Thriller | Scene Before

Other Mommy (2026): The Parent Crap

“Other Mommy” is directed by Rob Savage (Host, The Boogeyman) and stars Jessica Chastain (Interstellar, The Eyes of Tammy Faye), Jay Duplass (Pain Hustlers, Transparent), Arabella Olivia Clark (The Housemaid, Springsteen: Deliver Me from Nowhere), Rosie Anne O’Gorman, Dichen Lachman (Dollhouse, Neighbours), Arian Moayed (Spider-Man: No Way Home, Succession), Sean Kaufman (The Summer I Turned Pretty, Stumble), and Karen Allen (Raiders of the Lost Ark, The Sandlot). This film is based on Josh Malerman’s 2024 horror novel “Incidents Around the House” and follows a young girl named Bela who is trying her best to adjust to a new school and the growing separation between her parents. At the same time, she communicates with a supernatural being that resembles her mother, much to the bewilderment of her family.

Trailers are some of the coolest marketing tools ever created. Well… Unless you are sitting at an AMC and wondering why the movie hasn’t started yet. But one of the trailers I had the pleasure of watching during select film experiences recently is “Other Mommy.” The trailer came out last summer, around the same time that “The Odyssey” came to theaters. Logistically, this makes sense. After all, Universal released “The Odyssey,” and “Other Mommy” is also a Universal film. It is essentially Universal getting everyone thinking about “what’s next” just as they dive into their latest project.

One of the things I remember deeply from the trailer was in addition to several sequences showing her off, there was a giant piece of text reading “JESSICA CHASTAIN.” It was so big it took up the whole frame. I get why. She is a big star. She has top billing. The movie’s marketing shows her off for good reason.

Now that I have seen the movie, I am reminded of my experiences with some of the recent “Godzilla” projects, particularly 2014 and “King of the Monsters.” These are films with excellent marketing campaigns, but their movies absolutely pale in comparison.

Photo Credit: Universal Pictures – © 2026 Universal Studios. All Rights Reserved.

“Other Mommy” will go down as one of the biggest disappointments of 2026. Based on how much the trailer excited me, it is a film that I wanted to see as soon as possible. And upon seeing it, part of me wants a Men in Black agent to neuralyze the memory of this film from my existence. For those who pay attention to the cinematic calendar, there is often at least one horror movie that releases at the beginning of the year. Specifically January or February. This feels like a horror film that belongs in one of those months, but because this film had such an excellent marketing campaign, Universal likely decided October, which is primetime for horror with Halloween coming up, was the best month for this movie instead.

If anything, the trailer did not lie, Jessica Chastain deserves to be the top selling point of the film. After all, she plays two different characters, to a degree anyway, and by no means are either of her performances bad. However, I do wish Chastain were given better material. This film feels more like a Jessica Chastain demo reel rather than an actual movie.

When the film features Chastain as Ursula, we see her as this loving, but concerned mother of her daughter Bela, who occasionally communicates with a supernatural entity, who we come to know as the “Other Mommy.” That is where Chastain’s finer material comes in, and part of it is because of her facial expressions and general dialogue delivery, but the special effects work also occasionally adds a nice touch in some sequences.

That said, there is an unappealing vibe to this film. While the film may look polished, its dialogue and characters come off as if they belong in a Lifetime or Syfy original movie. The only reason why they are not on either of these channels is because, well, Jessica Chastain. She may not be as big as Zendaya, but she has proven she can give knockout performances, so putting her name front and center prompts high expectations. Maybe other than Jay Duplass, I did not recognize a good chunk of the film’s cast. But it didn’t matter. The film got my money anyway. Sadists.

To piggyback off of the unappealing vibe, there is a tonal inconsistency to the movie. The fact that it has Jessica Chastain in the lead role leads to, unsurprisingly, a decent performance. But I feel like it would have been slightly better if the film stuck to a serious tone. There are a lot of cheesy moments in this movie, whether they were intended or not. In addition, there were chunks of dialogue that were almost designed as if they were to diss on horror movie cliches, even if this horror film uses some of those cliches to a certain degree.

While “Other Mommy” is by no means the worst story I had the displeasure of sitting through, I was shocked to realize how bored I became as a result of watching the movie. The film starts off fine, but it becomes increasingly dull minute by minute. “Other Mommy” is 93 minutes. For a feature-length film, that is not long. There are so many scenes where the pace is surprisingly slow. Not slow in a way that is digestible, but slow in a way that makes it feel like Other Mommy is tucking me in so I can fall asleep.

Perhaps the most disappointing thing about “Other Mommy” is that the film is not scary. I watched this film in D-Box, and that did not even save it! The only way I can see someone jumping out of their skin as a result of “Other Mommy” is if their fanaticism for jumpscares is as extreme as skydiving. If you like jumpscares, “Other Mommy” might be your cup of tea. I am not the biggest fan of jumpscares, I think they are traditionally cheap, and this movie showcases their tacky nature.

I love a good twist in a movie. Note the use of the word good. This movie has a twist, but good is not the word I would use to describe it. If anything, I found the twist somewhat predictable. Granted, the twist is not broken, but still. The movie drops this ball towards the end that is supposed to sound like this big game-changer but in reality, I could kind of see it coming from a mile away. In fact, you know what would have been a great twist? This movie getting better! But it doesn’t! Forget “Other Mommy,” consider me interested in other MOVIES.

In the end, “Other Mommy” is shockingly boring and lacking in terror. Is “Other Mommy” the worst movie of the year? Not quite. Although I am confounded in what it was the crew was going for. Is this serious? Campy? Both? “Other Mommy” seems to have an identity crisis. Jessica Chastain is a fantastic actress and she commits to each scene. She never seems to phone it in. I am just disappointed she was not able to lend her tremendous talent to something much more watchable. If you like Jessica Chastain, there are better options for your viewing pleasure. “Interstellar,” “Zero Dark Thirty…” Heck! She even has a movie with MOTHER in the title that is better than this! If you have not seen “Mothers’ Instinct,” go check it out. It is a good watch. I am going to give “Other Mommy” a 4/10.

Also, I have heard some people online say that instead of “Other Mommy,” this movie should be called “Other Mother.” But I will defend the title “Other Mommy.” First off, some people might see “Other Mother” and think of the character from “Coraline,” which is much better movie than this one, by the way. Also, this movie is from the perspective of a girl who is still in the single-digit age range. Chances are the word “mommy” is part of her daily vocabulary. Just my two cents. There are some things in this movie that raises my eyebrows. The title is not one of them.

“Other Mommy” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! If you would like to see more of my film reviews, then check out my latest episode of “Movie Requests!” This latest episode features special guest Joe Gatto, who you may know from the TV series “Impractical Jokers!” He asked me to review the dark comedy “Gringo!” Click the video above to find out my thoughts! If you enjoyed the video, please subscribe to my YouTube channel and leave a like as well!

I am also happy to announce the next guest on Movie Requests is going to be Adam Conover! You may know Conover as the star of “Adam Ruins Everything,” as well as the host of his podcast “Factually!”. Conover is also a stand-up comedian who is touring across the United States. His new special, “Big Divorce Energy,” is now available on YouTube! You can catch me talking about Conover’s film of choice on Monday, November 2nd. The video will be available, again, on my YouTube channel, as well as this very website, Flicknerd.com. Look forward to it!

My next review is going to be for “The Social Reckoning.” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Sense and Sensibility,” “Whalefall,” “Wildwood,” “Clayface,” and “You Can See Everything.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Other Mommy?” What did you think about? Or, of the movies in which Jessica Chastain stars that contain some variation of a maternal figure in its title, which one do you think is the best? Is it “Other Mommy?” “Mothers’ Instinct?” “Mama?” I still have not seen “Mama,” so I may not have the most valid opinion here. But if you have seen “Mama,” let me know if it is better than this dud. Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

The Weight (2026): A Middle of the Road Quest for Gold

Posted on 7 Days Ago by Jack Drees

“The Weight” is directed by Padraic McKinley (Fightworld, The Good Lord Bird) and stars Ethan Hawke (First Reformed, Moon Knight), Russell Crowe (Gladiator, Unhinged), Julia Jones (The Twilight Saga: Eclipse, Dexter: New Blood), Austin Amelio (Everybody Wants Some!!, The Walking Dead), Avi Nash (Silo, The Walking Dead), Lucas Lynggaard Tønnesen (The Rain, 1899), George Burgess (Beast, Land of Bad), Cameron Brady (Sapphire, Quantum Quest), Avy Berry (Hollyoaks, A Quiet Place: Day One), Alec Newman (Frank Herbert’s Dune, Winne-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey 2), and Sam Hazeldine (Resurrection, The Innocents). This film is set during the Great Depression and follows a veteran who is hired to help smuggle a fortune in gold through the wilderness.

Before we begin my review of “The Weight,” I would like to shout out a good friend of mine, some of you from the Massachusetts-New Hampshire area would know his name, Brandon Gunnoe, an anchor at WHDH, also known as 7 News. I have the pleasure of working with Gunnoe several days a week. He is a fun person to talk to. The reason why I am shouting him out is because he twice suggested that I should watch “The Weight.” I heard about “The Weight” before he recommended it to me, but his recommendation encouraged me to check out the trailer, which I thought was decent. It promised a tense journey through the wilderness and made the movie look like fun, even with a somewhat serious tone. As I said before, I am proud to call Gunnoe a good friend. But that friendship was fun while it lasted. “The Weight” could have been better…

I kid of course, Gunnoe is still my friend. Though it does not change “The Weight” being a bit of a bore. The film has an intriguing hook to it. It stars Ethan Hawke as Samuel Murphy, an incarcerated man who is tasked with smuggling gold during the Great Depression. The film is also a bit more than that. While the two are not together the entire time, the film is very much a father-daughter story. I thought that aspect of the film was handled very well. Plus, Avy Berry does a great job portraying the daughter character, Penny. She is adorable. The moments the two spend together are joy-filled and smile-inducing.

For the most part, “The Weight” is quite slow. I do not mind a slow film. Slow does not necessarily mean bad. Though when it comes to “The Weight,” I wound up feeling, well, its weight. It is almost unfair of me to say this because “The Weight” does a decent job at providing tension in each scene. This is a man versus nature tale and most of the film’s obstacles have something to do with the elements. Everyone is outside, trying to make it from point A to point B. Whether the characters are trying to cross a bridge or find their way through a river, the film does a fantastic job at making me think about possibly biting my nails.

That said, while the film does a decent job at putting its characters in eerie situations, I wish I cared more about the cast. While I have seen one or two other people in the cast play roles in other projects, Ethan Hawke and Russell Crowe have the most star power. How do they do in this film? Fine. I am not complaining about their performances. This is far from Crowe’s worst outing, and it most certainly is not his best. If you like listening to a rugged man call Ethan Hawke “son” sometimes, then this is the movie for you. Hawke plays the most captivating character by far, which is good partially because he is the lead. The film is kind of on his shoulders. That said, the movie does not deliver any standout scenes from its cast that I could see being used down the line as part of a “for your consideration” montage. Hawke and Crowe are competent. Surprise surprise. But these are far from their greatest roles.

I have nothing against the actors who make up the film’s supporting cast. They all play their parts to the best of their abilities. That said, a lot of them utter dialogue that could perhaps best be described as cookie-cutter or overly stereotypical to their personalities. The characters do not feel that complicated or authentic. It feels like there is something missing to them as people. I cannot really put my finger on it. But there is something about these characters that makes them come off as somewhat thin. If anything, they come off as characters from a “Team Fortress” game, almost as if it were easier to refer to them by what they do rather than by their actual name. I get that the movie is not about these characters, but I think the movie would have benefited if they had more depth to said characters.

Although what this movie lacks in substance, it makes up for in style. On the surface, I was impressed with the film’s overall look. The framing and cinematography are sometimes gorgeous. It is not my favorite of the year. In fact, to be frank, I cannot really name a single thing from this movie that I would describe as my “favorite of the year,” but I was nevertheless impressed with Matteo Cocco’s variety of shots as well as their specific timing. The film starts and ends in a similar manner, which allowed for a kind of poetry with the framing as well as Padraic McKinley and Matthew Woolley’s editing. The color grading also pops in its own way. It reminded me a bit of “Train Dreams.” While definitely somewhat modern-looking, “The Weight” had a slight pinch that made the film feel like a throwback. The grass in almost every frame looked immaculate. The contrast most certainly stands out. The film was shot on location in Germany, and those particular locations did not disappoint.

The film has a vibe that, again, reminds me of “Train Dreams” with more action. But unlike “Train Dreams,” “The Weight” sometimes comes off as conventional and lacking in an oomph. On a paper, it sounds like a human story, but the execution of this film feels somewhat wooden and boring. The film comes close to sucking me into its atmosphere, but almost never achieves such immersion. Is “The Weight” awful? No. But it isn’t great either.

In the end, “The Weight” is dull and rather forgettable. It has a couple big stars, but if you want to watch Ethan Hawke or Russell Crowe, there are other projects I would recommend before this one. This is a good-looking film that would probably make for a halfway decent tech demo. It even looks better than some of the big studio franchise titles that came out earlier this year, like “The Mandalorian and Grogu” and “Supergirl.” But looks are not everything, this film tends to lack personality, which is arguably more important. So, if Brandon Gunnoe at 7 News reads this, thank you for the recommendation. Sorry we did not see eye to eye. We’re still friends. I am going to give “The Weight” a 5/10.

As of this posting, “The Weight” is neither available at home or in theaters.

Thanks for reading this review! If you enjoyed this written review, why not check out one I did on video? Last week I posted my latest episode of “Movie Requests,” featuring special guest Joe Gatto. He requested I should watch “Gringo,” a 2018 dark comedy! What did I think of it? Click the video above to find out! If you enjoy the video, do yourself and I a favor by subscribing to my YouTube channel so you can see more episodes as they drop!

My next review is going to be for “Digger!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Other Mommy,” “The Social Reckoning,” “Sense and Sensibility,” and “Whalefall!” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “The Weight?” What did you think about it? Or, what is a film that someone has begged you to watch that you disliked? Are you still friends with that person? Answer in the comments at your own risk! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Primetime (2026): Have a Seat… For This Enticing Thriller

Posted on 13 Days Ago by Jack Drees

“Primetime” is directed by Lance Oppenheim (Some Kind of Heaven, Ren Faire) and stars Robert Pattinson (The Drama, The Odyssey), Merritt Wever (Nurse Jackie, Godless), Skyler Gisondo (Vacation, Booksmart), and Phoebe Bridgers. This film dramatizes what happens when Chris Hansen’s show, “To Catch a Predator” is put on primetime television. The story shows what happens as Hansen works with the vigilante group Perverted Justice to curb child predators.

I am 26 years old. While I grew up the same time that Dateline NBC’s “To Catch a Predator” first aired on television, I never found myself watching it. On paper, it sounds intriguing, but keep in mind, I was 5 when the first episode aired. I do not think my parents would have been happy with me learning about sex crimes at that young of an age. Even when I heard this film was coming out, I never got around to putting it on television. Despite that, I was interested in “Primetime” for a number of reasons. On top of the general premise providing for a decent pitch, this is an A24 film, and as a distribution company, their track record is usually solid. Plus, Robert Pattinson is playing the lead. He’s had a hot year and his acting chops continue to demonstrate that he is one of the industry’s most talented people working today.

Speaking of A24, one of my favorite movies they have put out is “The Disaster Artist,” which is based on the making of “The Room.” I have shown that movie to people who knew nothing about “The Room” and they had a great time watching it. Similarly, as someone who has never seen an episode of “To Catch a Predator,” heck, I do not know if I have even seen a clip of “To Catch a Predator” prior to this film’s release, I nevertheless found myself engaged in what this film had to offer. “Primetime” is not my favorite film of the year. In fact, had I been more invested in “To Catch a Predator” and Chris Hansen, this movie maybe could have hit me a little bit more. Just a theory. But that does not mean “Primetime” is bad. It’s the exact opposite, actually! This is a solid thriller with a one of a kind vibe.

“Primetime” is such a fitting title for its respective film. Not just because it is about a man who suddenly sees his show on the primetime lineup, but because this year feels like a prime time for this film’s star, Robert Pattinson. On top of playing a couple secondary roles in “The Odyssey” and the yet to be released “Dune Part Three,” Pattinson is also the star of “The Drama” as well as this movie. I have seen both “The Drama” and “The Odyssey” and Pattinson is 2 for 2 thus far. Both movies are fantastic and his performances make each one worth the watch.

But I was not prepared for “Primetime.” This is likely going to go down as Pattinson’s best performance this year. Granted, as mentioned, “Dune Part Three” is coming. We could be in for something special. But so far, “Primetime” is probably Pattinson’s best.

Is Pattinson’s performance in “Primetime” the best I have seen through the entirety of 2026? No. Those honors still belong to Ryan Gosling for “Project Hail Mary” and Emily Blunt for “Disclosure Day” respectively. But “Primetime” gives slightly more spotlight to Pattinson than some of his recent projects, considering he played a co-starring role in “The Drama” alongside Zendaya and did not have the most screentime in “The Odyssey.” This is Pattinson’s film through and through, and the experience is all the better for it. It is almost difficult to imagine anyone else in this character’s shoes.

While Pattinson is definitely the film’s biggest star, there are a few other notable names in the cast like Alex Winter and Anna Faris, and while they do a fine job in the movie, there is one name that stood out almost as much as Pattinson.

Skyler Gisondo plays Dan Plum, and I was moved by this character. Gisondo very much channeled a working man’s spirit into his role as an aspiring actor who finds out that the job that he’s taken is a bit more than meets the eye. There was an admirable sense of humility given off by this character that made him infinitely likable. If anything, it brings a perfect balance to the film as Pattinson’s character is sometimes played up to be larger than life, at least to a certain degree… But Gisondo feels more down to earth. In no way do these tones clash at all. I was pleasantly surprised with how the film went about their individual characters and the chemistry they have on screen together.

The film’s pace is never breakneck nor sluggish. The movie finds a goldilocks zone in between, and for the most part, it works. It is hard to say that there is ever a point where I found the film boring. There are moments that are slower than others, but that did not necessarily mean that they did not have any entertainment value. For the most part, the film is tense and exciting. There is a lot to love about it.

The film’s cast has plenty of experience, but behind the scenes, “Primetime” is a story of firsts. This film is written by Ajon Singh, and it is his first screenplay to see a full release. As for the director, Lance Oppenheim, he has had some experience behind the scenes, but “Primetime” is my first foray into his filmography. In fact, this is the first feature narrative he’s directed, and I would say this is a solid start. These two make for an excellent team. Oppenheim takes Singh’s material and gives it a gritty flair. The movie’s cinematography is quite untraditional. For starters, it is shot in 1.50:1 and 4:3. It is nowhere near as wide as most movies nowadays. Also, the film, appropriately, is presented in such a way that evokes the feel of a show like “To Catch a Predator.” The film offers a weird, but intriguing sense of immersion throughout. The film’s color palette is also never completely consistent, but each frame is immaculate. There is a beautiful yet messy feel to each scene. This is the kind of movie that I could see myself randomly watching after 2 a.m.. It has a distinctive vibe that works best at that specific time of day. But no matter what time it is, it is a good time to watch “Primetime.”

In the end, “Primetime” is worth watching, even if you are not familiar with “To Catch a Predator.” I say this considering, well, again, I had not watched a single episode. Robert Pattinson kills it as Chris Hansen. If there is any reason you should be watching this movie, it is him. He is also joined by an excellent supporting cast, and Lance Oppenheim kills it as the film’s visionary. I am a new fan. I do not know for sure if I will be checking out “You Can See Everything,” which he also worked on. We shall see what time I have in the coming weeks or months given everything else that is coming out. Even so, I will be on the lookout for whatever he does next. I am going to give “Primetime” a 7/10.

“Primetime” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! Tomorrow, TUESDAY OCTOBER 13th… Although based on this post’s publication, tomorrow is not that far away, isn’t it?… I will be sharing a brand new episode of Movie Requests featuring “Impractical Jokers” star Joe Gatto! For those who do not know, Movie Requests is an original series where I ask celebrities what movies they think I should watch and talk about. This series is being done in honor of 10 years of Scene Before. To watch the promo for the episode, click the video above! The episode will be available tomorrow on Flicknerd.com and YouTube! Speaking of YouTube, please subscribe to my channel and hit the notification bell!

My next review is going to be for “The Weight.” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Digger,” “Other Mommy,” and “The Social Reckoning.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Primetime?” What did you think about it? Or, did you ever watch “To Catch a Predator?” Tell me your thoughts about it down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Don’t Move (2026): For Tonight’s Punishment… A Church Group Takes on a Giant Spider!

Posted on 29 Days Ago by Jack Drees

“Don’t Move” is directed by Maclain Nelson (Studio C, Show Offs) and stars Lyndsy Fonseca (The Young and the Restless, Kick-Ass), Russ (Trap, Little), Hunter King (Life in Pieces, The Young in the Restless), Joseph Lee Anderson (MacGruber, Young Rock), Tom Cavanagh (The Flash, Ed), and Rob Riggle (Holey Moley, The Hangover). This film is based on a book written by Darren Wearmouth and James Murray, also known as “Murr” from “Impractical Jokers.” In this movie, a church group has to fend off a giant spider while camping in the woods.

I do not watch a ton of television. Partially because I am so heavily invested in movies, but one of my major commitments on the small screen over the years has been “Impractical Jokers.” This show always gets a laugh out of me. Even the newer seasons without Joe have continued to deliver comedy goodness. One of the show’s stars, James Murray, on top of his success as a TV star, has found time to write books including “Awakened,” “You Better Watch Out,” and the one that inspired this movie, “Don’t Move.” When it comes to this movie, he is credited with writing and producing it.

For the record, while I own a copy of “Don’t Move,” I have yet to read it. But as someone who loves movies and is willing to support the world’s finest ferret look-a-like, I made it my duty to check out “Don’t Move” as soon as I possibly could.

Should you move as fast as you can to watch this movie? That’s… Complicated.

“Don’t Move” is not the greatest cinematic achievement of 2026, and I am pretty sure many, if not all the people working on the movie recognize this. No offense, but this ain’t “The Odyssey.” Although is it fun? Is it enjoyable? Sure.

“Don’t Move” is quite a departure from the material where a majority of James Murray’s fans know him. If you are looking for comedy, look elsewhere. There are not many laughs in “Don’t Move.” There may be one or two slight chuckles in the film, but this is a horror film first and foremost. If you like horror, this could be your jam. But then again, there are better horror movies released this year. Go watch “Obsession.” Go watch “Ready or Not 2: Here I Come.” Go watch “Send Help.” This film is not bad, but it pales in comparison to those three.

“Don’t Move” is by no means the best movie of the year. Again, there are moments to appreciate, but I have seen better. Although the film does stand out in two particular ways. The beginning and the end. This works well in the film’s favor as it provides a brilliant hook for what’s to come and eventually ties everything up in an exciting bow.

The beginning is not completely perfect, but as a general concept, it sings. It also does a decent job when it comes to serving as compelling exposition. More than an hour later, the film brings forth an ending that is not only bone-chilling, but also jaw-dropping. I did not know this film was going to end the way it did. I was genuinely impressed with the final scene.

Going back to the beginning, this is where we meet the film’s star, Megan (Fonseca) who is dealing with the loss of her loved ones. The film does a great job at encapsulating the emotions of what she was going through following her inciting incident, and it is only supported by her solid performance. Fonseca does a good job as the lead.

Another thing I admired in the film is the sound mix. In horror, sound is almost more important than the visuals sometimes. There are a couple cliche sound effects you have heard in dozens of other horror projects that make their presence known here. But they are used rather effectively. One sound effect in particular left me shook. It was well-timed and utilized at an appropriate volume. Although I cannot say that was the case for every sound effect. This may be a personal annoyance I have with the film, but there is a repeated whistle sound effect that ends up being essential to the story. I have no problem with the sound effect itself, but every time I heard it up close it would hurt my ears. Granted, this may be more of a problem of having sensitive ears than anything else. Though if I were mixing the audio, I would pinch the whistle effect down just a hair.

Speaking of things I would change, the film does have a lot of problems. Yes, there are good things about it, but there are also a lot of bad things. It is a bit of a mishmash.

While the scenes either featuring or having to do with the spider are fun, part of me wishes we got a little more action with the spider. I think the moments featuring the spider makes for some of the better parts of the movie, and quite frankly, I am surprised it was not utilized more. I was somewhat underwhelmed with how little the creature was used.

This film focuses on a church group in the woods. For the record, I am not in a church group, so I cannot say I have much experience with the typical goings-on, but I am pretty sure that few church groups swear and take the Lord’s name in vain as often as these people. I understand that some of these instances are played out for comedic effect, but it threw me off seeing this group be such pottymouths. For the record, I have no problem with pottymouths. Bring on the filthy. But it was a little hard to buy this group given some of their vocabulary. Although I will say, one of the most hilarious things about this film is that one of the members of the group, Pastor Rizzo (Cavanaugh) at times comes off as a dead ringer of Ned Flanders from “The Simpsons.” He is so overly calm and almost unnecessarily welcoming regardless of the situation. He comes off as both a neighbor I would like to have but also maybe ask to back away if they get too close.

Another thing I did not like in this film is the visual effects. For instance, this movie has a ton of fire effects. Sometimes they look great, but at other times they look like they belong in the late 1990s. Another effect that threw me off was a giant waterfall. The water flow looked unnatural and too clean. It lacked an imperfect ruggedness. I can slightly forgive the film’s faults in terms of its visuals as it is made on the cheap compared to many others that came out this year, but the effects still looked odd at times.

This film is helmed by Maclain Nelson, who has directing experience, but not with feature films. Having seen this film, it is somewhat easy to tell that it is from a director who lacks such feature filmmaking experience. In fact, the film somewhat looks like a television show. If anything, the look of the film reminds me of, perhaps coincidentally, “Impractical Jokers: The Movie.” Although I thought that the film’s look worked as it was, for the most part, based in reality. I will not deny that there are times where “Don’t Move” has a cinematic touch. The opening scene at the carnival in particular looks great. But there are a couple scenes in the woods that look a little too real. Not necessarily cinematic if that makes any sense.

On a sidenote, “Don’t Move” packs in some Easter Eggs for “Impractical Jokers” fans. These barely affect my opinion of the film as a whole, but it was nice to see this film show some nods. For instance, James Murray is in this film as a carnival worker. As a bonus, his nametag reads “D. Chiggins,” which if you have watched “Impractical Jokers,” you would be familiar with that name. Brian Quinn is in this film too. I will not say more, I will let you see for yourself. There are more Easter Eggs, but it is not like the film has one every other minute like “The Super Mario Bros. Movie.” As far as I am concerned, that may as well be a positive.

In the end, “Don’t Move” is all right. It is a competently made creature feature, but in some ways, it could have been longer. Some of it felt surface level and lacking in personality. This is, thankfully, not the case with the entire film. Again, the ending is surprisingly amazing. I like the main character of the film, I think Lyndsy Fonseca does a good job portraying Megan. She was very much the film’s heart and soul. The film is by all means entertaining and makes for a fun hour and a half, but it does not do a whole ton to provide an oomph. Overall, this is not a bad time. I am going to give “Don’t Move” a 6/10.

“Don’t Move” will be available on VOD starting October 13th.

Thanks for reading this review! THIS MONDAY ON SCENE BEFORE, get for the 11th episode of Movie Requests, featuring special guest Rosario Dawson! Movie Requests is the Scene Before original series that sees yours truly taking film suggestions from celebrities. What do you think Dawson suggested? Well, she gives a hint in a brand new promo, which you can watch by clicking the video above! If you want to see the episode, you can follow Flicknerd.com or subscribe to my YouTube channel!

My next reviews are going to be for “The Uprising” and “Forgotten Island!” Stay tuned for those! If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Don’t Move?” What did you think about it? Or, did you read the “Don’t Move” book? How does this movie compare to that? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

I Want Your Sex (2026): A Wilde, Sexy Ride

Posted on August 26 by Jack Drees

“I Want Your Sex” is directed by Gregg Araki (13 Reasons Why, Now Apocalypse) and stars Olivia Wilde (Don’t Worry Darling, Tron: Legacy), Cooper Hoffman (The Long Walk, Licorice Pizza), Mason Gooding (Ballers, Love, Victor), Chase Sui Wonders (The Studio, Generation), Johnny Knoxville (Jackass, Action Point), Margaret Cho (30 Rock, All American Girl), Roxane Mesquida (Now Apocalypse, Gossip Girl), Charli XCX (The Moment, UglyDolls), and Daveed Diggs (Black-ish, The Boys). This film is about a man named Elliot who takes a job at a company specializing in erotic art. Soon after taking said job, he finds himself in a sexual relationship with his boss.

Sex sells. End of story. Well, unless your sex-centric movie comes out against “Spider-Man,” then that’s a different conversation entirely. As Tom Holland, Zendaya, and Jon Bernthal continue their box office domination with “Spider-Man: Brand New Day,” released just two weeks after their smash hit “The Odyssey,” a significantly smaller title is getting, unsurprisingly, nowhere near as much spotlight. That movie being “I Want Your Sex.”

The concept of this film is intriguing, as it places a 23 year old man with a much more experienced woman in a series of sexual situations. The kicker to this, the 23 year old man just so happens to be working for said woman at, amazingly enough, a company dedicated to erotic art.

Couple things to note… First off, my family does read this blog, and I have no problem with them knowing that I very much enjoyed this raunchy, sexy movie. I would like to shoutout one cool aunt who was confused as to why I recommended “Anora,” which she deemed “pornagraphic.” Auntie… That’s tame compared to what “I Want Your Sex” has to offer. You’ve been warned. Now for all the sick human beings who have not clicked away from this review, you are in for a good time.

The best thing about this movie is the cast, not necessarily because of anyone’s star status, although it does contain a few recognizable names including Cooper Hoffman and Olivia Wilde, whose chemistry together is electric. For those who have followed me for a while, you may be aware that I was not the biggest fan of another film in which Hoffaman stars, “Licorice Pizza.” It is not entirely his fault the movie did not work for me, Hoffman played his part as he was instructed to do so. But the dynamic between Hoffman and Wilde in this latest film reminded me a bit of the dynamic the former had with Alana Haim in “Licorice Pizza.” This is yet another case of a much younger man having feelings of some sort for a woman much older than him. While the relationship in “Licorice Pizza” felt uncomfortable, I actually found quite a bit of enjoyment in what “I Want Your Sex” had to offer. Partially because one, the relationship is… Well, legal… Also, whereas I found Hoffman’s character in “Licorice Pizza” to be a pervy creep, I found myself occasionally sympathizing with the one he plays in “I Want Your Sex…”

As for the opposite end of the dynamic, Olivia Wilde, she is a knockout. Erika is packed with all kinds of range. Every once in a while you can see Wilde portraying her as a stern conversationalist. Sometimes she enters boss mode. Other times she gloriously loses her temper. And then there are those moments where her actions speak louder than her words. Every scene between Erika and Elliot had my eyes glued to the screen because I genuinely had no idea where things were going to go with them at certain points. This movie is a rather unpredictable ride.

The surprise star of the film… Charlie XCX. I never cared for her music, but even I must admit that she is brilliant here. On top of everything that is going on between Hoffman and Wilde, the former also just so happens to be in a relationship with XCX’s character of Minerva. One would think that my favorite sex-centric moment of the movie is between Hoffman and Wilde, but it is actually between the former and Charlie XCX, because it says a lot about where both characters were in the relationship and further tapped into Hoffman’s sexual tendencies. The scene perfectly establishes Hoffman’s need for sex in order to stay sane, as opposed to Charlie XCX, who clearly could not give two craps about it in addition to the relationship itself. Of all the characters in the film, Charlie XCX’s seems to be the least expressive, perhaps on purpose. I have no problem with it. The character works.

On top of the awkward intimate moments shared between Minerva and Elliot, the film occasionally has a hint or two that highlights how, let’s just say, important sex is to the latter. Elliot’s roommate, Apple (Wonders), asks him if he has ever faked an orgasm, to which he responds, “Well, I’m a guy, so…” It also puts a spotlight on unrealistic standards people seem to have for sex, especially when one is so often exposed to it in parts of their daily life outside of the actual activity.

If anything, the film is a love letter to, and at the same time, a parody of Gen Z, which I happen to be a part of. There is a lot of media coverage suggesting that some members of this generation do not exactly have a complete interest in sex, or have fears about engaging in said activity. Granted some of these people are younger, so sex is probably not something they want to think about. But others, like myself, are in their twenties, which some would stereotype as a time where sex winds up playing some kind of role in one’s life.

At the same time, I wonder how accessible this film will wind up being to my generation, considering how part of said media coverage on Gen Z suggests they want to see less sex in film and television. That said, this film has a lot of sex, and just about every scene ends up contributing to the story in some way.

But this film is a lot more than just sex. It is often quite funny and dramatic. The film, in addition to being about a May-December sexual relationship, also interweaves an intriguing part of the story having to do with the Los Angeles art gallery scene. There is never a boring moment in “I Want Your Sex,” which if there were, would be shocking, as the film is only 90 minutes. Is this the best film I have seen this year? No. But in terms of pacing and messaging, it is top-notch. This is my first Gregg Araki film, and I can say I am a new fan. He has a knack for brisk storytelling. I would love to see him helm another feature down the line.

In the end, “I Want Your Sex” is wildly entertaining. The film combines comedy, drama, romance, and blends everything together in a neat package. This is not a film for everyone. It is also one that should be watched only with certain individuals. But it was certainly a film for me. Olivia Wilde and Cooper Hoffman have incredible chemistry as the leads, and the film’s supporting cast members are also by every means an asset to the production. I am not the biggest Charli XCX guy, but even I was surprised with her performance as Minerva. She was perfect. I am going to give “I Want Your Sex” a 7/10.

“I Want Your Sex” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! For those new here to Scene Before, in addition to written reviews, I also have recently been doing video reviews! Be sure to check out my latest episode of Movie Requests, the original series where I ask celebrities what movies they think I should talk about, and give my official thoughts! My latest episode features the very funny Amy Sedaris, who suggests I should review two of her favorite movies, “The Elephant Man” and “Babe.” To find out if I liked these movies as much as her, click the video above! And if you enjoy the video, please leave a like and subscribe to my YouTube channel. I have more episodes coming featuring celebrities including Adam Conover, Rosario Dawson, Joe Gatto, Michael Rooker, and Tessa Thompson,. The next episode, which will be released on a future undetermined date, will feature Melissa Barrera (Abigail, In the Heights). Be sure to look out for that when it drops!

My next review is going to be for “The Invite!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Cookie Queens,” “Tony,” “Spa Weekend,” and “Coyote vs. Acme.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “I Want Your Sex?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite film that you would think twice before watching with your family? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Her Private Hell (2026): The Most Pretentious Science Fiction Schlock of the 2020s

Posted on August 15 by Jack Drees

“Her Private Hell” is directed by Nicolas Winding-Refn (Drive, The Neon Demon) and stars Sophie Thatcher (Heretic, Companion), Charles Melton (Riverdale, Beef), Havana Rose Liu (Bottoms, Tuner), Kristine Froseth (How to Blow Up a Pipeline, Oh, Canada), Shioli Kutsuna (Deadpool 2, Invasion), Aoi Yamada (First Love, Perfect Days), Dougray Scott (Mission: Impossible 2, Taken 3), Diego Calva (Babylon, Bird Box Barcelona), and Hidetoshi Nishijima (Drive My Car, Shin Ultraman). This film is set in a futuristic, neon-lit, mist-covered metropolis. At this time, an entity referred to as the Leather Man is taking the lives of the women he comes across.

Nicolas Winding-Refn is not my favorite filmmaker. In fact, I do not think his films are particularly my taste. But I do have a soft spot for his handling on visuals. He knows how to put together a good-looking project. I have seen “Drive” and “The Neon Demon” and even if I do not think the stories of those films are perfect, I do remember the projects for their vibes and visual splendor. When I saw Winding-Refn’s name attached to this project, I was intrigued. I was under the impression that he could deliver something worth my time.

If you were to ask me to describe “Her Private Hell” to you on a whim, I would probably stand before you in awkward silence. I say this despite watching the entire movie in a cinema and somehow not managing to fall asleep. I kind of wish I did however, because this movie was a nightmare to sit through. Part of me is struggling to describe what exactly “Her Private Hell” is in essence, but Hell is certainly what I found watching this.

Anybody remember “Megalopolis?” If you thought that film reeked of pretentiousness, then you are clearly not ready for “Her Private Hell.” This movie essentially uses its, admittedly, sometimes pleasing visual stimuli, to compensate for its lack of an engaging narrative. There are some decent action shots and well-lit scenes that stand out. Note that I said the visual stimuli is sometimes pleasing. There are quite a few moments in this movie in which I wanted to nearly avert my eyes altogether. I am by no means epileptic, but there was a point during this film where I am shocked I did not have a seizure. I do have sensitive ears however, and there is a moment where the music is cranked so loud that I was convinced that I was dragged into one of those modern bowling alleys that thinks it is more important to deck out the place in colorful lighting as opposed to, well, provide a good bowling experience. Safe to say, I nearly left this film with a headache.

Watching this movie evokes the feeling of entering a trendy art museum with tons of colorful lighting, neon, special effects. But as soon as I leave said art museum, those are the parts of the experience I will remember the most as opposed to the exhibits within. When it comes to anything in this movie involving story or characterization, there is nothing that sparks my interest until act 3. This film strikes a remarkable first impression with its grand score, heaping production value, and concept of a mind-bending future. I even thought I would end up listening to Pino Donaggio’s music in spare time. But part of me is apprehensive with that idea as it will most likely remind me of the complete and utter boredom I had to endure during this film’s slog of a runtime. The movie is not even two hours. Yet it certainly feels like it is just a bit longer than that.

This is one of the slowest movies I had to sit through all year. I do not mind a slow movie as long as the content within it keeps me engaged. “Her Private Hell” tries to do that on every level. The film evokes the cyberpunk feel of “Blade Runner,” a movie which is also pretty slow itself. But unlike that 1982 classic, “Her Private Hell” does not present a cohesive story or series of events that kept my eyes and ears onboard. Does the dialogue make up for it at least? Heck no! In fact, it only makes things ten times worse! I understand that this movie is not in our reality per se, but I was not able to immerse myself in this film’s reality that showcases some of the cheesiest sounding lines I remember hearing in a sci-fi flick. There’s nails on a chalkboard, and then there’s the incredibly sluggish delivery given by some of this film’s cast.

I would love to sit here and suggest that this movie makes up in its style for what it lacks in substance. Thankfully, it does in certain ways. Yet as I look back on my experience, I remember not being able to buy one or two sets in particular. There is one set in this movie that has tons of crystals in the background. It is almost as if someone on the crew looked at the Meta Crystal stage from “Super Smash Bros.” and decided to make a more colorful, three-dimensional space out of it. I was expecting Metal Mario to show up at some point to show everyone who’s boss. There is a particular polish to this set that reeks of artificiality. It gave me high school play or “Saturday Night Live” vibes.

Story-wise, the only time I found myself somewhat engaged is whenever the movie enters a relationship drama between two women and one man. I will not spoil much about it, but when it comes to both women in particular, I was intrigued as to what was going to happen to them in relation to this matter. I wish I could have felt this way through the rest of the film’s content, but this is proof that we cannot have nice things.

There is an antagonist in this film referred to as the Leather Man. The film convinces me its characters fear this individual, but it somehow lacks the ability to make me fear him in the same way, or feel for the characters as they are fearing him. It is the difference between watching something and experiencing something if that makes any sense. Never once did I look at the Leather Man and tremble or get a bad vibe. Even when the movie showcases him doing immoral or terrible things, I sat in my seat as still as can be, desperately waiting for the credits to roll.

If I were to watch this movie on mute, maybe I would have a higher opinion of it. “Her Private Hell” is, again, in certain ways, visually pleasing. But whenever I had to dredge through the film’s cringeworthy dialogue, ostentatious nature, and snoozefest of a story, it only drags that opinion off a cliff.

In the end, “Her Private Hell” is one of the worst movies of the year. It is pretentious crap to the tenth degree. The best films can make you feel all kinds of emotions. But “Her Private Hell” simply made me feel frustrated and tired. While I have respect for Nicolas Winding-Refn’s visual approach, this movie makes me wonder if his work is actually for me. Part of me thinks it is not. Does the cast do a good job with the material given to them? One could argue they do. For all I know, everything I watched was as the director intended. But it does not mean the material was worth my time. I am going to give “Her Private Hell” a 2/10.

“Her Private Hell” is now playing in select theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! I am happy to announce that the ninth episode of MOVIE REQUESTS is in the works and it is going to feature the funny and charismatic Amy Sedaris! You may know Sedaris from projects like “The Mandalorian,” “Strangers with Candy,” and “Elf!” For the first time in the series, I will be reviewing two movies from the same person! What do you think they are? Leave your predictions in the comments! The episode will be posted here on Flicknerd.com and on my YouTube channel, which by the way, please subscribe to my YouTube channel if you have not done so already! Stay for the episode coming SUNDAY, AUGUST 23RD!

My next review is going to be for “Haunted Heist!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Spider-Man: Brand New Day,” “I Want Your Sex,” “The Invite,” and “Cookie Queens.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Her Private Hell?” What did you think about it? Or, what is the most pretentious movie you recall seeing recently? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Obsession (2025): Partner Problems Ensue in This Terrifying Film

Posted on July 31 by Jack Drees

“Obsession” is directed by Curry Barker (Milk & Serial, The Chair) and stars Michael Johnston (Teen Wolf, Slash), Inde Navarette (Superman & Lois, 13 Reasons Why), Cooper Tomlinson (Roommates, Milk & Serial), Megan Lawless (The Hate U Give, The Girl from Plainville), and Andy Richter (Conan, Madagascar). This film is about Baron “Bear” Bailey, who has a crush on his friend and co-worker Nikki. When he uses a One-Wish Willow to get his crush to love him, Bear soon realizes that Nikki becomes a bit a more clingy than he anticipated.

So, I finally saw it. This is the movie that I said I would watch week after week after week after week. Even when it dropped on VOD, I said to myself, no, I am going to check this out in a theatre. I essentially have a self-imposed rule that I will only review movies as long as I see them in theaters. Therefore, “Obsession” is getting my two cents.“Obsession” is one of several films recently that has caught my eye, not just because of the content, but because of who was making it. This film is the product of Curry Barker, who prior to this film, was known for his YouTube background. Barker is just the latest YouTuber to take their talents and translate them to feature filmmaking for the cinema. I am glad to see more of these people getting their foot in the door, especially if they make a good movie. In the case of “Obsession,” I would say this is a good movie.

Is “Obsession” groundbreaking? No. It is very simple in terms of its concept and structure. But it does not mean it lacks cleverness. The concept of the film is that Bear wishes that his crush, Nikki, would love him more than anything in the world. The good news for him is that the wish comes true! The bad news is the wish comes with various consequences. And this should not come as a huge surprise based on the exact wording Bear uses to declare his wish. He wishes that Nikki would love him more than anything in the world, and boy does she. There is love, and then there’s whatever kind of attachment Nikki has for Bear. It is a kind of love that is so deep that you would think she would never leave Bear’s side. It results in some eerie scenes and concepts that kind of makes me glad I am still single at the age of 26. I will not spoil what happens in this movie, and while I recommend it to a lot of audiences, I may steer clear of recommending it to cat people given one or two of the horrific concepts that this movie handles.

Despite being single, I have had a crush or two throughout my life. As a single man who wonders where things could have gone with those crushes had I made the right move at the right time, I adored this movie. And I think many other people are going to find something to appreciate about it too. Relationships are hard, I will not deny that. But arguably just as hard, at least in today’s world, is initiating a relationship. We see this play out between Bear and Nikki, who are good friends at the start of the film. As the story progresses, Bear increasingly gives Nikki the idea that he has feelings for her. When Bear fails to confess those feelings, he uses a Wish Willow to make Nikki fall in love with him. If only it were that easy. Not all relationships are created equal, but one of my biggest fears is if I had a good friend, and I wanted to be more than friends with said person. Asking for that to become a reality is daunting, considering what we have is supposedly great.

As highlighted earlier, “Obsession” is good, but not groundbreaking. Part of that is highlighted by some of the choices in the screenplay. The first two acts of the film to me are clear highlights. I found them relatable, sometimes fun, and they kept me hooked. As soon as this movie dived into act three, I found just about everything that happened next to be quite predictable. I do not mind predictable movies, but there was a level of predictability in this one that sort of lessened the experience. There is also a moment where two people are talking on the phone, only for one person to say to meet them at “x location,” suggesting “it’s important.” If you are familiar with this frankly, beyond insufferable cliche, I think you can probably imagine what happens next.

The screenplay is not entirely flawed. Not even close. The dialogue, even from some extremely minor characters like Carter Harper (Andy Richter) is brilliantly executed. The film’s standout star, Inde Navarette, is given a goldmine of material to work with as Nikki. She nails each scene. I did not know her name before this movie, but I am ecstatic to know it now, because I think her killer performance is likely an indicator of how bright her career is going to be.

I also like how this film handles the character of Bear (Michael Johnston). Because the moments leading up to that big wish of his, I was rooting for him, and I did not envy being out of his shoes. This is a character that in very little time, I found myself attached to based on his one fantasy. Some say there are plenty of fish in the sea, but he seemed so dedicated to his future with his crush that I could not help but admire his efforts to make that happen. If anything, Bear’s journey felt like it could have belonged in an excellent short film. But to my pleasant surprise, the film expands its simple concept and fleshes out its main character nicely. Though it should be noted that “Obsession” just so happens to be inspired by Curry Barker’s own short. Regardless of the length, this project made me a Curry Barker fan. I am curious to see what he does next, whether it is another small budget horror movie, or a super-sized epic. Even though this movie is yet another spin on “The Monkey’s Paw” or any other “be careful what you wish for” tale, I think Barker did a good job at bringing it to life and I would like to see him continue making quality cinema.

In the end, “Obsession” is a solid horror flick, even if it is fairly familiar. In fact, Curry Barker himself says he based this movie partially on an episode of “The Simpsons.” Even so, I thought this was a lot of fun. It showcases some pure chemistry between Bear and Nikki, from the moments where the two are simply friends to the point where they become something else entirely. The entire cast does a good job, but Inde Navarette in particular is given quite a bit to do and she kills her role. This is a role with awards potential written all over it. The third act of the film is the weakest point, but it does not mean it is necessarily awful. It is just the most inferior part of what is ultimately an enjoyable flick. If you are into horror, this is worth checking out at least once. I am going to give “Obsession” a 7/10.

“Obsession” is now available to watch in theaters, on VOD, and on Peacock for all subscribers.

Thanks for reading this review! As a reminder, THIS SUNDAY, AUGUST 2ND, I will be sharing my latest episode of Movie Requests, featuring special guest Elijah Wood! If you want to see the promo for the episode featuring my interaction with him, click the video above! I had a chance to meet Wood in Philadelphia earlier this year. On Movie Requests, one does not simply walk in and do a film review, they must go find the one guest to rule them all! If you want to see this episode as soon as it drops, please subscribe to my YouTube channel! It will also be available here on Flicknerd.com in a dedicated post.

My next review is going to be for “Maddie’s Secret!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass,” “The Odyssey,” “Her Private Hell,” “Haunted Heist,” and “Spider-Man: Brand New Day.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Obsession?” What did you think about it? Or, given the recent stream of online content creators transitioning to feature filmmaking, what is a movie you enjoyed recently made by someone famous for creating online content? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

In the Grey (2026): A Surprising Snooze from Guy Ritchie

Posted on June 9 by Jack Drees

“In the Grey” is written and directed by Guy Ritchie (The Gentlemen, Snatch) and stars Henry Cavill (Man of Steel, Mission: Impossible – Fallout), Jake Gyllenhaal (Stronger, Spider-Man: Far from Home), Eiza González (Baby Driver, Ambulance), Kristofer Hivju (Force Majeure, Game of Thrones), Fisher Stevens (Hackers, Short Circuit), and Rosamund Pike (Gone Girl, Saltburn). This film is about a group of operatives who try to recover a billion dollar debt from a criminal organization.

My relationship with Guy Ritichie is iffy. I like some of his movies, that is of the ones I have seen. In fact, while it may have the DNA of a typical Jason Statham flick, I still remember really enjoying “Wrath of Man.” I thought it was well shot, had great action, and contained likable characters.

While “In the Grey” may not have Jason Statham, it does come packed with a ton of other stars including Henry Cavill, Jake Gyllenhaal, and Eiza González just to name a few. It is always nice when a movie is able to have notable, talented names in front of and behind the camera. So, my question is… Why did everyone waste their talent on this absolute chore of a movie?

This was BORING. And it is really weird to say that, because I could tell that this movie felt like it came from a singular vision. It is definitely Guy Ritchie’s film through and through based on the creative editing choices, the fast pacing, and unique layout of the screenplay. Also, note the use of the word “fast.” If your movie is fast, but also boring, then that is a different kind of special.

I am not going to pretend that “In the Grey” does not have anything good in it. I just wish that this talented, A-List cast who I enjoyed in other projects could have delivered something just as solid as some of their previous work. This movie feels like a step down for them, and I would not go as far as to blame the talent specifically.

That said, there are positives. A lot of the camerawork was eye-popping. Granted, I thought the movie’s color palette was quite underwhelming and looked more like something that belonged on Netflix. But there were quite a few shots I liked, including one at the beginning where we see Maggie Q’s character falling to the side. It reminded me of a similar shot of the same thing happening in “Ready or Not 2: Here I Come” earlier this year. The locations and production design are also neat. The set up of the movie does a halfway decent job at giving a sense of the tone, but what followed did not quite live up to what was given in the beginning.

The more I try to think of redeeming qualities, the more I wish I were talking about better movies released just a short time before this one like “Mortal Kombat II” or “Lorne.” While those are not the best movies I have seen in recent memory, I found something in those movies that this one tends to lack. Personality. Perhaps it is unfair of me to say that considering I already said that this film feels like a singular vision from Guy Ritchie. After all, it technically is. He wrote the movie itself in addition to directing it. If anything, this film reminds me a lot of “The Gentlemen.” Like this movie, that one contains a stacked cast, moves at a breakneck pace, and has a fair amount of action. I think I had more fun with “The Gentlemen” than I did watching this film, partially because I got to watch a rather unhinged Matthew McConaughey.

While I could tell that the actors were doing their best with the characters, they did not stand out in any significant way. Perhaps “In the Grey” does have personality, but said personality is not sitting well with me. You know that saying “Don’t judge a book by it’s cover?” My apologies, I think that saying lacks merit when “In the Grey” sometimes emits a sense of so-called personality that could best be described as grey.

Sometimes the characters will have a good line or two, and other times they won’t. No, seriously. For all I know, maybe the dialogue reads well, but as I watched certain scenes in this movie, the dialogue came off as something one would find in a “Saturday Night Live” parody of a generic action film. It is sometimes overemphasized, uninspired, and somewhat cliche. The movie itself does not entirely feel cliche. Getting from point A to point B is not exactly done in the most usual of manners, but the specific manners did not sit well with me.

In today’s world where second-screen viewing is a common occurrence for some people, “In the Grey” seems to challenge that concept with its constant need to put captions for certain things that may matter throughout the movie. I am not saying that this movie feels like it was designed to cater to the second-screen viewer. In fact, if you partake in second-screen viewing for everything you watch now, good luck with this movie, because the dialogue is some of the least digestible I remember hearing. I wish I could quote some of the characters for you off the top of my head, but I cannot, because every line is given as quickly as the other. The way the dialogue is laid out during the entire movie reminds me of an extended YouTube vlog where there happens to be a jumpcut every five seconds. I am not saying this movie has noticeable jumpcuts, but if you like nonstop talking, this movie is probably going to be Heaven for you.

I like my auteur directors. Christopher Nolan, Quentin Tarantino, and Denis Villeneuve are a few that come to mind. I have come to this conclusion previously, but if anything, “In the Grey” reminds me that maybe Guy Ritchie’s style is not exactly my jam. He is quick, and I do not mind quick. But there is no room to breathe. I would hate to see him do a “Run Lola Run” remake. Also, I do not care what you all think. That movie sucks.

In the end, “In the Grey” is a completely fitting title for what is ultimately one of the dullest flicks of the year so far. After seeing this movie, I am starting to question whether my artistic tastes line up with Guy Ritchie’s. I am sure he is a friendly human being and could be interesting to work with. But this movie is not quite doing it for me. On top of the well-known director, the movie comes with an A-list cast who deserve a script that is much more in line with their talents. I am probably not going to remember “In the Grey” for any reason other than the fact that it nearly put me to sleep. I am going to give “In the Grey” a 3/10.

“In the Grey” is now available to rent or by on VOD.

Thanks for reading this review! If you have not done so already, be sure to check out my latest episode of Movie Requests, featuring “Clerks” actor Brian O’Halloran! In this video I review his recommendation, the 1970 war film “Patton.” To hear my thoughts, click the video above! Be sure to like the video if you enjoyed it and subscribe to my YouTube channel if you want to see more new episodes as soon as they drop! They will also be posted here on Flicknerd.com, but if you want the fastest way to view the episode, subscribing to my channel will do the trick.

My next review is going to be for “Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu.” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “I Love Boosters,” “Backrooms,” “Masters of the Universe,” “Another World,” and “The Breadwinner.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “In the Grey?” What did you think about it? Or, what are some Guy Ritchie movies that you enjoy? I liked one of his more recent features, “Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre.” It was a lot of fun. I did not have a chance to review it a few years ago, but if I saw it early enough to do so, I would have given the film a positive score. Let me know your favorites down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Deep Water (2026): Plane Crashes and Sharks. What Could Go Wrong?

Posted on May 25 by Jack Drees

“Deep Water” is directed by Renny Harlin (Cutthroat Island, Deep Blue Sea) and stars Aaron Eckhart (The Dark Knight, Midway), Angus Sampson (Insidious, Mad Max: Fury Road), Ben Kingsley (Iron Man 3, Hugo), Lucy Barrett (Skincare, Charmed), and Molly Belle Wright (Omaha, The Best Christmas Pageant Ever). This film is about a group of people who are on a plane flying from Los Angeles to Shanghai, whose flight happens to go by the wayside as they crash in the middle of the ocean. As if things could not get any worse, the group is surrounded by sharks and must do what they can to survive.

It is now time to talk about “Deep Water,” not to be confused with the movie of the same name starring Ben Affleck and Ana de Armas, which is entirely different in premise and execution. Unlike that straight to streaming flick, this is a theatrically released thrill ride that involves a very simple, but intriguing premise.

Last year was the 50th anniversary of “Jaws,” which to this day, remains the best shark movie ever made by a clear mile. But just because “Jaws” is so great, does not mean that other shark movies do not have the potential to work. “Deep Water” is not quite a shark movie, but when the marketing showed sharks, I was sold. This looked eerie, intense, and entertaining. It is definitely a popcorn flick. Though I skipped the popcorn on this movie.

“Deep Water” does not reinvent the wheel when it comes to filmmaking or storytelling, but the film nevertheless delivers a satisfying package. Is it perfect? Absolutely not. But it does not change the fact that the film is worth watching at least once.

When it comes to the overall premise of the film, it keeps things simple. A bunch of people are on a flight from Los Angeles to Shanghai, then next things next, they make an emergency landing in the middle of the ocean. It is at this point where everyone must work together to survive. Although, getting everyone on the same page is not the easiest task.

This film contains a fairly sizable cast of characters, some of whom are played by well-known names. I am quite shocked that some of the names accepted their roles. Their paychecks must have been enormous. Although upon learning that this film had a $40 million budget, maybe not. Plus, this film is directed by Renny Harlin, who has helmed some well known films including “Cliffhanger” and “Die Hard 2.” Then again, he also directed “The Legend of Hercules,” a film so bad that I think it might as well have been better off staying a legend.

That said, while I remember some of the faces in this movie like Ben Kingsley, it is not as easy to remember the characters. Part of it is due to having so many of them, so the movie does what it can to allow everyone to have their moment, but only a particular few stand out. If you were to ask me if I am going to remember these characters in a year from now, I would probably guess not. Heck, I am having trouble recalling some of them even less than a month after seeing the movie. Do I have my favorite characters from the project? Sure.

Is this movie predictable? Perhaps. But I do not mind it being that way, because what it offers is undoubtedly entertaining. We get to know a bunch of people who are on a plane. Everyone from the crew to some of the core passengers, the plane makes an emergency landing in the ocean, and all of the characters who we got to know on the plane have some ongoing effect towards the story from here on out. Sharks appear every now and then, causing all kinds of trouble for the survivors, who realize their journey has only begun. Having said that now, it makes me appreciate this premise more. The only way this movie could have been crazier is if it went full “Snakes on a Plane” and decided to put the sharks on the plane as it was in the air. But as someone who likes logic, I am glad they did not go in that direction. It would just spawn bad memories of torturing myself while watching the “Sharknado” movies.

This movie combines two of my biggest apprehensions. Planes and sharks. For the record, I like planes. I really do. I find air travel fascinating, even if the modern air travel market is an overpriced scam. I do not fly super often, but I do take a plane one to a few times per year, and in the back of my mind I am always nervous about crashing. This movie reminds me of that fear. I always fly out of Boston, whose airport is right next to the Atlantic, a place that has sharks! Of course! Thanks, movie!

This film reminded me of another thing to be afraid of, and that happens to be lithium-ion batteries. They are everywhere. Like planes, I do not outright hate the concept of lithium-ion batteries. I understand their purpose, but the movie essentially kicks into gear because of something that happens to a lithium-ion battery. If you have ever seen a news story involving some kind of a device that contains a lithium-ion battery, I think you can imagine what that incident is. I am a little frightened as I write this review on my laptop, which I will remind you, has a lithium-ion battery inside of it that could blow up if I make one wrong move. There is a reason why people working at airports ask if you have anything with lithium-ion batteries on you before your flight!

Movies are experiences, and to say I experienced fear in “Deep Water” is an understatement. Is this the best movie of the year? No. The characters could be a little deeper (not literally), but it is never boring. It gives the bones of the characters and makes them likable enough. The shark action is sometimes fun to watch. It is not the best I have ever seen. It is not like I am watching “The Shallows” starring Blake Lively, which I still fondly remember about a decade after its release. That said, this film is not 100% camp. It has campy moments, but the plane crash, which goes on for more time than I was anticipating, felt rather dramatic. There happened to be a sense of stakes as the plane was falling down. You could feel the emotions and the nerves running through the characters, and those emotions and nerves stuck around as the sharks came out to play. This movie is thrilling, well-paced, and engaging.

In the end, “Deep Water” is a solid plane crash movie, on top of being a solid shark movie. It takes two disastrously bone-chilling scenarios and neatly combines them into one premise. This is not Shakespeare, but it is also not something that deserves to be tossed aside either. It is a decent movie that allows you to munch popcorn while watching tons of people figure out how not to die. Is this film the next “Jaws?” No. But it is a good watch. I am going to give “Deep Water” a 7/10.

“Deep Water” is now playing in select theaters. Tickets are available now!

Thanks for reading this review! I would like to take a moment to remind everyone that my next episode of Movie Requests is going to feature “Clerks” actor Brian O’Halloran! He has appeared in all three installments of Kevin Smith’s retail-based trilogy, and in the next couple of weeks, I will be reviewing his film of choice. That review is SUPPOSED TO BE HERE on Sunday June, 7th. If you have not done so already, please check out my review for “High Noon,” requested by “Battlestar Galactica” star Katee Sackhoff! If you want to see more reviews throughout the series as soon as they are uploaded, please consider subscribing to my YouTube channel! I will also share them here, but subscribing to my channel is the fastest way you can check them out. Life is short, you know. Might as well spend your time wisely.

I have a buttload of written reviews coming soon! My next reviews are going to be for “Animal Farm,” “Mortal Kombat II,” “The Sheep Detectives,” “In the Grey, “Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu,” and “I Love Boosters.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Deep Water?” What did you think about it? Or, what is a movie that reminds you of some of your personal fears? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Normal (2025): Nobody Should Miss Bob Odenkirk’s Latest Action Flick

Posted on May 8 by Jack Drees

“Normal” is directed by Ben Wheatley (Meg 2: The Trench, Free Fire) and stars Bob Odenkirk (Nobody, Breaking Bad), Henry Winkler (Happy Days, Arrested Development), and Lena Headey (300, Game of Thrones). This film centers around a sheriff who has a history of taking temporary jobs in one town to the text. His latest gig is in a small town by the name of Normal, Minnesota, where things go haywire as soon as he finds himself trying to deal with a bank robbery.

Remember “Nobody?” Remember how sick that movie was? Turns out Bob Odenkirk is not done being an action star. Sure, he came back for a sequel, but frankly, I think a man of his talents deserves better. This is no diss on Bob Odenkirk. He can do no wrong. He is a fine actor with quite a bit of range. As much as I like “Nobody,” I was interested to see that Odenkirk was headlining a brand new movie, “Normal.”

What makes “Normal” stand out is its quieter vibe. Whether it has to do with the wintry backdrop or the occasional delight that rises due to seeing Ulysses solve minor issues or obstacles for the town’s citizens, the film, despite being violent, simultaneously feels cozy.

This film is written by Derek Kolstad, whose previous credits include the “Nobody” films, and before that, the first three “John Wick” titles. Those two franchises carry a similar DNA considering they are fast-paced, obnoxious, and star somewhat older men who know how to shoot. This is not to say “Normal” is not in any way similar to those movies. In fact, speaking of fast pace, this movie is incredibly tight. There are also plenty of gun fights, not to mention creative kills. If anything, the kills are almost the selling point of this movie. Those are the parts of the film that if I were a general moviegoer and I saw this in the middle in its run, would have me flocking down the streets yelling about it. Perhaps I would look like a lunatic that promotes violence, but I am sure that people will understand what I am talking about once they see the film.

Unfortunately, this film, which has been out for several weeks now, has not received the widest audience. It had a soft opening weekend, and has only made about a quarter of its budget back. The film so far has made more than $5 million, but its budget appears to be less than $20 million. I hope the film has a boost on its way, perhaps on PVOD or through a streaming service, perhaps even cable, because as someone who got to see this in a theater with a large crowd, which I do not think a lot of people can say, it is an experience.

I had the privilege of seeing this movie at a giant theatre during the Miami Film Festival, and so many people were having a blast watching everything play out. I have no idea about the people around me, but I was quite surprised with how much flair this film delivered by the end of it. This film is as exciting as can be. If you are coming to “Normal” solely to watch Odenkirk kick all kinds of butt, this film gives you that in spades. If you are coming for a little bit more than that, there are some aspects that are properly delivered.

Not to say that “Normal” is by any means the comedy of the year, but there are quite a few laughs to be had in this movie. Some of those laughs are due to the kills. If you told me that Quentin Tarantino stepped in to direct a few scenes just to get some of the sickest violence one could possibly put into a frame, I would believe you. The film has a knack for more conventional attempts at humor too. One of my favorite gags in the film involves Henry Winkler’s character of Mayor Kibner, who despite living in this film’s titular small town for years, says he never saw a moose. In fact, we find out that Odenkirk’s character, Sheriff Ulysses, saw a moose, and told him about it, thus infuriating him.

“Normal” is, fittingly, set in the fictional town of Normal, Minnesota. This small town tends to play a large part in the film. It is basically a character of its own. One of my favorite things about it is its welcome sign that reads, “We like it here.” The name almost comes off as a joke considering the film’s concept, which sees the town’s newcomer, Ulysses, realize that there is something abnormal afoot in what seems to be a humble, tiny community. As for what that thing is, I will keep it vague, but the film does a good job at giving the sense that its community is proud and tight-knit. You get a sense of hometown pride in “Normal,” whether it is easy to side with such pride is another story.

Going back to what I said about this movie being tight, it is kind of a blessing as there is very little fluff. And whatever fluff there is, happens to work. I immensely enjoyed this film’s climax as it brings a lot of people into the same room, slowly builds up the tension, and gets into the chaotic violence fest I was hoping to see. I did not get popcorn for this movie. I am not even sure if my venue even had popcorn. Miami traffic sucks, so I almost missed the start of the movie, so I did not even have time to check if the place had a concessions stand. But if I had a bucket of popcorn in my seat, I would be shoving it in my mouth like a madman because this sequence is quite entertaining. Again, this movie feels like a blessing. But some things with blessings have curses too. Yes, “Normal” is a fun watch, but I wish it went on longer. If anything, it means Ben Wheatley and crew did a good job with the material. It left me wanting more. This does not necessarily mean I want a sequel to this movie. Though if a “Normal 2” were to happen, or perhaps another story featuring Ulysses in a different town, sign me up.

In the end, “Normal” is anything but. It is chaotic, it is bloody, it ever so slowly builds its excitement. I felt the same way watching this movie that Odenkirk did while navigating the small town. It seems quiet at first, but along the way, things just crank up. While not exactly the same kind of movie as “Nobody,” “Normal,” which also has Bob Odenkirk as the lead, sometimes gives off a similar feel. If you like Bob Odenkirk, as well as “Nobody,” then “Normal” is a nice addition to your watchlist. If you are ready for some bonkers action, you will not be disappointed. I am going to give “Normal” a 7/10.

“Normal” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available in select locations. If you cannot catch it in a theater, please make an effort to check it out on VOD starting May 18th.

Thanks for reading this review! I just want to remind everyone that my latest episode of Movie Requests is now available to watch! In this episode, I ask “The Mandalorian” star Katee Sackhoff what movie she thinks I should watch, and she picked the 1952 western “High Noon.” I had never seen it. Frankly, despite my love for all kinds of cinema, my western game could be stronger, so I thank her for the recommendation! What did I think of the movie? Watch the episode to find out! And if you enjoy the video, leave a like, leave a comment, and subscribe to my YouTube channel that way you can catch more episodes of Movie Requests down the line.

My next review is going to be for “Lorne!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Michael,” “Deep Water,” “Animal Farm,” and “Mortal Kombat II.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Normal?” What did you think about it? Or, have you seen “Nobody?” Perhaps even “Nobody 2?” Tell me your thoughts on those movies! Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

	Other Mommy (2026):… on Interstellar (2014): A Beautif…
	Other Mommy (2026):… on Godzilla: King of the Monsters…
	Other Mommy (2026):… on The Odyssey (2026): The Ultima…
	Digger (2026): I Did… on Don’t Worry Darling (202…
	Digger (2026): I Did… on One Battle After Another (2025…