Thriller

I Want Your Sex (2026): A Wilde, Sexy Ride

Posted on by Jack Drees

“I Want Your Sex” is directed by Gregg Araki (13 Reasons Why, Now Apocalypse) and stars Olivia Wilde (Don’t Worry Darling, Tron: Legacy), Cooper Hoffman (The Long Walk, Licorice Pizza), Mason Gooding (Ballers, Love, Victor), Chase Sui Wonders (The Studio, Generation), Johnny Knoxville (Jackass, Action Point), Margaret Cho (30 Rock, All American Girl), Roxane Mesquida (Now Apocalypse, Gossip Girl), Charli XCX (The Moment, UglyDolls), and Daveed Diggs (Black-ish, The Boys). This film is about a man named Elliot who takes a job at a company specializing in erotic art. Soon after taking said job, he finds himself in a sexual relationship with his boss.

© 2026 – Magnolia Pictures

Sex sells. End of story. Well, unless your sex-centric movie comes out against “Spider-Man,” then that’s a different conversation entirely. As Tom Holland, Zendaya, and Jon Bernthal continue their box office domination with “Spider-Man: Brand New Day,” released just two weeks after their smash hit “The Odyssey,” a significantly smaller title is getting, unsurprisingly, nowhere near as much spotlight. That movie being “I Want Your Sex.”

The concept of this film is intriguing, as it places a 23 year old man with a much more experienced woman in a series of sexual situations. The kicker to this, the 23 year old man just so happens to be working for said woman at, amazingly enough, a company dedicated to erotic art.

Couple things to note… First off, my family does read this blog, and I have no problem with them knowing that I very much enjoyed this raunchy, sexy movie. I would like to shoutout one cool aunt who was confused as to why I recommended “Anora,” which she deemed “pornagraphic.” Auntie… That’s tame compared to what “I Want Your Sex” has to offer. You’ve been warned. Now for all the sick human beings who have not clicked away from this review, you are in for a good time.

© 2026 – Magnolia Pictures

The best thing about this movie is the cast, not necessarily because of anyone’s star status, although it does contain a few recognizable names including Cooper Hoffman and Olivia Wilde, whose chemistry together is electric. For those who have followed me for a while, you may be aware that I was not the biggest fan of another film in which Hoffaman stars, “Licorice Pizza.” It is not entirely his fault the movie did not work for me, Hoffman played his part as he was instructed to do so. But the dynamic between Hoffman and Wilde in this latest film reminded me a bit of the dynamic the former had with Alana Haim in “Licorice Pizza.” This is yet another case of a much younger man having feelings of some sort for a woman much older than him. While the relationship in “Licorice Pizza” felt uncomfortable, I actually found quite a bit of enjoyment in what “I Want Your Sex” had to offer. Partially because one, the relationship is… Well, legal… Also, whereas I found Hoffman’s character in “Licorice Pizza” to be a pervy creep, I found myself occasionally sympathizing with the one he plays in “I Want Your Sex…”

As for the opposite end of the dynamic, Olivia Wilde, she is a knockout. Erika is packed with all kinds of range. Every once in a while you can see Wilde portraying her as a stern conversationalist. Sometimes she enters boss mode. Other times she gloriously loses her temper. And then there are those moments where her actions speak louder than her words. Every scene between Erika and Elliot had my eyes glued to the screen because I genuinely had no idea where things were going to go with them at certain points. This movie is a rather unpredictable ride.

The surprise star of the film… Charlie XCX. I never cared for her music, but even I must admit that she is brilliant here. On top of everything that is going on between Hoffman and Wilde, the former also just so happens to be in a relationship with XCX’s character of Minerva. One would think that my favorite sex-centric moment of the movie is between Hoffman and Wilde, but it is actually between the former and Charlie XCX, because it says a lot about where both characters were in the relationship and further tapped into Hoffman’s sexual tendencies. The scene perfectly establishes Hoffman’s need for sex in order to stay sane, as opposed to Charlie XCX, who clearly could not give two craps about it in addition to the relationship itself. Of all the characters in the film, Charlie XCX’s seems to be the least expressive, perhaps on purpose. I have no problem with it. The character works.

On top of the awkward intimate moments shared between Minerva and Elliot, the film occasionally has a hint or two that highlights how, let’s just say, important sex is to the latter. Elliot’s roommate, Apple (Wonders), asks him if he has ever faked an orgasm, to which he responds, “Well, I’m a guy, so…” It also puts a spotlight on unrealistic standards people seem to have for sex, especially when one is so often exposed to it in parts of their daily life outside of the actual activity.

If anything, the film is a love letter to, and at the same time, a parody of Gen Z, which I happen to be a part of. There is a lot of media coverage suggesting that some members of this generation do not exactly have a complete interest in sex, or have fears about engaging in said activity. Granted some of these people are younger, so sex is probably not something they want to think about. But others, like myself, are in their twenties, which some would stereotype as a time where sex winds up playing some kind of role in one’s life.

At the same time, I wonder how accessible this film will wind up being to my generation, considering how part of said media coverage on Gen Z suggests they want to see less sex in film and television. That said, this film has a lot of sex, and just about every scene ends up contributing to the story in some way.

But this film is a lot more than just sex. It is often quite funny and dramatic. The film, in addition to being about a May-December sexual relationship, also interweaves an intriguing part of the story having to do with the Los Angeles art gallery scene. There is never a boring moment in “I Want Your Sex,” which if there were, would be shocking, as the film is only 90 minutes. Is this the best film I have seen this year? No. But in terms of pacing and messaging, it is top-notch. This is my first Gregg Araki film, and I can say I am a new fan. He has a knack for brisk storytelling. I would love to see him helm another feature down the line.

© 2026 – Magnolia Pictures

In the end, “I Want Your Sex” is wildly entertaining. The film combines comedy, drama, romance, and blends everything together in a neat package. This is not a film for everyone. It is also one that should be watched only with certain individuals. But it was certainly a film for me. Olivia Wilde and Cooper Hoffman have incredible chemistry as the leads, and the film’s supporting cast members are also by every means an asset to the production. I am not the biggest Charli XCX guy, but even I was surprised with her performance as Minerva. She was perfect. I am going to give “I Want Your Sex” a 7/10.

“I Want Your Sex” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! For those new here to Scene Before, in addition to written reviews, I also have recently been doing video reviews! Be sure to check out my latest episode of Movie Requests, the original series where I ask celebrities what movies they think I should talk about, and give my official thoughts! My latest episode features the very funny Amy Sedaris, who suggests I should review two of her favorite movies, “The Elephant Man” and “Babe.” To find out if I liked these movies as much as her, click the video above! And if you enjoy the video, please leave a like and subscribe to my YouTube channel. I have more episodes coming featuring celebrities including Adam Conover, Rosario Dawson, Joe Gatto, Michael Rooker, and Tessa Thompson,. The next episode, which will be released on a future undetermined date, will feature Melissa Barrera (Abigail, In the Heights). Be sure to look out for that when it drops!

My next review is going to be for “The Invite!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Cookie Queens,” “Tony,” “Spa Weekend,” and “Coyote vs. Acme.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “I Want Your Sex?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite film that you would think twice before watching with your family? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Her Private Hell (2026): The Most Pretentious Science Fiction Schlock of the 2020s

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Her Private Hell” is directed by Nicolas Winding-Refn (Drive, The Neon Demon) and stars Sophie Thatcher (Heretic, Companion), Charles Melton (Riverdale, Beef), Havana Rose Liu (Bottoms, Tuner), Kristine Froseth (How to Blow Up a Pipeline, Oh, Canada), Shioli Kutsuna (Deadpool 2, Invasion), Aoi Yamada (First Love, Perfect Days), Dougray Scott (Mission: Impossible 2, Taken 3), Diego Calva (Babylon, Bird Box Barcelona), and Hidetoshi Nishijima (Drive My Car, Shin Ultraman). This film is set in a futuristic, neon-lit, mist-covered metropolis. At this time, an entity referred to as the Leather Man is taking the lives of the women he comes across.

Courtesy of NEON – © Courtesy of NEON

Nicolas Winding-Refn is not my favorite filmmaker. In fact, I do not think his films are particularly my taste. But I do have a soft spot for his handling on visuals. He knows how to put together a good-looking project. I have seen “Drive” and “The Neon Demon” and even if I do not think the stories of those films are perfect, I do remember the projects for their vibes and visual splendor. When I saw Winding-Refn’s name attached to this project, I was intrigued. I was under the impression that he could deliver something worth my time.

If you were to ask me to describe “Her Private Hell” to you on a whim, I would probably stand before you in awkward silence. I say this despite watching the entire movie in a cinema and somehow not managing to fall asleep. I kind of wish I did however, because this movie was a nightmare to sit through. Part of me is struggling to describe what exactly “Her Private Hell” is in essence, but Hell is certainly what I found watching this.

Anybody remember “Megalopolis?” If you thought that film reeked of pretentiousness, then you are clearly not ready for “Her Private Hell.” This movie essentially uses its, admittedly, sometimes pleasing visual stimuli, to compensate for its lack of an engaging narrative. There are some decent action shots and well-lit scenes that stand out. Note that I said the visual stimuli is sometimes pleasing. There are quite a few moments in this movie in which I wanted to nearly avert my eyes altogether. I am by no means epileptic, but there was a point during this film where I am shocked I did not have a seizure. I do have sensitive ears however, and there is a moment where the music is cranked so loud that I was convinced that I was dragged into one of those modern bowling alleys that thinks it is more important to deck out the place in colorful lighting as opposed to, well, provide a good bowling experience. Safe to say, I nearly left this film with a headache.

Watching this movie evokes the feeling of entering a trendy art museum with tons of colorful lighting, neon, special effects. But as soon as I leave said art museum, those are the parts of the experience I will remember the most as opposed to the exhibits within. When it comes to anything in this movie involving story or characterization, there is nothing that sparks my interest until act 3. This film strikes a remarkable first impression with its grand score, heaping production value, and concept of a mind-bending future. I even thought I would end up listening to Pino Donaggio’s music in spare time. But part of me is apprehensive with that idea as it will most likely remind me of the complete and utter boredom I had to endure during this film’s slog of a runtime. The movie is not even two hours. Yet it certainly feels like it is just a bit longer than that.

This is one of the slowest movies I had to sit through all year. I do not mind a slow movie as long as the content within it keeps me engaged. “Her Private Hell” tries to do that on every level. The film evokes the cyberpunk feel of “Blade Runner,” a movie which is also pretty slow itself. But unlike that 1982 classic, “Her Private Hell” does not present a cohesive story or series of events that kept my eyes and ears onboard. Does the dialogue make up for it at least? Heck no! In fact, it only makes things ten times worse! I understand that this movie is not in our reality per se, but I was not able to immerse myself in this film’s reality that showcases some of the cheesiest sounding lines I remember hearing in a sci-fi flick. There’s nails on a chalkboard, and then there’s the incredibly sluggish delivery given by some of this film’s cast.

I would love to sit here and suggest that this movie makes up in its style for what it lacks in substance. Thankfully, it does in certain ways. Yet as I look back on my experience, I remember not being able to buy one or two sets in particular. There is one set in this movie that has tons of crystals in the background. It is almost as if someone on the crew looked at the Meta Crystal stage from “Super Smash Bros.” and decided to make a more colorful, three-dimensional space out of it. I was expecting Metal Mario to show up at some point to show everyone who’s boss. There is a particular polish to this set that reeks of artificiality. It gave me high school play or “Saturday Night Live” vibes.

Story-wise, the only time I found myself somewhat engaged is whenever the movie enters a relationship drama between two women and one man. I will not spoil much about it, but when it comes to both women in particular, I was intrigued as to what was going to happen to them in relation to this matter. I wish I could have felt this way through the rest of the film’s content, but this is proof that we cannot have nice things.

There is an antagonist in this film referred to as the Leather Man. The film convinces me its characters fear this individual, but it somehow lacks the ability to make me fear him in the same way, or feel for the characters as they are fearing him. It is the difference between watching something and experiencing something if that makes any sense. Never once did I look at the Leather Man and tremble or get a bad vibe. Even when the movie showcases him doing immoral or terrible things, I sat in my seat as still as can be, desperately waiting for the credits to roll.

If I were to watch this movie on mute, maybe I would have a higher opinion of it. “Her Private Hell” is, again, in certain ways, visually pleasing. But whenever I had to dredge through the film’s cringeworthy dialogue, ostentatious nature, and snoozefest of a story, it only drags that opinion off a cliff.

In the end, “Her Private Hell” is one of the worst movies of the year. It is pretentious crap to the tenth degree. The best films can make you feel all kinds of emotions. But “Her Private Hell” simply made me feel frustrated and tired. While I have respect for Nicolas Winding-Refn’s visual approach, this movie makes me wonder if his work is actually for me. Part of me thinks it is not. Does the cast do a good job with the material given to them? One could argue they do. For all I know, everything I watched was as the director intended. But it does not mean the material was worth my time. I am going to give “Her Private Hell” a 2/10.

“Her Private Hell” is now playing in select theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! I am happy to announce that the ninth episode of MOVIE REQUESTS is in the works and it is going to feature the funny and charismatic Amy Sedaris! You may know Sedaris from projects like “The Mandalorian,” “Strangers with Candy,” and “Elf!” For the first time in the series, I will be reviewing two movies from the same person! What do you think they are? Leave your predictions in the comments! The episode will be posted here on Flicknerd.com and on my YouTube channel, which by the way, please subscribe to my YouTube channel if you have not done so already! Stay for the episode coming SUNDAY, AUGUST 23RD!

My next review is going to be for “Haunted Heist!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Spider-Man: Brand New Day,” “I Want Your Sex,” “The Invite,” and “Cookie Queens.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Her Private Hell?” What did you think about it? Or, what is the most pretentious movie you recall seeing recently? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Obsession (2025): Partner Problems Ensue in This Terrifying Film

Posted on by Jack Drees

© 2026 – Focus Features

“Obsession” is directed by Curry Barker (Milk & Serial, The Chair) and stars Michael Johnston (Teen Wolf, Slash), Inde Navarette (Superman & Lois, 13 Reasons Why), Cooper Tomlinson (Roommates, Milk & Serial), Megan Lawless (The Hate U Give, The Girl from Plainville), and Andy Richter (Conan, Madagascar). This film is about Baron “Bear” Bailey, who has a crush on his friend and co-worker Nikki. When he uses a One-Wish Willow to get his crush to love him, Bear soon realizes that Nikki becomes a bit a more clingy than he anticipated.

So, I finally saw it. This is the movie that I said I would watch week after week after week after week. Even when it dropped on VOD, I said to myself, no, I am going to check this out in a theatre. I essentially have a self-imposed rule that I will only review movies as long as I see them in theaters. Therefore, “Obsession” is getting my two cents.“Obsession” is one of several films recently that has caught my eye, not just because of the content, but because of who was making it. This film is the product of Curry Barker, who prior to this film, was known for his YouTube background. Barker is just the latest YouTuber to take their talents and translate them to feature filmmaking for the cinema. I am glad to see more of these people getting their foot in the door, especially if they make a good movie. In the case of “Obsession,” I would say this is a good movie.

Is “Obsession” groundbreaking? No. It is very simple in terms of its concept and structure. But it does not mean it lacks cleverness. The concept of the film is that Bear wishes that his crush, Nikki, would love him more than anything in the world. The good news for him is that the wish comes true! The bad news is the wish comes with various consequences. And this should not come as a huge surprise based on the exact wording Bear uses to declare his wish. He wishes that Nikki would love him more than anything in the world, and boy does she. There is love, and then there’s whatever kind of attachment Nikki has for Bear. It is a kind of love that is so deep that you would think she would never leave Bear’s side. It results in some eerie scenes and concepts that kind of makes me glad I am still single at the age of 26. I will not spoil what happens in this movie, and while I recommend it to a lot of audiences, I may steer clear of recommending it to cat people given one or two of the horrific concepts that this movie handles.

Despite being single, I have had a crush or two throughout my life. As a single man who wonders where things could have gone with those crushes had I made the right move at the right time, I adored this movie. And I think many other people are going to find something to appreciate about it too. Relationships are hard, I will not deny that. But arguably just as hard, at least in today’s world, is initiating a relationship. We see this play out between Bear and Nikki, who are good friends at the start of the film. As the story progresses, Bear increasingly gives Nikki the idea that he has feelings for her. When Bear fails to confess those feelings, he uses a Wish Willow to make Nikki fall in love with him. If only it were that easy. Not all relationships are created equal, but one of my biggest fears is if I had a good friend, and I wanted to be more than friends with said person. Asking for that to become a reality is daunting, considering what we have is supposedly great.

As highlighted earlier, “Obsession” is good, but not groundbreaking. Part of that is highlighted by some of the choices in the screenplay. The first two acts of the film to me are clear highlights. I found them relatable, sometimes fun, and they kept me hooked. As soon as this movie dived into act three, I found just about everything that happened next to be quite predictable. I do not mind predictable movies, but there was a level of predictability in this one that sort of lessened the experience. There is also a moment where two people are talking on the phone, only for one person to say to meet them at “x location,” suggesting “it’s important.” If you are familiar with this frankly, beyond insufferable cliche, I think you can probably imagine what happens next.

The screenplay is not entirely flawed. Not even close. The dialogue, even from some extremely minor characters like Carter Harper (Andy Richter) is brilliantly executed. The film’s standout star, Inde Navarette, is given a goldmine of material to work with as Nikki. She nails each scene. I did not know her name before this movie, but I am ecstatic to know it now, because I think her killer performance is likely an indicator of how bright her career is going to be.

I also like how this film handles the character of Bear (Michael Johnston). Because the moments leading up to that big wish of his, I was rooting for him, and I did not envy being out of his shoes. This is a character that in very little time, I found myself attached to based on his one fantasy. Some say there are plenty of fish in the sea, but he seemed so dedicated to his future with his crush that I could not help but admire his efforts to make that happen. If anything, Bear’s journey felt like it could have belonged in an excellent short film. But to my pleasant surprise, the film expands its simple concept and fleshes out its main character nicely. Though it should be noted that “Obsession” just so happens to be inspired by Curry Barker’s own short. Regardless of the length, this project made me a Curry Barker fan. I am curious to see what he does next, whether it is another small budget horror movie, or a super-sized epic. Even though this movie is yet another spin on “The Monkey’s Paw” or any other “be careful what you wish for” tale, I think Barker did a good job at bringing it to life and I would like to see him continue making quality cinema.

In the end, “Obsession” is a solid horror flick, even if it is fairly familiar. In fact, Curry Barker himself says he based this movie partially on an episode of “The Simpsons.” Even so, I thought this was a lot of fun. It showcases some pure chemistry between Bear and Nikki, from the moments where the two are simply friends to the point where they become something else entirely. The entire cast does a good job, but Inde Navarette in particular is given quite a bit to do and she kills her role. This is a role with awards potential written all over it. The third act of the film is the weakest point, but it does not mean it is necessarily awful. It is just the most inferior part of what is ultimately an enjoyable flick. If you are into horror, this is worth checking out at least once. I am going to give “Obsession” a 7/10.

“Obsession” is now available to watch in theaters, on VOD, and on Peacock for all subscribers.

Thanks for reading this review! As a reminder, THIS SUNDAY, AUGUST 2ND, I will be sharing my latest episode of Movie Requests, featuring special guest Elijah Wood! If you want to see the promo for the episode featuring my interaction with him, click the video above! I had a chance to meet Wood in Philadelphia earlier this year. On Movie Requests, one does not simply walk in and do a film review, they must go find the one guest to rule them all! If you want to see this episode as soon as it drops, please subscribe to my YouTube channel! It will also be available here on Flicknerd.com in a dedicated post.

My next review is going to be for “Maddie’s Secret!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass,” “The Odyssey,” “Her Private Hell,” “Haunted Heist,” and “Spider-Man: Brand New Day.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Obsession?” What did you think about it? Or, given the recent stream of online content creators transitioning to feature filmmaking, what is a movie you enjoyed recently made by someone famous for creating online content? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

In the Grey (2026): A Surprising Snooze from Guy Ritchie

Posted on by Jack Drees

“In the Grey” is written and directed by Guy Ritchie (The Gentlemen, Snatch) and stars Henry Cavill (Man of Steel, Mission: Impossible – Fallout), Jake Gyllenhaal (Stronger, Spider-Man: Far from Home), Eiza González (Baby Driver, Ambulance), Kristofer Hivju (Force Majeure, Game of Thrones), Fisher Stevens (Hackers, Short Circuit), and Rosamund Pike (Gone Girl, Saltburn). This film is about a group of operatives who try to recover a billion dollar debt from a criminal organization.

My relationship with Guy Ritichie is iffy. I like some of his movies, that is of the ones I have seen. In fact, while it may have the DNA of a typical Jason Statham flick, I still remember really enjoying “Wrath of Man.” I thought it was well shot, had great action, and contained likable characters.

While “In the Grey” may not have Jason Statham, it does come packed with a ton of other stars including Henry Cavill, Jake Gyllenhaal, and Eiza González just to name a few. It is always nice when a movie is able to have notable, talented names in front of and behind the camera. So, my question is… Why did everyone waste their talent on this absolute chore of a movie?

This was BORING. And it is really weird to say that, because I could tell that this movie felt like it came from a singular vision. It is definitely Guy Ritchie’s film through and through based on the creative editing choices, the fast pacing, and unique layout of the screenplay. Also, note the use of the word “fast.” If your movie is fast, but also boring, then that is a different kind of special.

I am not going to pretend that “In the Grey” does not have anything good in it. I just wish that this talented, A-List cast who I enjoyed in other projects could have delivered something just as solid as some of their previous work. This movie feels like a step down for them, and I would not go as far as to blame the talent specifically.

That said, there are positives. A lot of the camerawork was eye-popping. Granted, I thought the movie’s color palette was quite underwhelming and looked more like something that belonged on Netflix. But there were quite a few shots I liked, including one at the beginning where we see Maggie Q’s character falling to the side. It reminded me of a similar shot of the same thing happening in “Ready or Not 2: Here I Come” earlier this year. The locations and production design are also neat. The set up of the movie does a halfway decent job at giving a sense of the tone, but what followed did not quite live up to what was given in the beginning.

The more I try to think of redeeming qualities, the more I wish I were talking about better movies released just a short time before this one like “Mortal Kombat II” or “Lorne.” While those are not the best movies I have seen in recent memory, I found something in those movies that this one tends to lack. Personality. Perhaps it is unfair of me to say that considering I already said that this film feels like a singular vision from Guy Ritchie. After all, it technically is. He wrote the movie itself in addition to directing it. If anything, this film reminds me a lot of “The Gentlemen.” Like this movie, that one contains a stacked cast, moves at a breakneck pace, and has a fair amount of action. I think I had more fun with “The Gentlemen” than I did watching this film, partially because I got to watch a rather unhinged Matthew McConaughey.

While I could tell that the actors were doing their best with the characters, they did not stand out in any significant way. Perhaps “In the Grey” does have personality, but said personality is not sitting well with me. You know that saying “Don’t judge a book by it’s cover?” My apologies, I think that saying lacks merit when “In the Grey” sometimes emits a sense of so-called personality that could best be described as grey.

Sometimes the characters will have a good line or two, and other times they won’t. No, seriously. For all I know, maybe the dialogue reads well, but as I watched certain scenes in this movie, the dialogue came off as something one would find in a “Saturday Night Live” parody of a generic action film. It is sometimes overemphasized, uninspired, and somewhat cliche. The movie itself does not entirely feel cliche. Getting from point A to point B is not exactly done in the most usual of manners, but the specific manners did not sit well with me.

In today’s world where second-screen viewing is a common occurrence for some people, “In the Grey” seems to challenge that concept with its constant need to put captions for certain things that may matter throughout the movie. I am not saying that this movie feels like it was designed to cater to the second-screen viewer. In fact, if you partake in second-screen viewing for everything you watch now, good luck with this movie, because the dialogue is some of the least digestible I remember hearing. I wish I could quote some of the characters for you off the top of my head, but I cannot, because every line is given as quickly as the other. The way the dialogue is laid out during the entire movie reminds me of an extended YouTube vlog where there happens to be a jumpcut every five seconds. I am not saying this movie has noticeable jumpcuts, but if you like nonstop talking, this movie is probably going to be Heaven for you.

I like my auteur directors. Christopher Nolan, Quentin Tarantino, and Denis Villeneuve are a few that come to mind. I have come to this conclusion previously, but if anything, “In the Grey” reminds me that maybe Guy Ritchie’s style is not exactly my jam. He is quick, and I do not mind quick. But there is no room to breathe. I would hate to see him do a “Run Lola Run” remake. Also, I do not care what you all think. That movie sucks.

In the end, “In the Grey” is a completely fitting title for what is ultimately one of the dullest flicks of the year so far. After seeing this movie, I am starting to question whether my artistic tastes line up with Guy Ritchie’s. I am sure he is a friendly human being and could be interesting to work with. But this movie is not quite doing it for me. On top of the well-known director, the movie comes with an A-list cast who deserve a script that is much more in line with their talents. I am probably not going to remember “In the Grey” for any reason other than the fact that it nearly put me to sleep. I am going to give “In the Grey” a 3/10.

“In the Grey” is now available to rent or by on VOD.

Thanks for reading this review! If you have not done so already, be sure to check out my latest episode of Movie Requests, featuring “Clerks” actor Brian O’Halloran! In this video I review his recommendation, the 1970 war film “Patton.” To hear my thoughts, click the video above! Be sure to like the video if you enjoyed it and subscribe to my YouTube channel if you want to see more new episodes as soon as they drop! They will also be posted here on Flicknerd.com, but if you want the fastest way to view the episode, subscribing to my channel will do the trick.

My next review is going to be for “Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu.” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “I Love Boosters,” “Backrooms,” “Masters of the Universe,” “Another World,” and “The Breadwinner.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “In the Grey?” What did you think about it? Or, what are some Guy Ritchie movies that you enjoy? I liked one of his more recent features, “Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre.” It was a lot of fun. I did not have a chance to review it a few years ago, but if I saw it early enough to do so, I would have given the film a positive score. Let me know your favorites down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Deep Water (2026): Plane Crashes and Sharks. What Could Go Wrong?

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Deep Water” is directed by Renny Harlin (Cutthroat Island, Deep Blue Sea) and stars Aaron Eckhart (The Dark Knight, Midway), Angus Sampson (Insidious, Mad Max: Fury Road), Ben Kingsley (Iron Man 3, Hugo), Lucy Barrett (Skincare, Charmed), and Molly Belle Wright (Omaha, The Best Christmas Pageant Ever). This film is about a group of people who are on a plane flying from Los Angeles to Shanghai, whose flight happens to go by the wayside as they crash in the middle of the ocean. As if things could not get any worse, the group is surrounded by sharks and must do what they can to survive.

It is now time to talk about “Deep Water,” not to be confused with the movie of the same name starring Ben Affleck and Ana de Armas, which is entirely different in premise and execution. Unlike that straight to streaming flick, this is a theatrically released thrill ride that involves a very simple, but intriguing premise.

Last year was the 50th anniversary of “Jaws,” which to this day, remains the best shark movie ever made by a clear mile. But just because “Jaws” is so great, does not mean that other shark movies do not have the potential to work. “Deep Water” is not quite a shark movie, but when the marketing showed sharks, I was sold. This looked eerie, intense, and entertaining. It is definitely a popcorn flick. Though I skipped the popcorn on this movie.

“Deep Water” does not reinvent the wheel when it comes to filmmaking or storytelling, but the film nevertheless delivers a satisfying package. Is it perfect? Absolutely not. But it does not change the fact that the film is worth watching at least once.

When it comes to the overall premise of the film, it keeps things simple. A bunch of people are on a flight from Los Angeles to Shanghai, then next things next, they make an emergency landing in the middle of the ocean. It is at this point where everyone must work together to survive. Although, getting everyone on the same page is not the easiest task.

This film contains a fairly sizable cast of characters, some of whom are played by well-known names. I am quite shocked that some of the names accepted their roles. Their paychecks must have been enormous. Although upon learning that this film had a $40 million budget, maybe not. Plus, this film is directed by Renny Harlin, who has helmed some well known films including “Cliffhanger” and “Die Hard 2.” Then again, he also directed “The Legend of Hercules,” a film so bad that I think it might as well have been better off staying a legend.

That said, while I remember some of the faces in this movie like Ben Kingsley, it is not as easy to remember the characters. Part of it is due to having so many of them, so the movie does what it can to allow everyone to have their moment, but only a particular few stand out. If you were to ask me if I am going to remember these characters in a year from now, I would probably guess not. Heck, I am having trouble recalling some of them even less than a month after seeing the movie. Do I have my favorite characters from the project? Sure.

Is this movie predictable? Perhaps. But I do not mind it being that way, because what it offers is undoubtedly entertaining. We get to know a bunch of people who are on a plane. Everyone from the crew to some of the core passengers, the plane makes an emergency landing in the ocean, and all of the characters who we got to know on the plane have some ongoing effect towards the story from here on out. Sharks appear every now and then, causing all kinds of trouble for the survivors, who realize their journey has only begun. Having said that now, it makes me appreciate this premise more. The only way this movie could have been crazier is if it went full “Snakes on a Plane” and decided to put the sharks on the plane as it was in the air. But as someone who likes logic, I am glad they did not go in that direction. It would just spawn bad memories of torturing myself while watching the “Sharknado” movies.

This movie combines two of my biggest apprehensions. Planes and sharks. For the record, I like planes. I really do. I find air travel fascinating, even if the modern air travel market is an overpriced scam. I do not fly super often, but I do take a plane one to a few times per year, and in the back of my mind I am always nervous about crashing. This movie reminds me of that fear. I always fly out of Boston, whose airport is right next to the Atlantic, a place that has sharks! Of course! Thanks, movie!

This film reminded me of another thing to be afraid of, and that happens to be lithium-ion batteries. They are everywhere. Like planes, I do not outright hate the concept of lithium-ion batteries. I understand their purpose, but the movie essentially kicks into gear because of something that happens to a lithium-ion battery. If you have ever seen a news story involving some kind of a device that contains a lithium-ion battery, I think you can imagine what that incident is. I am a little frightened as I write this review on my laptop, which I will remind you, has a lithium-ion battery inside of it that could blow up if I make one wrong move. There is a reason why people working at airports ask if you have anything with lithium-ion batteries on you before your flight!

Movies are experiences, and to say I experienced fear in “Deep Water” is an understatement. Is this the best movie of the year? No. The characters could be a little deeper (not literally), but it is never boring. It gives the bones of the characters and makes them likable enough. The shark action is sometimes fun to watch. It is not the best I have ever seen. It is not like I am watching “The Shallows” starring Blake Lively, which I still fondly remember about a decade after its release. That said, this film is not 100% camp. It has campy moments, but the plane crash, which goes on for more time than I was anticipating, felt rather dramatic. There happened to be a sense of stakes as the plane was falling down. You could feel the emotions and the nerves running through the characters, and those emotions and nerves stuck around as the sharks came out to play. This movie is thrilling, well-paced, and engaging.

© Arclight Films

In the end, “Deep Water” is a solid plane crash movie, on top of being a solid shark movie. It takes two disastrously bone-chilling scenarios and neatly combines them into one premise. This is not Shakespeare, but it is also not something that deserves to be tossed aside either. It is a decent movie that allows you to munch popcorn while watching tons of people figure out how not to die. Is this film the next “Jaws?” No. But it is a good watch. I am going to give “Deep Water” a 7/10.

“Deep Water” is now playing in select theaters. Tickets are available now!

Thanks for reading this review! I would like to take a moment to remind everyone that my next episode of Movie Requests is going to feature “Clerks” actor Brian O’Halloran! He has appeared in all three installments of Kevin Smith’s retail-based trilogy, and in the next couple of weeks, I will be reviewing his film of choice. That review is SUPPOSED TO BE HERE on Sunday June, 7th. If you have not done so already, please check out my review for “High Noon,” requested by “Battlestar Galactica” star Katee Sackhoff! If you want to see more reviews throughout the series as soon as they are uploaded, please consider subscribing to my YouTube channel! I will also share them here, but subscribing to my channel is the fastest way you can check them out. Life is short, you know. Might as well spend your time wisely.

I have a buttload of written reviews coming soon! My next reviews are going to be for “Animal Farm,” “Mortal Kombat II,” “The Sheep Detectives,” “In the Grey, “Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu,” and “I Love Boosters.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Deep Water?” What did you think about it? Or, what is a movie that reminds you of some of your personal fears? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Normal (2025): Nobody Should Miss Bob Odenkirk’s Latest Action Flick

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Normal” is directed by Ben Wheatley (Meg 2: The Trench, Free Fire) and stars Bob Odenkirk (Nobody, Breaking Bad), Henry Winkler (Happy Days, Arrested Development), and Lena Headey (300, Game of Thrones). This film centers around a sheriff who has a history of taking temporary jobs in one town to the text. His latest gig is in a small town by the name of Normal, Minnesota, where things go haywire as soon as he finds himself trying to deal with a bank robbery.

Remember “Nobody?” Remember how sick that movie was? Turns out Bob Odenkirk is not done being an action star. Sure, he came back for a sequel, but frankly, I think a man of his talents deserves better. This is no diss on Bob Odenkirk. He can do no wrong. He is a fine actor with quite a bit of range. As much as I like “Nobody,” I was interested to see that Odenkirk was headlining a brand new movie, “Normal.”

What makes “Normal” stand out is its quieter vibe. Whether it has to do with the wintry backdrop or the occasional delight that rises due to seeing Ulysses solve minor issues or obstacles for the town’s citizens, the film, despite being violent, simultaneously feels cozy.

This film is written by Derek Kolstad, whose previous credits include the “Nobody” films, and before that, the first three “John Wick” titles. Those two franchises carry a similar DNA considering they are fast-paced, obnoxious, and star somewhat older men who know how to shoot. This is not to say “Normal” is not in any way similar to those movies. In fact, speaking of fast pace, this movie is incredibly tight. There are also plenty of gun fights, not to mention creative kills. If anything, the kills are almost the selling point of this movie. Those are the parts of the film that if I were a general moviegoer and I saw this in the middle in its run, would have me flocking down the streets yelling about it. Perhaps I would look like a lunatic that promotes violence, but I am sure that people will understand what I am talking about once they see the film.

Unfortunately, this film, which has been out for several weeks now, has not received the widest audience. It had a soft opening weekend, and has only made about a quarter of its budget back. The film so far has made more than $5 million, but its budget appears to be less than $20 million. I hope the film has a boost on its way, perhaps on PVOD or through a streaming service, perhaps even cable, because as someone who got to see this in a theater with a large crowd, which I do not think a lot of people can say, it is an experience.

I had the privilege of seeing this movie at a giant theatre during the Miami Film Festival, and so many people were having a blast watching everything play out. I have no idea about the people around me, but I was quite surprised with how much flair this film delivered by the end of it. This film is as exciting as can be. If you are coming to “Normal” solely to watch Odenkirk kick all kinds of butt, this film gives you that in spades. If you are coming for a little bit more than that, there are some aspects that are properly delivered.

Not to say that “Normal” is by any means the comedy of the year, but there are quite a few laughs to be had in this movie. Some of those laughs are due to the kills. If you told me that Quentin Tarantino stepped in to direct a few scenes just to get some of the sickest violence one could possibly put into a frame, I would believe you. The film has a knack for more conventional attempts at humor too. One of my favorite gags in the film involves Henry Winkler’s character of Mayor Kibner, who despite living in this film’s titular small town for years, says he never saw a moose. In fact, we find out that Odenkirk’s character, Sheriff Ulysses, saw a moose, and told him about it, thus infuriating him.

“Normal” is, fittingly, set in the fictional town of Normal, Minnesota. This small town tends to play a large part in the film. It is basically a character of its own. One of my favorite things about it is its welcome sign that reads, “We like it here.” The name almost comes off as a joke considering the film’s concept, which sees the town’s newcomer, Ulysses, realize that there is something abnormal afoot in what seems to be a humble, tiny community. As for what that thing is, I will keep it vague, but the film does a good job at giving the sense that its community is proud and tight-knit. You get a sense of hometown pride in “Normal,” whether it is easy to side with such pride is another story.

Going back to what I said about this movie being tight, it is kind of a blessing as there is very little fluff. And whatever fluff there is, happens to work. I immensely enjoyed this film’s climax as it brings a lot of people into the same room, slowly builds up the tension, and gets into the chaotic violence fest I was hoping to see. I did not get popcorn for this movie. I am not even sure if my venue even had popcorn. Miami traffic sucks, so I almost missed the start of the movie, so I did not even have time to check if the place had a concessions stand. But if I had a bucket of popcorn in my seat, I would be shoving it in my mouth like a madman because this sequence is quite entertaining. Again, this movie feels like a blessing. But some things with blessings have curses too. Yes, “Normal” is a fun watch, but I wish it went on longer. If anything, it means Ben Wheatley and crew did a good job with the material. It left me wanting more. This does not necessarily mean I want a sequel to this movie. Though if a “Normal 2” were to happen, or perhaps another story featuring Ulysses in a different town, sign me up.

In the end, “Normal” is anything but. It is chaotic, it is bloody, it ever so slowly builds its excitement. I felt the same way watching this movie that Odenkirk did while navigating the small town. It seems quiet at first, but along the way, things just crank up. While not exactly the same kind of movie as “Nobody,” “Normal,” which also has Bob Odenkirk as the lead, sometimes gives off a similar feel. If you like Bob Odenkirk, as well as “Nobody,” then “Normal” is a nice addition to your watchlist. If you are ready for some bonkers action, you will not be disappointed. I am going to give “Normal” a 7/10.

“Normal” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available in select locations. If you cannot catch it in a theater, please make an effort to check it out on VOD starting May 18th.

Thanks for reading this review! I just want to remind everyone that my latest episode of Movie Requests is now available to watch! In this episode, I ask “The Mandalorian” star Katee Sackhoff what movie she thinks I should watch, and she picked the 1952 western “High Noon.” I had never seen it. Frankly, despite my love for all kinds of cinema, my western game could be stronger, so I thank her for the recommendation! What did I think of the movie? Watch the episode to find out! And if you enjoy the video, leave a like, leave a comment, and subscribe to my YouTube channel that way you can catch more episodes of Movie Requests down the line.

My next review is going to be for “Lorne!” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “Michael,” “Deep Water,” “Animal Farm,” and “Mortal Kombat II.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Normal?” What did you think about it? Or, have you seen “Nobody?” Perhaps even “Nobody 2?” Tell me your thoughts on those movies! Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Ready or Not 2: Here I Come (2026): The Sequel to My Favorite Film of 2019 is Finally Here… Was it Worth the Wait?

Posted on by Jack Drees

© 2026 SEARCHLIGHT PICTURES

“Ready or Not 2: Here I Come” is directed by Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett, the same directing duo behind the original “Ready or Not” released in 2019. This film stars Samara Weaving (Bill & Ted Face the Music, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri), Kathryn Newton (Blockers, Freaky), Sarah Michelle Gellar (All My Children, Buffy the Vampire Slayer), Shawn Hatosy (Animal Kingdom, Southland), David Cronenberg (The Fly, Scanners), and Elijah Wood (The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, Grand Piano). This sequel once again follows Grace (Weaving), who just survived a nightmarish game of hide and seek against the Le Domas family. Now, she must face off against several elite families that make up the Council to play the same game with a twist.

“Ready or Not 2: Here I Come” is a movie I did not have on my bingo card. I say this as someone who loves the first film to death. “Ready or Not” remains my favorite film of 2019. Prior to watching this sequel, I took the opportunity to rewatch the original. It holds up tremendously. The ending is chef’s kiss. The simple utterance of “In-laws” is a top five final line in the history of cinema. It is up there with “Nobody’s perfect” from “Some Like it Hot.” I am not the most knowledgeable horror nut, but “Ready or Not” is an easy favorite of mine within the entire genre.

As much as I was looking forward to this movie, it had a lot to live up to. The original had a simple but fun concept. It contained a plethora of funny lines. It had a fantastic cast carried by Samara Weaving. If you know how the first movie went down, you would know that it would be impossible to bring most of that cast back. But to my delight, Weaving, once again, is leading this film and cooking up a killer performance with fire. She is one of the film’s many positives. Also, I know the term scream queen gets thrown around a lot amongst horror circles. To take that concept literally, Weaving’s screams are some of the most unique I have ever heard. It is to the point where I cannot imagine another soul playing her character.

Even you, Margot Robbie! I know you and Samara look so much alike, but I highly doubt your screams sound alike!

With this film being a sequel, it tends to follow the “bigger is better” cliche. Although if you are aware of my thoughts on various sequels over the years, you would know that I do not think they always live up to that phrase. “Ready or Not” is a beautifully simple movie that takes a childhood game as pure as hide and seek and turns it into an absolute nightmare. “Ready or Not 2: Here I Come,” puts its main character, Grace, in a situation where she has to play hide and seek against a ton of rich family members. Again. The before, during, and after, are a little different from the original. Although another similarity is that if these family members do not kill Grace by dawn, they die. The film does a fairly decent job at laying out some of the complications that make this experience different, and it also raises the stakes for the main character by bringing her sister Faith (Newton) into the mix and holding her captive. It also puts the elite family members in a situation where they have to do more than simply kill Grace. While doing so, they are competing for the Council’s “High Seat” now that the person who used to be associated with that position has died.

Bringing Faith into the picture does come as a bit of a surprise, as we learn a little bit about Grace’s backstory in the original movie, but not once does she mention she has a sister. Nevertheless, the sequel does a good job at making me believe these two are sisters. For starters, they look quite a bit alike between their blonde hair, big eyes, and expressive personalities. Also, knowing what we know about Grace from the original, I buy the fact that the two siblings had a bit of a falling out. It enhances that scene from the 2019 film where Grace talks about her family life, or lack thereof.

I enjoyed both “Ready or Not” and its sequel, but if you were to ask me which of these two movies I prefer, I would easily pick the original. The main reason is because Grace seems to go on a more personal journey. Sure, her sister is in the sequel, but as we get to the inciting incident of the first movie, it makes her rethink everything about her partner, her love life, her in-laws, whether she wants to be married… The first film was more interesting because it involved people she once trusted trying to kill her. The second film is an extension of that killer family, but without her partner, Grace is simply trying to defend herself against a group that held her captive.

So, the film may not be as memorable as the original, but to me, this could almost be the “Gladiator II” of the “Ready or Not” franchise. Is the story as exciting? Probably not, though it did keep my interest. But the action and humor more than make up for the film’s less intriguing plot. Every kill is terrifically done and the antagonistic family members come off with as much personality as those in the 2019 predecessor. The changes they made for how the game works were fun to see play out. It was also nifty to see Elijah Wood play a bad guy. Wood is not the first person I would associate with the term villain, but this film did make me reconsider. I was quite pleased with his quiet yet commanding performance. He reminded me of Grand Moff Tarkin in the original “Star Wars.” He does not have a big mouth, but every word that seems to come out of it sounds like it matters.

This sequel came out a little more than six and a half years following the original’s release date. As an avid fan of the original, I knew I was going to be in the cinema as soon as possible to see it. But even as a fan, I questioned if a sequel was the most sound idea. Judging by the fact that I liked the second movie, I could say it was. But even as someone who likes it, I recognize that the original is out of this film’s league. That said, I did dig the finale of the film. Much like the original, there were one or two out of left out of field moments that stuck the landing. I walked out of this film having a fun time. It added some exciting new material to the lore, maintained a good pace, and ended up having some genuine laugh out loud moments.

In the end, I really liked this film. It offers a lot of familiar aspects from the original. Sometimes expanding upon them. I prefer the first film’s simplicity and cast a bit more, but this new cast is by no means bad. They are actually quite fun to watch. That said, this film is directed by Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett, the same duo behind the original, and it shows. The duo helm each scene with perfect timing, balance scares and humor fantastically, and refuse to compromise on blood and gore. Kathryn Newton, who previously worked with these two in the excellent horror-comedy “Abigail,” is a lovely addition to the cast, and so is Elijah Wood. This film came out the same weekend as “Project Hail Mary,” which is doing very well at the box office. If that film is sold out, then “Ready or Not 2: Here I Come” is not a bad option to have as a backup as long as you are okay with violence and intense sequences. I am going to give “Ready or Not 2: Here I Come” a 7/10.

“Ready or Not 2: Here I Come” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! As a reminder, Scene Before is now officially 10 years old, and I am doing a brand new video series by the name of Movie Requests in honor of the occasion. Feel to check out my latest episode featuring “Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back” actor Jason Mewes, who requested I should talk about “House Party.” If you want to see more episodes, leave a like on YouTube and subscribe to my channel so you can stay up to date!

I am also happy to remind everyone that the next guest in the Movie Requests series is going to be “Avatar” actor Joel David Moore. You can catch that episode Sunday, April 19th. I have yet to watch his movie of choice, but I look forward to checking it out and talking about it!

My next review is going to for “They Will Kill You.” Stay tuned! Also coming soon, I will be sharing my thoughts on “You’re Dating a Narcissist!,” “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie,” “The Drama,” and “Exit 8.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Ready or Not 2: Here I Come?” What did you think about it? Or, which of the two “Ready or Not” movies do you prefer? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Dune: Part Three Sells Out Limited IMAX 70mm Screenings Months Before Release – The Eventification of Moviegoing

Posted on by Jack Drees

Hey everyone, Jack Drees here! My most anticipated movie of 2026 is Christopher Nolan’s “The Odyssey,” based on Homer’s epic poem of the same name. You may remember nearly 9 months ago, tickets went on sale for some of the movie’s IMAX 70mm screenings. And by sheer luck, I managed to grab a ticket for the first show in Fort Lauderdale, Florida when the movie opens this July.

Naturally, Warner Brothers must have seen this and decided to follow suit with another film I am looking forward to… “Dune: Part Three.” Around noon on the east coast, which is where I live, a list of theaters were selling tickets for the movie. I had very little notice to buy tickets, but I was scrolling on Instagram and saw a couple posts suggesting that tickets were going to go on sale in a half hour. Not next week, not the next day, but literally the next half hour. So, I go through the list of theaters and make a game plan… Opening multiple tabs, having different devices out… I was ready. After checking a couple websites, I go to IMAX’s official site and click on a link that brings me to the AMC Lincoln Square 13 in New York, New York… And lone behold… Tickets went on sale minutes before their scheduled time at 12 p.m.. So, I click on the 7 p.m. show for Friday, December 18th.

For the first time in my life, I had to go through multiple seat selections just to get something that will take me to the landing page. It took me three tries, and knowing how many seats were sold already, I am shocked the count was not higher. And if someone can get Hans Zimmer on the phone to play some victory music, that would be amazing! Why? Because I got my tickets! …And so did everyone else in the world, apparently. Less than a half hour after I buy the tickets, I check the “view” tab on my screening, and it says the show sold out. And so did other showtimes! Keep in mind, I bought tickets for Friday. There was also a show being held the day before that I had no idea about. When I checked AMC’s site originally, I did not see a listing for it. Not that I am complaining. Friday is still quite early in the release schedule and I am sure the crowd going to see it Friday will be just as enthusiastic as the crowd going the night before.

My theater is not alone. For this push, 19 IMAX theaters were selling tickets. Only two are located outside of North America. More than seven hours after tickets went on sale, most of these theaters say they “sold out” on IMAX’s website. All of these theaters were selling one show per day from opening Thursday to the following Sunday. Since buying my tickets, more showtimes have been added, and those are already selling too.

Though my ticket-buying experience makes me wonder if we are seeing a shift in how movie tickets are sold. Between “Dune: Part Three” and “The Odyssey,” buying movie tickets, in certain regards anyway, is starting to feel like buying concert tickets. The concept may not be resemblant to every concert, but these past couple of instances of buying tickets felt like the cinephile’s equivalent to scoring seats for Taylor Swift’s The Eras Tour a few years back. Between how early the tickets are going on sale, the specific venues that are allowing tickets to sell immediately, the fact that people like me are fighting to get the seat they want, as well as the price… These are not only hottest tickets in town, but buying one almost guarantees jealousy from others who did not acquire theirs in time. That is, if you choose to keep the ticket. There are already some users online selling them for several times their original price. Morons.

I bought two tickets for my screening at the AMC Lincoln Square 13. Each ticket cost me $30.49. It would have cost me more if my AMC Stubs memberships did not cover my convenience fees. Sadly, this film is excluded from my A-List reservations, but in actuality, I do not mind it that much. If anything, it saves me the trouble from having one less slot I can use for the next 8 months. For the record, the price is not that much different from what I would pay now for an IMAX movie at the same location. Not to give AMC any ideas, but I am a tad surprised the cost is not higher.

The reason why I say that is because not only is Lincoln Square home to one of the biggest IMAX screens in the country, but due to it being in New York City, I would expect the price to be more than some of the other markets selling tickets early. Yet to my surprise, there are a few less populated areas that are selling the same experience, but charging more money for it.

I was going through X, and found a couple of people posting about the prices some of these theaters were charging…

Including one in Nashville, Tennessee…

As well as another located about 35 miles away from Atlanta, Georgia…

I should also note, both of these are Regal locations. I am noticing a trend here…

In fact, since the theaters have added more showtimes, it has only given me a smidge more material to work with for this post. I checked a 10:45 p.m. showtime for the Regal in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. This theater probably would have been my backup if I could not get into Lincoln Square as the distance is somewhat drivable from home, and the fact that I have always wanted to check out the King of Prussia Mall. Though I likely saved myself a hassle, as tickets are $50 a pop.

Meanwhile, a Cinemark that is somewhat drivable from home, located in Rochester, NY, is also listing early showtimes. Having checked an 11 p.m. show on opening Thursday, they do not seem to be showcasing the same level of greed as Regal, considering how tickets are half the price at $25.

The pricing for this event does appear to be a bit out of control, especially when you consider that a ticket for an evening IMAX show set around the same timeframe for both Nashville and the Mall of Georgia is typically around $30 for adults. If I were to go see “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” this week during the evening, that is how much I would pay just for a single ticket prior to fees. As much as I do not mind the trend of premium screenings selling tickets early, I do think there is a limit on how high one of these screenings should be priced. $40 for a movie ticket in 2026 feels like overkill. $50 is just outrageous.

I have paid 50 bucks for a movie ticket before, but I felt that price was somewhat justified as the director of said movie showed up to introduce the screening and stay after to do a Q&A. By the way, the screening was for the 25th anniversary of “Dogma,” and getting to see Kevin Smith before and after was a complete blast. This was a standard 2D screening, but it had a unique luxury on top of it.

I have a feeling that should we continue to do events like these, theaters could end up taking advantage of their customers and make them spend more money than perhaps one realistically should on something as simple as a movie. And that is important to note. I have no problem spending a good chunk of money to see a comedy show or a baseball game, because you are witnessing the event live. Movies are on a screen, therefore you are not watching real people. It does not make as much sense to charge $10 more than what a typical ticket would cost around an identical timeframe in the same auditorium, even if the detail on the screen is going to be incredibly lifelike.

Interesting enough, if I were to see “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie” this week during the evening at Lincoln Square’s IMAX, where fate decided I should have a “Dune: Part Three” ticket waiting for me, I would be paying $30.49 for the adult tier. That is the same price as a single ticket for “Dune: Part Three.” It gives me the sense that Regal is jacking up the price on purpose… Again, going back to the eventification of moviegoing, this shows that even if a movie theater charges a higher price, someone will pay it just to be in the building. In fact, my backup option if Lincoln Square sold out was to buy a ticket at the Regal in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. But knowing myself as an IMAX fanboy, there is a good chance I would have paid whatever the ticket cost just to get my hands on it.

The $30.49 ticket price packs quite a bit into it. In addition to being part of one of the first audiences to experience “Dune: Part Three,” we are watching it in IMAX 70mm, one of clearest formats of all time. Any instance in which I can see something on one of the clearest formats of all time, I will most definitely take. There are very few theaters in the world with capable, working equipment to make this possible. The film is also shot on IMAX technology, including IMAX film. The screen is one of the largest in the country. There will be no trailers before the movie starts, which for AMC is almost unheard of. For my commitment, the theater is giving me a collectible filmstrip. The theater is giving a lot for 30 bucks. I would not pay that much for a movie each and every day, but I would for something like this.

Going back to what I said earlier about the “Dogma” screening and how cool it was to see Kevin Smith there, if we really want to eventize these screenings even further, here is an idea… Have the stars show up. Granted, these are 19 locations in different parts of the world, so it may not be possible for this to happen. But in theory, it would be cool to be welcomed to “Dune: Part Three” on opening weekend by Zendaya or Denis Villeneuve or Robert Pattinson. It is almost like a reward for buying tickets early.

Between “The Odyssey” and “Dune: Part Three,” movies are truly becoming much bigger events for yours truly then they have ever been. Granted, I have gone to press screenings and premieres in my area. I have been to screenings where celebrities show up. But these two movies have gotten me to consider crossing state lines just to watch them. I am flying to Florida in July. FLORIDA. IN JULY. Just to watch a movie. I think air conditioning is going to be my best friend when that time arrives. These are more than adventures to catch flicks. These are practically turning into vacations. Heck, since I am seeing “Dune: Part Three” a week before Christmas, I am already debating on what time would be best to visit Rockefeller Center to check out the big Christmas tree.

Could I watch these movies closer to home? Perhaps. In fact, I live 10 minutes away from the largest IMAX in New England, located at Jordan’s Furniture in Reading, Massachusetts, which is an amazing place to see a movie. …But it is not currently 70mm capable. If I waited months to buy tickets there, I would not be mad at myself. In fact, I would be excited. That theater is amazing and it would be fun to see something as hotly anticipated as “Dune: Part Three” there. But this screening is getting me more excited by the minute. It feels electric just knowing that I am going to be in a room with a group of people who are likely just as committed to seeing this film as me.

To add even further excitement… Unless Disney decides to change their mind, “Avengers: Doomsday,” which could end up making $2 billion at the box office, even without IMAX screens, releases the exact same day as “Dune: Part Three,” thus inspiring the term “Dunesday.” If both Warner Brothers and Disney are committed to this event, it is possible that we could witness the biggest moviegoing weekend in history. Now that I have my ticket for “Dune: Part Three” it makes me wonder when exactly I should plan to buy a ticket for “Avengers: Doomsday.” Should I do a screening the same day hours before? Should I do it the day before? It would let me easily avoid spoilers. Should I watch that film closer to home? I still have not figured out how I am getting to New York, so we shall see what happens. Part of me thinks deep down that “Dunesday” could end up hurting both “Dune” and “Avengers.” But after seeing the response “Dune: Part Three” is getting months before release with these ticket sales and the first trailer, I think this less diverse edition of “Barbenheimer” could pay off for both parties.

“Dune” and “Dune: Part Two” are movies that have given me some fond memories upon watching them, so it is no surprise that I am looking forward to “Dune: Part Three,” no matter how I see it. That said, I am thrilled to experience the film the way the director intended. Judging from what has been shown so far and the track record of the previous installments, I would not be surprised if this ends up being a Best Picture nominee at the next Academy Awards. Until then, if anybody else already has their “Dune: Part Three” tickets, congratulations! Maybe I will see you at Lincoln Square. Much like Paul Atreides’ promise at the end of “Dune: Part Two,” I am sure that IMAX and Warner Brothers are going to lead me to paradise this December. I cannot wait.

Thanks for reading this post! As a reminder, be sure to check out my latest episode of Movie Requests! This is a brand new series where I take movie suggestions from celebrities and talk about them. The latest episode features “Clerks” actor Jason Mewes. Check it out, give it a like, and if you want to see more videos in the series, consider subscribing to my YouTube channel!

My next review is coming later this week, and it is going to be for “Ready or Not 2: Here I Come.” I love the first “Ready or Not” to death, so it should not be a surprise that I eagerly awaited the sequel. I will share my thoughts on it soon. If you want to see more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you get tickets for “Dune: Part Three?” Where and when are you seeing it? And how much did you have to pay? Also, if you are a scalper, please find something better to do with your time. Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Send Help (2026): See This Thrilling Survival Flick One Way or Another

Posted on by Jack Drees

“Send Help” is directed by Sam Raimi (Spider-Man, Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness) and stars Rachel McAdams (Mean Girls, Game Night), Dylan O’Brien (The Maze Runner, Teen Wolf), Edyll Ismail (La Brea, Ghosts), Xavier Samuel (Blonde, Tell Me Your Secrets), Chris Pang (As We See It, Blade of the 47 Ronin), and Dennis Haysbert (24, Now and Again). This film follows office employee Linda Liddle and her boss Bradley Preston as the two individuals, whose personalities and backgrounds could not be more different, do what they can to survive while stranded on an island.

Photo by 20th Century Studios/20TH CENTURY STUDIOS – © 2025 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved.

Sam Raimi is a director who defined my love for movies and the art of filmmaking. Raimi directed Tobey Maguire in three “Spider-Man” movies, a trilogy that defined my childhood. Since then, I have gone on to enjoy some of his other works including “Evil Dead,” “Army of Darkness,” “Oz the Great and Powerful,” and “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness.” Raimi is a master storyteller whether he is doing something original or working with popular IPs. If there was any reason for me to be excited for “Send Help,” he was it. Not to say that the film lacked talent in front of the camera, as the film starred Rachel McAdams, who recently worked with Raimi in “Multiverse of Madness.” Alongside her is Dylan O’Brien, who I have grown to appreciate with each role he’s taken through the years.

Having talented people on your project is a great start. Though that does not guarantee the movie will be good. For example, I love me some Wes Anderson. But his last couple movies have been a bit too off the rails for me. Hopefully, that would not be the case with Sam Raimi’s latest flick. Thankfully, “Send Help” brings out the best in its cast and crew in just about every regard.

Given his past work, some would say Sam Raimi is a master of horror. “Send Help,” while not Raimi’s scariest film, undoubtedly taps into his horrific tendencies when it comes to showing the brutality of a plane crash or the adrenaline rush of hunting in the woods. One of my favorite scenes of the film is a one on one between Linda Liddle and a boar. Despite her clear obsession with the outdoors and nature, the scene does a good job at showing she is still afraid of the near inevitability of doom while in an unfamiliar environment.

As a master of horror, Sam Raimi also manages to implement perhaps one of the scariest concepts of all time… Office culture. The concept is probably a pinch scarier knowing that a woman is the protagonist. While the film is set inside the office, we come to realize that employees are sometimes punished for having lunch at their desk, even if time does not allow them to have it elsewhere. For people like Linda, it is difficult to achieve career growth. Part of this is because the higher-ups tend to maintain a bro culture, one of whom happens to be Bradley Preston, the son of Linda’s former boss.

The script for “Send Help” starts off fantastic and only becomes more compelling by the second. It is full of twists and turns, each of which made sense despite some colossal shock value. Everything feels very contained. There are not many characters in the film, which works in its favor as it allows each individual to stand out. The movie perfects the chemistry between Linda and Bradley. They are finely tuned frenemies. Throughout the movie, we learn about these characters’ pasts and personalities. Both are well written, and when it comes to Linda Liddle in particular, it is the little things that stand out like her passion for “Survivor,” the fact that she has cats, or her karaoke song of choice being Blondie’s “One Way or Another.” Is this a “Mean Girls” easter egg? Perhaps. Regardless of the reason the song is in the movie, it works perfectly.

For the record, Sam Raimi did not write this movie. Screenwriting duo Mark Swift and Damian Shannon handled those duties. Their previous work does not boast high confidence as their resume includes “Freddy vs. Jason” and 2009’s “Friday the 13th,” neither of which got the best reviews. They also did the 2017 adaptation of “Baywatch” starring Dwayne Johnson, which is one of the movies ever. I am proud to say though, “Send Help” is probably going to put both of these gentlemen on the map for me. Though it is worth noting, their screenplay was likely enhanced by the directing talents of Sam Raimi, who has an eye for great shots, brilliant timing, and chilling scares. That said, there is that saying that one is only as good as their last project. Swift and Shannon are now on my radar because this is a twisty movie that had me hooked from the very beginning. Although the beginning is not all to rave about in this film. This film’s ending is not only mind-blowing, but it is something I will be thinking about for a very long time. I could not think of a cooler ending to a movie like this if I tried.

Once again, Rachel McAdams plays Linda Liddle, a dorky cat lady who spends her time off work watching “Survivor.” In fact, she was even passionate enough to audition for the show. Seeing her journey play out, most particularly when the movie passes its inciting incident is riveting as can be. If you are looking for incredible character development, then put this movie on the top of your must-see list. McAdams proves she has talent as this film’s lead.

“Send Help” does a great job at showcasing Dylan O’Brien’s chops. While he may not be the first actor that I would call a thespian, the film proves he has skills. Also, despite his tendency to come off as a jerk, O’Brien, and perhaps by extension, filmmaker Sam Raimi, does a spectacular job at making Bradley look like a jerk, but also likable enough from the audience’s point of view.

On the technical side, “Send Help” sings. Sam Raimi has had an extended career and it is not surprising to see him surround himself with a crew he’s trusted over the years. You have composer Danny Elfman who assembles a marvelous score. There is Bill Pope, who continues to prove he is one of the best cinematographers working today. Editor Bob Murawski puts together some clean, perfectly timed scenes, and his choices enhance the movie’s occasional attempts at humor that rely on visuals or sound. There is one scene involving a boar’s head that had me dying. No spoilers, and you might know this moment when you see it, this film contains one of my favorite cuts in recent memory, and it involves a golf ball. That is all I will say.

Photo by 20th Century Studios/20TH CENTURY STUDIOS – © 2025 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved.

In the end, “Send Help” is another excellent film given by the directing god known as Sam Raimi. I can see this movie having quite a bit of replay value down the line. I read that Sam Raimi fought Sony, who did not end up distributing the final project, to keep this film from going straight to streaming. I am so glad he did that, because this is a film I think is best experienced with a crowd. It is scary, it is fun, it is why people go to the movies. The film contains a plethora of exciting scenes helmed by a master of his craft. It showcases the talents of two well cast leads doing their best to deliver a satisfying experience. This film is “Cast Away” with just the smallest pinch of “Office Space.” The story sucked me as it started, and refused to let me leave as it ended. Check this movie out if you can. I am going to give “Send Help” an 8/10.

“Send Help” is now playing in theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for “The Bride!”. Stay tuned! Also, stay tuned for my thoughts on “Hoppers,” “Project Hail Mary,” and “Ready or Not 2: Here I Come.”

I am also pleased to announce some information about the ongoing film review series Movie Requests, which features special guests selecting films for me to review. The second episode, which will feature “Clerks” actor Jason Mewes, will be released Saturday, March 28th! If you want to see the episode as soon as it drops, subscribe to my YouTube channel! Also, if you have not done so already, be sure to check out the first episode of Movie Requests, featuring actress Bryce Dallas Howard.

If you want to see all these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “Send Help?” What did you think about it? Or, what is your favorite Sam Raimi movie? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

The Secret Agent (2025): Wagner Moura Excels as the Lead in This Drawn Out Thriller

Posted on by Jack Drees

“The Secret Agent” is directed by Kleber Mendonça Filho (Aquarius, Bacurau) and stars Wagner Moura (Puss in Boots: The Last Wish, Narcos), Carlos Francisco (Bacurau, A Strange Path), Tânia Maria (Bacurau), Robério Diógenes (As Tentações do Irmão Sebastião, Onde Anda Você), Alice Carvalho (New Bandits, Love is a Knife), Gabriel Leone (Dom, Your Heart), Maria Fernanda Cândido (My Hindu Friend, The Traitor), Hermila Guedes (Second Call, New Bandits), Isabél Zuaa (Good Manners, Joaquim), and Udo Kier (Blade, Don’t Worry, He Won’t Get Far on Foot). This film, which is set towards the end of Brazil’s military dictatorship, is about a technology expert who returns to his hometown seeking peace, only to realize it may not be the right place take refuge.

If you read my review for “No Other Choice,” you’d know that my experience with Korean cinema is fairly limited. But at least when it comes to that nation’s output of movies, I at least knew who Park Chan-wook was prior to checking out his latest flick. I have a similar situation with Brazilian cinema, only worse. While some of this film’s cast has achieved international fame, I could not honestly say I recognized their faces going in. I had no idea who the director, Kleber Mendonça Filho, was before watching this movie. The only reason why I checked out this film is because of all the praise it appeared to be getting ahead of awards season. I never watched a trailer. I never saw a commercial. In fact, I went to see the film at one of the two theaters in my area playing it at the time. Was it worth the trip? I’d say so. The film is not bad, but it is far from my favorite of the year.

“The Secret Agent” is a great watch, but not the easiest watch for a number of reasons. Although one can say the film is rewarding if you can sit through all of it. The movie draws itself out pretty heavily and several scenes go on for what can best be described as a snail’s pace. Films like “Blade Runner” prove that a story can move slowly and still keep you hooked, therefore making the pace come off as a positive. “The Secret Agent’s” pacing often had me checking the time, and it made me less invested in the supporting characters than I probably should have been. However, that is not to say I disliked any of them.

On the surface, “The Secret Agent” is a solid narrative. But it is one that is probably at its best at the beginning and the end. The middle is where the film’s slowest and least engaging points tend to come up. The film starts off with a great hook, introduces a neat concept, and lets us get to know some admirable characters. The end, while not larger than life, is pretty killer with very little filler. The middle is by no means a bad watch, but the film’s highlights for me happen before and after said point. People often talk about how some audiences these days have very short attention spans, and I wonder, fairly or unfairly, how this movie would sit with people who are watching at home for the first time, or looking at their phones. When people think of movies that are best experienced in a theater, people will often lean to adventure, fantasy, or sci-fi blockbusters. “The Secret Agent” is a bit more grounded, but like those more expensive and flashy pictures, I think this film crafts a unique cinematic experience of its own.

“The Secret Agent” oozes an atmosphere like no other. Again, this film is slow, but if anything, it allowed me to carefully take in just about each scene one at a time. This film is often quiet, but it only allows me to suck myself into its environments. The film starts off in the middle of a desert. With the drawn out editing and lack of music, part of me felt like I was stranded in the middle of that desert. Part of the atmosphere is also highlighted by the production design. This film is set in 1977, so it felt classy to see a bunch of old cars in every other frame.

The cinematography, perfectly executed by Evgenia Alexandrova, is also a standout. Granted, going back to the desert at the beginning, having decent locations definitely helps. But each frame allowed those locations to shine. There is also a really cool POV shot involving blood towards the end of the film that blew me away. Each frame also weirdly goes against the film’s vibe. Every second of the film involves our protagonist trying to seek safety. Yet at the same time, nearly all the film’s frames feel bright and colorful. I am not mad about it though. The film looks incredibly picturesque. Another weird technical choice if you had to ask me involves the film’s music. For the most part, I thought the film had decent music choices that matched every scene. Then in the climax, there is a song choice that is oddly happy sounding for a chase sequence where our protagonist could die at any point. To me, this almost rubbed me the wrong way. If I were in charge, I would have picked a different song. Then again, the “Challengers” score left me with a headache and people seem to love those tunes, so what do I know?

The standouts to this film do not just extend to the technological elements, but little things like dialogue also pack a punch. “The Secret Agent” may not be my favorite screenplay of the year, but it most definitely has one of my favorite lines. When Marcelo says “I’d kill him with a hammer,” I felt that. There are few, if any lines of dialogue from a film released this year, that sent a chill down my spine like that one.

Also, Wagner Moura is fantastic in this movie. Moura is fairly well known internationally through the series “Narcos,” which I have not watched. Although I had the tremendous pleasure of seeing him play an infinitely haunting antagonist, specifically Death in “Puss in Boots: The Last Wish.” I love him in that movie, but “The Secret Agent” will be remembered as the film that made know his name. I cannot wait to see what roles he takes on next. Though this is no way of suggesting the supporting cast did not do a good job themselves. The two biggest MVPs in the supporting cast for me are Elza (Tânia Maria), whose charm knows no bounds, and young Fernando (Enzo Nunes) whose adorableness leaps off the screen.

In the end, I know there is a bit of hype going around for “The Secret Agent,” but frankly, I had the same reaction coming out of this movie that I had for “Sinners” and “Weapons.” I know both of those movies have their fans, and they are undoubtedly well made. If you read my reviews for those movies, you would know that I like both of them. “The Secret Agent” is not an exception to the rule. But I am not chomping at the bit to get an immediate second viewing of “The Secret Agent.” I would watch the film a second time, considering how much I liked the characters and production elements from the first watch. But I have personally seen more appealing films this year. I can see “The Secret Agent” winning a lot of people over, to the point where it is their film of the year. For me, it is a good watch, and I will leave it at that for now. I may revisit it in the future. I may not. Only time will tell. I am going to give “The Secret Agent” a 7/10.

“The Secret Agent” is now playing in select theaters. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! My next reviews are going to be for “Hamnet” and “Avatar: Fire and Ash!” Stay tuned! If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “The Secret Agent?” What did you think about it? Or, what is a film released this year that you like but also think is a tad overhyped? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!