Top 10 MOST DISAPPOINTING Movies of 2025

Hey everyone, Jack Drees here! It is time to count down my top 10 MOST DISAPPOINTING movies of 2025. Note the choice of words. These are not my least favorite or worst films of the year. I already made a list dedicated to that. These are not the films that I found the be the most intolerable, but rather the ones that I went into with high expectations, only to have them not be met. Spoiler warning, some of the films on the worst list make their way here. Sometimes a film is just plain bad, like I would anticipate it to be. I look forward to seeing every film that comes my way and hope for the best, but even with that in mind, I have to be a realist. If a trailer or poster does not impress me before seeing the film, it automatically lowers my expectations. That might as well be a long-winded way of saying “A Minecraft Movie” is not on this list. But sometimes a film, like ones that find their way on this list, are surprisingly unwatchable. Do we understand? Okay. Rant over.

That said, some ground rules apply to this list. This is completely subjective. Chances are we are not going to agree on what movies belong on this list. It only makes the world more interesting. Also, I have not seen every single film released in 2025. So, if there is a film that disappointed you that did not make the list, chances are I did not catch it, or I did not find it as underwhelming as you. Also, all of the movies here are theatrical releases. I do not count films that are straight to streaming, DVD, or television. In the spirit of disappointment, I apologize, but if you were looking forward to seeing some honorable mentions, you set your expectations too high. We are diving straight into the main event. These are my top 10 MOST DISAPPOINTING movies of 2025!

#10: Riff Raff

Starting off this list is “Riff Raff.” I am not going to pretend I knew a ton about “Riff Raff” months before seeing it, which is part of why it is one of the superior spots on this list. Although the main reason why “Riff Raff” made this list is because I thought it could have utilized its ensemble cast a lot better than it did. You have Jennifer Coolidge, Ed Harris, Bill Murray, Pete Davidson, Gabrielle Union. Some of these people are straight up icons! While it is fun to see a group like this one work together, part of me wishes they could have been in something far better. The film does have a laugh or two and it does get a bit twisted, but I think the positives in this film are quite bare. It is hard to say that I find the redeeming qualities of “Riff Raff” to stand out significantly. The film has some halfway decent comedy and drama, but I ended up forgetting a ton of it upon leaving the theater. That said, at least it is not the worst thing Jennifer Coolidge starred in this year. As much as I admire her, I cannot stand “A Minecraft Movie.” It is not good.

#9: The Phoenician Scheme

Courtesy of TPS Productions/Focus Features – © 2025

This film made my worst list, but now it is facing double trouble! “The Phoenician Scheme” is just plain insufferable, and it is only made worse because it is helmed by a well-known, respected director. I have a soft spot for Wes Anderson. I got a kick out of “Bottle Rocket.” “Moonrise Kingdom” is a solid flick. I even dug “Isle of Dogs.” But this? No no no. This is not quite doing it for me. The only scheme I see here is the one where this movie steals your money. Another reason why this film made the list is, like “Riff Raff,” because of the cast. And while that film had quite a few big names, it is nothing compared to the amount of superstars that make up the ensemble in “The Phoenician Scheme.” Everyone from Scarlett Johansson to Benecio del Toro to Benedict Cumberbatch to Tom Hanks to Richard Ayoade to Jeffrey Wright… I love all of these people, but again, I wish they all came together to star in something worth watching. This is also the second Bill Murray movie on this list. Not surprising though, he and Anderson have worked together several times. Why not one more?

#8: The Smashing Machine

Benny Safdie does not have the legacy of Wes Anderson, but he has proven to be a solid filmmaker alongside his brother Josh. While the latter ended up directing the terrific “Marty Supreme” this past year, the former unfortunately helmed “The Smashing Machine,” which I thought could have been better. This film, going into it, as well as coming out of it, reminded me of how I felt experiencing “Uncut Gems,” which the Safdie Brothers previously directed. Both films star actors in a main role you probably would least expect them to take on. In “Uncut Gems” you have Adam Sandler, and in “The Smashing Machine,” you have Dwayne Johnson. I am happy to say that Johnson aces his role, and so does Emily Blunt in hers. But those are the only two positive standouts of the film for me. I thought the story was surprisingly boring and forgettable. The film did not feel as experiential as I thought it would be. I remember walking out of “Uncut Gems” kind of anxious. I walked out of “The Smashing Machine” ready to move onto the next movie.

#7: Tron: Ares

Fun fact, I saw this next film in IMAX 3D. So, I got an extra dimension of disappointment. “Tron: Ares” is a digital mess. I am a sucker for “Tron.” Before going to see “Tron: Ares” I watched both of the previous installments back to back and those two are easily more memorable than this threequel. The film also feels like wasted potential. I thought it could have been cool to see what would happen if characters and concepts from the digital world in “Tron” entered the real world, but the execution of that concept ends up fizzling. This film stars Jared Leto, who seriously cannot catch a break. I do not think he is a bad actor by any means, but for whatever reason, he always ends up in the least watchable projects between “Suicide Squad,” “Morbius,” and now this. I barely remember any of the characters from this film, other than the fact that they sometimes spewed some of the cheapest dialogue of the year. Technically speaking, this film rocks at times. That does save it. The sound mixing is unbelievable. The visual effects are spellbinding. Nine Inch Nails has some good music throughout. And again, I saw this film in IMAX 3D. While I am not a huge 3D fan, the 3D in this film was kind of fun.

#6: Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery

Courtesy of Netflix – © 2025 Netflix, Inc.

At #6, we have “Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery,” or the third film in the “Knives Out” franchise. Like the two previous installments, this one is directed by Rian Johnson. I thought the first “Knives Out” may have been his all time best work, and the second is also quite fun. This third one, like the others, is good, but not great. The cast, like the other movies, contains some big names, but this film seemed to be lacking in the what I would call “the performance.” By that I would mean the performance that I would continue to think about for days after watching this film. In “Knives Out” those were Ana de Armas and Chris Evans. In “Glass Onion,” those were Kathryn Hahn and Dave Bautista. It was hard for me to put a finger on the one actor that gave a performance like those four. Sure, like the other movies, Daniel Craig is fantastic as Benoit Blanc, and he is clearly having a ball. But the rest of the cast almost pales in comparison.

#5: M3GAN 2.0

Photo Credit: Universal Pictures – © 2025 Universal Studios. All Rights Reserved.

While it is not my favorite horror film of all time, I appreciate the original “M3GAN” for its fine mix of scares and commentary. That film remained on my mind long after seeing it. So, when “M3GAN 2.0” was coming out, I knew I had to see it. Or at least I thought I knew… This is sequel that takes the vibe, tone, and familiar elements of the original “M3GAN” and puts them in a bold new direction. I have no problem with this. Just because one thing is not like the other, it does not mean that both things cannot be good. Except this second installment is not that good in the least. Instead of laughing with the movie, I found myself laughing at it because of how ridiculous things ended up getting at certain points. The action in this film is decently laid out, but not really much else in the film stands out for me as a positive. I do not mind the M3GAN character, although chances are this film did so poorly that I think it may have killed the chances of us getting a major project with her anytime soon.

#4: Love Hurts

We have yet another film with a solid cast, but for whatever reason, things did not quite work out. That film, my friends, is “Love Hurts.” And boy, did the experience of watching this hurt. “Everything Everywhere All at Once” was a massive comeback for Ke Huy Quan. I am glad to see him keep finding work in movies. He was just in “Kung Fu Panda 4” and after this film released he was in “Zootopia 2.” While Quan may be on a roll when it comes to voiceovers, I wish this live-action effort had more of an oomph. He is great in the movie, but the film itself does not live up to his charisma. The action scenes are often well choreographed and planned. I could see myself going on YouTube at some point just to watch certain sequences of the film a second time. As for the whole movie, I cannot see myself watching it again. If I were to watch it again, maybe I would mute it. The script and dialogue in this project are no match for the visuals.

#3: Materialists

A lot of the films on this list have nice casts that are totally wasted, great directors who do not showcase their full potential, or in the case of “The Phoenician Scheme” and “Wake Up Dead Man,” both. Turns out “Materialists” is yet another case of both being an issue. While this film’s cast is not as large as some of the others on this list, the star power is nevertheless strong here. You have Dakota Johnson, who has talent, but much like “Madame Web” in 2024, she felt kind of flat here. Joining her is Pedro Pascal, who quite literally was in a much more “fantastic” project released later this year. Completing this love triangle is Chris Evans, who does his best here, but it is not enough to make a good movie. The film sounds promising, but it ends up being kind of a waste. I had high expectations going into this film not just because of the cast, but because Celine Song ended up helming it. I could see why the three recently mentioned stars took on the project. If you have not seen Celine Song’s excellent 2023 film “Past Lives,” you are missing out on one the most heartwarming, emotionally striking films of the decade. It is sad to see that this is how she followed up that masterpiece. The film deals with fascinating ideas and topics about love, money, and why certain partners stick together, but for whatever reason they could not stick the landing. I would love to see what else Celine Song has up her sleeve, and I hope that this is just the one dud in her career. I think she has a promising future, but this is not the outing I anticipated following “Past Lives.”

#2: Captain America: Brave New World

I have established many times on this blog that I liked every Marvel Cinematic Universe movie that has come out since “Avengers: Endgame.” Unfortunately, that streak stopped in February 2025 with the release of “Captain America: Brave New World.” This film did not know what it wanted to be. While it is called “Captain America” and places its titular character front and center, the script shoehorns so much extra material to the point where this becomes a crappy sequel to the 2008 “Incredible Hulk.” Marvel movies are known for their visual effects. While they often tend to be a positive in these projects, they have been taking a bit of a downturn as of late depending on the situation. “Captain America: Brave New World” feels like the lowest of the low when it comes to visual effects in the MCU. The action scenes did not even stand out to me that much. For a Marvel movie, the core elements that are typically positives surprisingly fail to live up to their true potential. At times, the movie looked and felt like something that was supposed to go straight to Disney+. Then again, the film made a lot of money at the box office, so maybe dumping it onto streaming would have been a poor choice. The film also feels tonally inconsistent. While I wish nothing but the best for the future of Danny Ramirez as an actor, I do wish his character, Joaquin Torres, were less of a cartoon. Maybe he could have worked in something like “Guardians of the Galaxy,” but “Brave New World” feels mostly grounded, that is until Torres starts talking. If the film proves anything as a positive, it is that Anthony Mackie is incredibly charismatic and I would not mind seeing more projects where he can play the lead. I love him as Falcon and I am happy to see the character get their own movie, but I wish this film lived up to some of the adventures of Steve Rogers. Also, as much as I love Harrison Ford, Red Hulk was kind of wasted.

#1: Fackham Hall

My number 1 biggest disappointment of the year for cinema is “Fackham Hall.” Yes… That is the actual title. I do not make the rules, I just facking enforce them. Expectations are a funny thing, because the reality is that me disliking this movie could debatably be my own fault. I did not make a most anticipated movies list going into 2025. However, if I knew this movie were a thing at the beginning of the year, chances are it would have ended up on it. For starters, the trailer for this movie blew my socks off in every regard. I found almost every line in the film’s red band trailer, which I had seen for the first time in theatres, to be ridiculously hilarious. “Fackham Hall” is easily one of the funniest trailers I have ever seen. Sadly, the movie is nowhere near as comedic. Or, at least to me it is not. For all I know, I might have given the movie a more positive review had I not watched the trailer on YouTube several times after seeing it in the cinema. For the record, when it played in the cinema, it was not online yet. I kept waiting for the day it would finally drop, and when it did, I was one happy dude. Also, Jimmy Carr worked on this film. I do not think everyone reading this would be familiar with that name, but he is one of my favorite comedians and game show hosts. He happened to be writing this film along with a few other people, including his own brother, Patrick Carr.

Speaking of Jimmy Carr, he is also on screen as a vicar. He essentially has one joke in the movie done on repeat. I have massive respect for Jimmy Carr as a comedian, and if I wanted to hear Jimmy Carr not only tell more jokes, but also a greater variety of jokes, I will just go watch him in one of his specials or even on shows like “8 Out of 10 Cats.” I found him to be wasted here.

“Fackham Hall” is essentially “Downton Abbey” done in the spoofy spirit of “Naked Gun” and “Airplane.” I enjoy both of those movies. But “Fackham Hall” tries its best to make fun of its source material, but only takes the laughs so far. At times, the film feels like it was written by young adults who just learned adult humor but they have not heard enough complicated adult humor. In fact, the film has quite a bit of toilet humor that sounds like it comes out of a more mature Illumination movie. If you think the word “penis” by itself is funny, and that is the pinnacle of comedy for you, chances are you wrote this movie.

And before I forget, this film, while not the worst narrative of the year, at times feels kind of unstructured. While the film does advertise its murder mystery plot ahead of time, its placement in the final product feels rather out of the blue. Does it make sense? Sure. Should the film get rid of it? One could argue that it probably should not. But at the same time, its timing feels rather unexpected.

Prior to watching “Fackham Hall,” I had not watched the “Downtown Abbey” series, nor have I seen any of its feature films. I know enough about the series to understand it to some degree, but it is not for me. But for whatever reason, when the trailer for this film dropped, I lost my mind and I thought it made for an interesting concept. But the execution could not reach my high expectations, even if one could argue that said expectations were unfair. “Fackham Hall” may be cool title, but when it comes to the past year in cinema, there are so many fackin’ better uses of your time and money. “Fackham Hall” is my most disappointing movie of 2025.

Thanks for reading this countdown! So, we did the worst list and now, the most disappointing. Two negative lists in a row… I think it is time to go in a more positive direction. My next list is going to be for my top 10 BEST movies of 2025! I cannot wait to share these picks with you all, it is going to be fun.

Also, before we go any further, I just dropped a new poster for Celebrity Movie Requests! For those of you who saw my previous poster on Thanksgiving, you may think it looks exactly the same. There are some subtle differences though if you look close enough… Celebrity Movie Requests is an upcoming series where I review and talk about movies based on the requests of ten prominent people. I talked to them in 2025 and got their ideas on video to share with you all. I cannot wait to reveal who the special guests will be further down the road, along with the movies they asked me to review. Stay tuned for sometime later this year for more updates!

If you want to see the upcoming best list and more from Scene Before follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, what are your most disappointing movies of 2025? Do you agree with this list? Do you think I missed a movie? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

Top 10 WORST Movies of 2025

Courtesy of Warner Bros. – © Warner Bros.

Hey everyone, Jack Drees here! It is time to count down my top 10 WORST movies of 2025. Some of you may call this the fun list. Some of you may call this the unnecessary list. I just call it the list that I have to do in order to remind myself and others that you cannot have good movies without the bad. Each movie I have seen this year has provided with a unique experience. Sometimes that results in something memorable. That said, as these movies suggest, sometimes the word “memorable” is not always a positive. Before we begin this list, I will remind everyone that I have not seen every movie that has come out in 2025. While it is unfortunate that I missed a few titles, it also means that I do not have to talk about certain movies that I have heard less than stellar things about like “Five Nights at Freddy’s 2,” “Flight Risk,” and “Bride Hard.” Do not expect to see those on the list. Also, this is a subjective list. Everything you see here is based on my own experiences, staring at screens of my choice. Also, all the movies on this list have to have been released in theaters. If the film’s not in theaters, than it is technically “television.” Before we get to the top 10, there are a few dishonorable mentions to highlight for hopefully the last time.

And before I announce the first dishonorable mention, I will note that this year’s top 10 WORST list shows what an unfortunate year this has been for Comcast. Spoiler, a lot of their movies, whether they are from Universal Pictures or Focus Features, make the list. And before Comcast blacklists me from working at any of their outlets, I would like them to know that “The Odyssey” is my most anticipated movie of 2026 and I had a blast going to Universal in Orlando this year. I cannot wait to go back to see Epic Universe. It’s going to be sick. With that plea for mercy out of the way, let’s get this roast started.

Dishonorable Mention: Honey Don’t!

Courtesy of Focus Features – © Focus Features

And if you thought I was bluffing, turns out the first dishonorable mention is in fact a Focus Features movie, “Honey Don’t!.” This film is uniquely boring. While it may have star power courtesy of actors like Margaret Qualley, Aubrey Plaza, and Chris Evans, the film ends up being a complete drag. This is one of those movies that as soon as I left, my brain started vomiting out any information related to it that it had previously taken in. This is the second year in a row we’ve gotten a collaboration between Margaret Qualley and Ethan Coen, following 2024’s above average “Drive Away Dolls.” Safe to say, “Honey Don’t!” makes that film look like a masterpiece.

Dishonorable Mention: Captain America: Brave New World

I love Marvel, but even I have to admit that “Captain America: Brave New World” is not quite doing it for me. Other than the admirable lead performance by Anthony Mackie, there is not really much in this film to write home about. I thought some of the action sequences could have been more exciting. The special effects are some of the worst I can recall seeing in a modern superhero movie. And the film almost has an identity crisis! While the movie is called “Captain America,” the script acts as if it is supposed to be an “Incredible Hulk” sequel. That would be forgiven if the movie was good, but that is not the case!

Dishonorable Mention: Love Hurts

Going back to Comcast, it pains me a great deal to say that my last dishonorable mention is “Love Hurts.” I love Ke Huy Quan, and I am over the moon to see him keep getting work following his comeback in “Everything Everywhere All at Once.” While “Love Hurts” does satisfy at times when it comes to action, it often feels like a case of style over substance. If you want to watch a better Ke Huy Quan movie released this year, go watch “Zootopia 2.” Skip “Love Hurts.”

With those movies down, it is time to put the Moron in Movie Reviewing Moron. These are my top 10 WORST movies of 2025!

#10: Wicked: For Good

© Universal Studios. All Rights Reserved.

I was not joking when I said Comcast’s movies would dominate this list. The honorable mentions are just the beginning. Coming in at number 10 is “Wicked: For Good!” The original “Wicked” did not make my top 10 worst list last year, and looking back, I believe a large part of that was because the second half of the film had me hooked at times. So, why did this one make the list? Bear in mind, I knew nothing about the original musical prior to these films coming out, but when “Wicked: For Good” gets to the material that was made famous by “The Wizard of Oz,” the execution of some of it did not sit right with me. By the end of this film, I thought the story lost almost any potential stakes it could have had. I felt like nothing really mattered or had much of a substantial impact. Some of the numbers were okay. I thought “No Good Deed Goes Unpunished” was a highlight. Though I cannot think of any other numbers that quite reached the same level. Much like the original “Wicked,” the film’s color palette is not that easy on the eyes despite the neat production design. I was not a huge fan of either of these movies. And one could argue that these movies were not made for me, and such an argument would probably have a point. Even so, I found myself uninterested in a lot of what this movie had to offer. Parts of it dragged. As a musical it could have been better. And as much as I love Jeff Goldblum, the dude cannot sing.

#9: Him

At #9 is another Comcast movie! I am talking about the forgettable horror flick known as “Him.” Despite this movie starting off with the main character watching a football game, becoming obsessed with the sport, and getting invited to a location where he gets to take on football training sessions, I think football could have used a little extra screen time. For the record, if you know me in real life, I am not much of a football fan. But for a movie that is about football it could have used, I do not know, maybe more football. In my review for “Him,” I basically summed it up as “Whiplash” meets “Ex Machina.” You have a young man aspiring to be the next great in his desired field. That young man gets taken under the wing of an eccentric mentor, all the while staying at a remote facility. The film comes packed with fascinating ideas and concepts, but it ends up wasting every single one.

#8: M3GAN 2.0

Lookie here fellas, it is another Comcast film! Part of me was looking forward to this next movie, because I found myself to be pleasantly surprised by the original. This sequel surprised me too, but by that I mean I found myself surprisingly underwhelmed. “M3GAN 2.0” may have just killed its own franchise. If my personal opinion does not verify this claim, then the lackluster box office certainly does. I thought on paper, “M3GAN 2.0” had potential. The first “M3GAN” features its titular character as the baddie, but now she has become the hero. I thought that could have worked, but this idea was botched completely. At times, M3GAN reminded me of a variant of Deadpool who refuses to take their humor beyond a PG-13 level. Also, instead of a horror movie, like the first film was, this installment takes a more action-based route. I am all for franchises experimenting, trying new things, and going in oddball directions. But when it does not pay off, you get duds like “M3GAN 2.0.”

#7: Bugonia

Okay… Last Comcast film for now. Spoiler! Once this segment is over, we get back to bashing them in number five.

Ready for a hot take? I am not sure if you are, because this one’s as scorching as the Equator! “Bugonia” is easily one of the worst film experiences I have had this past year. While I respect Yorgos Lanthimos for delivering the banger of a flick known as “Poor Things,” this film, as well as a couple others he has done, has proven that his style may not be for me. I get that Jesse Plemons’ character was perhaps designed to be so moronic that he has fallen as deep into his echo chamber as he has, but it does not alter the fact that having to watch him be the hero of his own story for two hours was mind-numbing. Emma Stone, perhaps unsurprisingly, gives a solid performance. But it is not enough for me to give this film a pass. I will not deny that this film was disturbing, and that was perhaps the point. But when the point is so effective that I basically left the screening with a headache, I am not going to endorse the movie for that. I watch movies for many reasons. Hurting my brain is not one of them.

Throughout this countdown you are going to mostly see films I reviewed, but this next one is not one of them. I missed this film in the theater, but I ended up buying a used Blu-ray copy, which I ended up watching at the end of the year, and boy do I want my time and money back…

#6: The Alto Knights

This film showcases the talent of a popular actor whose films have influenced audiences worldwide, and this time around, they are playing not one, but two roles! Sounds an awful lot like “Sinners,” right? It is not. That movie was pretty good. Next up on this list is “The Alto Knights.” I am surely glad that I did not review “The Alto Knights” because that would have been a tough one to get through. While the first minute or so delivers an exciting, attention-grabbing scene, the rest of the film could not quite live up to that excitement. While I do appreciate Robert De Niro for taking on two roles, it is almost like the film is inserting two times the Robert De Niro to compensate for the utter boringness that ensues for its two hour runtime. This is one of those films that I was trying my hardest to stare at the screen and digest everything that was in front of me, but it felt near impossible to do so. I cannot name a single aspect of this film that stood out to me, maybe other than the production design. Well, that and some of the accents. This film is overacted to a sick degree sometimes. Overall, “The Alto Knights” could have been intriguing, but it falls flat on its face.

#5: The Phoenician Scheme

Courtesy of TPS Productions/Focus Features – © 2025

Is it just me? Or is Wes Anderson slowly losing his magic? I had fun with “The French Dispatch,” but after seeing “Asteroid City” in 2023, and now “The Phoenician Scheme” in 2025, which I found even worse, I am starting to question when, or if, he will deliver his next great film. Much like “The Alto Knights,” “The Phoenician Scheme” starts off with an enticing hook. We see our main character caught in a plane crash, and we find out that this is one of several he has been through. As soon as the first minute of the film is complete, it is all downhill from there. The film may have a humungous, recognizable cast, but that honestly makes the experience of watching it much worse! These people could have done anything, but they chose to be in something as dull as this! Yes, I know, a lot of people would kill to work with Wes Anderson. Nevertheless, I wish Anderson himself gave this cast significantly better material to utilize. I do not mind a Wes Anderson quirkfest, but quirks are not enough to make a good movie. I hope he can get out of his slump and deliver the next “Fantastic Mr. Fox.” I would much rather watch that over this garbage.

#4: The Ruse

© Mena Films, Inc

If you want a horror flick that is a total snooze, look no further, because I present to you, “The Ruse!” The best part of “The Ruse” is Veronica Cartwright’s shining performance, but almost everything else feels insignificant compared to that. Well, okay, some of the locations are nice. There is that. Although, as I look back at the movie, I do not recall a whole ton about the other characters. Nothing really stood out about any of them. Each one felt paper thin. Few things disappoint more than a horror film that is not scary. The film contains plenty of jumpscares, which despite some decent buildup, often came off as cheap. The story gets more absurd as it goes along. As the film’s climax played out, it did not feel that satisfying. Much of the material felt like something that belonged in a second act. Overall, this movie should have been better than what it delivered. Veronica Cartwright deserves better. The rest of the cast and crew deserve better. The audience deserves better.

#3: Jurassic World: Rebirth

Photo by Universal Pictures and Amblin Entertainment – © Universal Studios. All Rights Reserved.

We come to Comcast’s worst film of the year… The “Jurassic Park” franchise really needs to take a breather. And I think I am being friendly with that sentiment. If you disagree, then chances are you have not been exposed to whatever the heck “Jurassic World: Rebirth” turned out to be. There are a couple positive things I can say about “Jurassic World: Rebirth.” I found the dinosaur action to be an improvement over “Jurassic World: Dominion,” which made my 2022 worst list. And Gareth Edwards, like usual, does a decent job at highlighting scale. He did it spectacularly with the titular monster in 2014’s “Godzilla,” and then he did it again with AT-ATs in “Rogue One: A Star Wars Story.” So, it is no surprise that he does a good job in that regard when it comes to showcasing the dinosaurs in “Jurassic World: Rebirth.” The film has some of the hottest stars working today including Scarlett Johansson and Jonathan Bailey, but their star power is not enough to keep this franchise’s engine running.  The film’s screenplay leaves quite a bit to be desired. A lot of the film tends to feel like a homage to the original “Jurassic Park,” that is if that homage were exclusively sold at Dollar Tree. It’s not even good enough for Five Below. It’s that cheap. Some of the film comes off as a joke. One idea implemented into the script was that the general public living within the “Jurassic” franchise has become heavily fatigued by dinosaurs. They’ve become boring by this point. To that I say, try walking outside and looking at a bird. Yes, chances are a lot of you reading this see birds everyday. But birds have been around forever and been part of many people’s lives! You think society is bored by something as commonplace as freaking birds? Now you want to tell me people would rather watch paint dry as opposed to even look at a dinosaur? Also, has humanity gotten tired of zoos? We have had zoos and aquariums for many years! I was at an aquarium in Boston over the summer and the place was packed! Perhaps the film was trying to emulate the audience’s reaction to the franchise, as the more recent installments have not been as well received as the older ones. I have no clue. But I did not buy this idea for a second. Add in some cheesy one-liners that sound like they are out of a bad Michael Bay movie and then you get “Jurassic World: Rebirth.”

#2: A Minecraft Movie

Courtesy of Warner Bros. – © Warner Bros.

Even though I refused to play it, this video game was so popular growing up that a feature film with big stars felt practically inevitable. While said feature film, unsurprisingly, made a lot of money, it is also rich in schlockiness. “A Minecraft Movie” may be the most excruciating hour and a half of cinema I watched this year. I caught “A Minecraft Movie” a couple weeks after it was released with a friend. He paid for the tickets, so I thank him for that. And while I saved some money, the movie ended up stealing my time. I was not the biggest fan of “The Super Mario Bros. Movie” when that came out, as I thought it was unbelievably cliché. But at least it had a clear beginning, middle, and end with its titular protagonist at the front and center.

It is almost unclear who and what “A Minecraft Movie” is actually about. Maybe that is why it is called “A Minecraft Movie.” Even the title seems unsure of itself and what it wants to be. Is the film about Steve? Is it about the younger brother and sister? Is it about Jason Momoa’s character? Honestly, I do not care about what kind of story “A Minecraft Movie” wants to tell, because whatever it did tell me was a chore to sit through. None of the jokes were funny, and the whole movie comes off as if it were designed to be a meme. I can watch a film that refuses to take itself too seriously, but this one was a bit much. Jack Black gives a slightly less annoying performance than what he gave in last year’s “Borderlands,” but he is still a bit too overly obnoxious for my taste. The film has some notable stars, but few, if any, had decent material to work with. Danielle Brooks sounded like she did not want to be there. Jennifer Coolidge commits to what’s in front of her, but it does not make for the easiest watch. The only actor I like in the film is Jason Momoa, who plays a narcissistic video game shop owner. I thought he played the part well, even if some of his jokes felt like they were made for the under five crowd. Also, while this film is experiencing a cultural impact, I wish that impact did not associate with people bringing live chickens into movie theaters and throwing popcorn around the auditorium. The film is a 90 minute monstrosity through a cubed uncanny valley. I will admit though, my expectations were not that high for this film. So, at least I was not disappointed.

#1: Smurfs

Much like number 2, my final pick for this countdown is a family film. Although whereas I could see how “A Minecraft Movie” would appeal to a lot of young boys and maybe remain as a core part of their growing up, it a bit harder for me to see how exactly 2025’s “Smurfs” is going to maintain a long-lasting cultural impact of its own. I am not going to pretend I am all that into the “Smurfs” property. In fact, I went into this film with absolute morbid curiosity. The trailers irked me, and maybe that is where I should have held my horse. But for some reason, I decided to go see this film in the theater. What a life-affirming choice that was, not! The only “Smurfs” anything I watched prior to this movie was the 2011 live-action film, which to this day is one of the worst pictures I have ever seen. This 2025 animation is almost as infuriatingly awful as that atrocity. The movie may be called “Smurfs,” but at times it feels more like a 90 minute long Rihanna music video. Part of this is because, well, Rihanna plays Smurfette, one of the film’s main characters. The other main character in the film is No Name Smurf, played by James Corden. His resume amazes me to this day. I do not know if James Corden is purposefully picking roles in projects that he knows will end up being crap. Or, if the project starts off great, but Corden has magical powers to make his projects crappier. For all I know, chances are Corden thinks his projects always sound like masterpieces on paper. But between this film, “Cats,” and “The Emoji Movie” just to name a few, it is kind of astounding to see Corden take on one abominable project after another.

Of course, with this film being released in the 2020s, there is a multiverse connection. Admittedly, this might have been the one slight redeeming quality of the movie, as it did allow the animators to go absolutely bonkers with some of the styles, kind of like “Spider-Verse,” but that excitement literally lasts for a minute and then the rest of the film plays out as boringly as possible. Speaking of which, the film constantly blends live-action with 3D animation in certain scenes, and at times, it looks plain odd.

As I watched this film, as well as my number 2 pick for this list, “A Minecraft Movie,” I felt like I was part of the crowd at the Enchantment Under the Sea dance in “Back to the Future.” For all I know, somewhere, somehow, Marty McFly showed up on screen to profess to me that I was not quite ready for these movies, but my kids, should I have them, are probably going to love them, with the disclaimer that they watch them at a certain age. Except I am not so sure if that is the case, based on my own experience of watching this film in the cinema with a good amount of children. Maybe my experience of watching this film was vastly different than yours, but as I watched “Smurfs,” it was really hard to tell how many people were actually enjoying the movie or getting something out of it. When I go to a lot of these family movies, I find the audiences to be a bit more active. Although in this case, nearly the entire crowd was dead silent. Hey, I will take it over the chaos of some of the “Minecraft” screenings, including my own, where a lot of children were busy shouting out the memes. But at least that crowd sounded entertained. Out of everyone in the auditorium, I might have been the only person to even chuckle at the film. Amazing, right?! While it is true that a lot of comedy derives from great pain, it is kind of astounding to me how my one laugh in a film containing the “Happy Song” came from one character opting to sacrifice themself. For the record, this is a film that is chock-full of jokes! Although at the end of the day, the joke is likely on me, as I wasted 89 minutes of my precious time watching what I found to be one of the most cringe-inducing animations that has ever come across my consciousness. Again, like “A Minecraft Movie,” my expectations for “Smurfs” were low, so at least I was not disappointed. Although the film is still unwatchable enough to be the worst of 2025 for me.

Courtesy of Paramount Pictures – © Paramount Pictures

Thanks for reading this countdown! As someone who loves movies and wants to make them, it pains me sometimes to make these lists. But I only do it because I love the art form and as someone who reviews these movies, I always believed that honesty is the best policy. If you enjoyed this countdown, I have another on the way! You cannot have the bad without the good! In the coming days I will be sharing my top 10 BEST movies of 2025! I can guarantee that list will bring significantly more joy than this one. I might do another countdown as I have done three around this time in years past. Although I am not going to do a most anticipated list as I already saw one 2026, which I will review later this month. If you want to see that countdown and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, what are your worst movies of 2025? Do you agree with this list? Do you have your own? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

M3GAN 2.0 (2025): Does Not Compute

“M3GAN 2.0” is directed by Gerard Johnstone, who also directed the original “M3GAN” installment. This film stars Allison Williams (Get Out, Girls), Violet McGraw (The Haunting of Hill House, Black Widow), Ivanna Sakhno (The Spy Who Dumped Me, Pacific Rim: Uprising), and Jermaine Clement (Moana, The Flight of the Conchords). This sequel sees the return of the original cast a couple years after the titular character went on a rampage. Despite her dangerous antics, said title character is tasked with taking down a robot named Amelia.

Photo Credit: Universal Pictures – © 2025 Universal Studios. All Rights Reserved.

If you told me in 2023 that I would walk out of the original “M3GAN” having a great time, I would summon a lightning cloud and strike a bolt into your head. But to my surprise, the film is solid. And not just because the robot does a funny dance. I found it to be a fine metaphor for technology always being there for you, perhaps to extremely dangerous levels. I liked the first film so hopefully “M3GAN 2.0” would keep up the good work.

“M3GAN 2.0” had an unusual marketing campaign. The trailers seemed to indicate a shift similar to that of a James Cameron sequel like “Aliens” or “Terminator 2: Judgment Day.”  The first film is at its core, a horror movie. This sequel has horror elements, but it is a bit more action-oriented. It is definitely not as scary as the original film, at least not in a direct sense. Although if there was something that was as scary this time around, it would be the overhanging commentary. Another key difference this time around is that M3GAN goes from being a bad robot to a good gal. The film finds a less than buyable way to have her make amends with those she either harmed or nearly killed in the previous installment to justify her goodness, but still.

That is just one of several wrongs in this film’s screenplay. “M3GAN 2.0” is not that scary. Sure, this is less of a horror film than what the first film turned out to be, but there are attempts at horror in this film that do not stick the landing. The film clearly tries to be funny and edgy, but if anything it just sounds like M3GAN is trying her darndest every other second to join the cool kids table. If anything she comes off as a PG-13 robot “Deadpool.” There are select moments and lines where I think the film would have been better if they were done in a more R rated fashion. I am not saying that this film needs to go overboard like it’s the next “Wolf of Wall Street,” but I think it would have helped if M3GAN had a tad less of a filter. Granted, the original film was PG-13, so I guess logically this one had to be as well. If the film goes for an R, that would risk losing the younger audience who likely checked out the last film. But seriously! This sequel changes the genre as well as the titular robot’s personality. Why not a maturity shift? Is it to get more money? Because I do not think your $10 million opening weekend is not doing you any favors.

Honestly, the only genuine laugh I remember having in the film involves a line having to do with a yeast infection. If I did laugh at all for the remainder of the runtime, then said laughter was not that hard or it ended up being for the wrong reasons.

As previously established, “M3GAN 2.0” is an action movie. Is the action good? Well… It is competent. I do not have a ton of complaints regarding the action, but I am not going to pretend any of it was that memorable. Although there was one fun scene between the film’s antagonist and a wealthy individual in his erotic cave. Remember how I said the film was not that funny? Well, this part actually had me laughing for, you guessed it, the wrong reasons. It was not necessarily comedy gold. I was laughing at the movie rather than with it.

One thing that people seem to remember distinctly from the first film is the scene where M3GAN jumps around and dances. That moment is still ingrained in my mind and its memability is noticeable. In this sequel, the filmmakers appear to create a scene inspired by the roaring response that scene got. And quite frankly, it seems that is the only reason why that scene was put in the film. It felt kind of forced.

Speaking of memes, this movie introduces some new meme potential for the M3GAN character… She sings now. I do not want to spoil much about it, but I was so thrown off by this moment to preposterous levels. The moment that M3GAN sings is so out of left field that I would not have been surprised if at one point Lady Gaga’s Harley Quinn showed up in the background asking to perform a duet. It kind of reminded me of the musical planet from “The Marvels,” but at least that moment had some greater context and purpose in the story.

That said, I can somewhat appreciate the film’s commentary, which presents a double edge sword. Part of me wonders how this movie, and the more I think about it, the last one, is going to age. I saw the last movie as a warning that being too attached to your phone, or in some cases, your phone being too attached to you, can be dangerous. If anything, this film is a warning about artificial intelligence. You can argue the last film was as well, but this one feels stricter in that regard. It shows the dangers of advancing technology to a point where it could potentially kill us, and it may lead to an inevitability where we have to adapt to the technology being in our lives rather than ignoring it. As campy as these films occasionally come off, there are moments where they feel down to earth.

Unfortunately, the commentary feels like a downgrade from that of the original because as I said before, this film is not that scary. Part of what made the commentary work in the original movie is that it had a hand in the film’s scares. Here it is just littered throughout the script.

In a way, I can appreciate the crew behind “M3GAN 2.0” for trying something different rather than resorting to the same old tricks. I was looking forward to a more action-centered installment. But what makes this film different either felt too out there or simply put, poorly executed. As for what felt the same, it was kind of lame this time around. It does not matter if you try to go for something different or the same as before. If all of your material is bad, then it is bad. Plain and simple.

In the end, “M3GAN 2.0” was kind of disappointing. It is one of the weakest films of 2025. I was really looking forward to this film after the original turned out to be a delightful surprise. In a way one could say that this sequel was a surprise of its own, but not in the way that I would want it to be. The film differentiates from its predecessor in more ways than one. This is more of an action movie than a horror movie. But no matter what genre it shoots for, I simply wish it were a good movie. And unfortunately, it is not. I am going to give “M3GAN 2.0” a 3/10.

“M3GAN 2.0” is now playing in theaters and is available to rent or buy on VOD.

Thanks for reading this review! My next review is going to be for “F1: The Movie.” Stay tuned! Also, coming soon, look forward to my thoughts on “Superman” and “Guns Up.” If you want to see these reviews and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “M3GAN 2.0?” What did you think about it? Or, what is a sequel you enjoy that shifts its genre from the original? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!

M3GAN (2022): Come For the Dancing Robot, Stay for the Commentary

“M3GAN” is directed by Gerard Johnstone (The New Legends of Monkey, Terry Teo) and stars Allison Williams (Get Out, Girls), Jenna Davis (Maggie, Raven’s Home), and Violet McGraw (The Haunting of Hill House, Jett). This film centers around a young girl named Cady who loses her parents, is put under the custody of her aunt, but despite finding herself under said guardianship, she does not feel the same as she once did. Not to mention, said aunt is having trouble filling the shoes of her new, unexpected role. That is where M3GAN, an advanced toy doll prototype designed to practically be a child’s best friend, comes in.

When I think about the movie “M3GAN,” it would not be surprising for me to easily jump to conclusions and suggest that this is a gender-swapped version of “Child’s Play.” In some ways, it is. Although as I have said many times on Scene Before, horror is not my strongest genre, therefore I am not entirely familiar with “Child’s Play” and am purely going off of things I have heard. This time, the Chucky doll is a girl, and the child this movie revolves around is a girl as well. The trailer emitted these vibes from the moment I first witnessed it. Sure, there is that one dance routine that M3GAN does that makes her stand out, but I was not sure how a horror movie released in January could not only make its presence known, but worth appreciating. Sure, statistically, horror has been on a roll in recent months, at least for me. But now that we are in January, we are in the time where without exaggeration, movies go to die. If you are not going back to see “Avatar: The Way of Water” or “Puss in Boots: The Last Wish” for the first, second, or third time, you are probably going to be watching something that is either deemed less favorable, or something that is still pulling in people for an Oscar nod that came out during the fall.

Thankfully for “M3GAN,” this movie is a delightful surprise. Yes, the trailers make it look like January trash, but it does have some genuine charm throughout that makes it worth the watch. I was shocked and delighted to find out how layered this movie ended up being. From scene one, I ended up caring about the young Cady. I felt terrible for both Cady and her aunt, Gemma, as the two tried to get better acquainted. I have not lost my parents at a young age. I know people who have, and it must be a pain I could never fathom. Nevertheless, this movie manages to capture such a pain with excellence. As for Gemma, a lot of pressure was put on her in a split second. She does not have much experience with children, despite working at a toy company. I not only sympathized with the main character, but the supporting character who is supposed to look after said main character.

As mentioned before, regarding “M3GAN,” an obvious similarity would be “Child’s Play.” But I would also say that another film prominently featuring a technologically advanced toy, “Ron’s Gone Wrong,” would also make for a good comparison. These films have their vast differences. For example, I would not outright recommend “M3GAN” for children, but I think “M3GAN” does a good job at doing something “Ron’s Gone Wrong” tried to do, but in the case of “M3GAN,” the results were more pleasing. To be specific, this film dives into commentary about technology, the toy industry, and how these things can affect one’s social behavior. Children often form attachments to various possessions, and sometimes that can define their life around a certain age. I played a lot of video games when I was younger, so I had an attachment to my various consoles. I would go on vacations and literally take my Xbox 360 with me. This movie reminded me that children will inevitably have obsessions. Heck, every other time I am in a store like GameStop or Target, I will see a child and parent together, and every other time I would hear the child calling out for a toy or something of a similar nature and beg their parent to buy it for them. M3GAN comes off as a toy that could make such a thing happen if it were on display.

In addition to attachment, this movie does a great job at showing how technology tends to replace guardians in many cases. Technology is often used as an escape no matter what age somebody is. However, there comes a point where this movie is a reminder to monitor how often your child is in front of a screen. In M3GAN’s case, it is perhaps a bit more daunting than say my recent Xbox 360 example. Because an Xbox 360 is replaceable. Whether we are talking about more advanced consoles like the Xbox One, or whichever other Xbox 360 already in existence has yet to crap out because of the red ring of death. This movie advertises M3GAN as the one toy a child could ever want for the rest of their life. As a result, it is the one friend they could want too. M3GAN is equipped to do what other people Cady’s age can do and possibly more. Whereas the option is always there to play video games with my friends, M3GAN has the ability to take the actual social component out of anything.

To call “M3GAN” the scariest movie of all time would be a hyperbole beyond hyperboles. I should note, the movie is PG-13, but nevertheless, rather effective. However, I would say the scariest thing about “M3GAN” is something that happens in the movie, and what it made me think about upon leaving it. The most haunting thing about movies like “2001: A Space Odyssey” from 1968, “The Terminator” from 1984, or even more recent films like “Wall-E” from 2008 is that those stories are representative of realities where we could lead ourselves if we are not careful. “M3GAN” is not the scariest horror movie within the past year. The actual scares in the movie are kind of tame compared to say “Smile,” where I was shivering on a regular basis.

That said, the scariest thing about “M3GAN” is that the movie is perhaps representative of not our future, but where we are today. This movie starts off with an advertisement about a toy that is wholly reminiscent of the typical formula of almost any ad found during the daytime on Nickelodeon. If anything, M3GAN is what happens when you put Siri or Alexa inside of an American Girl doll. Heck, the doll even has singing capabilities. What if there is a point where this becomes a franchise and these dolls sell out concerts at Madison Square Garden? M3GAN is literally a smartphone with legs. It presents information in full detail when the moment seems most convenient. It is customized to cater to its primary user. And Cady is endlessly attached to it. Who is not attached to their phone these days?

To give an example of how “M3GAN” is not necessarily representative of our future, but today, let me give you a picture of my screening. This was nowhere near a full house. But the film brought in plenty of people into its small auditorium of ages varying from somewhere in the teens, possibly tweens, to that of a fully grown adult. Almost everyone had their phone out. Some had it out for a second. Some longer. There were moments where people were using their phone while losing focus on the movie. There were also moments where I saw a sea of four, five phones on at a time. In fact, since I do not carry a watch, I checked my phone, which I left in my pocket while doing so, to see the time after the trailers ended because AMC loves advertising everything under the sun. First off, if you are going to go the movies, the only screen that matters is the one the largest one in the room. Be respectful. Second, there is a scene in “M3GAN” that does not specifically target the people doing what they were doing in this theater, but the more I think about my experience, the more I connect it to Cady’s connection to M3GAN in that moment. She loves M3GAN so much that she is unwilling to give it up for even a couple hours for any other activity presented in front of her.

M3GAN is probably not going to end up in my favorite movies of the year list once we arrive at the end, but it probably is going to be one I will think about regularly because of how many connections I can make between the story and my life experiences. I went into M3GAN to see some silly robot take over the lives of a household. I definitely acquired more than that, and for such a reason, this movie was worth the watch.

In the end, “M3GAN” is honestly better than I expected going in. It is a fine mix of drama, comedy, horror, and social commentary. It does a bunch of things at once, and manages to do them well. In addition, it reaffirmed not only why I should be worrisome in regards to the future and how technology could affect it, but also how technology can affect people right now. I left this film worried, and honestly, that is what makes “M3GAN” as effective as it is. I am going to give “M3GAN” a 7/10.

“M3GAN” is now playing in theaters everywhere. Tickets are available now.

Thanks for reading this review! If you enjoyed my review for “M3GAN.” Check out some of my other reviews for recent horror titles like “Halloween Ends,” “Barbarian,” and “The Mean One.” Also, stay tuned because I will be dropping my thoughts on “Missing,” which I saw before “M3GAN,” but due to being under embargo, I decided to review “M3GAN” first. Stay tuned for my thoughts coming soon! If you want to see all of this and more from Scene Before, follow the blog either with an email or WordPress account! Also, check out the official Facebook page! I want to know, did you see “M3GAN?” What did you think about it? Or, what is a toy or piece of technology you found yourself attached to at some point in your life? Are you still attached today? Let me know down below! Scene Before is your click to the flicks!