Luis Guzmán

Coyote vs. Acme (2026): Don’t Walk, Roadrun.

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Coyote vs. Acme” is directed by Dave Green (Earth to Echo, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows) and stars Will Forte (Scoob!, Saturday Night Live), Lana Condor (Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken, X-Men: Apocalypse), Tone Bell (Whitney, Little), Luis Guzmán (The Limey, Traffic), Martha Kelly (Euphoria, Baskets), P.J. Byrne (The Wolf of Wall Street, The Legend of Korra), Eric Bauza (Looney Tunes Cartoons, Buddy), Kenneth Choi (The People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story, The Last Man on Earth), and John Cena (Blockers, The Suicide Squad). After many attempts of trying to catch the Roadrunner to no success, Wile E. Coyote has one thing to blame, Acme. Now fed up with the company’s defective products, Coyote decides to sue Acme for each of their products that kept him from catching the iconic blue bird. But winning the case will not be easy as Acme is a dominate corporate force, and Coyote teams up with a lawyer known for settling every case that comes his way.

I am not the biggest “Looney Tunes” guy. I did not grow up watching the property. Heck, even as someone who was born in the late 90s, I did not even watch the original “Space Jam” until I was 21. By the way, the movie is awful. Seriously… What was that? But even I was stoked for “Coyote vs. Acme.”

Even as a novice to the “Looney Tunes” brand, I am well aware, and sometimes amused, by the constant charade of Wile E. Coyote trying to catch the Roadrunner. Never in my life did I think we would ever get a movie where Coyote takes the company who makes his contraptions and gadgets to court. But as soon as I heard the pitch, I was all eyes and ears. This was a brilliant premise, and I really wanted to see it come to life. But Warner Bros. Discovery decided to go full Adam Conover and ruin everything.

Following in the footsteps of “Batgirl,” “Coyote vs. Acme” was fated to become Warner Bros. Discovery’s latest tax write-off. The film, while well-liked by people who worked on it as well as others outside the production, was not seen as a moneymaker to Warner Brothers Discovery, in addition to any potential buyers. Except for one. And that is Ketchup Entertainment, who also released another recent “Looney Tunes” project, “The Day the Earth Blew Up.” I did not see that one, but I was eager to check out this one.

I have now seen “Coyote vs. Acme,” and it is not just good. It is actually great. No… I take that back. This is one of the best films of the year.

This film, much like “Who Framed Roger Rabbit?”, is set in a world where people and cartoons co-exist. The Acme Corporation is a real company run by actual people, making animated products for cartoons like Coyote. We see that Coyote has had it. He has spent his whole life trying to catch the Roadrunner. He’s gotta eat! So, he gets an idea to sue Acme for each one of their products he got his hands on. None of them worked, and he wants to hit them where it hurts. So, he teams up with a lawyer named Kevin Avery (Forte) to get the job done. However, we find out that these two are opposites. Avery, and by extension, his firm, is known for settling. In fact, the firm has been involved in multiple cases against Acme and there has been a settlement for each one.

You have two core characters, each of whom want to get things done their own way. Coyote and Kevin make for an incredible odd duo. I was pleasantly surprised with not just how well Forte wound up doing in this film as a live-action performer blending in with cartoons, but the same can be said for how I felt about Coyote as a character.

The concept of watching Coyote trying to catch the Roadrunner by itself is fun on paper, but let’s be real. His goal is to end this bird’s life. He is kind of a fascinating character, because despite this movie being made for families, it centers around someone who is so dedicated to killing a bird that you cannot help but appreciate him. It is kind of like watching Mauser from “Marty Supreme,” who is a bit of a moron, but he has this drive that as I watched the film, I could not help but appreciate it. The film is, ironically, fantastic for younger people to watch. Because despite being about someone whose goal is to kill a bird, it also serves as a fine lesson for younger viewers to chase their dreams.

This lesson plays heavily not just into Coyote’s personal motivation, but also the relationship between him and Kevin. Coyote’s drive ends up inspiring Kevin to not just challenge himself to perhaps become a better lawyer, but it seems to instill him with a reason to keep on living.

As the film progresses, it becomes one of the most surprisingly heartfelt features I have seen in a long time. Heartfelt and “Looney Tunes” are two concepts that I did not think I would use in the same sentence, but here we are. I was almost convinced that I was watching a Pixar movie or something from Lord and Miller. A perfect execution of comedic gags that also manages to interweave moments that pull your heartstrings. I nearly cried at the end of this movie. When this movie nearly got scrapped for a tax write-off, I knew I wanted to see it. I did not know that it would be this compelling, this exciting, this moving.

The ending of this film is so satisfying. It is, in a way, a predictable ending, but it manages to pack in an element or two of unpredictability to get there. Regardless, the ending feels earned. It puts the film’s characters in a position that makes sense and overall, the final moments emit oodles of joy. This is a movie about underdogs, and it is perhaps only enhanced by the fact that getting the film to the big screen was a bit of an underdog story by itself.

Speaking of all the behind the scenes drama, one of my favorite things we see, not even in the film itself, but just before it starts, is the WB logo. This is a completely baseless assumption, but there is a subtitle in the opening logo that part of me wants to believe was put in as a response to the whole tax-write off saga. Moments into the title, we zoom in and we see a caption that reads “A wholly owned subsidiary of the Acme Corporation.” On one hand, it is kind of funny because it plays into the joke of Acme’s corporate dominance. But the joke may also have a double meaning. Much like how Acme is the villain of the movie, some people who wanted to see this film succeed saw Warner Bros. as a real life villain that kept this project from seeing the light of day.

…Or I could be overthinking this and the logo was designed before the tax-write off shenanigans even became a thing. I have to keep all possibilities open to avoid making a fool of myself.

Arguably the most notable physical standout in the film is John Cena, and not just from a looks perspective. He plays Buddy Crane, who is not only a lawyer for Acme, but just so happened to be Kevin’s rival while the two attended Harvard. Despite sometimes playing Crane up as this tough guy, and he is, he also manages to sometimes deliver a kind, calm aura. There is a balance to this character that Cena masters as a performer. Cena has proven in previous roles that he has a knack for comedy, and while this may not be his funniest role, he continues to prove that he has a fine presence on screen.

The movie also comes with plenty of fan service and fun Easter eggs. Sure, you have some classic footage and phrases that even casuals would recognize, but there are sometimes some nice small touches. There is a scene set in the middle of the film set to the DJ Shadow song “Nobody Speak,” which is a good song by itself, but the film adds a slight enhancement to the song and replaces a couple notes with the Roadrunner’s “meep meep.” I almost burst out laughing, but I wanted to avoid embarrassing myself in front of other people.

The film does come with some minor issues. For the most part, the blending of live-action with the animated elements works fantastically. It is actually kind of incredible how seamless everything is. But not all of it is consistent. Not everyone seems to be drawn in the same style. I do not have a problem with this as “Who Framed Roger Rabbit?” implements multiple styles, but I thought “Roger Rabbit” did a better job at blending those styles together than “Coyote.” While he is by no means an eyesore, the design for Foghorn Leghorn sometimes looks a little tacky when put next to live-action characters. He is not awful looking, but it is also true at the same time that he looks like a character during the main sequence of “The Simpsons Ride” at Universal Studios.

Even with some tiny issues, this film is not just a blast, it is a triumph. This is perhaps the greatest middle finger to corporate giants encapsulated via film since “WALL-E.” In fact, by happy accident, the film feels like it is throwing an extra middle finger to a real life corporate behemoth at the same time. I say this as someone who loves Warner Brothers as a studio. I am a massive fan of their movies. In fact, “Sinners” and “One Battle After Another” were two of my favorite films from last year. But they made a mistake by nearly axing this film. What one corporation sees as trash, is the audience’s treasure. Please go buy a ticket to this movie, because not only are you supporting a spectacular project, but you will be sending a message to the people who almost kept you from seeing it in the first place.

In the end, while I do not think “Coyote vs. Acme” is not going to get a Best Picture nomination from the Academy, it is one of those movies that you have to see at least once. This is a one-of-a-kind project that wound up being more than a pleasant surprise for me. I genuinely do not know when I am going to stop thinking about it. This film nearly broke me. It presents two completely admirable heroes who not only have fascinating goals, but make a great team. You do not have to be a “Looney Tunes” diehard to enjoy this film, and given the little history I have with this franchise, I am proof of that. Please go see this movie. It will make you laugh and cry. I am going to give “Coyote vs. Acme” a 9/10.

“Coyote vs. Acme” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! As a reminder, in honor of Scene Before’s 10th anniversary, I am working on a special video series, Movie Requests, which sees me reviewing movies suggested by celebrity guests. My latest episode features actress Melissa Barrera, who you may know from films like “Abigail” and “In the Heights.” In this episode, she suggests I should watch “Roma!” What did I think? Click the video above to find out! If you enjoy the video, please leave a like, subscribe to my YouTube channel, and hit the notification bell that way you can see more episodes as soon as possible!

My next review is going to be for “Idiots.” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Don’t Move” and “The Uprising.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, be sure to check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Coyote vs. Acme?” What did you think about it? Or, what is a movie that you wish you got to see that has never been released? For me, the answer is Sam Raimi’s “Spider-Man 4.” I remember that it was supposed to come out in the early 2010s, but it got scrapped in favor of “The Amazing Spider-Man.” No offense to Andrew Garfield, but I would give anything for another solo Tobey Maguire movie. Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Guns Up (2025): Kevin James Punches and Kicks His Way Through This Fun but Tonally Uneven Action Flick

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Guns Up” is written and directed by Edward Drake and stars Kevin James (King of Queens, Here Comes the Boom), Christina Ricci (Speed Racer, Casper), Maximilian Osinski (Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., Ted Lasso), Luis Guzmán (The Limey, Oz), and Melissa Leo (The Fighter, All My Children). This film is about a mob henchmen whose final job goes wrong and now it is up to him to keep his family safe.

I watch less television than movies. But sitcoms have played a heavy role in my TV habits through the years. One show that has long been a mainstay of mine is “King of Queens.” It is a fantastic show, but it is also one that comes with a side effect due to seeing Kevin James’ character from one episode to the next for a long time. Kevin James is super funny on “King of Queens” as Doug Heffernan, but ever since his noticeable jump to film following the series finale, I sometimes have trouble seeing James as anyone else. Sure, Paul Blart has a mustache. Whatever. Films like “Zookeeper,” “Grown Ups,” and “Pixels” see Kevin James playing variants of Doug Heffernan, despite some noticeable differences. But “Guns Up,” kind of like another recent Kevin James film, “Becky,” feels like an unexpected move coming from the comedic actor. Also like “Becky,” I thought “Guns Up” was a solid, albeit imperfect flick.

Going off of what I just said about Kevin James, if someone were to pitch “Guns Up” to me and said they wrote the screenplay with Kevin James in mind for the lead role of Ray Hayes, I would gladly tell that person to belly flop into a kiddie pool naked to think about what they have done. But I was pleasantly surprised. James does a good job carrying the film and just about every scene featuring him is fun to watch. I was also surprised to see how well he handled some of the action choreography. I am not sure how much of it was done with a double, but James did a good job with the action scenes and I bought into his character. There are elements of James’ previous, more comedy-based performances that sneak themselves into his latest one, but this is definitely one of the more unique outings James has had as an actor. I thought “Becky” was an unexpected turn for James when that film came out. But having now seen that film along with “Guns Up,” I am open to seeing James in many types of projects that I probably would have never imagined he’d take on about a decade ago. I have no idea if he would take on an Oscar bait role in the next five years. That said, Dwayne Johnson seems to be doing so right now with “The Smashing Machine” based on how that film is being marketed, so anything is possible. Heck, for all I know he could have a turn similar to his occasional co-star, Adam Sandler, like he did in “Uncut Gems.”

The screenplay is one of the more grounded ones James has taken on, though there is plenty of comedy sprinkled throughout. I am not going to say all of it was funny. There is one gag involving the f-word that was so overdone that it almost made me want to utter some swears myself. But there are gags that work, including one that shows the children learning how to shoot a gun. I thought that scene was cleverly executed and had a couple unpredictable lines. When it comes to comedy, the real star of the show for me is Leo Easton Kelly as Henry. To me, his character would sometimes remind me of myself when I was younger. I got the impression he would sometimes just jump into a conversation almost randomly just to get some attention. While I do not remember the exact lines, I recall Henry giving me perhaps the two biggest laughs in the movie. I do not know if “Guns Up” is going to be Kelly’s big break because the movie is from a lesser known studio and had a day and date release. As a matter of fact, on opening weekend, there were no showtimes for this film in my home state of Massachusetts, including Boston. I was lucky enough to be in Illinois, where this film happened to be playing when it came out.

“Guns Up” is an action-comedy, and there are plenty of films where those two genres can blend together seamlessly. Films like “Ride Along,” “Free Guy,” and “Zombieland” are a few that come to mind. As mentioned, “Guns Up” is not a bad movie, but it does not mean it is tonally consistent. Going back to “Free Guy,” it is a film where the action and the comedy tend to work together. You have Ryan Reynolds trying to take down a bigger, badder, nuder version of himself by the end of the movie. It is hilarious and also easy on the eyes. “Guns Up” is a movie where it is a little bit of action and a little bit of comedy. The genres at times feel like they distract from each other rather than do what “Free Guy” does which is make them work together. This is not to say the action is bad. This is not to say the comedy is bad. But it feels like it comes from two different visions. Only one person wrote the film, so this is not a result of too many cooks in the kitchen. That said, if this film were being prepared in the kitchen, it is perhaps possible that it is being made by a cook that is dealing with a Franken-recipe at times.

Speaking of the action, “Guns Up” is by no means the next “John Wick,” even though there is a line towards the climax that tries to make the audience think otherwise. In fact, the climax is a lot of fun. All of the characters play off each other well. The action, while not the best I have ever seen, is decently handled. There is a good mix of people working with their hands as well as using more advanced weaponry.

Much of the film is fluidly shot and decently cut. I cannot confirm the exact budget of “Guns Up,” but having seen the film, its budget definitely comes off as somewhat limited. I say this film is not the next “John Wick,” but I say that knowing that the “John Wick” franchise does not always come with a tiny budget. The film perhaps does not pop like a “John Wick” movie does sometimes, but it most certainly gets the job done and kept me on the edge of my seat.

One of my favorite moments of action in “Guns Up” involves a group of people going through a doorway, at which point the camera does not move. The shot shows tons of combat without having to pan, tilt, or cut to the next angle. It is such a minimalist idea, but it is executed beautifully. Take notes, “Taken 3!”

In the end, “Guns Up” gets a thumbs up. For the record, it is not a big thumbs up. The film’s budgetary limitations sometimes make themselves clear. The tone of the movie is sometimes inconsistent. Again, this film is an action comedy, and while neither of those two aspects are done horribly, the film’s action and humor are not the best I have ever seen. Other than the main family, the film’s supporting cast did not entirely stand out. That said, the film is most definitely entertaining and if you were to check it out, you would not be wasting your time. Is it a fantastic watch? No. Is it a decent watch? Yes, that seems to be a fair assessment. I am going to give “Guns Up” a 6/10.

“Guns Up” is now available to rent or buy on VOD.

Photo by Marvel Studios/MARVEL STUDIOS – © 2025 20th Century Studios / © and ™ 2025 MARVEL.

Thanks for reading this review! If you enjoyed this review, be sure to look forward to some of my other ones! I have a long list of reviews coming including for “The Fantastic Four: First Steps,” “The Bad Guys 2,” “Smurfs,” “Together,” and “Oh, Hi!” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Guns Up?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite project featuring Kevin James? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!