“Other Mommy” is directed by Rob Savage (Host, The Boogeyman) and stars Jessica Chastain (Interstellar, The Eyes of Tammy Faye), Jay Duplass (Pain Hustlers, Transparent), Arabella Olivia Clark (The Housemaid, Springsteen: Deliver Me from Nowhere), Rosie Anne O’Gorman, Dichen Lachman (Dollhouse, Neighbours), Arian Moayed (Spider-Man: No Way Home, Succession), Sean Kaufman (The Summer I Turned Pretty, Stumble), and Karen Allen (Raiders of the Lost Ark, The Sandlot). This film is based on Josh Malerman’s 2024 horror novel “Incidents Around the House” and follows a young girl named Bela who is trying her best to adjust to a new school and the growing separation between her parents. At the same time, she communicates with a supernatural being that resembles her mother, much to the bewilderment of her family.
Trailers are some of the coolest marketing tools ever created. Well… Unless you are sitting at an AMC and wondering why the movie hasn’t started yet. But one of the trailers I had the pleasure of watching during select film experiences recently is “Other Mommy.” The trailer came out last summer, around the same time that “The Odyssey” came to theaters. Logistically, this makes sense. After all, Universal released “The Odyssey,” and “Other Mommy” is also a Universal film. It is essentially Universal getting everyone thinking about “what’s next” just as they dive into their latest project.
One of the things I remember deeply from the trailer was in addition to several sequences showing her off, there was a giant piece of text reading “JESSICA CHASTAIN.” It was so big it took up the whole frame. I get why. She is a big star. She has top billing. The movie’s marketing shows her off for good reason.
Now that I have seen the movie, I am reminded of my experiences with some of the recent “Godzilla” projects, particularly 2014 and “King of the Monsters.” These are films with excellent marketing campaigns, but their movies absolutely pale in comparison.
“Other Mommy” will go down as one of the biggest disappointments of 2026. Based on how much the trailer excited me, it is a film that I wanted to see as soon as possible. And upon seeing it, part of me wants a Men in Black agent to neuralyze the memory of this film from my existence. For those who pay attention to the cinematic calendar, there is often at least one horror movie that releases at the beginning of the year. Specifically January or February. This feels like a horror film that belongs in one of those months, but because this film had such an excellent marketing campaign, Universal likely decided October, which is primetime for horror with Halloween coming up, was the best month for this movie instead.
If anything, the trailer did not lie, Jessica Chastain deserves to be the top selling point of the film. After all, she plays two different characters, to a degree anyway, and by no means are either of her performances bad. However, I do wish Chastain were given better material. This film feels more like a Jessica Chastain demo reel rather than an actual movie.
When the film features Chastain as Ursula, we see her as this loving, but concerned mother of her daughter Bela, who occasionally communicates with a supernatural entity, who we come to know as the “Other Mommy.” That is where Chastain’s finer material comes in, and part of it is because of her facial expressions and general dialogue delivery, but the special effects work also occasionally adds a nice touch in some sequences.
That said, there is an unappealing vibe to this film. While the film may look polished, its dialogue and characters come off as if they belong in a Lifetime or Syfy original movie. The only reason why they are not on either of these channels is because, well, Jessica Chastain. She may not be as big as Zendaya, but she has proven she can give knockout performances, so putting her name front and center prompts high expectations. Maybe other than Jay Duplass, I did not recognize a good chunk of the film’s cast. But it didn’t matter. The film got my money anyway. Sadists.
To piggyback off of the unappealing vibe, there is a tonal inconsistency to the movie. The fact that it has Jessica Chastain in the lead role leads to, unsurprisingly, a decent performance. But I feel like it would have been slightly better if the film stuck to a serious tone. There are a lot of cheesy moments in this movie, whether they were intended or not. In addition, there were chunks of dialogue that were almost designed as if they were to diss on horror movie cliches, even if this horror film uses some of those cliches to a certain degree.
While “Other Mommy” is by no means the worst story I had the displeasure of sitting through, I was shocked to realize how bored I became as a result of watching the movie. The film starts off fine, but it becomes increasingly dull minute by minute. “Other Mommy” is 93 minutes. For a feature-length film, that is not long. There are so many scenes where the pace is surprisingly slow. Not slow in a way that is digestible, but slow in a way that makes it feel like Other Mommy is tucking me in so I can fall asleep.
Perhaps the most disappointing thing about “Other Mommy” is that the film is not scary. I watched this film in D-Box, and that did not even save it! The only way I can see someone jumping out of their skin as a result of “Other Mommy” is if their fanaticism for jumpscares is as extreme as skydiving. If you like jumpscares, “Other Mommy” might be your cup of tea. I am not the biggest fan of jumpscares, I think they are traditionally cheap, and this movie showcases their tacky nature.
I love a good twist in a movie. Note the use of the word good. This movie has a twist, but good is not the word I would use to describe it. If anything, I found the twist somewhat predictable. Granted, the twist is not broken, but still. The movie drops this ball towards the end that is supposed to sound like this big game-changer but in reality, I could kind of see it coming from a mile away. In fact, you know what would have been a great twist? This movie getting better! But it doesn’t! Forget “Other Mommy,” consider me interested in other MOVIES.
In the end, “Other Mommy” is shockingly boring and lacking in terror. Is “Other Mommy” the worst movie of the year? Not quite. Although I am confounded in what it was the crew was going for. Is this serious? Campy? Both? “Other Mommy” seems to have an identity crisis. Jessica Chastain is a fantastic actress and she commits to each scene. She never seems to phone it in. I am just disappointed she was not able to lend her tremendous talent to something much more watchable. If you like Jessica Chastain, there are better options for your viewing pleasure. “Interstellar,” “Zero Dark Thirty…” Heck! She even has a movie with MOTHER in the title that is better than this! If you have not seen “Mothers’ Instinct,” go check it out. It is a good watch. I am going to give “Other Mommy” a 4/10.
Also, I have heard some people online say that instead of “Other Mommy,” this movie should be called “Other Mother.” But I will defend the title “Other Mommy.” First off, some people might see “Other Mother” and think of the character from “Coraline,” which is much better movie than this one, by the way. Also, this movie is from the perspective of a girl who is still in the single-digit age range. Chances are the word “mommy” is part of her daily vocabulary. Just my two cents. There are some things in this movie that raises my eyebrows. The title is not one of them.
“Other Mommy” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.
Thanks for reading this review! If you would like to see more of my film reviews, then check out my latest episode of “Movie Requests!” This latest episode features special guest Joe Gatto, who you may know from the TV series “Impractical Jokers!” He asked me to review the dark comedy “Gringo!” Click the video above to find out my thoughts! If you enjoyed the video, please subscribe to my YouTube channel and leave a like as well!
I am also happy to announce the next guest on Movie Requests is going to be Adam Conover! You may know Conover as the star of “Adam Ruins Everything,” as well as the host of his podcast “Factually!”. Conover is also a stand-up comedian who is touring across the United States. His new special, “Big Divorce Energy,” is now available on YouTube! You can catch me talking about Conover’s film of choice on Monday, November 2nd. The video will be available, again, on my YouTube channel, as well as this very website, Flicknerd.com. Look forward to it!
My next review is going to be for “The Social Reckoning.” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Sense and Sensibility,” “Whalefall,” “Wildwood,” “Clayface,” and “You Can See Everything.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Other Mommy?” What did you think about? Or, of the movies in which Jessica Chastain stars that contain some variation of a maternal figure in its title, which one do you think is the best? Is it “Other Mommy?” “Mothers’ Instinct?” “Mama?” I still have not seen “Mama,” so I may not have the most valid opinion here. But if you have seen “Mama,” let me know if it is better than this dud. Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
“Forgotten Island” is written and directed by Joel Crawford and Januel P. Mercado, the same team behind “Puss in Boots: The Last Wish.” This film stars H.E.R. (Yes Day, The Color Purple), Liza Soberano (My Ex and Whys, Lisa Frankenstein), Dave Franco (Together, Neighbors), Jenny Slate (Everything Everywhere All at Once, Marcel the Shell with Shoes On), Manny Jacinto (The Acolyte, The Good Place), Dolly de Leon (History of Ha, Verdict), Jo Koy (Easter Sunday, The Tiger’s Apprentice), Ronny Chieng (Crazy Rich Asians, The Daily Show), Kevin McCann (Puss in Boots: The Last Wish, Dog Man) and Lea Salonga (Mulan, Aladdin). This film is about a best friend duo who find themselves stranded on the island of Nakali. With time not on their side, they have to find a way back home, all the while keeping in mind they could lose the very memories they have built up over the years.
I had high expectations for “Forgotten Island” going into it. While DreamWorks has its fair share of hits and misses, the studio can sometimes hit a bullseye with their efforts. One bullseye in particular came in 2022, with “Puss in Boots: The Last Wish.” The film released the same day as 20th Century Studios’ “Avatar: The Way of Water.” While “Avatar” wound up making significantly more money, “Puss in Boots” was the much better movie. I had polar opposite experiences with both films. The bar was high for “Avatar: The Way of Water,” the latest film from directing legend James Cameron. For the record, the film failed that high bar. On the other hand, “Puss in Boots: The Last Wish” made me go, “Are we really doing this?” After that fine-at-best 2011 cash grab?
Yes. Yes we were.
Part of what made “Puss in Boots: The Last Wish” so great was the crystal clear, fast-paced, ludicrous, knockout of a vision from its directing team, Joel Crawford and Januel Mercado. These two were able to get not just good, but masterclass performances out of the film’s stacked voicecast in addition to unleashing some of the most mind-blowing sequences I have watched in an animated film. Not to mention, it was a clever story with all kinds of emotions. Naturally, I was excited for whatever the heck they did next.
Let’s start off with the bad news. “Forgotten Island” is not as good as “Puss in Boots: The Last Wish.” But I have a couple bits of good news. First off, the film is brilliant and you should see it. It does not matter how old you are. I showed “Puss in Boots: The Last Wish” to my mom recently, who does not care for animated films, but she was entertained by it and I am sure even she would be delighted by this latest movie. Second, “Forgotten Island” is more than likely going to get a lot of replay value from me. One of my slight peeves about this movie is that everything moves so fast that it is almost hard to keep up. But that is also what makes the experience of watching this fun. If I were watching this at 7 years old, I would be watching this over and over again for entertainment value, much to the possible annoyance of my parents. But as I potentially give my parents a headache from watching this film incessantly, part of me thinks that I will pick up something new with nearly each viewing. Much like “The Last Wish,” this film is so fast-paced to the point where I may have missed a joke or two. Possibly ten. There is a lot to digest, but it is not like I had to take everything in during the first sitting. The dialogue is snappy, the action is rambunctious, the characters are loud, and the animation is flashy.
The movie gets the most out of its voice cast. Yes, it is in certain ways, star-studded, which can be a question mark for me. Even if I like the stars, I hope that they can deliver something that goes beyond what they would give in a live-action performance. Thankfully, that is the case. Dave Franco as Raww is a standout in this particular regard. He comes off like an upbeat dad trying to motivate their children at any given moment.
I love how much DreamWorks is playing around with different animation styles. I am not going to pretend the variety always leads to perfection, but between “The Bad Guys,” “Puss in Boots: The Last Wish,” “Dog Man,” and now this movie, I admire the range on display. I am glad to say the animation style in “Forgotten Island” is spectacular. The film puts a lot of emphasis on blue and pink. Those are the colors of the best friends’ bracelets, plus there are quite a few blue and pink creatures our heroes run into along the way. Some standouts include Bungi (Jacinto), a baby demon, as well as King Truffle Wuffle (Chieng), whose army may be cute, but will not come off as cuddly should you acknowledge their adorableness to their face.
“Forgotten Island” is a fantastic story about friendship, especially considering how beautifully it showcases the connection between Jo and Raissa. Not all of DreamWorks’ films have aged well for me. I recently rewatched “Madagascar” during a rerelease. Despite how many times I watched it as a kid, I found myself questioning core aspects of the film that never crossed my mind when I was 7 years old. The biggest question on my mind is how the heck Alex and Marty were even friends. I did not feel any chemistry between them. That is not the case with Jo and Raissa. If I watched this movie at 7 years old, chances are I would enjoy watching these two on screen as friends, but the film does a great job at showcasing the two’s complications that have come as a result of being friends. It shows that their relationship, no matter how much they root for each other, is not perfect. They have some occasional patches that they either ignore or work through. There are times where one person is taking their life in a direction that does not match the other, thus affecting their bond. Maybe I would not pick up those complications at the age of 7, but give it a decade or two, I might.
This film serves as a solid reminder of what it means to be sentimental. Getting to live life each and every day is a blessing, and one of the amazing things about being human is being able to recognize that we can do, possess, or witness things that we will cherish for the rest of our lives. “Forgotten Island” is an incredible encapsulation of what it means to be human. After seeing this and “Puss in Boots: The Last Wish,” the directing team behind both movies should be allowed as much creative control as one can possibly give them. Please go watch this movie.
In the end, “Forgotten Island” is gorgeous, funny, and chaotic. This is a fantastic film for families. It is another win for DreamWorks, in addition to two of their best minds. I am not Filipino, but culturally speaking, I can see this film becoming significant for people who are of that descent. Even with my missed connection, I found myself hooked by this movie. It is a rollercoaster ride that throws so much at you that it is almost impossible to take everything in. But that is not a bad thing, because I look forward to potentially taking those things in during future viewings, partially because this first viewing left me massively entertained. I remember my review for another DreamWorks film, “Dog Man,” and I had similar things to say about it in terms of the pace and presentation, but the material presented in that pace did not hit me in the way that “Forgotten Island” did. “Dog Man” is probably not going to have any replay value, but the same cannot be said for “Forgotten Island.” I am going to give “Forgotten Island” an 8/10.
“Forgotten Island” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.
Thanks for reading this review! If you like this review, I have another one coming soon in video form. Be sure to look forward to the upcoming episode of Scene Before’s original series, Movie Requests, featuring comedian Joe Gatto! He will suggest a film for me to watch, and it will be my job to report my thoughts on said movie! The episode will be available to watch Tuesday October 13th! The video will be available to watch here on Flicknerd.com, but if you want to know the fastest way to watch it, subscribe to my YouTube channel and hit the notification bell!
Also, be sure to check out the previous episode of Movie Requests, which features “Ahsoka” star Rosario Dawson! She asked me to review the Ridley Scott movie “Legend.” Watch the video to see what I thought about it!
My next review is going to be for “Primetime.” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “The Weight” and “Digger.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Forgotten Island?” What did you think about it? Or, since we are on the topic, have you seen “Puss in Boots: The Last Wish?” Isn’t it awesome? You know it is. Tell me how awesome you think it is down below. Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
“The Uprising” is directed by Paul Greengrass (News of the World, The Bourne Supremacy) and stars Andrew Garfield (The Amazing Spider-Man, Hacksaw Ridge), Jamie Bell (Fantastic Four, The Adventures of Tintin), Stephen Dillane (Game of Thrones, John Adams), Tom Hollander (Harley Quinn, Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest), Cosmo Jarvis (The Alto Knights, Warfare), Thomasin McKenzie (Last Night in Soho, Fackham Hall), Jonny Lee Miller (Trainspotting, Hackers), Woody Norman (Cobweb, C’mon C’mon), and Katherine Waterson (Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, Fackham Hall). Inspired by the 1381 Peasants’ Revolt, this film is about a group of people who rebel against King Richard II.
To be real, there were not a ton of movies coming out in September that I was beyond excited to see. There were a couple titles that stood out to me, but when it comes to “The Uprising,” I felt like I was taking a chance on it. I knew little to nothing about the film other than listening to people talk about it online. I do not even recall if I watched a trailer for the movie prior to checking it out in theaters. That said, there are some promising things about the film at a glance, including star Andrew Garfield.
Andrew Garfield is a fantastic actor. I had iffy thoughts on his Spider-Man to a degree back in the day, but “No Way Home” gave him a bit of a boost for me. If anything, having seen that movie, I think part of that boost is because he was given much better material to work with than what was handed to him in the Marc Webb movies. But Garfield is more than Spidey. For example, he’s received Oscar nominations for “Hacksaw Ridge” and “Tick…Tick…BOOM!.” With each role, Garfield continues to prove he has chops and charisma. The same can be said for “The Uprising.” While Garfield himself is fairly recognizable in the role of a Ploughman, it does not change the fact that he does well as the story’s center. Is his performance the best of the year? No. But it is perhaps precisely what this movie needed due to Garfield’s range. Sometimes he is commanding. Other times he is a bit soft. It depends on the context of the scene, but Garfield plays his part well no matter what the role requires. Garfield is not the only actor who stands out. Others include Woody Norman as King Richard II, Jamie Bell as John Ball, and Thomasin McKenzie, the latter of whom has a particularly compelling backstory.
As for the film itself, it is quite good. The story is never boring and there is a healthy mix of engaging dialogue and thrilling action sequences to balance out the pace. Some might say the film is slow, which frankly, I kind of get, but do not wholly agree with. I prefer to call the film steady. It’s by no means a slog, but not a sprint either. It aims for the middle and does not miss.
Despite being set in the 14th century, “The Uprising” is a fitting movie for today’s times. For the record, I live in the United States, and it is not like this is a problem that is exclusive to this part of the world, but in recent years, it has become noticeable that prices for just about everything have been going up. That’s not an unusual concept, but the rate at which it has been happening has been exorbitant. So, it feels like perfect timing to have a movie come out where its heroes are trying to confront the reality that on top of already struggling as they are, they now have to put up with more taxes.
“The Uprising” is directed by Paul Greengrass. I have not seen all of his movies, but I tend to like the ones that I did see. Although this movie has a bit in common with his 2020 outing, “News of the World.” In addition to both films being somewhat action-centric, they also deal with topics relevant to their time of release, even if the films themselves are set long before said period. “News of the World,” which is about a man who goes around reading newspapers to audiences, came out a few years after the term “fake news” popularized with certain people. This film features political controversy and complaints over taxes. Those two topics are arguably evergreen, but as someone living in the United States, it is not hard to notice them making the rounds today.
Much like Greengrass’s other projects, there is quite a bit of shaky cam in this film. If that is not your thing, you may be turned off by this film’s production elements. Frankly, sometimes it works, and other times it feels quite clunky. There are one or two battle sequences that I thought the shaky cam ended up blending perfectly with the chaos. That said, there are moments where I felt the handheld videography came off as a bit overdone. One could argue that this speaks more to my personal preferences as a viewer than anything else. Heck, to this day I have not watched a ton of “The Office” and yes, one of the reasons why is because I don’t find it funny. Sorry not sorry. But another, perhaps dumber reason is because all the camerawork is handheld and it throws me off. The handheld camerawork in “The Uprising” is by no means the worst thing I have ever seen, I can make out what is going on in just about every scene, but there are a lot of moments where it feels a bit unnatural. To be fair though, this is a dramatic narrative, and in some ways, the handheld nature of the film does contribute to said drama.
No spoilers for those who have not seen the movie, but I dug the ending. If anything, this film almost crosses a line to the point where it becomes something else entirely during this specific moment. In actuality, the ending is fitting given what the story is, but its delivery is perhaps intentionally linked to another famous character. The ending is well done and has some solid action to back it up. Look forward to it. Sadly, the film’s marketing does spoil this moment, so chances are some of you reading this already have an idea as to the connection I am talking about. But if you did miss the trailers somehow, the ending is a fitting, yet almost out of left field treat.
In the end, “The Uprising” is a good flick. Is it the most exciting film of 2026? Not even close. It is not even the most exciting movie to come out this month… More on that in the next review. But the film is nevertheless engaging in more ways than one. It features a solid lead performance by Andrew Garfield and is incredibly relevant for today’s audience despite being set in the late 14th century. This is not a film that is going to have massive replay value, at least from me. Maybe if I am scrolling channels and I come across it, I will put it on. But it is nevertheless beautifully made and executed. I am going to give “The Uprising” a 7/10.
“The Uprising” is now playing in select theatres and is available to rent or buy on VOD.
Thanks for reading this review! If you want to keep the party going, check out my latest episode of the Scene Before original series Movie Requests! In this episode, Rosario Dawson requests that I should talk about “Legend,” the fantasy film from 1985. To find out what I thought about it, click the video above!
Also, look forward to my next episode of Movie Requests, which will feature comedian Joe Gatto! You may know him from “Impractical Jokers” and “The Misery Index!” The official upload date is unclear at this time, but if you want to stay updated on that episode and others, please subscribe to my YouTube channel! And if you enjoy the last episode, please give it a like! It really helps out!
My next review is going to be for “Forgotten Island!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Primetime,” “The Weight,” and “Digger.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “The Uprising?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite Paul Greengrass movie? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
“The Odyssey” is directed by Christopher Nolan (The Dark Knight, Oppenheimer) and stars Matt Damon (Saving Private Ryan, The Martian), Tom Holland (Spider-Man: Homecoming, Cherry), Zendaya (Spider-Man: Homecoming, Challengers), Anne Hathaway (Interstellar, The Intern), Robert Pattinson (The Batman, Tenet), Lupita Nyong’o (Star Wars: The Force Awakens, The Wild Robot), Samantha Morton (The Walking Dead, Elizabeth: The Golden Age) and Charlize Theron (A Million Ways to Die in the West, Atomic Blonde). This film is based on Homer’s epic poem of the same name and follows Odysseus as he makes a dangerous journey back home to Ithaca to reunite with his wife, Penelope (Hathaway).
Well… It is finally here. The movie that may as well be my most anticipated of the year, perhaps even of the decade.
“The Odyssey” is more than a movie. It is a story that follows an epic that has been around for several thousand years. Despite being an old story, there is a sense of innovation being brought to the table with this film. During my time in high school, “The Odyssey,” or at least adaptations of it, happened to be assigned to me as required reading in English class. I enjoyed getting to know about the story of Odysseus. It was a grand adventure tale that sparked the imagination. While I cannot say that it prompted a fascination with Greek myth in the way it may have with other readers, I found the material to make for a good read.
I even thought “The Odyssey” could make for a decent flick. Granted, the story is old, so there are, unsurprisingly, screen adaptations of it already. But I thought perhaps, unfairly, this would be a decent film from the likes of Peter Jackson, who is a master of sword and sandal cinema. Little did I know that my all time favorite director would one day be stepping in to handle this highly celebrated story.
Christopher Nolan is responsible for some of my favorite films ever, including 2014’s “Interstellar,” which came up in a conversation recently with family. My uncle asked me if I thought this new movie could surpass “Interstellar” in terms of quality. My response at the time, “It’s possible…” Having now seen “The Odyssey,” this did not surpass the quality “Interstellar,” but it finds a way to nearly match that cinematic masterpiece’s high bar. “The Odyssey” is gargantuan in every way. In fact, that is one of the reasons why I found “Interstellar” to have such tremendous replay value. It is a movie that feels larger than life. “The Odyssey” goes by the same philosophy. It is a story that emits endless verisimilitude.
Every frame of this movie, despite being part of a mythical epic, felt real. I believed in the film’s world. Its environment. Its characters. Its sets. If you are looking for peak immersion, this is the movie for you, regardless of what format in which you see it. I kid you not when I say every shot looks beautiful. Just about everything on screen was done for real, in camera. Nolan is a master of practicality. I genuinely could not believe what I was looking at during certain moments. Everything from the various interiors that fill your vision to a Cyclops that made my jaw drop to a crucial night scene in the water that showcases the wrath of a storm.
Given how much I love this movie, and believe me, I love this movie, I think it is arguably fair that I get into my flaws early on in the review. The biggest flaw I have in this film is the lighting. I have seen this movie three times, and the lighting is by no means atrocious overall, but there is a scene or two where I think it could have been pinched up a little. During my first viewing, I do not know if it is more of a fault of the projector than anything else, but it was somewhat hard to pick up all the details in several frames during the Cyclops scene. It is a dark cave, and as immersed as I was in the movie, one could debate that I was too immersed. I think the frames could have been brighter to better highlight essential information. Some of the dialogue is borderline cheesy and out of place, but we are talking bits and pieces. For the most part, I do not have a problem with the writing, but the problems I do have may as well be addressed.
And yes, I made sure as a die-hard IMAX fanatic, that my first viewing of this movie would be in 15/70mm film. I bought my ticket a year ago, as soon as they went on sale, dedicating myself so heavily to this film and its technical glory by buying a ticket in a completely different part of the country from where I live. For the record, I live in Massachusetts. New England forever! I bought a ticket to see this film in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. I am the last person who wants to spend time in Florida in July. I remember walking around Disney World in June when I was 18 years old… I am shocked I did not melt in the middle of Tomorrowland. My trip to see this movie, or my odyssey rather, was worth it despite my apprehensions, and eventually finding out that a theater in Providence, Rhode Island would also be getting the movie in the premium format. Not only is this a great movie, but it is one that I urge everyone reading this to watch in a theater at least once.
When I look back at Nolan’s last movie, “Oppenheimer,” I was amazed by the use of IMAX film in that project. It was most certainly worth the extra money for the IMAX experience. But I will not deny that of all the projects in which Nolan used IMAX to shoot it, “Oppenheimer” might have been the one of the bunch that was not as essential to view on an IMAX screen. This is not a diss. If “Oppenheimer” is playing in an IMAX near you, go check it out. You’d be doing yourself a favor. The trinity test and the black and white scenes are cool to see on a giant screen. That said, I think if you were to view “Oppenheimer” on a traditional cinema screen, you will not miss a whole ton, even if the aspect ratio suggests otherwise. On the other hand, “The Odyssey,” while excellent on any screen, becomes an event when bringing the IMAX experience into play. I have been to many IMAX experiences. This has to easily be a top 5 IMAX experience of all time. “The Odyssey” in IMAX is better than sex. “The Odyssey” in IMAX is better than winning the lottery. Once that IMAX logo flashes on the screen, get ready for 172 minutes of some of the most amazing cinema of your life. Not just because every frame fills the screen, showcasing some of the best imagery of any movie I have seen this decade courtesy of Hoyte van Hoytema’s brilliant camerawork, but because the movie is just that good.
Also, this review is being published after three viewings of the film, the last of which included a four-minute preview of “Dune: Part Three,” which is exclusive to IMAX 70mm screenings. My friends, YOU ARE NOT READY. Anyway, I digress. I just figured I should add that in as a bonus incentive.
The story may be simple and not every character has significant depth, but the movie does a great job at handling Odysseus (Matt Damon) as the center of the story. Damon’s struggle here is that he just wants to get home. He finished fighting in the Trojan War, he is surrounded by his men, and together, they work to overcome the various obstacles that stand in their path. Everything from a Cyclops to Laestrygonians to Sirens. The movie does a great job in its less action-packed moments, of which there are plenty, of showcasing Odysseus’ personal connections to his beliefs, his love, and his family.
Speaking of which, Anne Hathaway plays Penelope in what is her third Christopher Nolan movie. This is her best performance of the three. Hathaway constantly has to deal with the struggle that her husband is gone, and the dilemma as to whether he is gone gone. Meanwhile, tons of suitors are vying for her hand in marriage, thus making them king of Ithaca.
As this is going on, we see Tom Holland as Telemachus watching all of this from the sidelines, believing that “his dad is coming home.” Yes, weird line. There is one of those questionable dialogue choices. But even with some odd dialogue here and there, Tom Holland handles every line given to him with brilliance. This is one of the best performances of his career so far. Holland’s essential presence towards the end of the film is a highlight. That said, if I have one thing to say, of all the actors in the cast, Holland is perhaps the least disguisable. There are a lot of recognizable stars in this ensemble, and if I had to pick a weak link of the performances, Holland may be it. That is not to say he is doing a bad job with his role. But his transformation is not as noticeable as others in the cast. Even with what I just said in mind, if the Academy were to nominate him for his efforts, I would understand it. He is tremendous.
I am not kidding when I say this movie is full of recognizable stars. This feels like the “Super Smash Bros. Ultimate” of movie casts. Everyone is here. Zendaya. Charize Theron. Jon Bernthal. Robert Pattinson. John Leguizamo. Elliot Page. Lupita Nyong’o. Even Travis Scott. Much like one of Nolan’s previous projects, “Tenet,” Scott made an original song for this film.
Sadly, there is no Michael Caine. I cannot blame him though. He says he is getting old, and I respect his choice to stay out of this project.
Although if I had to name a favorite secondary character in this film, it is not Telemachus. It is not Athena. It is not Menelaus. It is the score.
It is so great to acknowledge the extraordinary talents of Ludwig Göransson, especially after watching “The Mandalorian and Grogu,” which I not only found to be his worst work yet, but the first time I recall watching a “Star Wars” project and being turned off by the music. This is Göransson’s third project with Christopher Nolan, and like a certain song suggests, three is indeed the magic number. I thought Göransson’s earliest collaboration with Nolan through “Tenet” was already a contender for the best score of the decade. This might beat that. The score almost serves as a hint of irony, especially when considering how this movie was entirely shot on a format as huge as IMAX. Compared to some of Nolan’s other works, the music is not that complicated. There is no huge, sweeping orchestra. Though much like “Tenet,” there is a lot of percussion. There are several scenes in which the tunes stand out, including one that dives into some background about the Trojan Horse. There is a particular beat that repeats, but every other second that beat increases speed. It is almost like a track you would put in a trailer for a horror movie. Another piece I love is a particular tune that sounds off every time Odysseus readies his bow. It is almost like his superhero theme. When you hear a specific set of four notes towards the final 10 minutes of the movie, they mean business.
I do not approve of filming in movie theaters while the film is playing. No, seriously. Stop it. This has gotten out of control. But I did see a video online where the four note leitmotif plays in the final 10 minutes and the audience just starts losing their minds like they are at a concert. Having seen this exact moment, I get why.
While there is still debate as to whether “The Odyssey” is the year’s best film so far, I am more than certain I witnessed my favorite climax so far this year. Having been exposed to “The Odyssey” in high school, I was familiar with some of what was about to go down, but even with beforehand knowledge, the final 20, 30 minutes of the film were unbelievably satisfying and come after an entire movie whose buildup is immaculate. There is a scene towards the end where Odysseus narrates about something that happened during the war, and just when I thought his words were powerful enough, the visuals were just as emotionally charged. The final ten minutes deliver a well put together action scene that had me glued to the screen. “The Odyssey” is a several thousand-year-old text, so I have no idea if how much I would be spoiling here, but holy heck… Parts of this ending may leave you with all kinds of chills.
And of course, those chills are best experienced in IMAX… For more reasons than one.
IMAX screenings for this movie, whether they are in 70mm, dual-laser, XT laser, or even 2K digital, are selling like there’s no tomorrow. I have an IMAX 10 minutes from home. And it is not part of a multiplex. It is a proper, 8 story IMAX. Trying to get a ticket there is harder than solving a Rubik’s Cube! But if you can see this film in IMAX at least once, consider yourself blessed. For one thing, this is the first Hollywood feature shot entirely on IMAX film. There have been movies shot entirely on IMAX cameras, like “Avengers: Infinity War” and “Avengers: Endgame,” but those were shot digitally, and in lower resolutions. As for IMAX film in Hollywood cinema, Christopher Nolan has always been at the forefront when it comes to utilizing the technology ever since his first go with it in “The Dark Knight.” The results are always a feast for the eyes and allow the movie to reach full immersion. But never did I think we would see an IMAX movie entirely shot with the company’s film cameras. Leave it to Sir Nolan to prove me wrong, and put a gigantic grin on my face. This is something I have been dying to see for a good chunk of my life, if I could not make it happen myself. I have been obsessed with the IMAX film format since my early teens. I am happy to know Nolan has done everything in his power to keep it going.
One surprise I discovered in this film is that I was just about able to make out each line of dialogue given by the characters. As much as I enjoyed “Tenet,” I thought the sound mixing in that film was sometimes a failure. There is one scene in that movie that takes place on the water where subtitles are essentially required to understand everything that is being said. Not here. Nolan seems to understand this problem. On top of making new IMAX cameras, one thing that was made specifically for this production was a blimp that would cover the IMAX camera while it was in use. This was to solve issues related to background noise, including how much noise the camera itself makes. Yet the same time, having such a big blimp creates its own problems. On top of making the cameras themselves heavier to lug around during certain scenes, it can make it harder for the actors to see each other. So, a mirror system was built that way the actors could maintain eye contact. Despite the source material being old, “The Odyssey” feels like a generational product that is not only fun to watch, but brings new tricks to the table when it comes to filmmaking.
It is hard to tell if “The Odyssey” is going to be a one time thing, or if we are going to see more movies shot on IMAX film from start to finish. In fact, where does Nolan go from here? Nolan is at the center of implementing IMAX into Hollywood cinema, but in a way, this feels like the ultimate goal. It is his equivalent to climbing Mount Everest. He has not shot anything on IMAX 3D cameras. I do not think he is a fan of 3D, but that has to be the next step, right?
Do not get me wrong, any theatre is worth the price of admission for “The Odyssey.” IMAX… LIEMAX… NO-MAX… But I stand here saying that I do not think there is a single film in history that has been worth the price of admission for IMAX more than “The Odyssey.” This film is big, loud, clear, and most importantly, an excellent time regardless of the technical aspects.
In the end, “The Odyssey” is my favorite Christopher Nolan movie since “Interstellar.” There are movies, there are epics, and then there is Christopher Nolan’s latest masterpiece. Going back to “Interstellar,” which I have seen 5 times in theaters ranging from 2014 to 2025, “The Odyssey” is likely going to get at least three viewings from yours truly during its initial theatrical run. For awhile I was thinking that “Project Hail Mary” had a straight shot at being my favorite film of the year. I am not saying I like “The Odyssey” more, but if there was a runner-up right now for my top movies list of 2026, this is it. “The Odyssey” is the cinematic form at its absolute peak. This movie has already made more than a billion dollars at the box office, it is a hit with critics and audiences, and I can see why. The entire cast is on their A-game. The score is stupendous. The techniques that went into the making of this film look incredible in the finished product, and those are just the ones that you can see for yourself. I do have some slight nitpicks with the lighting, but they do not take much away from what is an excellent time at the movies. I am ecstatic to know that premium and IMAX screens are selling out for this film, even about a month after its release. If there is one movie you should see on the big screen this year, it is “The Odyssey.” I was talking to cousins recently and they said they might wait for streaming to watch “The Odyssey” as it is not their type of movie. I get that completely, but I think if you wait for streaming to watch “The Odyssey,” you are going to be doing yourself a massive disservice. If everything I just said has not yet convinced you to buy a ticket for “The Odyssey,” then maybe my score will, because I am going to give the film a 9/10.
As far as I am concerned, this film’s legacy is not going to fizzle anytime soon. I studied “The Odyssey” in high school, and if that continues to be a part of students’ required material, I am going to be so jealous. Nolan’s film is rated R, so we shall see if students, particularly those in certain years of high school or below, will be able to watch it in class, but if they are given permission, they are going to be introduced to one of the finest masterpieces of cinema ever created with a crowd of their peers. Frankly, if I were in an English class, and I got to watch “The Odyssey” as a required assignment, I would probably kiss my teacher on the mouth. Please go see this movie. You will thank me later.
“The Odyssey” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now.
Thanks for reading this review! If you have not done so already, check out my latest episode of Movie Requests featuring Elijah Wood, Frodo from “Lord of the Rings” himself! In the video, he requested I should watch “Festen,” or “The Celebration” as it is known in English. To find out what I thought of the movie, click the video above! If you enjoy the video, please leave a like and subscribe to my YouTube channel!
Also, I will let everyone know that my next guest in the series is going to be Amy Sedaris! You may know Sedaris from films like “Elf,” “Is This Thing On,” “Jennifer’s Body,” and “Puss in Boots.” You can also find her on television shows like “Strangers with Candy,” “The Mandalorian,” “At Home with Amy Sedaris,” and “Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt.” She has quite the prolific resume! Work has already started on her episode, I will have more details soon, but look forward to it. It is gonna be a good one.
My next review is going to be for “Her Private Hell!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Haunted Heist,” “Spider-Man: Brand New Day,” “I Want Your Sex,” “The Invite,” and “Cookie Queens.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “The Odyssey?” What did you think about it? Or, what is the greatest movie theater experience you ever had? And I am not just talking about the quality of the movie… What is a cinema experience that checked every box for you? The film looked great, sounded fantastic, and truly felt like a once in a lifetime event? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
“Obsession” is directed by Curry Barker (Milk & Serial, The Chair) and stars Michael Johnston (Teen Wolf, Slash), Inde Navarette (Superman & Lois, 13 Reasons Why), Cooper Tomlinson (Roommates, Milk & Serial), Megan Lawless (The Hate U Give, The Girl from Plainville), and Andy Richter (Conan, Madagascar). This film is about Baron “Bear” Bailey, who has a crush on his friend and co-worker Nikki. When he uses a One-Wish Willow to get his crush to love him, Bear soon realizes that Nikki becomes a bit a more clingy than he anticipated.
So, I finally saw it. This is the movie that I said I would watch week after week after week after week. Even when it dropped on VOD, I said to myself, no, I am going to check this out in a theatre. I essentially have a self-imposed rule that I will only review movies as long as I see them in theaters. Therefore, “Obsession” is getting my two cents.“Obsession” is one of several films recently that has caught my eye, not just because of the content, but because of who was making it. This film is the product of Curry Barker, who prior to this film, was known for his YouTube background. Barker is just the latest YouTuber to take their talents and translate them to feature filmmaking for the cinema. I am glad to see more of these people getting their foot in the door, especially if they make a good movie. In the case of “Obsession,” I would say this is a good movie.
Is “Obsession” groundbreaking? No. It is very simple in terms of its concept and structure. But it does not mean it lacks cleverness. The concept of the film is that Bear wishes that his crush, Nikki, would love him more than anything in the world. The good news for him is that the wish comes true! The bad news is the wish comes with various consequences. And this should not come as a huge surprise based on the exact wording Bear uses to declare his wish. He wishes that Nikki would love him more than anything in the world, and boy does she. There is love, and then there’s whatever kind of attachment Nikki has for Bear. It is a kind of love that is so deep that you would think she would never leave Bear’s side. It results in some eerie scenes and concepts that kind of makes me glad I am still single at the age of 26. I will not spoil what happens in this movie, and while I recommend it to a lot of audiences, I may steer clear of recommending it to cat people given one or two of the horrific concepts that this movie handles.
Despite being single, I have had a crush or two throughout my life. As a single man who wonders where things could have gone with those crushes had I made the right move at the right time, I adored this movie. And I think many other people are going to find something to appreciate about it too. Relationships are hard, I will not deny that. But arguably just as hard, at least in today’s world, is initiating a relationship. We see this play out between Bear and Nikki, who are good friends at the start of the film. As the story progresses, Bear increasingly gives Nikki the idea that he has feelings for her. When Bear fails to confess those feelings, he uses a Wish Willow to make Nikki fall in love with him. If only it were that easy. Not all relationships are created equal, but one of my biggest fears is if I had a good friend, and I wanted to be more than friends with said person. Asking for that to become a reality is daunting, considering what we have is supposedly great.
As highlighted earlier, “Obsession” is good, but not groundbreaking. Part of that is highlighted by some of the choices in the screenplay. The first two acts of the film to me are clear highlights. I found them relatable, sometimes fun, and they kept me hooked. As soon as this movie dived into act three, I found just about everything that happened next to be quite predictable. I do not mind predictable movies, but there was a level of predictability in this one that sort of lessened the experience. There is also a moment where two people are talking on the phone, only for one person to say to meet them at “x location,” suggesting “it’s important.” If you are familiar with this frankly, beyond insufferable cliche, I think you can probably imagine what happens next.
The screenplay is not entirely flawed. Not even close. The dialogue, even from some extremely minor characters like Carter Harper (Andy Richter) is brilliantly executed. The film’s standout star, Inde Navarette, is given a goldmine of material to work with as Nikki. She nails each scene. I did not know her name before this movie, but I am ecstatic to know it now, because I think her killer performance is likely an indicator of how bright her career is going to be.
I also like how this film handles the character of Bear (Michael Johnston). Because the moments leading up to that big wish of his, I was rooting for him, and I did not envy being out of his shoes. This is a character that in very little time, I found myself attached to based on his one fantasy. Some say there are plenty of fish in the sea, but he seemed so dedicated to his future with his crush that I could not help but admire his efforts to make that happen. If anything, Bear’s journey felt like it could have belonged in an excellent short film. But to my pleasant surprise, the film expands its simple concept and fleshes out its main character nicely. Though it should be noted that “Obsession” just so happens to be inspired by Curry Barker’s own short. Regardless of the length, this project made me a Curry Barker fan. I am curious to see what he does next, whether it is another small budget horror movie, or a super-sized epic. Even though this movie is yet another spin on “The Monkey’s Paw” or any other “be careful what you wish for” tale, I think Barker did a good job at bringing it to life and I would like to see him continue making quality cinema.
In the end, “Obsession” is a solid horror flick, even if it is fairly familiar. In fact, Curry Barker himself says he based this movie partially on an episode of “The Simpsons.” Even so, I thought this was a lot of fun. It showcases some pure chemistry between Bear and Nikki, from the moments where the two are simply friends to the point where they become something else entirely. The entire cast does a good job, but Inde Navarette in particular is given quite a bit to do and she kills her role. This is a role with awards potential written all over it. The third act of the film is the weakest point, but it does not mean it is necessarily awful. It is just the most inferior part of what is ultimately an enjoyable flick. If you are into horror, this is worth checking out at least once. I am going to give “Obsession” a 7/10.
“Obsession” is now available to watch in theaters, on VOD, and on Peacock for all subscribers.
Thanks for reading this review! As a reminder, THIS SUNDAY, AUGUST 2ND, I will be sharing my latest episode of Movie Requests, featuring special guest Elijah Wood! If you want to see the promo for the episode featuring my interaction with him, click the video above! I had a chance to meet Wood in Philadelphia earlier this year. On Movie Requests, one does not simply walk in and do a film review, they must go find the one guest to rule them all! If you want to see this episode as soon as it drops, please subscribe to my YouTube channel! It will also be available here on Flicknerd.com in a dedicated post.
My next review is going to be for “Maddie’s Secret!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass,” “The Odyssey,” “Her Private Hell,” “Haunted Heist,” and “Spider-Man: Brand New Day.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Obsession?” What did you think about it? Or, given the recent stream of online content creators transitioning to feature filmmaking, what is a movie you enjoyed recently made by someone famous for creating online content? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
“Disclosure Day” is directed by Steven Spielberg (Close Encounters of the Third King, The Fabelmans) and stars Emily Blunt (Edge of Tomorrow, The Fall Guy), Josh O’Connor (Challengers, Emma.), Colin Firth (Love, Actually, Kingsman: The Secret Service), Eve Hewson (Bad Sisters, The Knick), and Colman Domingo (Sing Sing, Wicked: For Good). This film is about a meterologist and a cybersecurity expert who find themselves in the center of a movement to unveil government secrets about alien life.
Sort of in the way that there are no two words in sports that seem to match the excitement of “Game 7,” there are no two words in cinema that seem to match the excitement of Steven Spielberg. Or… At least that seems to have been the case until recently. Prior to “Disclosure Day,” Spielberg’s two directorial outings post-COVID were “West Side Story” and “The Fabelmans.” Both films are astounding in their own way, but neither was a financial success. Sure, both came out at a time where moviegoers were staying home more and perhaps more selective with what they chose to see. But if the sales for Christopher Nolan’s “The Odyssey” say anything, we still live in a world where a director’s name can be a huge selling point for a film. Spielberg is one of the best in the industry, so of course I bought a ticket for “Disclosure Day” as soon as I could.
When I see a ton of actors I recognize in one movie, it often gets me excited to see how they play off each other. I always get the impression that these people know what they are doing and do it well. At the same time, it is a little distracting, because having seen this cast’s faces, I already have an idea of what to expect from them. Thankfully, everyone in this film is brilliant. From Josh O’Conner, who does a great job allowing the audience to feel the wonder of the story. To Colman Domingo, whose character’s direct mannerisms do a fantastic job balancing the film’s overall tone. To Emily Blunt, who… What can I say? Emily Blunt has never been better. And there is a chance she will never be better than she is in this film.
We are only halfway through 2026, but I hereby declare that the race for Best Actress is already over. If we get a performance that somehow surpasses the incredible talents and range on display from Emily Blunt, then this is likely going to be one of the greatest years for cinema ever. Blunt is tasked with so much throughout the film, some of which I downright refuse to spoil. I remember watching the trailer, and seeing that moment where she was speaking gibberish during a weather forecast. It is super engaging in the full context of the film. I was also shocked at how well the gibberish came across. When I heard it in the marketing, part of me thought, “Well, that’s probably gonna end up sounding like nails on a chalkboard.” I was delighted to be colossally wrong.
Speaking of surprises, John Williams has still got it. I really shouldn’t be surprised. It’s John Williams. He’s done some of the best film scores. But there was a magic to this one in particular. The dude is 94, which in my mind meant a couple things. Between his previous experience and his old age, he’s already done so much great work to the point where it makes me wonder if he’s possible to deliver something as memorable as he did back in the day. I was wondering if he was just going to phone it in. But at the same time, with age comes knowledge. And knowledge is power. Trust me when I say this score is mighty powerful.
Prior to seeing “Disclosure Day,” I heard from some people who had already seen it comparing it to Christopher Nolan’s “Tenet.” For the record, I have liked every film Christopher Nolan has helmed. “Tenet” included. It is not his easiest film to understand, even after several viewings, but it is an experience unto its own. There are few movies that gave me something akin to it. I can see why the two films share some similarities. Both feature clever sci-fi concepts, contain brilliant musical scores, and run at a rather quick pace. In fact, one thing I thought both movies did very well is that they set the tone and got straight to the action from the first minute. The movies may be long, but they do not waste time. Much like “Tenet,” I would also like to watch “Disclosure Day” a second, perhaps a third time. And unlike “Tenet,” one of those reasons is not because the sound mixing was sometimes terrible. The sound in this movie is actually quite great. In fact, technically, this film is one of the best overall cinematic experiences of the year. The color palette had this old school pop to it. The editing was impeccable. There is not one shot in the movie that I thought looked questionable.
Although like “Tenet,” “Disclosure Day” can sometimes feel clunky. “Tenet” is clunky in its complicated, confusing approach to its story and progression. “Disclosure Day” on the other hand feels a little more straightforward and easier to digest. Yet as the film enters its climax, it does sometimes feel riddled with conveniences. The climax is exciting and it did have me, at times, on the edge of my seat, but nevertheless. Am I rooting for the protagonists? Sure. Yet at the same time, there seems to be a lot of dumb luck that throws things off for me. Much like Edgar Wright’s “The Running Man,” the climax of “Disclosure Day” is most definitely the weak point. This film’s climax is much better. Despite its flaws and recently mentioned conveniences, it is undoubtedly entertaining and fits the flow and spirit of the story.
If I had to rank the Steven Spielberg-directed UFO films, I think I would put “Close Encounters” on the bottom. It is a good movie, but I like certain parts of it more than others. At the top, is “E.T.,” which has solid characters and an emotionally powerful ending. “Disclosure Day” is somewhere in between. It is good, but not fantastic. That said, I am curious to know if the ranking could change after multiple viewings. That said, figuring out my next viewing for this film is going to be tough. I have so many movies to watch, and so little time.
In the end, “Disclosure Day” is a thrilling, albeit confusing ride. Even with its flaws, I do think this movie is worth watching at least once. And depending on how that initial viewing goes, maybe it is worth watching again. Not necessarily because it could end up being your favorite movie on the first go. I say this because this comes off as a movie that I imagine getting better as I digest it and unpack it. Maybe the same could be true for you. Although if there is any reason to watch this movie at all, it is Emily Blunt, who gives a career-defining performance as Margaret Fairchild. Trust me, look forward to seeing some of the best acting of your life. I am going to give “Disclosure Day” a 7/10.
“Disclosure Day” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now!
Thanks for reading this review! In case you missed it, be sure to check out my latest episode of Movie Requests, featuring Sandi Harding, the owner of the last Blockbuster Video that is still open! She requested I should watch “The Goonies!” What did I think of it? Watch the video and find out! Be sure to like the video and subscribe to my YouTube channel if you want to see new episodes of Movie Requests as soon as possible!
My next review is going to be for “Toy Story 5!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Supergirl,” “Jackass: Best and Last,” “Obsession,” “Maddie’s Secret,” “Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass,” and “The Odyssey!” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Disclosure Day?” What did you think about? Or, what is your favorite Steven Spielberg UFO film? Or even, your favorite film of his in general? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
“I Love Boosters” is written and directed by Boots Riley (Sorry to Bother You, I’m a Virgo) and stars Keke Palmer (Nope, Password), Naomi Ackie (The End of the F***ing World, Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker), Taylour Paige (Zola, Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom), Poppy Liu (The Afterparty, Sunnyside), Eiza González (Ambulance, Baby Driver), LaKeith Stanfield (Sorry to Bother You, Get Out), Will Poulter (Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3, The Maze Runner), Don Cheadle (Space Jam: A New Legacy, Iron Man 2) and Demi Moore (The Substance, Ghost). This film is about a group of shoplifters who go after a fashion maven and try to sell their clothes at a lower price.
“I Love Boosters” is not my first exposure to Boots Riley’s filmography. While I missed it in the theater, I ended up checking out his film “Sorry to Bother You” after buying it on Blu-ray. I was fairly impressed with it. I thought it had good performances, clever writing, and an excellent use of color and production design. While “I Love Boosters” was not the biggest release over Memorial Day weekend, I will not deny that I was constantly exposed to its marketing, particularly one of its posters. Other than that, I went in with no memory of watching any trailers or hearing the film’s general premise. I heard interesting things about the movie, and I was onboard. I am delighted to say that this film is a unique cinematic experience that I will think about for a long time.
This is not my favorite film of 2026, but there is truly no picture that I have seen this year that provides an experience like this one. “I Love Boosters” is one of those movies that could have easily clashed its tones to such an unbelievable degree. But this picture is smarter than that. It finds a way to present likable heroes of their own story, a compelling antagonist in Christie Smith (Moore) whose mere existence brings forth diabolical charisma, all the while showcasing some of the most rad production elements I recall seeing in a film recently.
Perhaps my favorite thing about “I Love Boosters” is that it is so vivid and colorful. Then again, given one of this film’s initial opponents at the box office, there could be some recency bias to take into account with this sentiment. This film came out the same weekend as “Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu,” and not only do I think this is the better movie, but to my surprise, “The Mandalorian and Grogu” comes off as an occasional eyesore between its questionable color palette choices, dull presentation, and lack of flair. Within the first five minutes of “I Love Boosters,” I thought I was on drugs. This film’s emphasis on color is some of the finest I have ever seen. It has a look that belongs on a children’s TV program but perfectly blends itself into a mature story. Everything from the many eye-popping outfits that the characters don on screen… To the multitude of interiors that sometimes answer the question, “What if an M&M were a floor or a wall?”… Even seeing the different colors on the characters’ hair make me think that in another universe that this movie would be selling action figures like hotcakes.
Speaking of things that you have to see to believe, this film’s editing is jaw-dropping. This film moves fast, and boy am I not even close to becoming furious. If anything, the editing makes for a blessing and a curse. It keeps the movie from being boring, but the film is also so quick that it makes me wonder if I missed something important. Ah well, I plan to watch this a second time regardless.
Another favorite thing about this film is something I cannot see… The music. The Tune-Yards composed an original score for this film, and boy does it score. They previously scored another Boots Riley title, “Sorry to Bother You,” so it is clear he likes their approach, and I can see why, because much like some of John Williams’ memorable tracks, the score is almost its own character. The year is still young, but I could see this being my favorite score of 2026 by the end of it. I listened to this film’s theme several times since my screening. When I look at the screen and I see characters played by Keke Palmer, Naomi Ackie, and Taylour Paige, lingering in the background is a supporting role that can best be described as a sick beat.
While not exactly as good, I find “I Love Boosters” to be this year’s “Everything Everywhere All at Once.” It is a film that runs at one of the most breakneck paces imaginable. It is all killer, no filler. There is a perfect blend of comedy and drama. In fact, speaking of that, it is tough to really put this film in a box and give it a specific genre. It is not that the film does not know what it wants to be. It is that it wants to be something so unique, so fresh, something that even as a jaded moviegoer, I cannot recall ever seeing in my life. At the same time though, that probably makes this film slightly harder to recommend to certain people. I feel like Marty McFly in “Back to the Future,” part of me is ready to say to a collective audience that they might “not be ready for that yet.”
But if I were to recommend “I Love Boosters” to somebody, it would probably have to be someone who likes stories about people rising up against the bigger man. Perhaps someone who does not really feel the need to take everything so seriously. There is quite a bit of absurdity in this film. Yet in the context of its universe, characters, and vibes, all of the absurdity is seamless and makes the movie an animal of its own. As for myself, I cannot wait to watch this movie again. Not just because I had a blast watching it, but as I suggested before, this film flies by. I have a feeling I missed something cool the first time around. There are probably one or two memorable lines or moments that flew over my head that are probably going to land better the second, third, maybe fourth time I watch this.
In the end, it is almost impossible to describe “I Love Boosters” without using terms like wild or zany or nonstop. This is an experience. Sadly, with this film opening up against “Star Wars,” it kind of hurt its box office potential from the start. Then again, if somebody pitched this movie to me and I happened to be an executive, I think it would be a hard sell no matter what. It is debatable as to whether the characters are actually “heroes.” Then again, it is possibly true that everyone sees themselves as the hero of their own story. The concept of this film is so unique that it is difficult, at least to me, to compare this film to many others. But the fact is that this film is worth watching at least once. It has a fantastic cast lead by the always charismatic Keke Palmer. Its look is going to make for a fantastic demo down the line if I end up buying a new television or projector. And boy, is that theme song still stuck in my head. I am going to give “I Love Boosters” a 7/10.
“I Love Boosters” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now.
Thanks for reading this review! This is a bit of a short-notice announcement, but on SATURDAY, JUNE 20TH, I will be dropping the next episode of Movie Requests! This one is going to feature “The Wall” and “Talking Dead” host Chris Hardwick. You can hear his suggestion by clicking the video above! What do you think it is? If you want to find out what film he asked me to review, as well as my thoughts on it, you can watch the review right here on Flicknerd.com, or you can subscribe to my YouTube channel!
My next review is going to be for “Backrooms.” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Masters of the Universe,” “Another World,” “The Breadwinner,” “Disclosure Day,” and “Toy Story 5!” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “I Love Boosters?” What did you think about it? Or, what is one of the wildest films you recall watching recently? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
“Michael” is directed by Antoine Fuqua (The Equalizer, Training Day) and stars Jaafar Jackson, Nia Long (Missing, Boyz in the Hood), Juliano Valdi (Arco, The Loud House), KeiLyn Durrel Jones (Better Call Saul, Succession) Laura Harrier (Spider-Man: Homecoming, BlacKkKlansman), Jessica Sula (Recovery Road, Skins), Mike Myers (Shrek, Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery), Miles Teller (Whiplash, Top Gun: Maverick), and Colman Domingo (Sing Sing, Wicked: For Good). This film is about Michael Jackson’s rise to stardom, chronicling his growing up, family life, and the rising conflict he faces as an artist.
The last movie I reviewed on the blog is “Lorne,” and now I am doing “Michael…”
Ladies and gentlemen… We missed a grand opportunity to make the next “Barbenheimer” happen. LORNE MICHAEL? The name writes itself!
Anyway, “Michael” has been on my radar for some time, not necessarily because I was looking forward to it. Not that I thought the movie would be the worst I have ever seen, but Michael Jackson is not my goto artist. Sure, I like hearing “Thriller” every now and then, especially around Halloween. But keep in mind, this guy is called “the king of pop.” I am generally not a pop guy. I am more rock and roll, classical, jazz, heavy metal… Those genres speak to me more.
To be frank, the real reason why I am reviewing this movie is not because it heavily interests me, but rather because it seems to be of interest to so many other people. Some are projecting that this could end up becoming the highest-grossing musical biopic in box office history. I have family members and relatives who grew up with Michael Jackson who wanted to see this ASAP. I do not despise Michael Jackson. I think as a musician he knows his stuff, but he is not the first person I would pick to listen to in my spare time.
Also, some people have nicknamed me “Jackson 5…” So that’s a bonus.
Here is some seemingly shocking news… I have never seen an Antoine Fuqua movie. I have always been meaning to check his work out. My dad has expressed his approval for “The Equalizer” and “Shooter” for example. I just have not had the time or motivation. But given how popular I projected “Michael” to be from the getgo, I felt the need to check this movie out for myself.
Having seen “Michael,” it is better than I figured it would be in some ways, but the movie is not without its faults.
I am not a Michael Jackson fanatic. Again, I recognize his talent, but he is not my jam. That said, I have a feeling that in some way that a lot of Michael Jackson fans are going to see this film as a personal love letter, showcasing some of his greatest hits and career highlights. In that sense, the film feels overstuffed, which is really weird to say given how the film itself plays out.
Do not get me wrong. “Michael” has a story. In fact, when it comes to executing its story, or, based on several factors, as much of the story as it is willing to unveil, I thought it did a better job than the recently released “Super Mario Galaxy Movie.” Interesting enough, I find both movies to be quite similar. Both are based on cultural behemoths, they are aiming towards family demographics to a certain degree, and there seems to be a divide between the critics and audiences as to whether or not the movie is good.
Another thing that puts these two in the same boat is that they seem to rely on nostalgia. If you grew up in the 80s, you may have been playing “Mario” or listening to Michael Jackson. Perhaps both. When I was watching “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie,” I found myself needing more than nostalgia to keep me entertained. That is also the case when it comes to “Michael,” and the case arguably has more merit this time around, as, again, he is not my artist of choice. Of course, I have heard several of the songs in this movie… “Thriller,” “Beat It,” “Billie Jean,” but when they played, I do not think they hit me in the way the crew would have hoped.
What I liked about “Michael” is not so much the music, but rather the journey as to how we got some of the music. “Michael” reminds me a bit of “A Complete Unknown,” because that film seems to explore an artist who wants to play music based on what he is passionate about, and there are obstacles standing in his way of doing that. For Bob Dylan, the protagonist of “A Complete Unknown,” the obstacle was the audience, who put the artist in a box. For Michael Jackson, the biggest obstacle is his family. In some ways, the film highlights the importance of Jackson’s family, but it also sets up his father as an antagonist. We see Michael begin as a member of the Jackson 5 with his siblings, but the more the movie progresses, the more we see Michael feel the need to tread his own path. The only problem, his father wants him to keep making music under his supervision and with his siblings.
I am not going to pretend that “Michael” is the best movie of the year, but there is a decent movie in here somewhere. Is it familiar? Sure. But it is sometimes engaging. When I am watching “Michael,” I do not see myself watching a film about an aspiring performer who became a huge success, even though that idea does play a part in the story. If anything, I found myself mostly invested in the protagonist’s personal conflict of being his ultimate creative self. Yes, the movie presents Michael Jackson’s eccentricities. For example, we see his relationship with his pets. And these are not your typical dogs and cats. These are the kind of pets that Veruca Salt would beg for after finally getting her hands on a golden goose.
Not all of the concert scenes are exactly memorable, but I will not deny that there are some that stood out to me. There is one scene in particular that is shot and edited less like a movie and more like a televised special, or an actual “concert film.” I thought it was kind of clever. The sound mixing is also quite good, and I had a feeling it would be from the getgo, where the movie opens to a crowd chanting “Michael’s” name over and over again. The auditorium was almost shaking at that point.
Perhaps the biggest standout in “Michael” is… Well, Michael himself. Or more specifically, Jaafar Jackson, who plays him. In real life, Jafaar is Michael Jackson’s nephew, so I would have been shocked to say that his performance was not good. Thankfully, he is excellent. It is too early to tell if his performance is awards-worthy, but Jackson brings a flair to his uncle that feels similar to how some would probably imagine the artist in real life. Jackson does a great job at capturing the character’s ambitions and kineticism. It is clear that Jackson did some major studying behind the scenes to capture his uncle’s essence.
“Michael” is Jaafar Jackson’s first movie acting credit. My question is, and I say this as someone who found this performance to be excellent, what is Jaafar Jackson’s future in film? Is he just going to play Michael Jackson and call it quits? I would be interested to see him in another role, as long as it is something completely different than the one he played in “Michael.” I would like to see some range should he continue acting. This is also the biggest factor as to why he may not win an Oscar next year. As great as Jaafar Jackson is, he is playing someone who has a somewhat personal attachment to him. Jackson is superb, but unlike Rami Malek as Freddie Mercury or Austin Butler as Elvis Presley, his performance feels less transformative in comparison.
This does not take anything away from Jackson’s ability to capture the character and bring him to life. I will not deny that he did exactly that. In fact, if there is one positive that I will continue to think about regarding this movie, Jaafar Jackson may be it. All due respect to everyone else involved, including the super talented Colman Domingo as Joseph Jackson, but Jaafar steals the show.
As I watched this movie though, I found parts of it to drag, especially around the middle. For a movie whose trailers promise something exciting and kinetic, I was kind of surprised to find myself bored during certain scenes. I think about 10 minutes of the runtime could have been trimmed just to provide something tighter.
In the end, “Michael” is not the worst film I have ever seen, but it is occasionally bogged down by somewhat poor pacing, feeling somewhat incomplete in the story it is trying to tell, and the concert scenes not having the oomph that I was expecting. For a movie about the King of Pop, it works in some places, but overall, it does not quite pop. This movie is likely going to go down as a success at the box office, and I partially played a factor in that. I cannot say my experience of watching it, however, was exactly the best. Did I have a decent time? Perhaps barely. But I do not see “Michael” having any replay value down the road. I am going to give “Michael” a 6/10.
“Michael” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.
Thanks for reading this review! If you want to see more of me, and by that I mean, literally see me, check out my latest episode of Movie Requests, featuring special guest Katee Sackhoff! She requested I should watch “High Noon,” and I was more than happy to do so! To hear my thoughts, click the video above! Give it a like if you enjoyed it! If you want to see more episodes down the line as soon as they come out, please subscribe to my YouTube channel!
My next review is going to be for “Deep Water!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, be on the lookout for my thoughts on “Animal Farm,” “Mortal Kombat II,” “The Sheep Detectives,” and “In the Grey!” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Michael?” What did you think about it? Or, what are your thoughts on Michael Jackson as a performer? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
“The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” is directed by Aaron Horvath and Michael Jelenic, and co-directed by Pierre Leduc, all of whom helmed 2023’s “The Super Mario Bros. Movie.” This film stars Chris Pratt (Guardians of the Galaxy, The LEGO Movie), Anya Taylor-Joy (Emma., The Northman), Charlie Day (It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia, Fist Fight), Jack Black (Kung Fu Panda, A Minecraft Movie), Keegan-Michael Key (Toy Story 4, Key and Peele), Benny Safdie (Happy Gilmore 2, Uncut Gems), Donald Glover (Atlanta, Solo: A Star Wars Story), and Brie Larson (Captain Marvel, The Glass Castle). This film follows Mario as he ventures through space, facing new challenges and enemies along the way.
“The Super Mario Bros. Movie” is the very definition of “acceptable.” By no means am I ever going to watch the movie again, unless I one day have kids and we end up watching it together or something. This is a movie that, if I were to have children, I would not be mad at them for watching, but it is far from the greatest family film ever made. My biggest problem with “The Super Mario Brothers Movie” is that just about everything about it screams “cliche.” There is nothing in it that I felt like I have not seen in other movies over the years.
The banality of “The Super Mario Bros. Movie” frankly soured my expectations for what would be known as “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie.” I hate to say this, as I love the “Mario” games. I grew up playing them as a child and I continue to enjoy them to this day. Of all the “Mario” games I played, the original “Super Mario Galaxy” just so happens to be my favorite due to its unique style, immersive gameplay, epic orchestral score, and clever worlds. I was definitely curious to see how Illumination would adapt my favorite game in the franchise, but I also tempered my expectations. The marketing was nowhere near perfect, but had its moments.
Now that the movie is here, I can very much say it reminded me of the last one.
In some ways, this can be seen as a positive because it means that the movie is on brand. If you liked “The Super Mario Bros. Movie,” then there is probably a decent chance you will enjoy “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie.” Only thing, I barely enjoyed “The Super Mario Bros. Movie,” so it should not be a surprise that I happen to find my experience watching its sequel to be just as middle of the road.
The movie is not all bad. The biggest boast it carries happens to be the visuals. While I am not the biggest fan of Illumination, I cannot say their attention to detail when it comes to animation has ever let me down. Even if the content within said details happens to be incredibly brain-numbing. The film is colorful, polished, and for the most part, faithful to Nintendo’s games. If I were to watch this film with the sound off, it would be an “A.”
That said, I watched this film in IMAX, so the audio was not only on, but quite loud. That is another aspect that “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” often nails through faithful sound effects and score that do a great job at bringing some of the game’s greatest hits to cinema. Brian Tyler, much like the last film, does an excellent job composing the music.
But unlike a galaxy, the positives of “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” can only reach so far. This film has a problem some other video game-based films run into. The characters and story feel rather thin. I was not exactly fond of how the previous movie decided to have its characters follow the most basic story structure imaginable, but at least it had a story. To say that “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” does not have a story would be a lie. But to suggest it has a coherent story is also a stretch.
The movie is paced like a TikTok video. The film is designed to give as much information as possible in as little time imaginable. Do not get me wrong. I like a good, fast-paced flick. And like a lot of fast-paced flicks, the film packs in a couple decent action sequences. The first encounter between the Mario brothers and Bowser Jr. is quite entertaining, well choreographed, and has a rather cool use of slow motion. Though sometimes the film goes so fast that it is not always easy to digest the information that is in front of you.
At times, the movie is so focused on shoving as much as it can into its 98 minute runtime to the point where not all of it feels like it matters or comes off as substantial. “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” has some good ideas. But those good ideas did not receive the best execution.
Watching “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” is the equivalent of putting on Twitch and watching someone speedrun a “Mario” game. The only difference is that this cinematic experience does not come with a fun on-camera personality who feels like your pal from afar. The film is too fast and it almost made me furious.
Speaking of personalities, Chris Pratt is, unfortunately, back as the voice of Mario (right). I am still not accustomed to his voice. I honestly bought into his performance a bit more in his first go. Chris Pratt has proven to be a halfway decent voiceover artist through his performance in “The LEGO Movie.” Sadly, “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” does not live up to that. A lot of his lines feel flat and lifeless, especially compared to most of the other cast members. His presence feels nowhere near as animated as anyone else in the film. Charlie Day is often expressive and hyperactive as Luigi (left). Jack Black is over the top and loud as Bowser. Benny Safdie has such a psychopathic presence as Bowser Jr.. Brie Larson is incredibly inviting as Rosalina. Chris Pratt at times sounds like he is in a different movie than his castmates.
I have no idea how many of you are going to consider this a spoiler, but if you have missed out on the posters for this movie, then you might want to log off this post, as there is a potential detail afoot that could be described as a spoiler. You have been warned.
Not good enough? Okay. Here is a countdown.
3…
2…
1…
Going once…
Going twice…
Going thrice…
If you are still reading this and have not seen the movie…
You are wasting your time…
You have been warned…
You have been double warned…
Fox McCloud is in this movie.
Glen Powell voices the main character of the “Star Fox” franchise, and he does a pretty good job. I thought the idea of including him in a film where Mario goes to space makes sense. But he felt very minimal in the movie’s overall impact. Sure, he had a place in the story, but barely. He comes off more as an excuse to cater to a certain branch of gamers rather than to be of service to the story. In fact, I will not drop spoilers, but Fox is not the only non-Mario Nintendo character we see in this film. Does this mean we are getting a “Super Smash Bros.” movie anytime soon? Frankly, based on what they do with one or two of these characters, I am thinking the chances of getting that movie is highly unlikely. As a fan of those games, I am a bit disappointed. But as someone who thinks these past two “Mario” movies have been average, I think this might be for the best that way I do not end up underwhelmed with what a “Smash” movie could be.
Not to sound like a politician, but despite the movie’s faults, I felt at times it had “concepts of a plan.” In terms of characterization, the movie does not do the best job at developing the cast. If anything, I think of all the characters, Peach ends up going through the most change through her relationship with Mario and what we see through her backstory and how it plays into rest of the film. Also, I do like seeing Bowser reconnect with his son after some time apart. The two may be bad, but watching their relationship is quite good. Their connection also inspires my favorite conversation in the movie, which features the line, “Nothing’s more dangerous than a friend. When your armor’s down, they’ll stab you in the back.”
Some of you might defend “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” for not having the best story, possibly because not all the video games have much of a story. That is technically true. As much as I love “Mario Kart World,” I cannot say I am playing the game for the plot. I am playing the game to take down opponents with banana peels. The inspiration behind this movie, “Super Mario Galaxy,” may not have the deepest plot, but it introduces an interesting character in Rosalina while delivering mind-blowing gameplay. And that is the key word. GAMEplay. Keep in mind, this picture is called “The Super Mario Galaxy MOVIE.” The “Mario” games fall within a play-based medium. Even if the story is minimal, the game can still be fun as long as the gameplay works. When you are making a movie, the story becomes more important. But when you have a team that is more concerned about finding an excuse to randomly show off Toad in a penguin suit or build a security system with a presentation modeled after the art style of the “Super Mario Bros.” NES game, it gives me the impression that story is not a top priority. If anything it comes off as a commercial for the games. I am not saying a movie cannot also be a good commercial. Go watch “The LEGO Movie.” Sure, it is based on LEGO blocks, but the movie uses that concept and, no pun intended, builds a good story around it.
Also, if this movie were a commercial for the “Mario Galaxy” games specifically, it almost feels like false advertising, as we do not often see Mario in space. Not long after those stories begin, Mario ends up in space and stays there for the entire story. Sure, we see Mario venturing off into space at a certain point of the movie, but a surprising amount of Mario’s journey is spent closer to home, around the Mushroom Kingdom. I hate to be the guy who judges a book by its cover, but I would be fine if the crew called this film “The Super Mario Bros. Movie 2,” even if it is a bit of a mouthful. It probably would have lessened my complaint even by the tiniest amount.
But there is one positive note worth mentioning. This movie, like its predecessor, is more enjoyable than “Super Mario Brothers” from 1993. Yet if I were to go into the woods and film a Mario action figure jumping on mushrooms for a couple hours, that would also be more tolerable to watch than 1993’s “Super Mario Brothers.”
In the end, it is weird to say, but somehow prefer “The Super Mario Bros. Movie” over “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie.” I mean, it is almost guaranteed that putting something in space sounds cool, but even so, this sequel feels like more of the same. More references. More cookie cutter backstories and characterization. More TikTok-like scenes. The movie looks pretty and if I were in charge of a Best Buy, chances are I would consider using “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” as a demo on a big screen TV because some of the scenes are simply that easy on the eyes. But I can guarantee you I have no plans to watch this movie again. The “Mario” games have replay value. The amount of times I turned on “Mario Kart World” in the past year has to be somewhere in the double digits at minimum. I cannot say I am going to have the same attachment to “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” down the road. There are elements that work. Bowser Jr. is kind of fun. Donald Glover was a fine pick to play Yoshi. And the music is quite good, regardless of whether or not it is based on something that I have heard before. Each tune plays its part well. That said, it is not enough to make this movie worth my time past the initial viewing. I am going to give “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” a 5/10.
“The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now.
Thanks for reading this review! If you have not done so already, please check out the latest episode of Scene Before’s original video series, Movie Requests. This latest episode features “Avatar” actor Joel David Moore, who requested I should watch “Force Majeure.” My thoughts can be summed up in the video above! And if you would like to see more episodes, do me and yourself a favor by subscribing to my YouTube channel!
My next review is going to be for “The Drama!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Exit 8,” “Normal,” “Lorne,” and “Michael.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie?” What did you think about it? Or, what do you believe is the superior film? “The Super Mario Bros. Movie” or “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie?” Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
“EPiC: Elvis Presley in Conert” is directed by Baz Luhrmann and is a documentary about the titular musician, following portions of his life through pre-existing footage, a good chunk of which had not yet been witnessed by the public.
Back in 2022, I reviewed the “Elvis” biopic. I waited a bit after its premiere to check it out. Not because it was off my radar. I just had other people in my life who also had interest in checking it out so I figured I’d wait so I could watch it with them. Safe to say, it was not worth the wait. While there are worse movies I saw in 2022 like “Morbius,” I do not know if there is a movie that left me with a headache like the one “Elvis” did. And it is not that I do not like Elvis’ music. After seeing the film, I think I can come to the conclusion that Baz Luhrmann’s filmmaking style is not my tempo. I have vivid memories of watching “Romeo + Juliet” in middle school, and immediately getting the sense that the movie stole my soul. Since watching “Elvis,” I have since checked out Luhrmann’s “Moulin Rouge!,” which felt like a case of style over substance.
So far, Luhrmann’s filmography has left me all but impressed, which is why I was somewhat nervous going into “Elvis Presley in Concert.” That said, this is a documentary and not a fictional narrative. Perhaps this could allow me to see a different side of Baz Luhrmann. Much like Luhrmann’s past films, “Elvis Presley in Concert” comes with a distinct, clear style. Although unlike “Elvis,” I occasionally found myself having a good time with this film.
“Elvis Presley in Concert” gives you what you came for and more. I say “more” both as a positive and a negative. The movie is part documentary, part dive into Elvis’s career, and part concert showcase. Not all of it is perfect, but let’s start with the good.
If you came for a concert film, this absolutely delivers. If you are a die-hard Elvis fan, this is automatically going to leave you impressed. This is probably the closest one can get to experiencing Elvis in concert today. I had the privilege of watching “Elvis Presley in Concert” on a true IMAX screen via its 4K laser projection system. While the film is not quite “full IMAX,” it comes very close at times. In fact, at my screening, I noticed the way the film was formatted and essentially all of the framing was off center. All the scenes that were in scope widescreen had a taller black bar on the top than the bottom. There are scenes that are a bit taller-looking that essentially have no black bar on the bottom of the screen, but a black bar on the top. It is an odd choice, but I had the sense Luhrmann wanted to make the audience believe certain people in the film were standing on my auditorium’s ground. You see a lot of movies nowadays that advertise themselves as “Filmed for IMAX.” While the footage that makes up “Elvis Presley in Concert” was filmed long before IMAX was associated with Hollywood fare, this is a film that feels like it was designed for IMAX first. This may as well sound like a negative… I feel that watching this film in IMAX almost ruins every other possible way I could see it.
That said, while the formatting of this film is perhaps best experienced in an IMAX theater, the sound mix is probably going to translate well across various formats, whether you are watching it in the cinema or at home. From the very beginning, this film is booming. The first couple of minutes unleash a sense of electricity beyond comprehension. Certain performance sequences like those for “Burning Love” or “Suspicious Minds” gave me the sense that I was part of the audience in Vegas, some of whom happened to be women screaming their lungs out. I could really tell some of the audience enjoyed the film too, because during my screening, some people were clapping to a performance here or there. Granted, this movie did not garner the same attention that the “Taylor Swift: The Eras Tour” documentary did a couple years back. There were no screaming youngsters in my audience, which, frankly, despite being in my 20s, I am okay with. I do not mind loud movies, but my sensitive ears can only take so much.
Another monumental technical achievement this film boasts is its clean editing. This is some of the craziest film editing I have seen in recent memory. Not only does the edit blend tons of archival clips together beautifully, along with one engaging soundbite after another, but all of the pre-existing material makes for a fascinating story about Elvis himself, all the while saving room for the concert experience that many people likely came to see. It is amazing how much this film was able to tell in just a short amount of time. That said, much like Luhrmann’s “Elvis” biopic, the film is almost too fast. The film tells a lot of information in a short amount of time. In fact, I was somewhat surprised to find out that the film was only an hour and 36 minutes. As the movie ended, I asked myself, “That’s it?” But apparently it was. This movie’s supersonic pace, which sometimes works, made it somewhat difficult to digest every little detail. Maybe upon a second watch I will appreciate certain parts more, but there are a handful of bits highlighting Elvis’s career and personal life that had me less entertained compared to other scenes.
The pacing issues were especially noticeable towards the beginning, which does not start off bad. In fact, the first moment of the movie features Presley walking onstage and introducing himself to the crowd. What follows is a lot less concert material than I anticipated and a lot more backstory material. I get that this film is a documentary, but given how the film has “concert” in the title, I found it to take a bit of an odd turn early on in the runtime. It’s around the first twenty minutes or so, and perhaps another point or two, that the movie spends so much time being one thing that it nearly forgets to be something else.
Do not get me wrong, I was entertained. I like the movie as a whole, but at times, it feels like it has ADHD. It is too fast and almost unfocused. Technically speaking, it is astounding at times. But I am not sure if this film is going to have much replay value for me down the line, even in the cinema again despite how immersed I happened to be.
In the end, “EPiC: Elvis Presley in Concert” is undoubtedly a good time, even with its flaws, which do not take much away from an overall entertaining hour and a half. I wonder how well this film is going to play with people who are not Elvis fans. Granted, I am not a hardcore Elvis fanatic myself, though I do like some of his songs. I think even if you are not an Elvis fan, there is something to be said about how well put together this movie is. The concert scenes are a lot of fun. The footage feels seamless at times. The pacing is a bit iffy, but forgivable. That said, I think if you are an Elvis Presley lover, this will be your jam. If you are an Elvis Presley casual, I think there is something to appreciate here. I liked this film more than the “Elvis” biopic, so if anything, I consider that win, especially considering both projects were helmed by the same filmmaker. I am going to give “EPiC: Elvis Presley in Concert” a 7/10.
“EPiC: Elvis Presley in Concert” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.
Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for “Send Help.” I know I am a bit late to the party on this film. I was going to go see it during an early access screening, but I ended up skipping it as I felt somewhat sick beforehand. Cut to the weekend the film came out… I was in New York. Then things did not end there as I could not make time within the next couple of weeks. Blog projects got in the way, weather got in the way, other movies got in the way, but no longer! Stay tuned for that review, which will be dropping soon! Also, coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “The Bride!” and “Hoppers.”
And I will once again remind everyone, if you have not checked it out yet, please watch the first ever episode of “Movie Requests,” it is a brand new review series where I talk about movies requested by some familiar faces. I just talked about “The Idiots,” which was requested by Bryce Dallas Howard. You can watch the video above to hear my thoughts on the film. Also, if you enjoy the video, please leave a like and subscribe to my YouTube channel!
If you want to see more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “EPiC: Elvis Presley in Concert?” What did you think about it? Or, since the topic is relevant, have you seen the “Elvis” biopic? Am I a monumental moron for disliking it? Leave your thoughts down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!
