Colin Jost

The Breadwinner (2026): An Unfunny Comedy That Really Wants You to Buy a Toyota and Watch Shark Tank

Posted on by Jack Drees

“The Breadwinner” is directed by Eric Appel (Die Hart, Weird: The Al Yankovic Story) and stars Nate Bargatze (Your Friend, Nate Bargatze, Nate Bargatze: Hello World), Mandy Moore (Tangled, This Is Us), Colin Jost (Saturday Night Live, Tom & Jerry), Zach Cherry (Fallout, Severance), Martin Herlihy (Saturday Night Live, The Running Man), Kumail Nanjiani (The Big Sick, Eternals). and Will Forte (Scoob!, The Last Man on Earth). This film is about a dad living in the suburbs who must adapt to a stay-at-home parent lifestyle when his wife gets the opportunity of a lifetime to take her invention to the next level.

I love comedy. I think the world is a better place for having it. Sadly, comedy films are at a bit of a low point. This is not to say that they are dead, there have been wins here and there, but the comedy genre does not feel the same as it did pre-COVID. Part of this may be because a lot of mainstream comedies are finding their way onto streaming services. While some viewers may not care, it kind of turns me off, and makes me think that the people who made the movie do not have much faith in it.

So, when I found out that “The Breadwinner” was going to be a theatrical release, I was pleased. Well, sort of. Because the trailers, while not the worst I have ever seen, did not look fantastic. I cannot say I outright laughed at anything the trailers had to offer.

But you know what? Maybe this is a blessing in disguise. Perhaps “The Breadwinner” listened to me every time I watch a comedy trailer, see all the funny jokes, and complain that there is nothing else that happens to be funny when the film comes out. The good news is, there are moments of the film that I did not see in the marketing that made me laugh. Kumail Nanjiani plays a supporting character and he is easily the best part. He has the funniest lines and visual gags. If there is any reason to see this movie, it is him.

Beyond that, I cannot come up with another reason to check this project out. That is unless you want to watch an hour and a half commercial that technically qualifies as cinema.

I have seen Nate Bargatze do standup both through prerecorded specials and live events. He puts on a good show. While not my favorite comedian working today, I think he has a knack for family-friendly humor. The kind that you would expect to fly on an episode of “America’s Got Talent.” Given his success with the standup scene, I was wondering if Nate Bargatze would be able to bring something fresh to the comedy film genre. While the film does feel rather on brand for Bargatze’s standup persona, I think said persona is perhaps handled better on a stage rather than a screen.

“The Breadwinner” feels like an extended episode of “Everybody Loves Raymond,” and not a very good one. Nate Bargatze plays Nate Wilcox, the “average guy” character with a steady job. Mandy Moore plays Katie, a stay at home mom. They have three children and all live in the suburbs together. When Katie gets an opportunity to make something of herself outside the home, it throws Nate off and forces him into the stay-at-home dad role. For Nate, this goes about as well as you, and probably he, would expect. Speaking of things that did not go well, the jokes are more often misses than hits. At no point did the battleship sink. You can only have Nate Bargatze fall down so many times and expect it to be hilarious. The attempts at humor are not only unfunny, but a lot of them feel been there, done that, and in certain cases, done better.

This is a PG movie, and I did see some children at my screening. I would be curious to know how well this comedy is going to age for the younger viewers who check it out. But as a 26-year-old who has quite a few flicks under his belt, the jokes come off as too familiar and predictable for them to work.

This film sort of takes me back to when Happy Madison comedies dominated theatres. And by that I mean, the film reminded me of what I sometimes hated about those movies. This is a glorified, shameless, endless commercial.

Product placement and in-film advertising is nothing new. Also, this is a Sony movie, so this is most certainly nothing new for them. This film reminds me a lot of “The Emoji Movie,” which so incessantly flashes brands on the screen and even makes them interwoven so heavily into the plot to the point where part of the climax would not be possible if it were not for the Twitter bird mascot saving the heroes. With this being a Sony movie, of course, they decided to put in some tie-ins to their properties. There are a couple noticeable nods to “Jeopardy!” for example, that are frankly inoffensive.

But would anyone like to guess how the story moves forward when Katie decides to take her invention to the next level? She goes on “Shark Tank,” of course! Do not get me wrong. A lot of people would, realistically, kill to bring their product on that show for the chance of getting a deal. But I would be willing to bet five bucks that if this were not a Sony movie, “Shark Tank” would make no appearance in this flick whatsoever, as that is also a Sony show. Also, the scene is about as dumb as can be.

Are you seriously telling me that in regards to Katie’s invention, that Kevin O’Leary says he’s out because Nate walks onto the set while eating a donut and presenting himself as the antithesis of a fashion model? Would the real Kevin O’Leary do this? I don’t think so. Some of you might be saying, “Come on, it is a character, let him be.” Yeah, but judging by Nate Bargatze’s performance that lacks any and all transformation, I am not quite sure how much acting is really going on in this film. Not to digress, but the movie tries to present this whole gag where Nate becomes known as “the donut guy.” I understand the Internet can be odd and rude, but this has got to be one of the dumbest viral trends I have ever seen. Then again, I remember a time when portions of the Internet thought the Harlem Shake was cool, so there is that.

“Shark Tank” is not even the biggest culprit of this film’s neverending stream of commercialism. Because this movie really wants you to buy a Toyota. And frankly, it fails miserably. Not just because “The Breadwinner” is a terrible movie by itself, but also because if this were a genuine Toyota ad, I would question its messaging. My mom and I saw the film together, she liked it by the way. Upon discussing our difference in opinion, one of the first things I said to her as we left the cinema is that the film paints Toyota as an anti-family company. If anything, Toyota is the villain. Somebody give Nate Bargatze a Ford so he can go to town on a Toyota dealership!

Oh, and don’t forget to remind Nate Bargatze to take that Toyota to Walmart for some errands! And also don’t forget to tell the talent to take every other brand name cereal off the shelf to make sure everyone knows that is exactly what the family is buying! This movie cost $25 million to make, and I am sure most, if not entire the budget was paid for with this endless charade of brand bootlicking.

There is not much legitimate acting going in this movie, but based on the direction everyone is given, they fulfill the basic requirements of their roles. The women who play the Wilcox sisters, Stella Grace Fitzgerald, Birdie Borria, and Charlotte Ann Tucker, are sometimes adorable and play off the other characters well, even if some of their jokes feel like they are written for a Disney Channel original movie.

Going back to what I said about this film feeling like an extended “Everybody Loves Raymond” episode, the more I think about this film’s director’s background, I can see why. While Eric Appel has a lot of experience behind the scenes making material within the comedy genre, most of his material is TV-based. Even his more recent feature films did not get theatrically released. He directed “Weird: The Al Yankovic Story,” which is a Roku Original. Beyond that, some of his more recent projects include the “Die Hart” films on Prime Video, where Kevin Hart plays a version of himself. …Doesn’t he do that in every other movie he’s in too?

Plus, the writers of this film do not have much experience on the big screen either. In addition to starring in the film, Nate Bargatze also has a screenwriting credit. Upon looking at his IMDb, this is also Bargatze’s first acting credit in a feature film. The other writer, Dan Lagana, mostly has a TV background. The two also produce the film as well alongside Jeremy Latcham, a former Senior Vice President of Production and Development of Marvel Studios. So, you have all these minds coming together who for the most part, are not exactly known for feature filmmaking. I am not against these people giving filmmaking the old college try. But as for this try, it was a fail. These people got their start, but it was not the finest of beginnings. If anything, I am glad to see a studio put their money where their mouth is, which judging by this film’s content, their mouth was probably on a Toyota’s trunk fairly recently, and put a comedy in theaters. That is nice to see in this day and age. That said, this does feel like a comedy that was probably intended to go to streaming, but somehow wound up on the big screen.

In the end, “The Breadwinner” made me lose some brain cells. Nate Bargatze is a talented comedian, but I frankly think standup is where he is best. I am not sure how much of a future he is going to have as a movie star. I do not know if he is aiming to pursue more film roles, but if he does, I hope they are superior to what he has given here. The worst thing about this film is simply the fact that I did not find it funny. Yes, I emitted a chuckle here and there, and Kumail Nanjiani saves the film whenever he pops up on screen. But I was expecting more from someone who is killing it in the standup scene. Instead, “The Breadwinner” is essentially this year’s version of “Easter Sunday,” starring Jo Koy. It is a film that wastes the talent of a successful comedian, as well as my time. I am going to give “The Breadwinner” a 2/10.

“The Breadwinner” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! This Tuesday, July 14th, get ready to make it a “Blockbuster Night!” Or… Day, I do not care. Your choice. Either way, I say such a thing because the next episode of Movie Requests is going to feature Blockbuster Video owner Sandi Handing! She owns the Blockbuster Video in Bend, Oregon. That is the last one still open! I had the privilege of meeting Harding in November, when she requested I should watch a certain movie whose title will be revealed when the next episode of Movie Requests officially drops! You can catch the video on Tuesday July 14th on Flicknerd.com and YouTube! Make sure you subscribe to my channel! It may not give you superpowers, but it will make you super aware of when exactly this episode drops! And isn’t the power of knowledge the greatest thing of all?

My next review is going to be for “Disclosure Day!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Toy Story 5,” “Supergirl,” “Jackass: Best and Last,” “Obsession,” “Maddie’s Secret,” and “Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “The Breadwinner?” What did you think about? Or, have you seen any of Nate Bargatze’s standup material? Look, I may have been harsh on this movie. Although Bargatze is not a comedic hack. He can put on a good show. I will look forward to his next standup special or upcoming gig in the New England area, but “The Breadwinner” was not for me. Ah well, can’t win ’em all. Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Tom & Jerry (2021): Who Shamed Roger Rabbit?

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Tom & Jerry” is directed by Tim Story and stars Chloë Grace Moretz (If I Stay, The Fifth Wave), Michael Peña (Ant-Man, Jexi), Colin Jost (Saturday Night Live, How to be Single), Rob Delaney (Catastrophe, Deadpool 2), and Ken Jeong (The Hangover, The Masked Singer). This film places the iconic cartoon cat and mouse duo in a live-action environment, specifically in New York City. Simultaneously, we follow the character of Kayla, who acquires a job at a fancy hotel, occasionally runs into the two cartoons, and needs to accompany guests for a balls out wedding.

I have never watched the “Tom & Jerry” cartoons as a kid, except maybe once or twice. Therefore, like some other things that have been adapted into live-action like “The Smurfs,” I had little to no connection to it as a child. I know the titular duo always find themselves trying to take each other down, and conceptually, it sounds entertaining. If I were six years old, I could find it to be a solid time-waster. But there’s no real story or plot to it that I can come up with other than the fact that the two creatures do not like each other, as cats and mice probably shouldn’t and they always end up in shambles against one another. This leads me to my first positive of the film, there are a couple entertaining fight sequences. They’re not all memorable or fascinating, but they have glimmers of entertainment throughout. Unfortunately, that is where all the positivity stops.

After all, even though this movie is about two animated rascals trying to beat each other up, that’s not even the whole story. Instead, it is another lame, copypaste, live-action snoozefest that has no substance. I just want to say to everyone reading this who has kids, if you are planning on taking your kid to the theater this weekend, do not watch “Tom & Jerry.” Save yourself from going inside. The kids might have fun, although I will admit, since seeing the movie, I talked with someone I know who has kids and they were apparently bored instantly by the film upon first watching it. Go watch “Raya and the Last Dragon” instead! That film has substance, great characters, laughs, and even though one of the core elements of “Tom & Jerry” are the action sequences, that film manages to have better action! Both in terms of style and story! I have not seen many movies in 2021 so far, but this is currently the worst one of the year for me.

Now, let’s talk about some characters. That’s always a great place to start in a review, right? Well, the movie’s called “Tom & Jerry” so it would only be appropriate to talk about Tom & Jerry first, right?

Nope! This is not their movie! They’re on the title because you know, franchises make money!

Instead, let’s talk about Kayla for a second. How is she a positive role model for children? Sure, maybe throughout the movie she’s taming a cat and mouse, which might translate to some kids being good with pets, but as a person, she is not exactly fine and dandy. She starts off the film by quitting her job, going to a hotel where she runs into a woman trying to apply for another job, manipulates her into not applying, and tries to acquire the job for herself. How is this a teaching moment for children? How do you get to the top? Lying! Unfortunately, Moretz is not the only hairball in this mess. This movie comes with a sadly obnoxious Michael Peña, who very much reminded me of his character in the piece of crap people call “Jexi.” Colin Jost and Pallati Sharva play a rather entitled celebrity couple I almost did not even come close to caring about. Ken Jeong is a chef who is weirdly dynamic and I don’t really remember anything else about him or almost anyone in this movie. Granted, it has been a few weeks since I saw “Tom & Jerry,” but it really goes to show how disposable it is.

Let me just be clear. The cast of this movie has talent. I admittedly have not watched a lot of Chloe Grace Moretz’s work, but I can tell she always commits to her craft. And given the little substance this movie offers, she does her best. Michael Peña unfortunately has followed a trend lately where some of the movies he’s been in that I’ve personally seen are not some of his best, and this is one of them. Colin Jost is consistently funny on “Saturday Night Live,” keeping up with the genius of Weekend Update from one episode to the next. Rob Delaney is an actor whose work I need to follow more often, but he was one of the highlights for me in “Deadpool 2” as the powerless Peter. Ken Jeong is a dynamic personality that will take any project that he is in and improve it by just a sliver, even if it is already great! In fact he was in “Over the Moon,” one of the best animations I have ever seen and my favorite film of last year. While these actors have had better days in terms of performances, much of it has to do with bad writing and perhaps just as awful directing. This movie consistently feels like it is doing the bare minimum to keep kids entertained, but not enough for grown-ups to keep themselves from cringing.

Also I want to address a problem with this film that has been bugging me. I say this as someone who has never had a childhood attachment to “Tom & Jerry.” But this film is not about “Tom & Jerry.” If you take “Tom & Jerry” out, you have a slightly different film with more realistic drama and it is completely centered around the human characters, many of whom I did not give a s*it about. My point is, “Tom & Jerry” comes packed in with a couple of the same problems viewers had with the live-action “Transformers” movies, all of which, and this maybe even includes “The Last Knight,” are more entertaining than whatever this piece of crap happens to be! The film centers around “Tom & Jerry,” the iconic duo known from your childhood days watching cartoons, but they shove in all these forced human storylines just for the sake of going, “Bippity boppity boo! Here’s a movie! It’s not completely in shambles!” And those are not the only flaws this movie comes with, because remember, this is a live-action adaptation of a cartoon. Remember “The Smurfs?” This is basically the exact same thing, only it does not go into multiverse bulls*it and transport Tom & Jerry to earth! Now to be fair, unlike the Smurfs, who hail from their own fantastical village, Tom & Jerry come from more realistic environments, so you can say that they’ve always been on earth. But given how the older material usually strays away from complete realism, the comparison is close enough. You have these two imbeciles, they have their life of brawling each other, and to be fair, that part of the source material seems faithful enough. But they are not the center of the story, it’s f*cking Kayla! Whenever Tom & Jerry show up, they cause trouble, create shenanigans, and show that they really don’t like each other, which given things going on in the movie, is kind of a problem. However, they are not the main characters. Sure, their actions occasionally link to one’s successes or downfalls, but the direction they decided to take this movie in not only feels boring, but also repetitive. We’ve seen this weird creature/human interaction thing done before, but not always to positive results. Although I will admit, last year’s “Sonic the Hedgehog” is one of the delightfully positive exceptions.

Movies like this show that not everything translates to film. “Tom & Jerry” works as a series of animated shorts, not as a big blockbuster epic. And I will admit one of the positives of this film is that it actually is somewhat faithful to its source material. The duo come off like their hand-drawn counterparts, and unlike the live-action “Smurfs” or “Alvin and the Chipmunks” movies, they are in 2D and not CGIed to another dimension. And while this is faithful, Tom and Jerry do not talk. I bet this is part of why they put all of these human characters in the film as an attempt to relate to its audience. While there may have been good intentions, they proceeded to bad results. I bring up Tom & Jerry not being able to talk because in a lot of these family movies, you have these characters that are expressive and excited or upbeat. At least communication was not a problem in those other movies. Here, the solution makes for something that lessens a problem, but it still creates another one by making me want to rip my ears and throw them into a trash compactor! Just because this movie comes off looking like “Who Framed Roger Rabbit?” does not mean it is the next “Who Framed Roger Rabbit?.”

In the end, this movie feels like a lazy cash grab, and based on the box office, they certainly happen to be grabbing that cash! “Tom & Jerry” opened to over $14 million domestically, which would be a disappointment by pre-coronavirus standards. But with the current pandemic and Warner Bros. simultaneously releasing new films on HBO Max, that is actually not a bad result. I’m glad the studio is making money, I’m glad the theatres are making money. But I felt like I wasted my money watching this. I felt like I was in a giant mousetrap for the entire runtime! This is a ridiculous, lazy, and uninspired film with some of the worst writing and direction I have seen in recent memory. Some of the fight scenes were entertaining though and I will also leave you with this, there are a couple genuinely funny lines in the film, but sadly I do not even remember them. Save your money, go see “Raya” instead, or find something else to watch on HBO Max. I’m going to give “Tom & Jerry” a 3/10.

I said this to myself before going into “Tom & Jerry,” and that thought has not changed since. I’ve been looking forward a big event featuring two classic characters in the ultimate fight for society. And that fight will be settled… IN “GODZILLA VS. KONG!”

“Tom & Jerry?” I’m sorry, what are you talking about? It was a pass from me before watching the movie, and it is still a pass from me after watching the movie. Although I did see the movie with a friend who admittedly enjoyed himself, so good for him.

“Tom & Jerry” is now playing in theaters wherever they are open and is currently available to watch if you are subscribed to HBO Max.

Thanks for reading this review! I just want to let everyone know that my next review is going to be for Disney’s “Raya and the Last Dragon.” I saw the film in IMAX a couple weeks ago, but I have not gotten around to review it, kind of like “Tom & Jerry” due to my commitments with the Jackoff Awards. Also coming soon, I will have my thoughts on “Chaos Walking” starring Tom Holland and Daisy Ridley, so look forward to that!

One more thing, awards season is in full swing, and if you have not done so yet, check out the 3rd Annual Jackoff Awards, where one moron awards a ton of movies! Be sure to follow Scene Before with email or WordPress account, also check out the Facebook page so you can stay tuned for more great content! I want to know, did you see “Tom & Jerry?” What did you think about it? Or, did you watch the “Tom & Jerry” cartoons? What are your thoughts? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!