ridiculous thrill ride of a saga. This movie is the definition of epic. And I mean that in more ways than one. Between its long runtime, fast-paced sequences, globe-trotting adventure, emotional scenes, and one of the most painful trips down a stairwell ever caught on camera, this film is massive. Keanu Reeves is not only thinking he is back, but he is also knowing it this time and giving 110% as the titular character. We also see the return of franchise mainstays played by Laurence Fishburne, Ian McShane, and the late Lance Reddick. And that is not to say the newcomers fail to bring their A-game. Because the performances from those including Donnie Yen, Bill Skarsgård, and Clancy Brown just to name a few, help make the movie as compelling as it is. Nominated for 4 Jack Awards, this is “John Wick: Chapter 4.”
In 2023, the Writers Guild of America went on a long, hard fought strike. One of the reasons why writers went on strike this year against major studios, specifically those represented by the AMPTP, was due to terms regarding use of A.I.. When the strike ended, it was agreed that A.I. could not be credited as a writer. These writers struck for the ability to continue their craft without worry, and with a 99% vote in favor of a new contract over the fall, it is safe to say the writers are proudly continuing to do what they love. These writers are coming up with stories that are totally extraordinary, totally admirable, and totally human. We are honoring ten films tonight for their brilliant writing. Five of them are adapted. Five of them are original. All ten are made by the people for the people. Here are the nominees for Best Adapted Screenplay.
BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
American Fiction – Cord Jefferson
BlackBerry – Matt Johnson, Matthew Miller
Oppenheimer – Christopher Nolan
Poor Things – Tony McNamara
Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse – Phil Lord, Christopher Miller, Dave Callaham
And the award goes to…
Tony McNamara for “Poor Things!”
Going back to what I said about films being escapes, “Poor Things” is another great example of that. And that is most certainly highlighted with its screenplay. Yes, it takes some inspiration from “Frankenstein” and is based on previous work, but it has a feel to it that can arguably be described as original. There is no other movie from this year that feels like this one. While Yorgos Lanthimos did not write this movie, Tony McNamara crafted something so beautiful to match the wacky, cuckoo, colorful style Lanthimos had in mind and brought to the screen. And this screenplay has the essentials of what a movie experience should be. It is funny. It is emotional. It gets you attached to the characters. There are some deep scenes that enhance certain characters and their backstories. The entire movie feels like it was written for its own universe. It is something that we could never obtain, even in our future. But it is a universe that for a couple of hours, I would not mind visiting. Congratulations to Tony McNamara and his work on “Poor Things.”
And now, onto the Best Original Screenplay category, here are the nominees!
BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
Air – Alex Convrey
Bottoms – Emma Seligman, Rachel Sennott
The Holdovers – David Hemingson
Maestro – Bradley Cooper, Josh Singer
Past Lives – Celine Song
And the Jack goes to…
Celine Song for “Past Lives!”
This is a film whose dedication to authenticity knows no bounds! The film proves that great stories, even original ones, have to come from somewhere. And in the case of “Past Lives,” the film comes from the life experiences of the writer herself, Celine Song. What separates this film from its competitors is its ability to do what films do better than any other art form, showing and not telling. Of course, the film has dialogue. In fact, the dialogue is spoken in multiple languages. But even with the dialogue, you can tell the emotional backdrop is there. And that is because of Song’s personal touch. But there are tons of moments where the film takes its characters through various environments where the frame allows you to be there watching everything that is going on with minimal interruption from anyone’s voice. It is the definition of a visual trip. Every word feels real. Every interaction feels lifelike. This movie may have the single most romantic encapsulation of marriage put on screen in years. And that is while also showcasing the reality of what life could have been had our characters gone in a different direction. Every scene had my eyes and ears paying attention. This is easily one of the best movies of the year, and much of it is owed to Celine Song. It shows what it means to appreciate what you have now. It shows what it means to reminisce over what you enjoyed then. It shows what it means to love. It shows what it means to live. It shows what it means to be human. Congratulations!
Our seventh Best Picture is about an electronic that defined a few years of many people’s lives, and one that would give way to several others. This film is about the rise and fall of a company that you would literally encounter everywhere you go. It was in advertisements! Hands! Pockets! Offices! And look what happened to it! This film details the company’s humble beginnings, unbelievable tick to relevancy, and its downfall to notable competitors. It is hilarious, well-written, stupendously acted, and all around just a great dose of fun. This entertaining and thought-provoking take on geek history has all the ingredients to achieve nerdvana. Nominated for 3 Jack Awards, this is “BlackBerry.”
Our next category involves cuts. Not paper cuts. Not pizza cuts. But we’re talking rough cuts, final cuts, J-cuts, L-cuts, and sometimes, scenes that go on for so long that you wonder when it is going to cut. But let’s cut to the chase. Editing is one of the most important, individualistic aspects that defines what movies are. Without it, filmmaking would not be what it is today. And these five films have made the cut for today’s show, so it is time to give them the honors they deserve. Here are the nominees for Best Film Editing.
BEST FILM EDITING
The Holdovers – Kevin Tent
Maestro – Michelle Tesoro
Oppenheimer – Jennifer Lame
Poor Things – Yorgos Mavropsaridis
Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse – Michael Andrews
And the Jack goes to…
Jennifer Lame for “Oppenheimer!”
That is win number 3 for “Oppenheimer!” For those keeping track… That is “Barbie” – 4, “Oppenheimer” – 3.
And what a victory this is! This is Jennifer Lame’s third Jack nomination and second win! She was previously nominated for “Marriage Story” and won for, coincidentally, another Christopher Nolan movie, “Tenet.” And much like “Tenet,” the craftsmanship in this work is off the charts good. It is actually kind of crazy to know that a movie could be this well done. Much of why “Oppenheimer” works so well is owed to the precise timing and pacing within Lame’s work. And there are certain scenes that if they were done by a different crew, chances are they would be nowhere near as emotional. Nowhere near as gripping. And at times, nowhere near as horrifying. While “Oppenheimer” may not be a horror movie, it has a story that idealistically would have a feel that evokes scares, chills, and fear. The film is very much a visual experience. It is a trip not only through World War II, it is trip not only through a piece of history that will be long remembered, but it is a trip through a person’s mind. We see that person’s mind brought to life within the span of three hours. And what a mighty three hours it is. Jennifer Lame should be proud of her work. Congratulations! She has another Jack on her mantle!
Moving onto cinematography. These next five nominees are beautifully shot, exquisitely lit, and easy on the eyes. Without cinematography, there would be no movies. There would be no lights, there would be no camera, and there would certainly be no action. Whether they were shot on digital, film, or IMAX, these movies contain many frames that sparkle, shine, and stand out. Here are the nominees for Best Cinematography.
BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY
Asteroid City – Barney Pilling
John Wick: Chapter 4 – Dan Laustsen
Killers of the Flower Moon – Rodrigo Prieto
Oppenheimer – Hoyte van Hoytema
Poor Things – Robbie Ryan
And the Jack goes to…
Hoyte van Hoytema for “Oppenheimer!”
This is the fourth win for “Oppenheimer!” And it is a big win! Literally! So big you could fit it on an IMAX screen! For the record, this is Hoytema’s fourth Jack nomination! He was previously nominated for “Ad Astra,” “Tenet,” and “Nope!” Hoytema ended up winning Best Cinematography last year for his work on “Nope,” making this is the second year in a row he won a Jack. Much like “Nope,” “Oppenheimer” was shot using a mixture of standard 65mm film and IMAX film. But this film also uses a mixture of black and white and color. The spectrum and shot variety of this film knows no bounds. Just when you think a film of this subject matter should look bleak, they somehow make it look as pretty as can be and somehow make it work. This film was nominated in both sound categories, but you could arguably watch “Oppenheimer” with the sound off and be riveted in every frame. This is a movie that takes an event that actually happened and frame it in such a way that feels nothing more than an outrageous, nightmare-fueled fantasy. I am over six feet tall. Probably 6 foot 2 or something like that. That’s fairly tall. Not necessarily humungous, but it’s fairly tall. Having watched this film in IMAX, it has undoubtedly made me feel tiny. It is hard to believe that some of the shots in this film actually exist. There are instances of explosions, fire, and sparks that are incomparable. This is Hoyte van Hoytema’s fourth collaboration with Christopher Nolan, not to mention the fifth movie he shot using IMAX film cameras. If I were directing a movie and wanted to shoot it in IMAX, I would go by the numbers and trust Hoyte van Hoytema to give the best possible results. He knows what he is doing. He’s done it for years. Not to mention, he’s done it well. Bravo! Congrats on another year of taking home the gold!
Our eighth Best Picture is a trip through the early life of an interesting individual. Cailee Spaeny leads a brilliantly done story helmed by Sofia Coppola. Talk about a riveting, captivating, sometimes terrifying flick that takes a deep dive into a relationship featuring two prominent people. Plunging into the perspective of its titular protagonist, it delivers one of the most raw, honest, and emotional tales of the year. It centers around a character whose choices are ones they would look back on and regret, but at the same time, they come across as genuine and understandable. Overall, it is a compelling tale of first love and what one would do to continue to stay connected to one of the most popular stars of their time. Nominated for 4 Jack Awards, this is “Priscilla.”
One of the most talked about films of 2023 is “Barbie.” In fact, not only did a lot of people see the movie, the hype and conversation going into the film was sky high. It was so high in fact that Mattel, the toymaker behind the Barbie brand, announced they are going to create, get this, 45 films based on their properties. Some of these include He-Man, Barney, and Uno. How the heck are you gonna make an Uno movie?! What the heck are you gonna do? Is the protagonist gonna try to stop the villain from making him draw 4 every 5 minutes?! But there is also another property Mattel is looking to give the Hollywood treatment, and we have the first exclusive footage of the film. We can confirm it is happening, it is in the works, and we are proud to show it to you. Take a look.
This next category is gonna sing! And that is because we are moving onto Best Original Song! This year honors three animated films and two live-action films that are responsible for the creation and execution of five memorable tunes. These are the bops so good you’ll never want to get them out of your head. The lyrics so catchy you’ll wanna sing along. The beats so terrific you’ll want to headbang until the day you die. Every verse, every riff, every note has led to this. Here are the nominees for Best Original Song.
BEST ORIGINAL SONG
I’m Just Ken – Barbie – Mark Ronson, Andrew Wyatt
Wahzhazhe (A Song for My People) – Killers of the Flower Moon – Scott George
Peaches – The Super Mario Bros. Movie – Jack Black, Aaron Horvath, Michael Jelenic, Eric Osmond, John Spiker
Suzume – Suzume – Radwimps, Toaka
This Wish – Wish – Julia Michaels, Benjamin Rice, JP Saxe, Ariana DeBose
And the Jack goes to…
Mark Ronson and Andrew Wyatt for “I’m Just Ken” from “Barbie!”
Hi-five to “Barbie!” Because it is win number 5! “Barbie” was a film that I knew from the beginning was going to be unlike anything anyone could have predicted. Even with that notion in mind, I can say I was blown away at times. The film has a few good original songs in it between Dua Lipa’s “Dance the Night,” Billie Eilish’s “What Was I Made For,” and I even enjoyed Lizzo’s opening song, “Pink.” The film has a few good tunes. But the track that dominates the competition is “I’m Just Ken,” sung fantastically by the one and only Ryan Gosling, who of course plays Ken. The track is one of the most integral in the entire movie. It perfectly defines his character, what he is going through, and his emotional state. So in the context of the movie, it is perfect. But of course, it would help if the song is good. But it is not good, it is bloody incredible! The lyrics are top-notch. The pace is bombastic. The song is basically what happens when a Hot Topic and the entire decade of the 1980s get married. It is a thing of beauty. If you want to hear the track for yourself, I provided two links. One is the track itself. The other one is the track in context of the film. Enjoy!
Congratulations! In more ways than one! First, congratulations to everyone who was nominated today. Second, congratulations to everyone who won today! Third, congratulations to everyone who somehow managed to make it this far into the show. You’re the real heroes! For those keeping track, we are down to the final four categories, starting with the one that honors maybe the most prominent position in film, the director. It is the job of the director to imagine their vision, and translate it into a visual medium. Because of these five individuals, we’ve had visions of lifelike dolls, a composer’s love and life story, a throwback to one of the most important times in all of history, a reconnecting of childhood friends, and an oddball, unique journey of self-discovery unlike any other. Here are the nominees for Best Director.
BEST DIRECTOR
Greta Gerwig – Barbie
Bradley Cooper – Maestro
Christopher Nolan – Oppenheimer
Celine Song – Past Lives
Yorgos Lanthimos – Poor Things
And the Jack goes to…
Christopher Nolan for “Oppenheimer!”
These are words I have waited to say for the longest time. Christopher Nolan wins Best Director. And I mean it! Nolan is responsible for some of my favorite movies ever. “Memento,” “Inception,” “Interstellar,” “Dunkirk.” All of these films have helped define my tastes. Much like tonight’s Roger Deakins Award winner, Hayao Miyazaki, I cannot say he has a single bad film on his resume. And now he comes out with his most visceral sucker punch of a vision yet. The telling of a man’s progression through one of the most important events in the history of the world, and the wild aftermath that ensues as a result. When I go watch a movie at the theater, I usually want to go and have a good time. In the case of “Oppenheimer,” the reason why I had such a good time was because it made me leave on a sour note. Because that was the point. The whole idea of “Oppenheimer,” everything the movie established, would not work as well if it were not for an emotional script. If it were not for intriguing drama. If it were not for the fact that it allowed a shift in multiple perspectives. But I think Nolan’s greatest achievement as a director of the film is simply this… Taking a concept like this, taking a script like this, and making it interesting. Because on the surface, a three hour movie featuring nothing but people talking and maybe an occasional explosion here and there, would be boring. But Nolan does his best to keep your attention, keep the pace flowing, and put his best foot forward. Per usual, Nolan’s use of IMAX technology here is astounding. When it comes to Hollywood movies, he started using IMAX scenes with “The Dark Knight” in 2008, and with his latest effort in “Oppenheimer,” his use of the technology continues to be jaw-dropping. There is nothing like a Christopher Nolan movie, and this year proves that. Congratulations!
And you know what? This is the most perfect of transitions! Because our ninth Best Picture just so happens to be the latest film from Christopher Nolan! The director of epic action films like “The Dark Knight,” “Inception,” and Jack Awards Best Picture winner “Tenet” is back to deliver his grandest outing yet. It features intense scenes of people talking in a court. People talking in a home. People talking on grass. People talking in the hallway. But that’s not a bad thing. Because there are several moments in this film that make it worth talking about. It is a three-hour masterpiece combining 65mm and IMAX shot scenes, audible sound editing, a booming score from Ludwig Göransson, and one heck of a screenplay. It is a film that I walked out of both happy that I saw it but also a little weary for the future. Much like one of his previous films, “Dunkirk,” this is yet another worthy World War II-set picture that will be remembered for a very long time. With a stacked cast from Cillian Murphy to Emily Blunt to Robert Downey Jr. to Florence Pugh to Matt Damon, this film is packed with enough star power to fill a galaxy. And if you thought a three-hour film about a guy inventing a bomb with black and white scenes would fail to get audiences in seats, think again. This film did it, and it did so perfectly. Nominated for 14 Jack Awards, I present, today’s frontrunner! This is “Oppenheimer!”
From the beginning, my objective with the Jacks has always been to put on a show. But when I look at these next five nominees, all I can say is that they are nothing more than “showstoppers.” These five actors broke a leg, then refused to end there. They utilized their chameleon-like powers. They turned into authors, businessmen, teachers, musicians, and scientists. These are the five leading actors that make this show pale in comparison to their magnificence. Here are the nominees for Best Actor.
BEST ACTOR
Jeffrey Wright – American Fiction
Adam Driver – Ferrari
Paul Giamatti – The Holdovers
Bradley Cooper – Maestro
Cillian Murphy – Oppenheimer
And the Jack goes to…
Cillian Murphy for “Oppenheimer!”
“Oppenheimer” has achieved win number six! It is one win away from tying the record “Everything Everywhere All at Once” set last year as the winningest film in Jacks history. And I’m not necessarily doing this for show, Murphy is THAT good in this movie! When I saw his marvelous portrayal of this important, notable man in July, I wondered if anything else during the upcoming awards bait season could top him, but they didn’t! The reason why Murphy’s performance works so exquisitely is because he refuses to play it up. Of course, the movie is quite fast-paced for a biopic on the building of the atomic bomb, but Murphy plays a center of the cast who frankly lives in the moment. Never once does he feel like a character. The entire time, he feels like a person. Some may reenact history. But people like Cillian Murphy choose to embody it. To capture it. To live it. In doing so, he makes a history-defining performance of his own. He is arguably Christopher Nolan’s most impeccable lead yet. It should not come as a surprise that these two are working together as they’ve established a relationship in previous works, but “Oppenheimer” brought the best out of both of these two. Film is about showing, not telling. And what several frames reveal just from Murphy’s facial expressions tell you everything you need to know about the character. When you take that and his incredible, intimate delivery, and combine it with the off the charts technical mastery this film aces across the board, you know that this is something special. And you know how I said these actors are showstoppers? Well, speaking of that, I feel like this show has been stopped a little. I cannot believe I am saying this… But for the first time in Jack Awards history, I do not have a high quality clip to share of the actor’s performance. I’ve looked everywhere but I cannot find a thing! So, I figured, as a substitute, I put a little featurette of the “Oppenheimer” crew talking about Murphy’s performance. It’s the best of a bad situation. If you so much as decide to watch, enjoy. It’s two minutes long. I’m sure they’ve had plenty of footage to work with for this video…
Moving onto Best Actress, we have five more showstoppers to discuss! These five women used their powers to bring some well realized characters of their own. They’ve turned into the heart and soul of the Osage Nation. A bartender and Uber driver who will do anything, or anyone, to have a car. A two-time immigrant whose past is being brought into her present. A revived individual who discovers what it means to live, indulge, and discover. And the woman who rose to prominence through her attachment to an equally prominent musician. The show cannot stop now, because here are the nominees for Best Actress!
BEST ACTRESS
Lily Gladstone – Killers of the Flower Moon
Jennifer Lawrence – No Hard Feelings
Greta Lee – Past Lives
Emma Stone – Poor Things
Cailee Spaeny – Priscilla
And the award goes to…
Emma Stone for “Poor Things!”
Looks like big things are in store for “Poor Things!” In fact, two big things for that matter! This is the second win of the night for the film, its first being for Best Adapted Screenplay. This is a performance that I honestly thought redefined acting. I say that without exaggeration. It is hard to come up with another performance I have seen in my entire life that is like this one. It is difficult to know whether it is the greatest of all time. There are a lot of movies out there, including some I have never seen. But this is perhaps the best performance of Emma Stone’s career. And she has brought forth a series of scene stealers and showcases of talent. She did a great job as Gwen Stacy in “The Amazing Spider-Man” movies. She was stupendous in the technically brilliant “Birdman.” She was spectacular in “La La Land.” She was great in “Battle of the Sexes.” As far as modern actresses go, there are few with as prolific, diverse, and fantastic of a resume as Stone. And despite all this praise, this is Stone’s first Jack nomination and first win! But she deserves it! She is given so much to do in this one film as Bella Baxter, not to mention as Victoria Blessington. She has to blend into this fairy tale of a universe with a scientific edge. She has to embody the personality of an infant, a child, a teenager, and someone barely trying to be an adult all in one body. It is a great mix of quantity that unleashes some unforgettable quality. There is nothing like it. Her performance defines the film. While the story has a consistently tragic flair to it, there are little doubts about its comedic edge. Stone has to balance drama, comedy, sensuality, and curiosity all at once. It is a performance that very much centers around the human condition, all the while displaying the life of someone who is spending much of their time refusing to play by the rules. And I have some good news, the show is not completely broken, because I have a decent clip showcasing Emma Stone’s performance in “Poor Things!” All is right with the world!
It is time for the second Lifetime Achievement Award. This one is known as the Stan Lee award. It is given to an individual who has made significant contributions to the film industry who is no longer with us. Nevertheless, their legacy will live on through eternity. This year’s winner is an actor and filmmaker. Born in New York, New York on March 26th, 1934, this gentleman has been active as a performer in the industry since the 1950s. He had a career in folk music – performing in groups like The Tarriers and The Baby Sitters. On the film side, his first role was in the 1957 musical “Calypso Heat Wave.” In the early 1960s, he made his Broadway debut in 1961’s “From the Second City.” He also entered the world of television, where he appeared in shows like “East Side/West Side” and “ABC Stage 67.” Over the years, he has received many accolades. He has won an Academy Award, a BAFTA, a Tony, two SAGs, a Golden Globe, and has been nominated for six Emmys. Different people across multiple generations will remember him for varying roles. One group of people will say they know him best from his work as Captain John Yossarian in “Catch-22.” Some will point to his portrayal of Bill in “Edward Scissorhands.” Others will remember him most from his sole Oscar winning role as Edwin Hoover in “Little Miss Sunshine.” Then you have another group of people fondly reminiscing over the times they’ve seen him as Lester Siegel in “Argo,” which earned him his fourth and final Academy Award nomination. He has also not shied away from animation and voiceovers. On the television side he has lent his voice for four episodes of Netflix’s “BoJack Horseman” and on the movie side he appeared in 1982’s “The Last Unicorn” as Schmendrick. His last role for the screen was in 2022’s “Minions: The Rise of Gru” as Wild Knuckles. He is also no stranger to being behind the camera. Throughout his career he directed three films, including 1971’s “Little Murders,” which was given a limited release. Reviews were positive for the picture. To this day, the film has an 80% Rotten Tomatoes audience score and a 71% critic score. Roger Ebert of Chicago Sun-Times gave the film a perfect four stars. Ebert’s eventual on-screen partner in “At the Movies,” Gene Siskel of Chicago Tribune also gave the film high praise with his own top grade of four stars. There are way too many credits to name in order to fully discuss this man’s prolific career in one show, so I am just going to say that this year’s recipient of the Stan Lee Award is none other than Alan Arkin.
Alan Arkin has lived a prolific, busy life and it is more than appropriate to honor it with pride. From comedy to television to film, he kept himself going until the end. I think a little part of us all aspire to live a life like that. All we can do is keep going until the end. Congratulations to Alan Arkin! May he rest in peace.
Our tenth and final Best Picture is a spectacular, amazing, animated sequel that would make for a great watch in any multiverse. The original film received a Best Picture nomination during the first Jack Awards, and now, we have this thrilling sequel to continue the tradition. The film sees the return of Shameik Moore as Miles Morales, a teenager living in Brooklyn who must maintain a balance between his personal life and hero life. Joining Moore is a talented voice cast including Hailee Steinfeld, Oscar Isaac, Jason Schwartzman, Daniel Kaluuya, and Karan Soni just to name a few. This is one of the most ambitious animated titles of all time with one of the longest runtimes for an animation made in Hollywood, six different styles, and tons and tons of characters, many of whom have memorable personalities and great utterances of dialogue. The film dives into a fantastic arc with its main character but also introduces compelling villains like Miguel O’Hara and the Spot. We also see the return of Gwen Stacy, whose journey is one of the most enthralling I have seen this year. The film is funny, action-packed, and full of wonder. Nominated for 5 Jack Awards, this is “Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse.”
Back in July, popular musician Taylor Swift held a couple concerts in Seattle, Washington. According to a seismologist, the noise during those concerts was enough to equal a 2.3 magnitude earthquake. Swifties, I see your earthquake and ask my readers to raise the roof! Because it is time to give out the biggest honor of the show, BEST PICTURE! Per usual, this category is not up to me. It is up to you! Now I pick the ten films that are to be awarded Best Picture, but I let you decide which one you think is the most deserving to win. Pretty balanced relationship I’d say. And this year we have ten of the finest films humanity has ever seen. Just to have a place amongst this group is a huge honor and everyone behind these projects should be proud. From the crews who worked tirelessly through days and nights, to the studios who greenlit the project, to the producers who put up all the money to make some magic happen. Congratulations to everyone. But… There can only be one winner. And one has been decided! So it is time to introduce this year’s nominees for Best Picture!
BEST PICTURE
BlackBerry – Fraser Ash, Niv Fichman, Kevin Krikst, Matthew Miller
The First Slam Dunk – Toshiyuki Matsui
Godzilla Minus One – Minami Ichikawa, Shūji Abe, Kenji Yamada, Kazuaki Kishida, Gō Abe, Keiichirō Moriya
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 – Kevin Feige
John Wick: Chapter 4 – Basil Iwanyk, Erica Lee, Chad Stahelski
Oppenheimer – Emma Thomas, Charles Roven, Christopher Nolan
Past Lives – David Hinojosa, Christine Vachon, Pamela Koffler
Priscilla – Sofia Coppola, Youree Henley, Lorenzo Mieli
Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse – Avi Arad, Phil Lord, Christopher Miller, Amy Pascal, Christina Steinberg
Suzume – Kōichirō Itō, Genki Kawamura
Once again, if “Oppenheimer” wins this award, it ties “Everything Everywhere All at Once” as the winningest film in Jacks history. Here we go…
Without further ado, the Jack goes to…
“Oppenheimer!”
This is the seventh win for “Oppenheimer.” The film has also won for Best Sound Editing, Best Sound Mixing, Best Film Editing, Best Cinematography, Best Director, and Best Actor. The film was also nominated for Best Supporting Actor, Best Supporting Actress, Best Original Score, Best Makeup & Hairstyling, Best Production Design, Best Costume Design, and Best Adapted Screenplay. This is the second Best Picture win for a film released by Universal Pictures.
The world will remember this day! The day “Oppenheimer” won Best Picture! This is the second Christopher Nolan film to be bestowed with such an honor at the Jack Awards. The previous one being “Tenet.” This film is everything that movies should be. Entertaining. Moving. And captivating. Plain and simple. Actually, you know what? I take that back. Because it’s not simple! In fact, it is one of the most intriguingly complicated narratives of 2023! This is a film I saw in theaters three times, and each one was as sweet as the last. The film is a triumph like no other! It has a star-studded cast featuring Nolan regular Cillian Murphy as the title character. His performance is one of the most grounded, hallowing, and emotional he has ever given. Joined by him is Robert Downey Jr. as Lewis Strauss. Of course, he’s had a notable career in years prior. But after many years of contributing to the success of the MCU and having that success therefore contribute to his own, this movie answers the question, can Robert Downey Jr. maintain a career nowadays outside of Marvel? The answer to that? A definite yes. Not only does he show off in his performance, he slays it with heat vision! Both Murphy and Downey Jr. were nominated today for their acting roles, but let’s not forget one more nominee. The talented Emily Blunt as Kitty Oppenheimer, whose presence in every scene makes the movie better. She is a tour de force. But there is also plenty of magic behind the camera. The movie is shot on 65mm and IMAX 70mm film. And in no way does this feel like a throwback gimmick. If anything, it looks more pristine and appealing than most of the movies that came out this year. Not just because of the high quality of the material used to the shoot the movie, but the talent of Hoyte van Hoytema as a cinematographer. Throughout his career, he has continued to work with high quality cameras and work with them exquisitely. I cannot wait to see what he shoots next. Aesthetically, the film could not be better. The locations are beautiful. The costumes are authentic. The makeup is grounded. Top tier work all around! But of course, I need to talk about the biggest surprise for me… The sound. Now, I will not deny that Christopher Nolan’s movies have always been good when it comes to sound editing. His sound choices and ability to immerse you into the scene continue to amaze me. But even when the sound editing is good, there have been times where the sound mixing feels like an afterthought. Not here. For the first time in years, I not only felt immersed by the sound of a Christopher Nolan movie, I could essentially decipher and take in just about every word the characters say. And given how the film is chock full of dialogue in its nominated screenplay, that is especially important. In front of the camera, the film is magical. Behind the camera, it is astounding. Together, it makes for the Best Picture of 2023! Congratulations to the producers, cast, crew, and everyone involved with this film!
And I apologize because this show is already long enough, but I want to say one more thing. I want to acknowledge one of the biggest surprise events in the history of moviegoing. Barbenheimer. July 21st, 2023 will go down in the books as one of the most iconic, celebrated, epic, unmatched days in film’s lifespan. Honestly, it is one of the best things that has ever happened to movie theaters. Combined, the two movies made more than $2 billion at the box office. Both have earned rave reviews. Both have significant followings from fans and average moviegoers. It got people to dress up to go to the theater. It did so many things this year for the people who made these pictures and the viewers going to see them. And I also want to shout these movies out for this reason, “Oppenheimer” is today’s top winner with 7 awards. For the record, it was nominated for 14, including Best Picture, which of course it won. “Barbie” was nominated for 6 awards. While Best Picture was not one of them, it nevertheless ended up winning 5 awards, making it a near perfect run at today’s show. These are the two winningest movies of the ceremony with 12 awards combined. That’s more than half of the categories! It just goes to show, if you make a great movie. Put in the time, the care. the effort, your heart and soul… People will show up. You can make whatever argument you want about “Barbie” winning the box office or “Oppenheimer” winning the awards. The real winner as far as I am concerned is the audience. And I’m talking about the critics, the average moviegoers, those who go to the theater every weekend! And how could I forget the fashionistas, cosplayers, and those folks who made a last minute trip to the store to buy something pink or perhaps a suit, tie, or a hat!!! Because these people are getting two great movies that are worthy investments of their time and money. If you have not seen either of these films, you owe it to yourself to check them out. Do a double feature at some point, make a night of it, and have some fun. Congratulations to both of these films for bringing people together, creating long-lasting memories, and keeping movies alive! Cheers!
And that’s our show! Special thanks to everyone who tuned in this year for the 6th edition of the Jack Awards! Shoutout to everyone who voted for Best Picture! Shoutout to even those who accidentally clicked on the link to be here! Congratulations to all our nominees and winners! I owe my gratitude to everyone who put in tons of effort into movies this year! And it is my pleasure to honor them all here. The Jack Awards is a Scene Before tradition and I enjoy doing it every year!
For those wanting to stick around on Scene Before, I’ve got several reviews coming, including one for one of our nominees, “American Fiction!” I will also soon be reviewing “Lisa Frankenstein,” “Madame Web,” “Drive Away Dolls,” and “Bob Marley: One Love!” So for those who hate reading, movies, and guys who won’t shut up about their opinions, prepare to be disappointed! That said, thank you for the clicks! And speaking of clicks, click onto the official Scene Before Facebook page and give it a like! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
“Argylle” is directed by Matthew Vaughn and stars Henry Cavill (Man of Steel, Mission: Impossible – Fallout), Bryce Dallas Howard (Spider-Man 3, Jurassic World), Sam Rockwell (The Bad Guys, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri), Bryan Cranston (Malcom in the Middle, Breaking Bad), Catherine O’Hara (Schitt’s Creek, Beetlejuice), Sofia Boutella (Atomic Blonde, The Mummy), Dua Lipa (Barbie), Ariana DeBose (West Side Story, Wish), with John Cena (Peacemaker, Blockers), and Samuel L. Jackson (Kingsman: The Secret Service, The Avengers). This film centers around a notable spy novelist named Elly Conway who finds out the events she happens to be writing in her next book are similar to those that are playing out in front of her.
I have not seen all of Matthew Vaughn’s work, but I am a fan of the “Kingsman” movies. Particularly “Kingsman: The Secret Service.” I have nothing against the second one. I had fun with “The Golden Circle” even though I think there are one or two moments I would rather have not sat through. Elton John alone was worth the price of admission for me. But I would rather honestly forget about Vaughn’s latest feature film, “The King’s Man,” a prequel to those two other movies. If you asked me what the heck happened in that last movie, I honestly would not be able to tell you. I was immensely bored with it and I cannot believe it even got made.
Nevertheless, I was looking forward to “Argylle.” Vaughn’s been on a bit of a downward trend lately, but I figured a fresh idea could give him a boost. You have new characters, a fresh story, but you also have some of Vaughn’s directorial trademarks making a comeback. “Kingsman: The Secret Service” definitely has a flashy, glitzy, in your face style, but it does not mean the movie lacks a good story to back it up. The good news about “Argylle” is that if you like Matthew Vaughn’s style, you will find it here. The bad news, the story ends up falling flat on its face.
I will be fair though. The story is not all bad. If anything, the first act of the film is easily my favorite part. It is the part where I had the most fun, emitted the most laughs, and not once was I ever taken out of it. I like how they handled Elly Conway’s mannerisms and point of view throughout between how she visualizes her stories, how she puts one thing and another together, and there is also a neat first-person perspective shot gimmick that comes into play. I like those techniques. There is also some good action. There is a fight on a train that is nothing short of a thrill ride. It also introduces us to my favorite character in the film, Aidan, played by Sam Rockwell. I have not seen everything Rockwell has done, but one of my favorite works of his is his performance in “The Way Way Back,” a coming of age comedy where he plays a waterpark employee. Having seen “Argylle,” his mannerisms here reminded me of how he executed his more comedic lines in “The Way Way Back.” He is very much a scene stealer and while it is in the trailer, the way he utters, “I love this book!”, got a genuine laugh out of me in the film.
Unfortunately, once the first act concludes, the whole movie enters this spiral of madness that almost gave yours truly a headache. I saw the film in IMAX, and while I love the IMAX experience, I must say that this one was on the verge of breaking me. It was almost too loud, too zany, and too rambunctious. I love when a story keeps you guessing, when it is full of twists and turns, but there is a sense of novelty that is lost once we find out where the movie is taking its characters. The movie is twisty. No doubt about it. A tagline for the film is “FROM THE TWISTED MIND OF MATTHEW VAUGHN.” But the movie throws so much at you all at once that is overwhelming. It is like sitting through ten AP classes at once and being forced to digest those subjects at the same time! I could only take so many notes! Yeah, there are elements to this charade that stick the landing, but there are plenty of others that leave a bit to be desired.
Also, if I have to be real, while the movie has great action in the beginning, I felt it became too much to handle by the end. Going back to “Kingsman,” one of the reasons why I find “The Secret Service” to be a better movie than “The Golden Circle” is because “The Secret Service” had action sequences that appeared to consistently exist in their own reality. They were ridiculous, but they were fun. “The Golden Circle” still has good action, but there are moments where the movie tends to jump the shark that lack a sense of heightened realism. It’s almost as if they broke some sort of rulebook. By the end of this film, “Argylle” felt more akin to “The Golden Circle” than “The Secret Service.” Yeah, there were a couple stylistic moments that pop, but there are others that are too flashy and do not emit much emotion.
There is a moment at the end of the film where it basically pulls a “Batman & Robin.” Unfortunately, as far as I can recall, there is not a single ice pun in the entire film. That’s not cool at all. But what I mean is, if you remember “Batman & Robin,” there is a moment that the titular characters conveniently emit ice skates from their boots to take down some baddies. There is a moment in “Argylle” that instantly triggered a memory of that, and how stupid that instance truly is. There is something involving skates in “Argylle” that is so played up, so over the top, so ridiculous, that it had me shrugging angrily in the middle of the theater! I was dumbfounded by this! How is this convincing?! You kind of have to see it yourself to fully embrace and grasp the feeling I got as soon as it came up. I wanted to roll my eyes.
Unfortunately, “Argylle” basically feels like an adolescent girl’s cringeworthy spy fantasy brought to life, but they gave the keys to Matthew Vaughn to tidy up the writing and make a $200 million movie out of it. It’s flashy, it’s shiny, and everything is all over the place. There’s cats! There’s good-looking men like Henry Cavill and John Cena! There is a kind-hearted, but somewhat shy woman in the center of it all! But unfortunately, those elements do not come together to make a neat package. The film kind of reminded me of Guy Ritchie’s “The Gentlemen,” which from a filmmaking perspective, looks nice, but I cannot say I appreciated the story.
At the risk of beating a dead horse, if you want a fun spy movie with Matthew Vaughn, watch “Kingsman: The Secret Service!” In fact, here is another thing that movie does better! Let’s talk about animal companions! Remember how in “Kingsman: The Secret Service” all the spies had to have a dog alongside them? The way they went about that story tactic was essential and delivered plenty of emotion to everyone’s journey in the film. “Argylle” makes it clear that our character is a cat lady, but when it comes to the cat itself, it was almost like watching a Disney animated film trying to utilize its most merchandisable character to the point where the film essentially becomes a commercial. For the record, I am not much of a cat person. So you could say I am biased in my assessment here. But I will also remind you that I am the furthest thing from a dog person! I am even allergic to dogs! Despite that, I can say that “Kingsman: The Secret Service” does a significantly better job at utilizing its animal companion than “Argylle” does in spades. If you want me to be real about “Argylle,” when it comes to fare prominently featuring cat characters, this is not as catastrophic as 2019’s “Cats.” But, this movie certainly had me angrily hissing by the time it was over.
In the end, “Argylle” is just plain bad. This movie has so much gloss and glamour to the point where they just put a bunch of people on sets and forgot to make a movie. I like the cast. Bryce Dallas Howard, Sam Rockwell, Bryan Cranston, Catherine O’Hara, Samuel L. Jackson. These are all big names. And I imagine much like some recent action fare on Netflix such the intolerable “Red Notice,” this could factor into why the film has a $200 million price tag. Honestly, for all I know, Apple is a great streaming service. I have never used it to watch a show. But I have heard titles like “Ted Lasso” and “For All Mankind” are worth seeking out. But their movies are for the most part, forgettable. The one exception was “CODA,” which despite some cliches, was one of the most emotionally powerful movies I have seen in the past couple years. It was perfect. But from “Killers of the Flower Moon” to “Napoleon” and now this hot mess, Apple needs to get their ducks in a row and unleash a good movie. If you know me in real life, you know that I use an Android phone. I use Windows computers. I stream most of my music through YouTube. To get me to buy or invest my time in an Apple electronic would be like getting Howie Mandel to shake my hand. It would be nearly impossible. I wonder if the same fate could be coming to Apple’s movies if they continue to be this sloppily executed and poorly contrived. I am going to give “Argylle” a 3/10.
“Argylle” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now.
Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for “American Fiction!” I have seen so many titles in 2023, but this was not one of them. I had to wait until this year to watch it. But I will have my review up very soon! By the way, I will not give away my final score on the film, but let’s just say that it has already been nominated for a couple Jack Awards! Which leads me to say…
THE JACK AWARDS ARE NEXT SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 25th! If you have not already done so, cast your vote now for this year’s Best Picture! Hope you tune in! Be there or be square! If you want to see this and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Argylle?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite Matthew Vaughn movie? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
Hey everyone, Jack Drees here! It is that time once again! It is time to announce this year’s nominations for the Jack Awards! The Jack Awards have been a Scene Before tradition going back to 2019. Back when it was called the Jackoff Awards. As I have explained before, I did not choose that name. It won an X poll, back when it was better known as Twitter, a much more sophisticated and engaging social media platform. The 2024 edition of the Jack Awards is the 6th edition of the ceremony. It will honor and recognize the movies of 2023. These movies come from far and wide. Most are from the United States, but there are a few outside the country as well. Just a reminder to everyone reading this post, the Jack Awards is, quite literally, Jack’s awards show. So, all the nominations and winners will be decided by yours truly, except for one. More on that at the end. This also means I have to have seen the movies listed here. Otherwise this would not be a legitimate show. This means movies like “May December,” “Nyad,” and “The Color Purple” are unfortunately disqualified. Another rule that must be noted is that every movie that is listed for a nomination has to be a theatrical release. No DVD exclusives. No straight to television fare. No streaming originals. Unless of course they played in theaters. The show will also have two Lifetime Achievement Award winners. Someone who is still with us will be taking home the Roger Deakins Award. Someone who unfortunately passed in 2023 will be remembered with the Stan Lee Award. Those winners will be revealed during the ceremony. With that said, this show is set to honor the best pieces of cinema offered to audiences in 2023, and it is time they have their moment in the sun. Here are the nominees for the 6th Annual Jack Awards!
BEST ANIMATED FEATURE
The Boy and the Heron – Hayao Miyazaki, Toshio Suzuki
The First Slam Dunk – Takehiko Inoue, Toshiyuki Matsui
Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse – Joaquim Dos Santos, Kemp Powers, Justin K. Thompson, Avi Arad, Phil Lord, Christopher Miller, Amy Pascal, Christina Steinberg
BlackBerry – Fraser Ash, Niv Fichman, Kevin Krikst, Matthew Miller
The First Slam Dunk – Toshiyuki Matsui
Godzilla Minus One – Minami Ichikawa, Shūji Abe, Kenji Yamada, Kazuaki Kishida, Gō Abe, Keiichirō Moriya
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 – Kevin Feige
John Wick: Chapter 4 – Basil Iwanyk, Erica Lee, Chad Stahelski
Oppenheimer – Emma Thomas, Charles Roven, Christopher Nolan
Past Lives – David Hinojosa, Christine Vachon, Pamela Koffler
Priscilla – Sofia Coppola, Youree Henley, Lorenzo Mieli
Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse – Avi Arad, Phil Lord, Christopher Miller, Amy Pascal, Christina Steinberg
Suzume – Kōichirō Itō, Genki Kawamura
And those are your 6th Annual Jack Awards nominees! Congratulations! Per usual, Best Picture is not up to me, it is up to YOU! The list of nominees is inspired by my own top movies of the year, but I have listed them all here for you to decide which one is the greatest of them all. For those who want to vote for Best Picture, CLICK THIS LINK RIGHT HERE. The survey will expire on Sunday, February 25th at midnight! It will take you to a poll where all these movies are listed. That is the only legitimate way these votes will count. Do not even try commenting on this post, it defeats the purpose of the poll and will not be counted towards the final tally. Either way, these are the nominees of the most legitimate, ambitious, groundbreaking awards show you could ever find on a movie blog. Why? Because I said so. Therefore, it’s true! Be sure to tune into the Jack Awards on Sunday, February 25th. For those keeping track, it is the same day as the Film Independent Spirit Awards. I am sure the nominees appearing at that show in California are gonna look at this show and think, you know what? Maybe I’ll make a guest appearance on the Jacks instead. That’ll be a hoot. If you are not following Scene Before, do so now with an email or WordPress account to get the 6th Jack Awards in your feed when it arrives! Also, be sure to like the official Facebook page!
I dropped a new trailer for the 6th Annual Jack Awards on my YouTube channel, feel free to view it above! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
“I.S.S.” is directed by Gabriela Cowperthwaite (Blackfish, Our Friend) and stars Ariana DeBose (West Side Story, Wish), Chris Messina (Alex of Venice, The Mindy Project), John Gallagher Jr. (Come Play, Underwater), Masha Mashkova (McMafia, For All Mankind), Costa Ronin (The Americans, Homeland), and Pilou Asbæk (Overlord, Game of Thrones). This film centers around a group of American astronauts and Russian cosmonauts who work together at the International Space Station, when suddenly, conflict breaks out between their respective nations back on Earth. Meanwhile, both sides are ordered to take over the space station no matter the method or cost.
If you have known me or followed Scene Before for some time, it is no secret that I love space movies. Some of my favorite movies include “2001: A Space Odyssey,” “Interstellar,” and “Star Wars.” When it comes to cinema, I may have a predisposed bias to anything that takes place in space, but it does not mean I am guaranteed to like it. For example, “The Space Between Us” stands as one of the worst travesties I have ever witnessed in the sci-fi genre. But I should note that the movie came out in February 2017. As I and others have noted, February is one of the worst months for films. Right alongside that rathole is its next door neighbor, January, so going into “I.S.S.,” I had to temper my expectations despite the trailer looking decent.
Nevertheless, “I.S.S.” has a presentable concept. I like the idea of taking an object in space that has been the subject of years of collaboration and having war break out on it between its two respective parties. The Americans and the Russians. And when it comes to handling this concept, I have to say the film is very well done. If you asked me if I wanted to go space one day, the answer is a resounding yes. But after watching this movie, it reminds me of my slight fear toward the idea. Because depending on how things go, that childlike dream can potentially become a nightmare. While it is not my favorite of the recent space fare, one movie that has always stuck in my mind both from its technical power and storytelling mastery, is “Gravity.” “I.S.S.” very much reminds me of “Gravity” because the story is not only gripping on paper, but the way it is told allows for some scary moments. “I.S.S.,” much like “Gravity,” is not the best space film I have seen. In fact, I think “Gravity” is the superior watch of the two. But I am going to be thinking about this movie for some time because some of the imagery is vividly haunting. On top of that, the way it goes about handling its characters easily strikes fear as to what could potentially happen if something goes wrong in our world, and eventually makes its way into space. Regardless of how realistic this movie is in its execution, it is one that got me thinking, and I appreciate it for that.
One reason why I think this film is good, but not as good as the recently mentioned “Gravity,” is that I am looking back at the characters, and I have to say they are not the film’s strongest asset. Do not get me wrong, they are not an insult or anything. But as I look back on the film, I do not think I will remember anybody’s name within the next month. The movie sometimes does an okay job at establishing character quirks, individualities, those sorts of things. But sometimes it feels surface level. There is one astronaut, Christian, played by John Gallagher Jr., who we learn has two daughters. They are obviously a driving force for his journey and role. But it is also hard to fully appreciate the character because we are simply told about these characters and never get a visual or audio reference to the daughters themselves.
At the beginning of the review, I mentioned one of my favorite films was “Interstellar,” and one reason why I adore that film so much is because it took its time in letting its audience get to know not just Cooper, the main astronaut, but it also let the audience know about his family. So whenever the film references his family or children, either through his mouth, or simply by showing them, the impact is so much bigger. One of the strengths of “I.S.S.” is that the film is tightly paced in its 95 minute runtime. So if you are looking for a short movie that gets the job done, this is not a bad watch. But the film sometimes suffers from its short runtime, and the more I think about it, its limited scale. The film lets us spend time with a select number of characters, but it also prevents us from having a full-fledged story. Granted, when I look back at “Gravity,” one of its standout scenes is when Ryan and Matt are just having a conversation while floating through space and we learn about Ryan’s backstory about what she does, her origins, and how her dad wanted a boy. But not only was that well written, but the movie does a fantastic job at unleashing memorable performances out of Sandra Bullock and George Clooney. The performances in “I.S.S.” serve the movie quite well. But when it comes to main protagonists, Kira Foster (DeBose) is no Ryan Stone.
But if you want me to be real, the performances, while not legendary, are genuinely good all around. The chemistry between everyone in the cast is perfect. DeBose breaks a leg in the lead role. I thought on the Russian side, Masha Mashkova and Pilou Asbæk were the two most prominent standouts. The moments where all the astronauts meet and get to know each other make for some fun bonding scenes.
Another problem I have with this film is the ending. The ending is not the worst I have seen. But it concludes in such an abrupt manner to the point where I can simply go, “Well, it’s over.” It neither left me wanting more nor did it leave me passionately angry. It just happened. It is like the movie did not how to wrap up so it just whipped something into shape really quickly and said, “Here you go!” Enjoy! Except it was not as enjoyable as it probably could have been. That’s just the reality. “I.S.S.” is both paced well enough to justify its runtime, but lacks just enough depth to make me wish it was longer.
In the end, “I.S.S.” is not the best space movie in recent times, but it is one that I do not regret seeing. The film is not getting the best scores from audiences, and while I can understand why, I cannot say I am in line with those audiences. On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a 62% critic score and a 44% audience score. I am going to have to lean towards the critics on this one. This is not to say I loved the movie, but I would give it a thumbs up. As a thriller, it is exciting. As a space movie, it is riveting. And while it is not as terrifying as some recent horror fare, it has its moments of chills. Everyone in the film’s small cast does a good job and there are select characters I almost cannot see anyone else playing. Does the film have problems? Yes. But I will not deny that it had my eyes on the screen the entire time. For that reason alone, I would describe my experience with “I.S.S.” to be a positive one. I am going to give “I.S.S.” a 6/10.
“I.S.S.” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now.
Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for the brand Matthew Vaughn spy flick, “Argylle.” I found myself giving the trailer a lukewarm response, but I have to admit in the past decade, “Kingsman: The Secret Service” has stood out as one of my more rewatched action flicks, so I cannot deny that I at least had some excitement about checking this film out. Was it worth the watch? You will have to find out yourself. If you want to see this and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “I.S.S?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite space movie? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
“Driving Madeleine” is directed by Christian Carion (Merry Christmas, The Girl from Paris) and stars Line Renaud (I Can’t Sleep, Welcome to the Sticks), Dany Boon (Welcome to the Sticks, Murder Mystery), Alice Isaaz (Night at the Museum: Kahmunrah Rises Again, Elle), and Jérémie Laheurte (Blazing Neon, Blue is the Warmest Color). This film centers around a woman who reflects on her life to a cab driver all the while being given an adventurous ride to a nursing home.
On the surface, “Driving Madeleine” sounds somewhat uninteresting. The whole movie is basically an extended car trip. That is probably what I would have said before I was a teenager. I love the concept of this film because even at my age, I find the whole idea relatable. As someone who lives in the U.S., a country who unfortunately treats trains like second class citizens, car rides are an everyday thing to me. Taxis are not something I am that familiar with from experience. Of course, as someone who has been in urban environments, I know what they are. I am not an idiot. I just live in an age where Uber and Lyft dominate the rideshare market. But having seen “Driving Madeleine,” the film reminds me of a personal joy of taking certain Uber and Lyft rides. Interacting with the driver.
My relationship with rideshare drivers have never blossomed into anything remotely close to lifelong. Though there have been a couple cases where I have encountered the same driver. But it is fun to know about their life, their job, what they like to do. And at the same time, you get to see the world around you. It’s a winning combo. This is just a small fraction of why I found myself entranced with “Driving Madeleine.”
That said, when I am immersing myself in the world of rideshare, very rarely is it for something I do not want to do. In the case of this movie’s story, the titular character of “Driving Madeleine” does not necessarily have that luxury. This is a once in a lifetime trip. But it is not to a place on every person’s bucket list like the Empire State Building or Disneyland or the Sydney Opera House. Instead, it is perhaps the last place we will ever want to attend. A nursing home. One of the joys of this film is seeing this woman embrace every moment in front of her and make the most of what some may consider to be a gateway to the end. This film definitely has its downer moments, but it also contains many more sprinkles of fun and happiness than I would likely expect of a film with this kind of concept. In some ways, this is just a fun road trip movie with an unfortunate endgame. There is a saying that it is not about the destination, it’s the journey, and there are few movies that come to mind that represent that idea as effectively as this one does.
This is more than just a road trip adventure. It is a slice of life story. A tale of friendship. Nostalgia. Regret. It is, in one sense or another, an encapsulation of what it means to be human. This is not the best movie I have seen recently, but it is one that had me thinking some time after leaving the theatre.
“Driving Madeleine” reminds me a bit of “Green Book.” Of course, both primarily take place inside cars and heavily involve car trips. But the two films have another standout quality in common. Both feature characters who given the context of the situation, develop an unlikely bond. I enjoy both of these movies because they allow these kinds of companionships to blossom. The way these films go about that idea vary a bit. But they nevertheless get their point across all the while unleashing fantastic chemistry between the two leads.
One of my more notable surprises with “Driving Madeleine” was that there were moments of genuine stakes. There was a real sense of tension in a number of scenes that stuck the landing. The obstacles that the characters encounter throughout the film are appropriate, well-timed, and allow the duo to think on their feet. There were two scenes in this film where the tension reaches a maximum that I cannot stop thinking about.
“Driving Madeleine” is not only one of those films that shows what it means to be a person. But it shows what it means to be around other people. I am a bit of a lone wolf, an introvert, a recluse to some degree. My social life is kept to a minimum. But even with that, I will admit that there is a supposed necessity to have other people in my life. Whether it is my family, friends, acquaintances. This film, in multiple situations, shows the beauty of what happens when two total strangers hit it off, develop a bond, and take things further. Does this film make me want to potentially befriend every cab or rideshare driver I meet? I wouldn’t necessarily say that. But it is a magnificent adventure that pays tribute to the value of the human connection.
But on top of the main journey, we get several insights into Madeleine’s life. How she grew up. What she does. Significant events. There are a couple curveballs in this film involving the character that I would bring up, but given how this is a spoiler free review, I will just suggest you watch the film yourself.
The film sometimes follows a slightly beaten path, but as I have said in other reviews, I am okay with that as long as the movie itself is good. As long as the familiar beats are admirable. And that is the case here. The familiar beats in no way water down the two most important aspects of the film, those being the leads. Not only are these two insanely likable centers of the film, but they are played by two people who give it their all from the opening scene all the way to the film’s conclusion. Those two being Line Renaud and Dany Boon.
The film’s music selection is quite good too. I have no real compliments about the score. That said, I have no real complaints about the score either. If anything it serves its purpose. But there are some good tunes in the film’s soundtrack. There is one song in the film that is used marvelously. Particularly “At Last” by Etta James. I do not think I can remember a song that has been this fantastically used in a film’s soundtrack, specifically a song that was not originally made for the film, since one or two songs from “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” or Led Zeppelin’s “Immigrant Song” in “Thor: Ragnarok.”
In the end, I am not sure how much replay value “Driving Madeleine” is going to get from yours truly, but I am glad I saw it. This is quite a good movie and I would recommend it to anyone looking for something simple, short, but deep. The film is in French, but as Bong Joon Ho famously said in during the 2020 Golden Globes, “once you overcome the 1-inch-tall barrier of subtitles, you will be introduced to so many more amazing films.” “Driving Madeleine” is a lovely, pleasant, hour and a half long rideshare experience, without having to worry about paying way more than what most people would pay just to fill their own gas tank. You know, depending on how many people you have in your party at the theater or how much you are willing to spend on food. I am going to give “Driving Madeleine” a 7/10.
“Driving Madeleine” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.
Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for the brand new thriller, “I.S.S.!” I always love a good space movie. This felt like a necessary watch for me. Was it as necessary as I was expecting? You will find out soon enough! If you want to see this and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Driving Madeleine?” What did you think about it? Or, what is the best car trip you have ever had? For me, I always love going through the middle of New Hampshire every fall to see the foliage. I always enjoy those trips. Let me know about your excellent rides down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
“The Beekeeper” is directed by David Ayer (Suicide Squad, Fury) and stars Jason Statham (Fast X, The Meg), Emmy Raver-Lampman (Central Park, The Umbrella Academy), Josh Hutcherson (The Hunger Games, Five Nights at Freddie’s), Bobby Naderi (Black Summer, Bright), Minnie Driver (Good Will Hunting, Speechless), Phylicia Rashad (Creed, The Cosby Show), and Jeremy Irons (The Lion King, Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice). The film centers around a beekeeper and former operative who goes on a revenge quest after a woman falls for a phishing scam.
January and February are the two months where movies go to die. That is an objective fact. Do not get me wrong, there are some cases where you can release a movie in those months and have a hit. Look at movies like “Kung Fu Panda 3” or “Deadpool.” Both were well received and made a lot of money. When it comes to Jason Statham’s newest film, “The Beekeeper,” there is no way that I can see this film surpassing those at the box office. But much like those films, there is definitely a marketability behind this film that got me in the door. For one thing, it was not “Mean Girls,” which I do not plan on seeing. But in all seriousness, Jason Statham, kind of like Dwayne Johnson, has become one of Hollywood’s more likable action leads. Even if he does something that I would rather forget about like “Meg 2: The Trench,” I nevertheless like him. I just want to see him bust some heads.
Bust some heads? Should I say buzz? You know, buzz some heads?
…
Whatever, doesn’t matter.
Thankfully, we get plenty of head-busting in “The Beekeeper.”
This film is simple in its premise. It has some trademarks that action junkies may be used to seeing in other films, but that does not mean that this is a lackluster effort. If anything, it uses those trademarks decently. This film seems to follow a somewhat by the numbers revenge film formula, but the way it goes about it is entertaining. And a large part of that is because Jason Statham does a good job in the lead role.
Similarly, the same can be said for actors like Phylicia Rashad who plays the part of the victimized retired teacher, Eloise Park, with excellence. You also have Josh Hutcherson who arguably gives the best performance in the film as the antagonist, Derek Fanforth.
I have been used to seeing Hutcherson in certain roles over the years. In “The Polar Express” he voiced the Hero Boy. In the 2013 animated film “Epic,” he played a young Leafman named Nod. In “The Disaster Artist,” he plays Phillip, who ends up playing “Danny” in “The Room,” the film that movie is about. And of course he is well known for his time playing Peeta in “The Hunger Games.” In these roles, I often got a Mr. Nice Guy vibe from Hutcherson to some degree, even if his character had personal flaws. In this film, it is a much different role for Hutcherson, and I admire what they did with him. From the first scene, he is a moron with little to no remorse whatsoever. His character is almost what happens if you take someone with the looks and personality of John Mulaney but mixed it with that of a charismatic cult leader who has been involved in many a scandal.
Another notable positive that captivated me from scene one is the overall aesthetic of the film. The set design, such as that inside the UDG call center for example, is eye-popping. Everything leaps off the screen and it either makes me feel like I am either in the scene or I want to reach out and touch something in the scene. Everything is not only neatly patterned, but insanely colorful. The lighting in the film is quite nice. Technically speaking, I am not going to pretend this film is the next big thing. In fact, there are a few action films from the last ten years that I would point to that look a bit better and creatively more ambitious than this film makes itself out to be. That said, every trick this film goes for, it seems to nail. The camerawork is dazzling. The lighting is pristine. The editing is quickly paced and well spliced. Overall, I would give the film’s look a thumbs up.
Now there is clearly a lot that I enjoy about “The Beekeeper.” In fact, as far as January movies go, this is surprisingly good. That said, it is predictable and somewhat cliché. If you have seen certain action films in recent years, again, there are things that feel repetitive from those other movies. But that’s not the problem with “The Beekeeper” that seems to linger on my mind the most. That problem in particular is the ending. Now, I do not feel cheated. I am not going to say that this is the worst ending I have witnessed in the history of cinema. But in terms of recent film, I cannot think of one that is as abrupt and out of nowhere than what this film gives. It is not really that satisfying. Yes, the main issue of the film comes to a conclusion, but the film ever so quickly says goodbye to its audience. It does not give much time to breathe. It is kind of like “Transformers: Dark of the Moon” in a sense where the big climax hits its peak and just like that, the movie takes little time to wrap itself up. It feels spontaneous.
Going back to positives, “The Beekeeper” sort of reminds me of the original “John Wick” in a sense. Both films star charismatic men who kick tons of butt and take names, but the films offer similar vibes throughout their runtime. There is a dramatic flair, but with some occasional wit here and there. But the real reason why the two feel like a match made in Heaven is because they both have protagonists who you can watch and root for just for violently taking out tons of people left and right. I have lived entirely in an age of computers, I think phishers are the scum of the earth, and that is putting it nicely. As someone who briefly worked in tech at Staples and as someone who uses a computer every day, I love seeing a man go to town on people who think it is okay to take advantage of those who may not know as much about technology. Of course, the real me knows killing people is wrong. But I am watching this movie feeling as if many of the kills Jason Statham makes happen to be justified. Honestly, after watching the obnoxiously dreadful “Fast X” and the intolerably dull “Meg 2: The Trench,” it is great to see Jason Statham in something worth watching for the first time in awhile.
No, I did not watch “The Expendables 4” for those who ask. I am well aware of the negative reviews. That said, they did not steer me away from the movie. I did not watch the prior three.
In the end, “The Beekeeper” is not quite an A, but I am sure that a movie of this title would happily settle for a B. Jason Statham kills it in the lead role. The supporting cast, across the board, all do their best and deliver satisfying results to this thrilling ride. Does it have problems? Sure, it has a few. But as far as January movies go, this is a win. The film reminds me of other revenge flicks I liked in the past decade like “John Wick” and “Nobody.” It is hard to know if I will remember “The Beekeeper” to the same degree I to which remember those two films, but I had a good time with it nonetheless. I am going to give “The Beekeeper” a 7/10.
“The Beekeeper” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now!
Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for “Driving Madeline.” I just had a chance to watch the movie over the weekend with a couple pals. I will share my thoughts soon. If you want to see this and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “The Beekeeper?” What did you think about it? Or what is your favorite Jason Statham movie? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
“Night Swim” is written and directed by Bryce McGuire and this is his feature directorial debut. This film stars Wyatt Russell (22 Jump Street, Overlord) and Kerry Condon as a couple who move into a new house, they settle in with their family, and they quickly become accustomed to their surroundings. Only thing, there is a haunted swimming pool in the backyard.
To start things off, this is my first review of a 2024 film. I just saw “Night Swim” over the weekend. I did not get around to it the weekend before as I was a bit busy. But as we cannonball into this review, I thought the idea for this film had potential of working. There have been numerous titles over the years that have used water environments and turned out to be really scary. Look at “Jaws” for instance. Despite the shark looking fake, that movie continues to make people not want to go in the ocean. Shark movies like that one have been a cinematic staple for years. Not many films have lived up to that 1975 original classic, but I cannot deny that even lesser shark movies understand how to make the ocean or sharks scary.
When it comes to “Night Swim,” it is a much different scenario. There are no sharks, and there is also no ocean. Instead, we have a swimming pool. But again, there is potential. If you learn how to swim when you are young, that can be scary. Sometimes there are cases where people never learn to swim. Depending on the direction those people’s lives lead them, it could induce anxiety. I like a good pool. But I am just saying, the potential to make pools terrifying is there.
And I can confirm something about “Night Swim” was absolutely terrifying indeed. No, it was not the pool. It was the fact that the movie somehow released!
Then again, I should not be surprised that we are getting a throwaway horror film at the beginning of January. This is an unfortunate tradition in cinema as infamously consistent as showing all the funniest parts of a comedy movie in the trailer.
I want to be fair though, because this film is directed by Bryce McGuire, and this is his first feature as a director. He has done a number of short films in the past, and for all I know, he has a knack for filmmaking. That said, “Night Swim” is based on a previous short film he did of the exact same name. As someone who has made short films himself, I have often thought about maybe one day turning them into a feature. I made a short film in college that I am still proud of to this day. I consider it some of my finest work as a creator. But part of me wonders if taking that movie and making it longer would sacrifice some quality. I feel like that is what happened here. It’s not like this is a completely new thing. This is not a short film, but take “The Lion King” for example. The 1994 animation was short and sweet. There was no filler whatsoever. So when I watched the so-called live-action remake that came out in 2019, I was not afraid to point out that one of the biggest critiques I had was that the new material, which extended the movie’s runtime, dragged the product as a whole. Longer does not always mean better.
You might be thinking I am pulling these statements out of my butt. You might be thinking I did not watch the original short film. This link I pulled from YouTube may suggest otherwise. Having watched the film, it is very simple in premise and effective in what it is trying to convey. I think as a horror short, it’s not bad. But this new feature inserts all sorts of concepts that honestly don’t work only to make the runtime somewhat reasonable.
It is not that the entire movie fails to make sense. In fact if you want me to be real, much of the movie’s story and structure derails for me mostly in the second half. The first half is serviceable to some degree. The reason why I enjoyed “Night Swim” is because I feel the film did a decent job at establishing Wyatt Russell’s character, Ray Waller, a former professional baseball player. I like the little hints they drop about his backstory. There is also a part of the film where we see him playing baseball with a bunch of kids and that made for one of the film’s highlights for me. I liked the scene overall. It felt rather wholesome, nostalgic, and fun. But as I am watching this film, I got the sense that Ray Waller probably ended up being the only character I was remotely interested in watching. It is not that the other characters were incomprehensible, poorly structured, or the banes of my existence. It is just that when it comes to putting these characters together, explaining their backstories, and what makes them tick, the movie almost refuses to go above the bare minimum. Even in moments where it feels like it tries to, they just cannot stick the landing.
For example, there was a decent subplot about the character of Izzy, played by Amélie Hoeferle. She, naturally, decides to join the swim team, develops an instant crush on this one boy, and that becomes a driving force of the plot. I think their chemistry is in a word, acceptable. It is a fine depiction of puppy love to some degree. But when I am looking back at these characters, some of them feel cliché. Or, I did not care about them that much to recall everything about them upon leaving the theater.
But characters and story aside, I must ask the million dollar question. Is “Night Swim” scary? Kind of. It’s got a few neat tricks up its sleeve. I think the film gets rather creative with what random ideas they could utilize regarding the pool every once in a while. Sometimes that feels inventive. But again, by the second half of the movie, I just stopped caring. One thing led to another where I lost any and all interest in the plot, the characters, and whatever events could follow. When I reviewed “Godzilla Minus One” a month ago, one reason why I gave that movie such high marks is because it knew what to do with its characters. I said a large part behind why that movie was horrifying was because I cared about the characters and did not want them to get hurt. While the story in “Night Swim” makes sense, its characters kind of go off the rails to some degree by the movie’s end. There is a certain flair that they are missing as the movie progresses.
The film features a character named Kay, played by Jodi Long. Knowing what I am watching, I should be shivering during the moments in which she happens to be on screen. But knowing what is happening in the scene in addition the visuals and sound that could potentially make the scene eerier, I am watching it feeling more annoyed than terrified. It reminded me of when I watched “Midsommar.” I didn’t find that movie scary. If anything I found it annoying in terms of how they went about executing certain scenes. I was not amused. “Night Swim” is the first major movie to release in 2024, and as far as I am concerned, the cinematic calendar this year can only go up from here.
In the end, “Night Swim” dives head first and hits the ground hard. The first two thirds are mildly interesting and somewhat compelling. It is not perfect, but it had my attention the whole time. I like the main dad character, but everyone else took a back seat for me. That said, the film is not that scary. There are occasional scares, do not get me wrong. But at the end of the day, there is nothing to write home about. And by the third act, I tuned out. This film is cliché, tonally inconsistent, and I had my arms crossed for a good portion of the runtime. If you are looking for a good movie at the cinema to start off the new year, maybe pick something from last year. I am going to give “Night Swim” a 3/10.
“Night Swim” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now.
Thanks for reading this review! I want to end this post by saying that you may have noticed something missing from me this year. Specifically, my most anticipated movies of the year list. I do not do one every year, but I did them for 2021 and 2023. Sadly, I am not doing one this year. It is a bit late and when I was making one, my head almost burst open because one movie switched its release date as I was making it and I had no idea. So I am just going to say that my most anticipated movie of 2024 is “Dune Part Two.” I will leave it at that. But if you are interested in knowing my thoughts on the movies of the previous year, check out my countdowns for the top 10 BEST and WORST movies of 2023! If you want to see more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Night Swim?” What did you think about it? Or, what movies are you looking forward to seeing in 2024? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
Hey everyone, Jack Drees here! It is time to put the happy in happy new year, because we are going to talk about my favorite movies from last year. It is time to count down my top 10 BEST movies of 2023! Before we go on with the list, I want to remind everyone that I also made a top 10 WORST movies of 2023 list, you can read it by clicking here. And much like the worst list, the rules are the same. First off, I have to have seen the movie. There are certain titles I wanted to get around to this year that for whatever reason I couldn’t. I have yet to see “The Color Purple.” I have yet to see “Beau is Afraid.” I have yet to see “Saltburn.” But that’s too little too late at this point. The list is locked and loaded. Also, the movie must have had a theatrical release of some kind. No exclusives to DVD, streaming, or television are on this list. Also, this list is packed with something I am sure the Internet needs more of. Opinions. These are just my personal favorite movies of the year and in no way am I trying to pressure anyone to like these. If you saw these movies and didn’t enjoy them, that’s fine, we’re still friends. I am not trying to hurt anyone, I am just trying to have fun. Also one last thing, I will have links to my reviews I did for the movies listed here. For the record, I was not able to review every movie on this list, as one of them came out earlier in the year and I finally had a chance to catch it at the tail end when I figured a review would be irrelevant. With that in mind, let’s dive into some honorable mentions. Honestly, this year in terms of cinema is one of the most spectacular I have ever witnessed. I am going to double my usual honorable mention count, which is typically three and list six movies that could not quite crack the top 10, but I feel deserve some recognition.
Starting off the honorable mentions is “Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One.” Much like another Tom Cruise-led blockbuster that came out a year before, “Top Gun: Maverick,” “Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One” cements why I go to the movies. White knuckle action from start to finish. Dazzling, larger than life set pieces. Great characters we have come to know and love along with other newcomers who successfully enhance the experience. This is the third “Mission: Impossible” film Christopher McQuarrie and Tom Cruise have done together and I cannot wait to see what they do next.
“The Boy and the Heron” is Hayao Miyazaki’s return to filmmaking after a decade-long hiatus. And boy oh boy, is it ever worth the wait. This movie offers exciting world-building, a distinctive and pleasing color palate, a great hero’s journey, and one of the best musical scores of the year from Joe Hisaishi. It is not my favorite Miyazaki outing, but like many other movies he has done, this one is filled with sparks of imagination in every frame.
One of my favorite comedies of the year, “Joy Ride” knows how to have a good time. It is raunchy, disgusting, and glorious. The four leading ladies all blend in to their roles and have fantastic chemistry. The jokes hit quite often. The screenplay is one of the best and most surprising I have witnessed in this genre. And much like a couple other movies on here, I watched it twice this year.
Speaking of raunchy, “Bottoms” is one of the single most unhinged flicks I have ever seen in my life. It is horny, occasionally violent, and creates its own unique universe that works within the context of the plot and characters. Rachel Sennott and Ayo Edebiri are both phenomenally cast and play their parts to a tee. I often have a back and forth as to whether this movie or the recently mentioned “Joy Ride” is the funniest comedy of the year. One day I’ll say this movie, one day I’ll say the other. Either way, this movie is a perfect watch if you are looking for something where you’ll want to pee your pants laughing.
“The Holdovers” is a movie I have looked forward to ever since I first heard about it, and safe to say, it did not disappoint. “The Holdovers” is funny, heartwarming, and a bundle of joy. The entire cast, especially Paul Giamatti, put on quite a show. The movie had a wondrous old-timey feel. As a Christmas movie, it is one of the finest I have seen in a long time. Lovely story, top tier characters, and stupendous performances. What more could you want?
Lastly for the honorable mentions is “The Tunnel to Summer, the Exit of Goodbyes.” This anime came out of nowhere for me, but I was pleasantly impressed with how much I enjoyed it. The story and plot offer nothing but absolute engagement from start to finish. The two leads are both excellently written and I loved every minute of when they were together. The animation is quite diverse throughout the film with several moments standing out. I cannot wait to watch this film a second time.
With those out of the way, it is time to talk about the 10 movies that offered experiences this year like no other could. These are my top 10 best movies of 2023!
Coming in at #10 is “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3!” This has been an interesting year for the MCU. Both in terms of how much money their movies made, and the way they were received by critics and audiences. If you ask me, I liked every MCU movie that came out this year. But much like the majority of audiences, I have to declare this year’s clear winner is “Guardians 3.” James Gunn’s trilogy capper is an exciting, funny, and emotional story that knows how to unleash the best from its characters. I loved getting to know more about Rocket, who has been a particular favorite of mine amongst the main cast. Bradley Cooper has always done a good job voicing him, and in this film, we get to see some more range from him all the while hearing the legendary Sean Gunn take a stab at voicing his younger variant. I liked his sidekick characters. I thought their chemistry was great. Their connection was surprisingly cute especially when considering Rocket’s personality over the past couple movies. He clearly has lost some of that adorable touch. The High Evolutionary is one of the best MCU villains we’ve gotten in recent times, and his performance by Chukwudi Iwuji is top notch. The action is stunning. The visual effects per usual in this franchise, are eye candy. And it some of the most fun I had at the movies this year. If James Gunn can keep this quality up on the DC front going forward, than that branch is in good hands.
#9: Past Lives
#9 is “Past Lives.” …A movie that I did not review this year. Prior to watching it, I have seen tons of talk about it online. I bought the Blu-ray for a relatively cheap price and put it aside for awhile. Then I got together with family over Christmas and my uncle recommended this movie to me. He drew me in. I have to say, shoutout to my uncle, because “Past Lives” slaps. It is a fantastic story between a main trio of characters, all of whom are charming and likable. Honestly, when it comes to genuine romance and sentimentality, there is almost no better movie that came out this year when it comes to those two aspects. I love the long lost connection this movie dives into, but I also like seeing where our lead protagonist ends up. It is a fascinating look at what it is like to live in an unfamiliar country (twice!). It is a movie that suggests that things may line up and fall into the right place, but it also tinkers with what life could have been had people gone in a certain direction. If you want fleshed out characters in a simple, but time-spanning story, “Past Lives” is for you.
2023 has been a goldmine for animated movies, and we are continuing this top 10 with the latest film from Makoto Shinkai, the creator of “Your Name.” And while “Suzume” is not as good as “Your Name,” I was heavily enchanted with this film from start to finish. As an adventure, this film is one of the most exciting I have seen this year. It is funny, charming, and marvelously animated. Shinkai always has a glowy polish to his work that I always find to be breathtaking. The film very much reminded me of one of the strengths I often find from Pixar movies. Specifically, taking inanimate objects or concepts, or in this case, a chair, and bringing significant life into it. This movie has intriguing world-building and lore. It is not only fun to watch, but as a visual piece, I honestly could not take my eyes off it. The sound mixing is rather bombastic too. This film was a blast to watch in IMAX. It is not Shinkai’s best work, but it is another proper addition to his library.
If you told me the concept of “BlackBerry,” I would be sold. If you showed the movie to me right after, chances are I would have kissed you on the mouth. This is of the most hysterical, funny because it is true stories I have seen in a long time. I was born in the late nineties, meaning I am quite familiar with the BlackBerry craze to a degree. When I was growing up I would hear those distinctive ringtones all the time. My mom had a couple BlackBerry phones. It was nice to see this crazy true story brought to life with this well-executed comedic angle. All the actors deliver on their role, especially Glenn Howerton as Jim Balsillie. That might go down as this year’s most underappreciated performance. He stands out in every scene he is in. As a story, it very much dives into the idea that hard work will result in success. But it also suggests that everyone in the group needs to be aligned with what is being done, otherwise the vision is more likely to fizzle. If you want my glowing endorsement for “BlackBerry,” here it is. To those behind the film, feel free to put this on an eventual DVD cover. Watch this film on the biggest screen possible. But really, any screen works. Even an iPhone will do.
In 2022, many people flocked to the movie “Elvis,” including myself. While the film has its fans, I was nowhere close to being one of them. Then a year later we get a movie about his former wife, “Priscilla,” and it turns out to be one of the most gratifying stories of the decade. Cailee Spaeny does a ridiculously wonderful job in the lead role. I bought her in every scene. Jacob Elordi gives a riveting, hallowing interpretation of Elvis Presley that unleashes a much different vibe than what Baz Luhrmann’s 2022 musical biopic offered. But even if you do not consider the fact that this is based on a true story with two famous individuals, this film is a deep tale of what it is like to experience first love. That said, when you take the overall premise of the movie into account, it makes it just a tad better. Because while Priscilla may not be the smartest protagonist, this movie absolutely justifies why she makes the choices she makes. When you are given the chance to be a partner of one of the biggest stars in the world, that idea is incredibly difficult to turn down. Another thing, I was amazed on how much they utilized the character of Elvis Presley in this movie, and yet not once did they use any of his original songs. Of course, and by no surprise whatsoever, Elvis Presley Foundation did not allow any of the artist’s songs to be used, and declined their approval of the film. But in my book, this film not only gets a seal of approval, but it will be remembered one of this year’s most chilling and hypnotic times I had at the movie theater this year.
Christopher Nolan has done it again! He has dazzled with “Inception.” He has marveled with “Interstellar.” He has riveted with “Dunkirk.” He has hypnotized with “Tenet.” And now, he has captivated with “Oppenheimer!” This guy can do it all! “Oppenheimer” is basically two great movies in one package. One is about the rise of the atomic bomb, and the fall of its mastermind. Some of my favorite movies this year managed to entertain me to no end, and “Oppenheimer” is no exception. But of the movies on this list, “Oppenheimer” stands out for its ability to haunt my mind. Because it reminded me of how much I want world peace. It reminded me of how mankind’s most advanced creations could arguably be its most destructive. I contend “Oppenheimer” has my favorite final line in the history of cinema. It is so perfect to the narrative and arc at hand and leaves me with such an uneasy feeling that is beyond tough to explain sometimes. This is also one of this year’s most technically powerful films between its use of 70mm and IMAX, earth-shattering sound, and reliance on practical effects. The film is led brilliantly by Cillian Murphy but is packed with tremendous performances from a star-studded supporting cast ranging from Robert Downey Jr. to Matt Damon to Emily Blunt to Florence Pugh to Kenneth Branagh! If you asked me who my favorite filmmaker working today happens to be, my answer would immediately be Christopher Nolan. And if you need a reason, this movie is exhibit A.
Yeah, I’m thinking this is the best “John Wick” movie. “John Wick: Chapter 4” is an utter goldmine containing one ridiculous action scene after another. I was nervous going into “John Wick: Chapter 4” because I was wondering if it would be too long, if it would bore me. Never once did I tune out or feel bored. And I should have gone to the history books before making these assumptions because the reality is that “John Wick” is like “Mission: Impossible” to some degree because each film keeps getting better and better. I did not think it could get better than “John Wick: Chapter 3 – Parabellum.” I have never been more delighted to be wrong. We have practically hit peak “John Wick!” When broken down, this latest “John Wick” installment is less of movie and more of a video game. I feel like I am in the middle of the action with the protagonist who constantly has to get rid of various swarms of enemies one by one before the next one comes in. It is the definition of an adrenaline rush. And even with the positives of the last couple of these movies, I feel like the stories in these films are treated as an afterthought. With this fourth installment, that is not the case. Great story, fleshed-out characters, stunning sound, marvelous cinematography, astounding set pieces. It is everything you can want in an action flick.
When it comes to my top three, it feels like choosing my favorite child. These could probably change at any time. I am not going to lie. One reason for that is because they felt like the best of “something.” As for my #3, “The First Slam Dunk,” it is the best sports movie I have seen in years. I am a self-described anime novice. Therefore it should not come as a surprise that “The First Slam Dunk” is my first exposure to the “Slam Dunk” property. I said in my review that this movie made me want to explore more of this property. To be frank with you, I still have not gotten around to doing it. I want to, but I just couldn’t find the time just yet. But it does not change the fact that the film is excellently voiced, viscerally filmed, and stunningly animated. This film had me on the edge my seat between the fleshed-out characters, established relationships, and creative non-linear storytelling. There are a number of sports movies out there that have a number of small events, perhaps smaller games that eventually lead to the climax which is the biggest event or game of them all. I admire this film’s choice to practically start and finish at the big game. It is honestly amazing how it got me to care about these characters all the while focusing on one event. The way this film uses flashbacks is surprisingly brilliant. It really added to the emotion of the film. The film is animated, but the story is definitely down to earth. That said, “The First Slam Dunk” is one of those movies that shows the power of animation, and honestly, I cannot imagine the film being any better in live-action. This is one of the year’s most punch-packing, thrilling, and engaging watches for sure.
When I reviewed this movie, I called it the “Citizen Kane” of comic book movies, and that is why “Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse” has eternally lingered in my mind. I had insurmountable, sky high expectations for this film and safe to say, I was not disappointed. Is it my favorite “Spider-Man” movie? No. I have to give the slight edge to Sam Raimi’s “Spider-Man 2,” but I think of all the “Spider-Man” movies, this is arguably the most well made of the bunch. Terrific voice acting, especially from Hailee Steinfeld as Gwen Stacy. Her character has one of my favorite arcs I have seen on screen this year. Plus the “will they, won’t they” connection between her and Miles is kind of adorable. The “Spider-Man” movies have always done a good job at injecting romantic chemistry between its leads, and this one is no exception. It is a different approach here, but I honestly welcome it. I really hope we get to explore this connection a little bit more in the next film whenever it comes out. Plus, the film has two well written villains, both of whom take up a good amount of screentime. You have The Spot, whose portrayal by Jason Schwartzman is dynamite. There is a distinctive hyperactivity to his voice that he utilizes perfectly. Then we get to the main antagonist of the film, Miguel O’Hara, otherwise known as Spider-Man 2099, played by Oscar Isaac. Much like Thanos in “Avengers: Infinity War,” Miguel O’Hara is one of those villains that I could honestly side with. But I also think this film does a much better job at getting me to side with the main hero as well in this particular rivalry. Not to say that “Avengers: Infinity War” failed to do that, but “Across the Spider-Verse” does an incredible job at personalizing the stakes for our hero Miles Morales, while also presenting a case for the villain where his motivation will keep everything in balance for the sake of reducing anomalies and ruining timelines.
But of course, I must also address how technically advanced and gorgeous this film looks. This film is so pleasing to the naked eye in a way that is so notoriously difficult and mind-numbing to put into words. I admired this film’s predecessor, “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse,” for its unique look and presentation. This sequel not only uses that same animation style exquisitely, but they implement several more that offer jaw-dropping, sensational results. The movie has six animation styles, and not only do all of them qualify for some of the best looking animated material ever put on a screen, but the way each of them blend together happen to be seamless.
Though you may be wondering, how is the story? Basically, it is fun-filled multiverse-spanning tale that shows what it means to be Spider-Man. In this movie’s universe, that could have multiple interpretations. But if we are simply widdling things down to Miles Morales, his meaning is nothing short of relatable. I always found Spider-Man to be my favorite superhero because his stories have always shown a balance between right and wrong, wants and needs, and trying to do the right thing. And not only did I get a sense in every scene that Miles was trying to do the right thing even in his lower points, but I got the same sense from his guardians. Every scene between Jeff and Rio cemented this idea into the ground. While these three people may not be on the same page, I got a sense that each one of them are just trying their best to progress through their daily lives even if the circumstances are tough or unfamiliar. This movie not only enhanced our superpowered characters like Miles and Gwen, but I think a notable positive backbone of this film would have to be Miles’s connection to his parents. Not only did this add a ton to the movie and plot, but made me root for Miles even more. On top of all of this, Daniel Pemberton delivers bone-chilling, adrenaline-pumping score that gets me going every time I hear it. His themes throughout the movie stand out significantly. I would love to see this movie presented with a live orchestra at some point in my life.
“The First Slam Dunk” is amongst the best sports movies I have ever seen. “Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse” is one of the best comic book movies I have ever seen. It’s up there with “The Suicide Squad” for me as the best of the decade. But this next movie offered me an experience like no other this year, and I am honestly shocked it ended up being this high on the list.
My #1 best movie of the year, is, “Godzilla: Minus One!” For the longest time this year, I thought “Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse” would be my #1 this year. Maybe sometimes I would switch it back and forth with “The First Slam Dunk” and have that be my #1. Then much like a Godzilla-esque disaster itself, this monstrous masterpiece comes in out of nowhere and shakes up the competition with enormous power. I have long been a “Godzilla” admirer. Who does not like seeing big monsters destroy cities? But little did I know a concept of that nature could be this captivating, awe-inspiring, and emotion-fiddling! Much like “Slam Dunk,” I consider myself a “Godzilla” novice, but having watched “Godzilla Minus One,” it made me want to go back and watch some other “Godzilla” movies I have not seen. In fact, the next day, I ended up finally watching the 1954 original picture and had a lot of fun with it. That said, “Godzilla Minus One” might be a contender to be my favorite monster movie. And it is not just because of Godzilla himself. That said, Godzilla is written perfectly from start to finish. There is no dimension to this character, but that is what makes the character great. All it happens to be is a ruthless monster that will take out everything and everyone you know and love. It is that simple. When that beast unleashes its atomic breath in the film, I got chills. The biggest difference between this film and say 2021’s “Godzilla vs. Kong,” which is a good film in its own right, is that I am watching that movie and admiring it mostly for its spectacle. Not only from a design perspective. But I am talking action, polish, CGI, cinematography. Much like “Godzilla vs. Kong,” “Godzilla: Minus One” is action-packed, but it is action-packed in a way that offers significantly more emotion. When I watch “Godzilla vs. Kong,” I occasionally admire all the destruction that is going around a big city. In this one, I want the big city to stand tall. I want its people to survive. And that case is well established with how well written the human characters happen to be, which I am shocked and delighted to point out.
Unlike the last couple outings featuring the king of the monsters, this film is made in Japan. Naturally, the film tells a story that not only that country can relate to when taking its history into consideration, but its message has a versatility that extends around the world. I mentioned one reason why I loved “Oppenheimer” is because the message of the film furthered my desire for perhaps unachievable world peace. “Godzilla: Minus One” deals with similar-sounding ideas, similar-sounding themes, but with notable key differences between the story and the fact that there is a giant monster destroying everything. Much like how the original “Godzilla” suggests that nuclear war will be detrimental to our society, “Godzilla Minus One” takes that idea and expands upon it. It shows how sometimes we as humans tend to live life to an extent where we neglect danger. This film shows how we sometimes fail to take our lives into consideration before we destroy ourselves. It teaches us to value life, value each other. And similarly, I value the human characters in this film. Between the protagonist, Koichi Shikishima, a kamikaze pilot who feels internally hurt after fleeing his duty. You also have his love interest, Noriko Oishi, a homeless woman who is doing what she can to survive in postwar times. And together, the two are raising a baby that latter acquired from a mother who did not want it in the first place. These two are some of the kindest, sweetest people in the history of the world. This movie did everything and more to not only get me to like them, but make me bite my nails at the thought of them being in Godzilla’s sights.
One of my favorite films of all time is “Star Wars,” and that is the kind of film I could not stop thinking about as I watched “Godzilla: Minus One.” Granted, I think about “Star Wars” all the time. I am a fan. But when it comes to “Godzilla: Minus One” that film offered an experience that made me feel like I was seven years old and someone showed me “Star Wars” for the first time. The film is easy on the eyes, powerful on the ears, and offers an admirable hero in the center of it all. And the more I think about it, I look at the villains of “Star Wars” like Grand Moff Tarkin and Darth Vader and while they may offer passionate motivations and aspirations, I ultimately want the heroes to win. They say a movie is only as good as its villain, and if that is the case, “Godzilla Minus One” is one of the best movies ever made. I love a good villain like Thanos in the MCU or Scar from “The Lion King” or Lotso from “Toy Story 3” for their compelling backgrounds that may indicate how they got to where they were. But “Godzilla Minus One” shows that you can make a villain great just by having them do the simplest thing you can do to hero, get in their way. There is not a significant purpose to the character, they just want to destroy and move on. The motivation is as simple as that.
And I would like to propose one thing before we move on. Perhaps the biggest cinematic phenomenon in 2023 is “Barbenheimer,” where you watch “Barbie” and “Oppenheimer” back to back and vice versa. I would like to propose a different double feature. Sorry, “Barbie,” you’re not invited to this party. It doesn’t mean you’re a bad movie, but it just doesn’t fit in this example. If there is ever a day where you have five hours to spare, take advantage of that time and start those five hours watching “Oppenheimer,” and once you’re finished with that, use the remaining two to watch “Godzilla Minus One.” These are two high-quality, conceptually similar movies that offer fantastic rosters of characters, a thrilling storyline, great acting, and ties to nuclear war. Start with “Oppenheimer” get the chills going, and finish off with “Godzilla Minus One” as a palate cleanser. It is not all fun and joy, but trust me, it works.
Between the humungous stakes, riveting story, shockingly well written human characters, a heart-pumping musical score by Naoki Satô, and the absolute terror of the titular titan himself, “Godzilla Minus One” is the one of the most exciting theatrical experiences I had this year. This movie made me feel like I was seven years old and I was learning how cool movies could be. And “Godzilla Minus One” is pretty cool. So cool in fact that it is my favorite of 2023.
Thanks for reading this countdown! Thank you so much for joining me once again in another year of cinema. This has been one of the best years for movies I have ventured through ever since starting Scene Before. Plenty of memorable franchise titles. Some exciting originals. And a lot of surprises. “Bottoms” came out of nowhere for me and I ended up loving it. There were a lot of great, and surprisingly good animated titles from this year. I did not think I would enjoy “Migration,” but somehow I gave it a thumbs up. My breath was taken away by how “John Wick” not only kept its hot streak going, but delivered its best film yet. I was very excited to get to see “Oppenheimer” in IMAX 70mm this year, and I was overwhelmed with happiness to know that the trend was catching on with people in my circles, and even some people who I did not think would latch onto such a thing. I am rather delighted to know that I am not the one humungous nerd that needed an excuse to drive an hour away from my house to see that film the way it was intended. And if things are going in a certain direction, chances are that these top 10 films are going to be this year’s best picture nominees at the 6th Annual Jack Awards, which is set to arrive on Scene Before later this year. I do not have an official date yet. But if you liked this list, why not check out another one? I just posted my top 10 WORST movies of 2023, so feel free to check that out whenever you can. But if you want to see content like this and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, what are your favorite movies of 2023? Do you agree with my list? Disagree? What are some of the gems I missed this year? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!